Sunday Post

So I am dealing with a lot right now, so if the posts don't come as quickly as they should, look at it from my perspective.  I've explained virtually every "unknown" in pre AuT physics and the grants are a little slow in coming.

I am drinking my second half cup of coffee, giving you an idea of how slowly my brain is coming around.  I was up at 5am which is actually a little later than I slept yesterday.  There is a lot riding on the next few weeks.

So, the book I've been writing since I was 9 years old can be bought on Kindle.  Don't run out and order it yet, I need to re-write the last chapter, but superstitious as I am of the irony driven universe, I wanted to make sure that my life wasn't at risk in case the universe wanted to make sure I died before that happened and I need a break from it as I ran through the last two books (its 80,000 words in 4 books published as one).

That, of course, is not the thing headed towards the end of the railroad tracks the fastest.  Only time will tell if that train is on the money or not.

In the old big bang universe, a lifespan had a certain relevance in the "known" universe.

10,000 out of 14 billion; it's a number you can pretend is relevant.

But if the bang is merely one of a very, very great number of inflection points then we become more like the length of a quantum instance.

Why important?

Because we can believe that events at this 1x10-37th of a second are covered by physics but we think that in a 14 billion year universe we are big enough to be relevant, the universe exists for us.

But this is where Men in Black got it right.  MIB was about relativity, the first one anyway.  The later versions got off message, but the original had it right.

We think we're all that in big bang mathematics, but in AuT we have gotten a lot more brief, perhaps we're at the relativity of the quantum instant relative to the entire value of x.

There is a conflict between the forced movement and the tendency toward compression which requires separation even as separation is replaced with compressive states.

The idea is that sharing has to become sharing of higher states with new force results instead of sharing ct1 directly.  A single quantum ct5 state, a minimum size black hole, is surrounded by compressed ct4 states which the theory suggests are substituting for the stacked ct4 states making up the black hole spiral.

Interestingly (and not surprisingly) the process is reflected by what is observed, the black hole, the highly compressed ct4, ct3, ct2, then space.  Movement is interesting.  The poles radiate energy indicating a lack of movement and it can be envisioned that this compression of radiation (getting rid of unused lower ct states) is moving towards “zero” in a converging infinite series which would be reflected at very high compressed states as essential a single beam of ct2 with the sharing of states at lower levels.  The idea of a beam of space (ct1) being generated is not being ignored, but how this non-dimensional element would be reflected is a math problem that I haven’t gotten to yet.

With looking up from ct3 and down from ct5 we have two ways to observe how the minimum size ct3 compressed ct4 state compares with the more profoundly bound ct3 non-quark, building blocks made up of different overlapping spiral states of primary ct4 states or ct4 states with shared underlying compressive states which have exchanges that replace the ct1 exchange and allow for movement and especially quantum change without the direct exchange of ct1 states.

          The general separation of black holes and the space within locally dense ct4 states, then ct3 states, then ct2 is very suggestive of a substitution rate. 

So with ct4, you’d see ct3 states concentrated (wavelength forms) surrounding the ct4 quantum bit, then ct2, then ct1, although we don’t radiate light so that mechanism is a little strained, but the presence of the wavelengths is seen, it is seen in the forces holding atoms together, the positive and negative aspects of these have multiple ways to come about.  One is opposite spirals, one is opposite spins for different value compressed states and other solutions may present themselves.

But this post, is not about this science, which is for the next 3 posts of AuT.  Perhaps it is about storms, and wind, love and separation, goals and hurdles.  The slow approach of time, steadily longer periods of sleeplessness until the inflection point of death.  The simmering love fed by separation or combination, the inflection point when either gets to be too much.  The storms come and they go, the wind blows frighteningly hard and then is still.

A-u-T 7a of 10 break from delving too deeply

I have begged for my freedom.  You don't believe it, but its true.  Sometimes even wishing that in exchange for this that there would be death, a release from the gnawing pain in my mind.  But other days, not so much.
Why that is necessary, why it was necessary to get to this theory I don't know.  Things line up specifically for a reason.  Your prejudices against me and my mathematics are not because the theory is wrong. You know I'm right, but part of the process of disclosure, since disclosure is an effect at this stage and point in the universe, is here.
And yet in terms of freedom and math you expect me to do better.
Everything you read is a little out of date, my mind and my drafts constantly moving towards the corrected.  I don't get this perfectly, because there is so much to get, but I see the basics clearly and the outlying portions are seen as through a dense fog, but as I get closer they come out of the fog and I share them with you, but I have to remember them and assemble them and it comes slowly, this picture from the fog which is given to me for reasons I can't explain and for a reason that I do not understand.
I know that not everyone would want to stick with this boring stuff.  But this is my process.  If you want to skip it, wait for the books, the next one will be out before July if all goes well, and before that even the second edition of the first book.  Or perhaps neither will come out and you will have to continue my work.
This set of posts is setting out out how charge, strong and weak forces, magnatism and the higher ct4 compression states result from quantum phenomena, in particular quantum ct4 states.  It's a tall order for 10 posts.  You try it.
It the posts that come up, this is going to be tied together and some formulaec stuff will be proposed.
Unlike the fundamental equations, things get sticky in the applied arts.
You think this is easy for me?
But AuT tells us where to look and explains why we don't see what we expect.
Half life theory indicates, for example, that protons should spontaneously self destruct and that moving to energy it should be observable.  AuT adopts that, but in a slightly different format.
In AuT there is a balance between things, but an unequal balance moving towards the infinite (infinite series math solutions) but inflection points allow for transitions.  These transitions are hard to see for matter for several reasons.  One is they happen pretty fast (1.07x10^-37th second in space time).  The other suggested by this line of posts, is that they are going on constantly, that we do see them already as strong and weak magnetic forces and more fundamentally as postive and negative charge.  If you had never seen one and you were given a "where's waldo page" and told to find waldo, it's likely you wouldn't see him.  You don't know what to look for.  AuT is far from finished, but it does suggest some of what waldo looks like. Maybe it doesn't paint the picture but it says he may have glasses or maybe a striped shirt.
So if you fill a cave with water and look for flashes of light, you're likely to be disappointed.  The distance between carrier transitions is long, but moreover the transitions you are looking for are likely generating the very water you're seeing in place of bare ct4 states because they are mathematical transitions and not flashes of light (more specifically flashes of wave energy) and they are, due to the counterpoints of compression and length between turns, at that level of compression a sharing process as the ct3 states peel off of one ct3 carrier and on to another.  Again, the forces are all there, but we're looking for flashes of light, litle nuclear explosions, where they don't exist.  You can, however,  find those transitions.  Nuclear phenomena show those transitions and that has been known since Einstein figured out what we were looking at when we observed radiation.
It's absurdly difficult to get precise, but knowing that we are looking for shadows when we're looking for forces means that we can look beyond the shadows for the solutions and the results.
One reason is that I have to accept my science as more probable than not.  It does render things, render them what?  render them period. It takes all science and history and melts it down to pretty much nothing.  Religion goes with it.  Understanding is cold comfort for being abandoned by our superstitions.
Doesn't make it cease to exist, it just turns it into mush, the mush it really is.  That isn't easy, this is not some grand design, it is too simplistic to be grand.  It is a simple design that gives a complex result, but the enormousness of the result is just shaped fat that when exposed to the heat of knowledge melts into a primorial mush of little consequence.
Mankinds' magnificience is just waht we always knew it was, vanity of the idiot.
You, of course, know I'm right in the basics of the theory, the universe matches up to it too well, but you are impatient.  You want me to hurry up things but you also have to understand that after 3 years from only the grain of a concept I'm moving reasonably fast, ahead of everyone else in some respects and behind everyone else in others.  As I am with everything else.

