Smart questions with AuT answers

It is Sunday.  The birds this morning filled the trees and drowned out the other sounds, but now it is less quiet, the sounds of the city, not too far away, predominate.  The birds have moved on, gone silent or been drowned by the other noises.
It was primitive and a little scary this morning; now it suggests a dystopian doom; odd that the word does not spell check.
It rained last night at last, but the colder weather promised is not here yet.
The scraped skin where I rocketed over my handlebars is not healed, but might be well enough for me to swim outside if the pool is open.  I don't know how short it would be or what energy I have in me for that, but it has been a long time since I swam last and might yet be longer if I don't take advantage of this strange collection of weather and opportunity.
I feel sullen this morning, I have an intense love that has nowhere to go.  All my heart cries out for some release; but there is nothing there for it.
It has been grey mostly for several days, but it does nothing to lessen or improve my mood.
I would like for it to get cold and bathe outside in hot water, but as I have open wounds, it is just as well that I cannot.

Over the last few days, I worked out the model for the fusion engine for the next patent and the grant, the details are complicated and while easy enough to carry out with the right facilities; they are not the kinds of things to do at a homeless campsite.  The plan for the day is to work on the models that are drawn out, turning drawings into words and words into claims; but I already know it will be Monday and Tuesday before any great work is finished on these.

January 3 is getting closer.   There are 6 days left, one being pretty much the same as another, but much to do on any given day.

It is difficult.  With a half decent 19th century laboratory, 5000 dollars in modern equipment and chemicals, I could at least superficially test my science.  But I don't have the laboratory and it is dangerous in the preparation as some things are, not as dangerous as dynamite, perhaps, but more dangerous than a cockney pub or a fireworks factory and those both often go awry.  The tests themselves could be complicated, but once the preparation was done, the execution of reactions would have some remote potential to create fusion and while in very low quantities, the science and effects are worth considering.

I can say this, the most simple form involves a hardened container, two chemicals and a single piece of equipment; but could, in theory provide fusion.  It is almost, but not quite, too simple to believe, but it applies the science in the most simple fashion to get the result.  Whether it can be safely prepared requires several steps, testing the container and the equipment without the chemicals and then with them and while the build out is simple, it requires the proximity of things which nature did not mean to make proximate and perhaps in that lies the solution to the question of why it cannot happen in the absence of the preparation.

Even so, it would cost a fraction^10 of what the other fusion projects want for things which cannot work and it is frustrating.  "It" would certainly yield better results, although I continue to fear someone will stumble or steal into the correct path and apply it to the overly complex methods otherwise developed and claim the prize that is rightly mine and whatever country comes to my aid first.

I was within a couple of pounds and a fraction of my target weight again, thanks perhaps to the irregular sleep and exercise of the past few days, a few grams can be attributed to the loss of skin and blood; but mostly it appears to track the exercise and diet.  I went to bed yesterday not as clean as is otherwise warranted, but it was only my sweat and only me to suffer from it, scraggly, unshaved, but exercised with a healthy feed.  I am awake now but tired; frustrated in every way that a person can be frustrated.

I promised AuT answers and questions.  Normally there is not enough in these types of questions to warrant the need to answer, but the science of AuT is more developed than the non-participant can be informed, there are some secrets that are still secret.

I have these covered, in the broadest sense in the recent books, however out of date they are in terms of application; the specific methods of application counted in months in terms of broad concept, but only days and weeks in terms of specific design.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-building-block-unit-of-spacetime

This answer I would have said was ct1 at one time, but now it is ct1-3 and parts of 4 especially for the time part.  And yet the math of the answer remains the same with only the greater specificity and understanding of continuing to work it out, not quite public or secret as it winds its way through the patent offices around the world and works itself out in my mind.

https://www.quora.com/Gravity-is-described-as-bending-space-but-how-does-that-bent-space-pull-stuff-into-it

This one is also of recent issue, partially but not fully told in the original science; now so important to fusion oddly enough, the key to fusion without the stupid expensive lies with the answers which were given only privately to this question and which themselves continue to be worked out imperfectly, but within experimental parameters.

Soon enough the experiments will begin or be thwarted by ignorance and prejudice.  It remains to be seen which will be the greater, the only certainty is that it will now be revealed through the system of sharing that was established for this type of science; and there is much to do between now and then.

the next patent

It is early in the morning and cold, but I am