http://www.space.com/36562-earth-moon-through-saturn-rings-cassini.html

AuT-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 7 of 10

It is so strange to see so far beyond everyone else in this regard.  And yet, the mathematics of space compression is very complex in the presence of the high ct states, 4 and 5 for this discussion.  The gradual compression equation, so prevelent locally even during the latter half of an expansion cycle not only compresses ct4 states into electron and proton pairs, but also defines a process that associates these in bulk to the intermediate states.
This result comes from algorithm that must "force" concentration into its solution or we'd have a homogeneous nothing of a universe, the result of an algorithm where the geo function does not grow in the presence of compressed states, where higher solutions do not remain with higher solutions.  We call this effect gravity, but in fact it is a result of the linearity that gives rise to gravity which increases with higher solutions.
In terms of solution it is something like this:
1) The algorithm provides that compressed states tend to stay in proximity to compressed states but not to the exclusion of decompression of space.
2) The algorithm provides that there be enough ct1 in the presence of compressed states to allow for ct1 changes with each change in the value of x
3) Shared ct1 states between compressed states are provided by having proximate solutions of multiple higher states in the presence of a common ct1 solution.
It is not satisfactory as an explanation because of the general separation of black holes and the space within locally dense ct4 states.  It speaks to a relative proximity of solutions rather than a precise one; but in truth what it has to do with is the necessityfor ct1 for movement.  Space and the resulting separation are necessary because it is necessary for movement and change is required for each ct state because of the explanation of the formula.
There is a conflict between the forced movement and the tendency toward compression which requires separation even as separtion is the preferred.  The forced movement is because every coordinate has to change for every change in the value of x.  This means that no matter how concentrated teh coordinate change it is required that there be enough ct1 states, shared or otherwise to make the change occur and this is consistent entirely with the universe based on alternating converging and diverging series.  That is, the observed result, is the logically expected result.

This post will cover the problem with focusing on the results instead of the algorithm itself.
One of these processes which has been studied is fusion.  But while mathematics has explored the process of fusion and while practice has accomplished fusion in a controlled and uncontrolled environment, the most obsesrved one being the uncontrolled processes of the sun, we fail to recognize our role in the spiral mathematics of tools of an extremely complex system when we do simple fusion reactions on earth.
It is a conceit that we think we are studying the process or using the process when we are being used by the super symetry underlying space-time and illusory entropy.
Nevertheless, our role in the process is rather minor compared to the actual process itself.
We know the idea of combining masses to release mass and this is important in the present analysis.  It isn't important because of the e=mc^2 or more specifically ct4=f(4)^(2^4); but it is important because it shows a reaction of spirals moving both towards and away from higher compression states in a reaction that is U(x)=U(x)ct4+Ux(ct3)+Ux(ct2)+Ux(ct1) goring from U(x)1 to U(x)2 for a localized system where geo is largely the same for all U(x) but where x is changing between two time periods goverened by a change for x 10^37 times every second.
Outlier factors, such as the spirals governing our actions become relative remote in terms of defining what happens with a short period of time in the concentrated area around the partial universe represented by the reacting particles and the adjacent space even though the amounts of ct1 exchange are enormous over even a few seconds.  Because this is all a part of an interconnected matrix going all the way back to x=1 only approximate results are possible, but locallized analysis is largely accurate even though the permutations are enormous.
We expect these permutations in a system as dense as, say, the sun, but even in a vacuume in a lab, the vcuume necessarily being a location of ct1 exchange, the system is very dense and includes specifically our intereaction with the process.
We can estimate the value of the changes based on the ratios that exist between ct2,3,4 and 5 and by the weight measurements between the various portions (roughly 1830 to 1) of the neutron.
What we would like to assume is that the intermediary ct4 states for ct2 substitution and ct3 substitution, either of which is pure since all involve elements of the other would somehow yield a ratio of 1 to 1830.
There is another element brought up which is the converging series nature of half lives which appear to be present here.  That means that existence of the higher states lasts forever in steadily decreasing amounts.  This suggests that the amount of anti-matter and matter never match up but approach an equal quantity which would tend to covert all matter eventually to space.
Proton decay ranges in length (according to years) in a range from 10^30 to 10^35 years although half lives higher than 1.67*10^34th years have be posited as has the order of 10^32 years but these models are based on string theory than anything else with quarks.  The decay in this case is the decay towards minimal ct4 states, but then to lower states.
So how do we account for continued compression stages in the ct4 state.  To do this we have to use the parts we have either the geo funciton or the compression function and since all that is open is the geo funciton in this regard.  This new rule has to explain why we have greater compression at high compression states, particularly proximate to big bangs, and why less when we have high decomrpession states, sort of where we are now.  In looking at the spiral function we know that you need long enough spirals to have stable states between turns.  We have different values of curvature depending on where a point is relative to other solutions in order.  And so we come up with greg's rule: The greater the curvature (the closer in solution distance between spiral solutions) the shorter the spiral length between turns necessary to obtain compression.
Of course, this whole thing is greg's rule, so whatever.
Where there are 4 coordinates being solved at once, the compression at any one point must be solved by the solution to each of the 4 coordinates being solved together.
To understand this better, let's look at one coordinate at once ct1: 1,1,2,3,5,etc.  For this you have a different value of pi unless it is in the presence of a higher state (we're in existence where the higher state is at least ct5) so you have to sum all the points and based on distance so you have curvature a function of the specific geo function of pi (evolving) plus Sum(1,max x)KdA where this is gaussian curvature for the spiral set in question and dA is the quantum area for that curvature K.  We showed this with drawings earlier:

And

Although these drawing suffer somewhat at the ct1 state where curvature and dimension is yet to be resolved, you need at least three points to define this type of curvature.
The complexities of the measurements in question arise from the complex nature of defining curvature based on the type of information included (curvature is different for each type of information, obviously, but only based on the number of coordinates being solved together) and by the fact that only at a quantum instant is curvature well defined for any point and that definition requires a solution for whatever vaue of x is present in the universe at that quantum instant.  Since it is a function of the relative order of solution, giving rise to what we perceive as distance, it gives rise to the complex scalars which exist at the quantum instant only as relative timing of solutions to whatever point is being examined.  A point in the middle of space, like we are, as opposed to a point on one of the edges will have a much more complex approximate solution, the exact solution requiring a solution to every point in the universe and therefor being impractical and practially speaking unnecessary especially since the solution will shift drastically when x changes each 1.07x10^-37th of a second.
One problem with using observed phenomena to arrive at answers is that we assume three dimensional space which we know is inaccurate both because three dimensional space is a function of 4 coordinate changes and because of the presence of 5 dimensional space (ct5) and lower dimensions of space based on lower orders of information combinging to create the changing face of ct4.

Einstein curvature, for example, understood that there was a matrix of space time, what we call an order of information solutions, and focused largely on the concentration of solutions of ct4 in a given environment.  What's interesting about this analysis is that it recognizes that there is a relationship between the higher order of curvature and the lower order of curvature based on energy, but it incorrectly assumes that pi is a fixed part of the equation when pi itself only exists relative to the position of information relative to point under examination and where even the approximation of pi varies greatly (although without much practical relevance) according to how many coordinates are changing at once for a given solution and the state of compression (how many points are being proximately solved at the quantum instant where proximate refers to the relevant locality, irrelevant locality being that so far away as to not have a practical effect on the solution) so that you have some very complex underlying symetry to take into account.
Hence the matter/curvature equations work well in the proximity of large amounts of matter, and fail pretty miserably when you are dealing with lower information states or higher ones although the basic concepts remain the same.
Another aspect of this is that curvature is therefore a perspective issue.  From one position it is one thing, from another it is something different.

We must eventually get to where we discuss gravitational waves which use, as a medium, space time itself and how that occurs in an algorithm based system.  But not tonight.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/109731/how-to-measure-the-curvature-of-the-space-time

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaussianCurvature.html

http://www.johnagowan.org/proton.html

AuT-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 6 of 10

We are discussing where the Nuetron arises as an intermediary step after the creation of the basic ct4 state.  The changes are toward converging compressed series of which the ct4 state is very near the beginning.
There's a lot of ground to cover and only 5 posts left to cover it.
It remains possible that beyond the visible ct5 (black hole) states are ct states which already exist and have more than 5 coordinate changes at once.  It is possible that these are so compressed with so many coordinates changing at once that even their gravity is not perceived from them.  That is, just as light is not seen to radiate from ct5, so it is possible that from ct6 not even gravity is perceived.
Why is this important in this discussion?  It is merely because the intermediary stages of ct4 may be tied to higher ct states.  This is not considered likely, however.  Instead, we must look to F-series stack in order to find the answer as to why ct4 states form intermediary stable compression states before getting to ct5.
Electron Inflection:  Let's assume that in this process there are intermediary steps at the ct4 level (ct3 stacking).  In such even there would be an "electron inflection point" which would occur at the electron-proton interface.
The first inflection point is the ct3-ct4 variation.
There is precedent for this in ct3 (ct2 comrpession) where you have waves of various types, the short to the long.  It makes sense that ct4 (ct3 compression) with its more complex matrix would have more complex and less transitional inflection points.
Election Inflection suggests that at very small concentrations of ct3 moving towards ct4 electron compressed stability, you get a negative result and then at some point of ct4 concentration it shifts to a positive result.
This stacking, inflection point works closely with the solutions limiting the proximity of ct1 during the compression process to increase the compression.
The obvious place to look for this transition is size, but that isn't the suggested result:
Size:
Now roughly speaking a Proton is 1830 times the size of an electron (1838 and change for a neutron and 1836 and change for neutrons)
While this ratio makes little sense, it has a substitution rate of 7 (and change) difference at the speed of light (1830/256).  Why important?  Because the proton is lowed to a relative near stop compared to the fast moving electron (which is far slower than the speed of light).
Let's look at the specific numbers:
Proton Diff 1836.153 (p/e)   Substitution ratio (1836/256) 7.17247
Neutron Diff 1838.68 (n/e)   Substitution ratio (1838/256) 7.17241
The relative speeds between protons and electrons is the measure that determines what leads to the relative compressions, the faster allowing for negative electrons, the slower allowing for the more dense protons and the combined neutrons.
The electron moves at 2200 km/sec; 1% the speed of light, 1% or 2.56 substitutions per change relative to the ct1 state changes along the carrier.
This doesn't appear to be the type of relationship that matters.
What we want to look for is a relationship that makes sense at least in terms of scale, between the proton features and the electron features and find where these are eliminated in favor of a common scale in the neutron.
It's worth speculating where the 1830 comes from.  One place is ct4/5*(ct1 compression-256)^5; but that has little relevance other than coincidence although this type of analysis does work in some cases, the division of ct3 state compression by 256^3 yields one.
https://socratic.org/questions/how-fast-does-a-proton-have-to-be-moving-is-order-to-have-the-same-de-broglie-wa
Sub CT state changes
A more likely suggestion is that the negative electron is related and compressed according to ct2 substitutions within its underlying matrix.
The slower moving proton is associated with the postive, slower changing ct3 substitution.
The neutron results from the combination of the two substitutions.
Both are primary changes and overall velocity and separation continue to be tied to the underlying ct1 substitutions that are below both ct2 and ct3.
CT2 substitutions are closer to light speed in the ct4 matrix.  These substitutions presumably result in what is observed as a negative charge were any charge possible at that level.  Note again that charge like any other force is a result and not a driving feature.  The force result aspect of AUT is one of the crucial differences between that and the more primitive pre-aut physics which accepts space-time as a given and assumes that forces drive the universe instead of the supersymetry of the underlying algorithm envisioned in AuT.
Back to our discussion: This fits well with the model that each stage of compression is opposite (ie in this case solved as oppositely charged) from the prior state.  That is once you get to ct4 (ct3 substitution) the results are complex enough to yield charge from the forces that in prior state do not show charge, but they are energy.
This also indicates that there are multiple stages of compression possible for CT4, at least there are two (positive/negative; proton/electron) and those two combine to form a 3rd (neutron) which is our target of inquiry.
The indication here, then, is that the electron grouping compresses along a different path than the proton group, the former purely or primarily an effect of ct2 compression and the latter purely or primarily a result of ct3 compression; and presumably the former being from "negative spiral solutions" and the later from "postive spiral solutions".  The question remains are the carriers positive/negative; are the carried positive/negative or both.  Another question is whether there are places in the universe (an equal number) where these are reversed to give us the balance of anti-matter or perhaps during the post decompression cycle we are currently in will we see a steady increase of anti matter over matter as a result of the pre-eminance of the compression solution spirals during those states.
Quarks
Quarks fit well into this inquiry and deserve some discussion.  There are two stable quarks called up and down.  There are "high" and "very high" energy quarks which are temporary.  The correspond to intermediary starges of different types.  The up and down quarks which make up protons can be seen as reflections of the positive and negative ct3 spirals.  The higher energy quarks are those temporary states that exist only as non-stable transitions, such as a photon with only 255 and not 256 spirals.  In the case of the unstable photon, it would exist as space, but unstable ct4 states transition between ct3 and ct4 states because of the large amount of matrix and this transition can be observed just as ct3 transitions between ct3 (wave energy) and ct2 (photonic energy).
In the AuT analysis the Electron also has quark-like features but whereas the Q features of protons are the features of transitioning ct3 states, themselves relatively stable by comparison to their faster parent solutions of ct2, the q-features of electrons derives from the faster and simpler ct2 solutions.
The results are:
1) Small fast ct2 substitution based electrons where ct1 interactions allow for 2200k/s movement averages without compression and
2) Larger (1800 times larger) ct3 substitution based proton elements where the ct2 interactions result in more compressed, slower movements.
Note that ct1 substitutions provide for ct2 changes and ct2 changes provide for ct3 changes relative to their carrier spirals and the ct3 subsitutions along a ct3 carrier provide for relative change along the ct3 spiral carriers that make up ct4.
For the ct4 states, the complex resulting exchange between ct4 states of ct2 or ct3 allow for intermediate (between ct4 and ct5) stable compression states we see as electorns and protons and the combination of these as neutrons.
Thus endith the 6th post on this subject.

AuT-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 5 of 10-a long post with some answers about ct1

Well, I'm very disappointed in everyone's guessing ability.  But it's Friday and I want everyone to see how right this solution is going into the weekend, so here goes:

So why all this attention on big bangs if we're talking about neutrons?  That answer becomes very clear as we look at why there is compression in the pre-big bang compression point and how that compression occurs and then applying that same process to Neutrons.

When you look at this it is critical to remember that if you're looking for forces to drive this, then you're looking at the results driving the equation rather than the equation driving the results  It is, after all, Algorithm Universe Theory, not force Universe theory which is the failed version that even 2500 years ago was acknowledged as fault.
However, it is also important that the process show that mathematical result events reflects what we see from our force driven point of view.
While fundamental ct4 states are very small, pre-quark type states, ct4 has so much compression (space or the lack thereof is very important as you will see shortly) so that you get Neutrons which are an intermediary step between ct4 and ct5 and hence they are considered to be temporary compression states even though they are extremely durable from our perspective.  To understand this, you have to look at the big bang inflection points when most of space becomes compressed to temporary (from a time perspective) ct2 (or higher) states, so there is not so much space, but lots of light.  Later, after the inflection point, this light will begin to degrade to space in the model at a rate that gives the resulting faster than light expansion that is observed, especially when coupled with the rapid increase in ct1 due to F-series phenomena.
The same features of high compression that give rise to state changes (more coordinates changing at a time) give rise to these intermediary steps.
Representation of compression F-series states is merely the number of coordinates changing at once and once we define the exact equation leading to these changes: 1,11,111,1111,11111,etc; then we have the equations powering the universe.  These equations relate the amount of ct1 to the higher states controlling both speed and separation in the fashion described right now!
Something happens, an equation is defined, during intersections that causes the above reference results to be fixed along carriers for given numbers of spirals.
At net compression states (around big bangs) you have short term ct2 compressive states.  These are defined by having short carriers between "turns."  While short might be defined in terms of billions of years, they are short relative to the mass carriers.  They are all, of course, different.   The result is that there is less space and lots of photonic ct2.
You are going from many ct1 states (1,1,1,1,) to ct2.  These are solution based results so it is important to understand how you get from 1,1,1,etc to 11,11,11, etc.
How about from 11,22,33?  do you get to the next higher number and if so how?  In this case 0,1,1; then 11,11,22, then 111,222,333; then 2222,3333,5555.  Does the absence of zero make the compression possible in the algorithm?  Is there a different type of compression that includes zero, the neutron state?
To understand this you have to remember that ct1 substitution provides for velocity and the absence of ct1 substitution provides for compression.  On the galactic scale, you can't expand beyond space because there is no ct1 to substitute, any ct4 beyond this point would be frozen in time, something not allowed by single variable solutions, although very slow movement with very little ct1 substitution is about to become very important.  For therein lies the answer to intermediary stages of ct4.  They are stages where the order of solutions are such that there is not enough ct1 to move within the accumulations of ct4.  The neutron is the basic result but where there is not enough compression (lack of ct1) to form a neutron, the result is the electron/proton pair, where there is sufficient ct1 to allow movement of one set of a pair.  Presumably the pair can be negative proton as well well as positive proton plus positive electron plus negative electron although for whatever reason we don't experience high quantities of those in o-space at least not localized.
The idea of anti-matter "destroyed" is a stupid, pre-AuT idea because information is not destroyed.  It may transform into space, ct1, however which may explain why we don't experience it locally, any positive and negative combination in proximity would result in unraveling at that solution.
One way of looking at this might include changes back and forth between positive and negative states at rates that cannot easily be accepted, e.g. at every change of x, but that is a diversion to the overall process and will be dealt with later.
Since solutions are spiral based in the model, Positive and negative would appear to originate with the direction of the spirals forming the solution. In such a case, what we would see, for example, is that a positive carrier plus negative carried spirals would be, at ct1, positive, so that ct2 would be positive in this structure.  Then you have ct2 formed by the opposite arrangement and this forms ct3 as negative.  Then you have ct3 stacking in the opposite direction going positive again.
Let's assume that in this process there are intermediary steps at the ct4 level (ct3 stacking).  In such even the "inflection point" would occur at the electron-proton interface.  In this way, at very small concentrations of ct3 moving towards ct4 compressed stability, you get a negative result and then at some point of ct4 concentration it shifts to positive.
This stacking, inflection point works closely with the solutions limiting the proximity of ct1 during the compression process to increase the compression.
And how is that done?  Well, there are 5 more posts in this series.

AuT-The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 4 of 10

As we approach the half way point, we have to look at space and spatial elements of information in a new way and perhaps, just perhaps admit that space has no gravitational element independent of compression.
Higher states, atomics and molecular states, function as a result of the multiple types of interactions within the mesh-like matrix making it up.  It moves constantly and at a very high rate of speed.  Substitutions of ct1 ultimately drive the mechanism moving electrons at very high speeds relative to the associated Protons and Neutrons although presumably there is a notable speed difference in Protons over Neutrons.  Charge also has to be deal with, presumably resulting from longer carriers for positive charges along positive spirals than the negative ones.
One suggestion, that multiple polarity states could substitute for turn solutions or positive and negative spiral solutions cannot be discounted completely, althought he observed model of net curvature suggests the primary model and the polarity model with infinite deviations of polarity arrives at the same net effect, a halving of the positive is the same as the halving of the angle of intersection or origin.
Density, assuming electrons to be multiples of the minimum ct4 state, would suggest that carriers behave differently depending on the orientation.
The arrangement suggests that true spiraling may be replaced with polarity shifts between positive, negative and neutral, at least at the ct4 level.  It has to be remembered that these shifts are not powered by forces, but are instead powered by mathematical solutions or you end up where traditional physics gets stuck looking at force driven reactions instead of the underlying sequences giving rise to force.
The interactions are numerous for ct4, but not infinite comprising:
ct1 stacking (to get f-series carriers), ct1 compression (to get to ct2), ct2 compression (to get ct3) and ct3 compression (to get to ct4).   All of these exist together for ct4 and presumably for positive and negative spiral solutions (positive and negative being merely words to describe the intersecting solutions) and it is further understood due to the building mechanism f-series that for the 1111,2222,3333 ct4 mechanism that each state involved (ct1,2, and 3) all are formed from F-series spirals constantly lengthening according to the formula x=x-2+x-1.  Given the very high states of compression for each of these, they are meshlike and snakelike at an unbelievably complex level at any speed greater than 1.07x10-37th of a second, the one at a time change and even at that very slow speed the substitutions, compression and decompressions happen at very high multiples.
The most basic of these interactions is gravity, then photonic energy, then wave energy, then the strong and weak forces which presumably result from having multiple solutions occurring together.  This suggests that the number of forces is a function of the number of compression interactions.  For ct2 you have ct1 substitutions which give speed to the resulting issue which is so fast that we call it light, 1:256 each 1.07x10-37th of a second.
For ct3 you have ct1 substitutions but also ct2 substitutions giving rise to speed and linear attachment to form waves of high speed change.
For ct4 you add to each of the other two the ct3 substitutions.  Now you have speed, plus linear attachment, plus non-linear attachment.
Non-linear attachment means attachment along multiple dimensions.  Electrons can be defined as those ct4 states that have limited non-linear attachment, essentially one attachment to a ct4 proton or none in some cases.
Once you begin to have multiple non-linear attachments resulting from the 4th coordinate change you begin to have a positive charge result although positive and negative are random terms since polarity can be reversed for different spiral solutions, an anti-matter environment where the spirals are in the opposite direction.
The solution to the equation is merely that solution which provides a change for compression of 1, 11,111,1111,11111 solutions to F-series fixed equations.  While a portion of this is the F(x)^(2^x) equation, that is more an expression of the resulting changes of the tying of multiple f-series together than the actual equation that says at compression you add one more coordinate change.
We are missing anti-matter (at least locally) and we are missing gravity overall.  The missing gravity is easier to deal with.
The problem with AuT is the missing gravity.
Some of it is hidden in History according to observation which is now the front runner for the origin of Dark Matter.
But the rate of information growth involves more than just ct1 which would not generate gravity although it would generate space.
Hence we need to look at ct1-non linear vs ct1 linear; the former is just information, the latter is information that can be compressed.
Only for ct1 does the process which leads to this equation for the entire universe:
(pi)r^2(2)-(pi)r^2(1)=F(x2)-F(x1).
For CT2, which comes into existence as space time, there is information in the form of history which goes with the different compression states.  The existence of History (SCT) remains for all subsequent states.
This approach assumes two different types of information. One is space time information, having at least one compressed element (vs for example ct3 which has 2).  The relativistic effects extend far past the perceived gravitation elements in this.
CT1 increases without gravity so we have expansion of the universe in an F-series of information (space during decompression and a massive increase in higher ct states during the compression state).
On the other handhe higher CT states hide most of the change as history which shows up as dark matter.
So what happens with the anti-matter?

AuT-3 The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 3 of 10; plus my pitch

Here is my pitch-any comments?

Over the last 4 years I've been developing a theory on Quantum Mechanics.

The theory is published and read by a very limited audience all over the world, it's also a work in progress.

I'd go so far as to say it is accurate and relies heavily on a math model developed 600 years ago and is an extension of the work of Parmenides.

It takes a lot of effort to accept the theory.  It will challenge a number accepted concepts in physics.

I'd like an opportunity to present it as a lecture to your physics, astronomy and math departments for whatever teachers and students might want to attend. This presentation would largely be for my benefit, presenting the theory to a sophisticated group and taking questions if anyone wants to ask which I may or may not be able to answer.

  While I cannot say that it will be worth their time, I will explain what the big bang was, what occurred before it, how space time arises, why there is quantum phenomena, what black holes are, what space is, and many other things with some mathematical precision. I will explain how history exists in a quantum universe environment.

I will provide an explanation of super-symmetry, i.e. how our universe does not have true entropy.  It will take me 45 minutes-1 hour.  What do you think?

The ultimate culprit is the algorithm itself.  No matter the intermediate mechanisms, the basis for intra ct4 compression is the algorithms model of converging infinite series which requires multiple big bangs for each state and during successive big bangs, net compression increases as well as the compression into higher and higher ct states.
Compression is so high at the big bang inflection point that many things temporary in nature exist and continue to exist because the unwinding process is so slow due to carrier lengths being so large for older spirals.
One dangling part of the theory which has yet to be shown to have an specific basis is whether ct states can only jump during a net compression state, that is must there be a imminent big bang for the next higher state.
In the book Tau Zero, the protagonists survive by stepping outside of the big bang.  This is not a requirement of AuT because there is no singularity at the big bang, only a net compression state.  To the extent in Tau Zero, the protagonists were not part of the gross universe, they fit the bill, but it doesn't work that way.   It is entirely possible when the next net compression state/big bang occurs that there will be entire galaxies survive far (solution wise) from the center of compression which, due to the solution model would have great compression at the center (enough to go to the next higher ct state) and according to observed galactic speeds and due to this similarity of solution times (not identical but very close due to massive overlap/compression) would be compressing very fast.  Multiple of light speed compression.  At the point of inflection, this speed would "instantaneously" at least in net terms reverse.    What it would be like to experience this is complicated to envision since localized inflections would not change.  The net shift in the universe would be instantaneous, but the only the average, for other points, they would shift according to their own rules.
Of course the background radiation observed suggests that this alone might kill everything not already dead although that is not a foregone conclusion.
Space itself would be "relatively finite," that is you couldn't get really really far away by universal standards, but you might get quite a distance away on a galactic basis.  Would the sky in such an event fill with light?  The suggestion is that it would be very bright, more space compressed into light or near light states, but also that the speed of expansion would mean that the edges of space would "outrun" light speed as ct1 can increase without reference to space time it is not subject to the speed limits of space and hence the light would quickly disperse as temporary compressed ct1 was converted back to ct1 from ct2.
This suggests that while apparently stable, our state is also subject to dispersion during this process so that what is solid today would eventually, due to localized expansion reach a net maximum dispersion before collapsing back again to some extent.
One problem with what is "observed" is that the model suggests the amount of information is increasing at an alarming rate.  While this provides the "fuel" for compression (looking at things backwards it gives sufficient mass for the universe to re-collapse) the speed with which this would happen in the suggested model is sufficient so that it should be observed both locally and overall even over the short time that we have observed the universe.  That is every 10^-37th of a second if the model was, strictly speaking, correct, we'd see a near doubling of the amount of information in the universe; something which is not observed.  While much of increase is hidden as history, there would still be wild increases and these have to be defined by movement, expansion of space until the big compression and after that by a steady increase in the weight locally.
Where am I going?  Only 3 of 10, we'll see, although I'll give a free copy of the book to the first person to guess correctly in the comments section.

AuT-2 The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 2 of 10

There is yet another possibility which is troubling, but which cannot be ignored.  That possibility is that super symetry is exceeded by the creation of forces within a web of such complexity that they begin to act independently of super symetry.  That is, the strong and weak forces which hold atomic structures together that arose from simple compression now acts independent of super-symetry.  Predictable physics remains in place, the super symetry break down (decompression primarily from our perspective) continue to provide a basis for observed (vs actual) randomness and entropy, but now forces have been generated especially in the nature of modifications of algorithm solutions due to multiple layers of compression, so that the structure of the solution is generated by specific results within the higher states.
This feature of the solution complexity is even greater at the black hole level where the escape of lower particles from a field about black holes is more limited and might not exist at all at ct6.  In fact, the structure of the higher ct states might be such that they lose the ability to exert gravity at all, the most fundamental result of the algorithm from our perspective (ct1 solutions being a more fundamental result which we only see as space despite the inherent richness of a state which provides thorugh substitution velocity) mght thereby be eliminated as an observed result.
This is significant since it would affect many aspects of the universe, most importantly it would mean we could exist in a state which is ct(anything) because the higher ct states exist independent of the lower ct states from the most observable level.
However, and this is the intriguing part of all of this, they might exist as things observed as the strong and weak forces, for example.  That is, the tie in between ct4 and higher states of matter may have less to do with ct4 itself and instead be reliant on a ct6 which is so compressed that it has ceased to show gravitational results but still affects lower states to compress them into what we would call quarks, but whch are in reality merely super-compressed ct6 (for example) or ct6 and ct7 (for example) solution proximate to ct4 solutions.

AuT-1 The interaction between larger particles and ct4 quantum elements 1 of 10

One thing we should talk about before getting into the meat of this, is whether we should exist.  For example, when I was walking tonight my thoughts moved to the observation of the transparent moon, half reflection, half pre-sunset solid rock.  Just that event at just that moment requires randomness according to modern thought.  But that is much more unlikely than that these exact events are predetermined by events that started the process.  We'll come back to that; but first lets admit that there is somethng that has to happen to ct4 states during the compression process to get us where we are today.
There are several ways to look for the relationship between what we call neutrons and fundamental ct4 compression states.
The first, most obvious, is to look at quarks, but quarks have their quirks and we don't need to go there for the overview.
Why neutrons?  Neutrons are seen to embody the elements of electrons and protons so we're merely coming up with a starting point to work from.  We could start with black hole material or anything else to arive at the same place.  Also, the conversion of matter to energy skips the intermediate steps that we call quarks and this suggests that quarks are largely phantom intermediate steps existing because of what we do with gross compression intermediaries.
The first question, is why have intermediate stages at all?  That is, why not go from fundamental ct4 states to fundamental ct5 states?  The answer lies in the makeup of ct4 which embodies ct3 states which in turn are embodied with ct2 and ct1 states.
Why positive and negative?  One suggestion by dual spiral theory is that ct4 protons are made of positive spirals taking on positive spirals and ct4 electrons are made of positive spirals taking on negative spirals; (2) or positives taking on negative/negatives taking on positives being negatives and postiives taking on positives and negatives taking on negatives being positive or other similar combinations.
Another suggestion is simpler, that the positive portion, being larger, requires more stability so that the substitution rate is less, hence the negative portions by virtue of the higher ct1 substition rates have to move faster and therefore circle the related (because they are two halves of the same proton) slower subsitution state.  This raises the question of what is going on when you get a stream of electrons independent of the protons and this is not hard to answer because what you are doing is destablizing both parts.
But we're early into this discussion, there is no need to rush anything.

Beautiful Ruins

There are some reference in the title book that approach what is  true of the universe in terms of time and connectivity.  It's an interesting book which shows what you get when peolple fumble with the ideas behind AuT and a book which had a particular message to me of what is wrong with morality, desire vs moral intention.
There is, however, a fly in the ointment, the inability to accept the moral imperatives of duty; the need to give up the past and the inability to escape the changes forced upon me.
Tonight I decided I want to add a musical number (fictionally) to my book and I decided I would jazz it up some in the telling of the performance but I have to find what exists of musical style histories from 2500 year ago.  I think it not out of place to imagine an eric clapton of the lute, after a fashion; some sort of operatic vocals and the like, things that would largely have been lost to time perhaps.
Could there not have been a "sailing away of the ice of a new day" performance since at least the flute after a fashion, if not Jethro Tull's version, then someone who might have done something an I heard Figaro performed in a way that was very rappish.
So today's post is not about physics, its about the practical aspects of living trapped within an amber of our own making instead of the background amber that provides supersymetry to the strange composit of free will and entropy that we live in.
It is depressing to see too much, I envy the savages that believe in one or more gods that they can turn to; a weakness that I share because I pray for some paths to be given to me even though I know I must build them myself.

AuT-ppp From the rewrite of The Zeno-Socrates Dialogs: in search of a better understanding of compression

One of the items I aluded to in the prior post had to do with a reason for experiencing a net postive universe.  A balanced universe would be boring.  In order to have our universe seem so interesting several related elements come into play:
1) Offset positive a negative (yes/no) states.  Presumably these come from the idea that the "maybe" state from which the algorithm takes its form allows for both, although only the algorithm itself requires both.
2) Off set angles converging of pi
3) Information quantities diverging as an F-series or as this

4) Compression states converging as an F-series F(n)^(2^n) as in increases one unit at a time.
Another novelty of F series is that if you subtract one from the prior, offset by one, of necessity you get another F-series of numbers.  In this way, we have, with offset intersecting spirals a solution which is one F-series and slightly off angularly from the prior one which is the solution observed.
The reflection of compression comes in many fashions showing we are moving towards a compressive state.  What we call an information revolution is an example.  In this case, information is compressed to reflect our movement towards a more organized compressed state from a less compressed one at least locally.  Eventually, we will move to decompression and this information will all disappear.
Another place is the concentration of people in cities. These are aspects of civilization but they are also aspects of compression.
These all relate to a common point of origin, but you have the true F-series (1,1,2,3,5) and the modified F-series for all the information in the universe F(n)=(n+(n-1)+(n-2)) which shows that the current total amount of information is basedd on all the information in all the histories of the universe.
One question which remains is whether F(n) ends here or whether it includes n-3 and beyond except they are too small to affect the solution substantially.
That is for another day, however.

Anyway, enough work, time for something a little more entertaining
I'm rewriting Socrates to be novella length-here is an insert from the rewrite

Parminides finished the walk to the wall gates of the Palace di Novo and shuffled up to the guards who looked at the dusty figure asking for Governor Pulicus with great suspicion.  He did not look like an assassin, but protecting the governor from senile old men was also within their authority.
Parminides merely anounced himself and then sat on a concrete table meant for some uncarved statue and rested his feet.  The guard who was questioning him called for a young boy who was inside the walls and sent him running.  You never knew with the governor's moods what spontaneous whim he might pursue, perhaps his new passion was interviewing old men.
The boy returned, and spoke to the guard, not even a little windedd and Parminides grumbled to himself of lost youth and the waste of giving it to this small boy with nothing more important to do than run errands for guards.  The guards did nothing, but seemed all the more suspicious of Parminides for all of that.  He would have left but his feet hurt and the statuary stand was as comfortable as anywhere else in the shade of the towering walls.
After a few minutes another boy came and talked to the first briefly and then to the guards who now straightened up.  Soon a small entourage of well dressed bearded men in their prime came through the door and divided to show a middle aged but powerful man with a neatly trimmed beard.  "Parminides!  You walked.  If you had asked I would have sent a chariot for you."
"If you had sent the offer, I would have accepted."  The guards now stood at attention, showing more attention to this man who spoke so casually, almost insultingly to the governor who held life and death in his hands.
"Come walk with us," Publicus said giving a gesture that caused the others to drop behind the.  Parminides decided against giving him the satisfaction of admitting his exhaustion after the long trip and the walk to the palace.
"Do you wish to talk of the trial?" Publicus asked.
"I do not."
"This way," Publicus said and they entered a garden.  "There are over a hundred acres enclosed within the palace grounds, the hills provide a natural barrier and the stream you see winds through."  There were trees on either side of the bubbling brook which made pleasant sounds and the water seemed to cool the air greatly.
"I remember," Publicus continued, "that you loved to lecture when you were younger.   You seem to be quieter in your old age."
Parminides stubbed his toe on a rock and skipped for a second.  When he caught his balance he had time to respond, "I have been working through a problem in my mind, it has worried me."
"But not your trial.  You disappoint me in what you see as important.  I like that young fellow Zeno, but he will get you in trouble.  If you were willing to sacrifice that young man your problems would go away."
Parminides said nothing, just signed in concert with the brook.
"There are fish in the deeper pools.   They are delicious.  I know you are a learned man and your teachings when I was a young man were invaluable to me."
"I never taught you to kill men, someone else seems to have taught you better than me."
"But you taught me how to calculate how much food men would need, how much a city needs to withstand a seige or to live well.  Those are skills of a general and a governor."
"So my time was not wasted."
"Don't condescend to me."
"You summoned me here.  Did you do so out of nostalgia?"
"I was hoping for some new counsel, some  new insight."
"Older men have to ask question to find answers, only children don't know what questions to ask."
"I am not a child but I will not let you antagonize me.  You seemed difficult to me then, I thought it was a child's eyes.  Do you remember striking my hand with a stick?"  Parminides nodded, thinking of the child from so long ago that had been so hard to keep focused.   He wondered if his old student would have him beat with a stick.   Publicus was a fierce man, huge biceps, not as tall as parminides, but more commanding, the strides of a man in his prime who hadd lded armies and might lead them again.
"I am one of the most powerful men in the most powerful  country in the world, my power stretches farther than a man or horseback can travel in a week.  There are semafores but it takes a week for  any information of consequence to reach me from the borders.  If I go to the borders, I can see my enemies not 5 minutes by a fast walk, and yet I cannot touch the, I can cause them no harm, my reach is restricted."
"I am sorry you are not able to kill faster," Parminides answered.
"Perhaps I should have guessed you would not be sympathetic to the needs of a ruler."  They came upon a small alter.  "Do you hunt?  Perhaps we could kill something for a sacrifice?  No?  Your friend Zeno loves to hunt.  But no, I can see you have lost your interest."
"I mostly eat green things, I have become a cow in my old age."
"I hate the priests myself.  But their churches bring jobs to a town that otherwise would have none.  The sacrifces feed the poor andd it brings comfort.  Can you tell me how to find comfort from the priests?"
"I lost my faith.  The stories of the ancient heros are children's tales."
"You made me memorize them."
"I tried and failed.  But the exercise of trying perhaps helped you."
" The stories of Hercules are monster stories.  I think perhaps they would have been more interesting had the monsters won more often."
"You are right."  Parminides thought of this interpretation andd saw the brightness he had seen in his old studdent.  He wondereed to himself what Publicus really wanted.  He could not expect that Parminides was hiding some secret to the problems he had mentioned.
"They would be more interesting if there were still monsters."
There are many monsters still left, otherwise you would not have walls and armies."  Now Publicus was quiet.
"I do not deal with practical problems."
"Then tell me what you do deal with these days?"
"There are logical problems with space that bother me."
"I have heardd Zeno try to explain this."  Parminides was surprised and his look must have shown it because Publicus added, "I do not live within these walls all of the time and Zeno is entertaining.  Tell me about space an why an arrow will not strike you deadd if it only travels half way to you?"
"That is a child's explanation.  The problem is more complex than describing the arrow, the problem is describing why an arrow exists at all, why it is there to be fired why we know it was fired."
"You see," Parminides was lecturing as they walked, more to fill the time till Publicus was ready to speak and partially because this was the problem that he hadd worried over, "things ha to start from some logical point or we would not have logic which must reflect this beginning.  So we start from zero andd build outward, but there is some mathematical formula that should cover this building.
"I believe there must be some place from which postive things and negative things come, but in some way that the positive over times comes to overwhelm an equal amount of negative, as if they both change together, but some formula shows an exponentially greater growth at each change for the positive with the negative following a step behind.    In this way, we see the positive and the negative, but the postive seems to overwhelm the negative."
[editor's note]Parminides saw, but could not explain the effect of f-series expansion which is that differences are multiplied due to exponential length changes which is why we see so much more of positive spiral.  At the time of expansion, there seems to be nothing more than pockets of negative, but what would be seen at the point of net compression?
"I believe the steps must be discrete, that the past is somehow incorporated into these discrete steps so that we see history because it is built into the present.  But somehow, the steps of the equal size must appear different and change with time."
"I cannot always see what is written for me," Publicus tells him.
Ah, the problem at last.  "When you hold it far from your face, it becomes more clear?" Parminides asks, dropping his train of thought for this more immediate problem.
"Yes.  It is a weakness, I cannot have weakness of this type."
"And yet you do.  It means you will be able to see your enemies from a great distance for many years.  It is a blessing.  I can no longer see what is far away.  Our strengths balance our weaknesses."
"I do not need your platitudes.  you have no solution?"
"A curved pool in a clear container will make the words appear bigger underneath, polished shells till they are paper thin.  When not around a reader who you trust to read accurately."
"Yourself?"
"I am too old to keep up with you.  I could find someone."
"Zeno?" It is almost snorted with derision.
"Zeno would make up what he things the message should say.  I can find someone, I think, smart with no ambition."
"You want me to solve your problems in return?"
"I am tired.  I feel alone even when I am with others.  I worry constantly.  What would you do to help someone who would kill himself if he were not too afraid?"

AuT ppp history determines current location

The equation f(n)=n+n-1+(n-2) which applies to entire universe as compressive stacking has an important function in determining curvature because n-1=n-2+(n-3) an so on.   In this was the solution to any information state is finite, but requires the inclusion of every prior state going  back to x=1.  Since for all practical purposes for our observations x=infinity today (even though it is actually an infinite distance from infinity in all other respects, this makes the determination of any quantum point impossible in o-space.  Fortunately, g-space has no time restrictions so each build of the universe (at the equivalent rate of 1.07x10-37th of a second essentially is calibrated on a rebuild of every qunatum state each time it occurs.
Perhaps one of the most significant features of this stacked universe is that when the relative change occurs, no two F-series carriers will be exactly the same length, no relative change will be exactly the same and no SCT will be exactly the same as another.  
This occurs via a simple process with so many changes that it appears to be an infinitely complicated process.
The idea of potentially like sized spirals to create the stacking mechanism ONLY "appears to happen" BECAUSE THE RESULTS ARE SO close together.  The actual stacking process which I will draw and explain mathematically is not complicated until it is applied.  Once it is applied...well that's different.
What we saw last was that history is necessary in order to determine current separation; which reinforces the conclusion taught  by f-series stacking at the beginning, an idea inherent in all of this, but something considered in the cool of a gregorian monk chappel where the only answer to the god that lived there was that its acceptance as opposed to some steady state god seemed counter-intuitive due to Leonardo di Bionnaci.

The stacking function for these increasingly large spirals is believed to involve oppositely traveling spirals to a carrier, but these are effects and not actual spirals, or perhaps "results" and not actual spirals.
To attempt this solution for ct1 to ct2 is complicated for what we view as stable compressive states because the numbers involved to generate our perspective from ct4 or a ct5 universe are essentially infinite numbers to our limite capacity for handling them.
 But the process is the same for changes in ct1 and so we're going to apply "dimensional" calculus to the non-dimensional calculus in order to show where the results come from and why the two give such different results.

The spirals are generated as set forth herein, then the results are stacked in order to generate carrier spirals.  This process continues on so many different levels that it is possible that the compression states are generated when 256 ct1 spirals align at the same time to generate a single photon.
Alignment of space is an uncertain process but since it can occur based on any common feature, I'm going to start  and the same process occurs at the enormous values of x required to get similar concentrations of ct2 to get to ct3 and so on as x increases towards infinity.

Notations:
y=fx: dy=df
f' (newton for derivative) =df/dx=dy/dx=d/dx(f)=d/dy(y)
omits x(0)
fx=x^n; n=1,2,3 [in our case we're slightly modifying this by making it x^2^n
d/dx(x^n)=?; df/dx=[(x+dx)^n-x^n]/dx  could put in x0 at first x+dx
x is fixed, dx moves
binomial theorem: (x+dx)^n=(x+dx)*(x+dx) n times=x^n+n(x^n-1)dx+junk terms but since the change is actually finite the junk terms have weight that we experience as history.
Junk terms O(big oh) O(dx)^2 where this is dx^2,dx^3 and higher are important because they don't go away because there is a specific limit, the same end point that allows pi to have a specific definition in AuT, the same that allows for there to be a quantum state beyond which there is no separation because it breaks down to pure information.

df/dx=1/dx((x+dx)^n-x^n)
=1/dx(x^n+nx^(n-1)dx+O(dx)^2-x^n)
=1/dx(nx^(n-1)dx+O(dx)^2)
=nx^n-1 + Odx
tends as dx goes to 0 to nx^n-1
=d/dx(x^n)=nx^(n-2)

So for our equation (f(x) is d/dx(x^2^n)=2^n(x^((2^n)-2) + O(dx)^2
The difference is that we do not want to get a total or sum for the various answers or ignore O(dx) because that is where the history of the equation lies and because we have a non-linear answer with discreet quantum units which assure that at a certain number of places we get an answer. 

Here is how this changes:
lim (as x goes to x0)  [f(x0+dx)-fx]/(x-x0) and you cannot plug in zero because in a quantum universe you don't have zeros.  The zeros do exist at the ct1-ct0 boundary, but these are not "actual zero" but merely the potential for a yes or no answer; the potential for a plus or minus answer.  You can divide a maybe by a maybe and get one.



We have actual limits in our analysis of AuT but the limits change with each change in x and these limits affect both curvature and the change in information quantity.  The arrangement of information also evolves since the curvature solution changes.

Derivative limits limits for AuT approach not zero but a specific minimum value of x which is so far from the current solution as to appear infinitely small or infinitely far away.  We talk about a 13 billion year old universe, but AuT explains that the latest big bang is only the latest average inflection point between compression and expansion and gets us nowhere close to the actual beginning of the algorithm.

There are complicated questions that arise from the formulation of this algorithm is the question of what happens when you add two prior states to get the next state with an offset.
While one drifts to history which is the only place it can go there is no "new" state, but if enough occur at once then you don't see double the set, instead you see just a higher state.

Take a deep breath, I am still here.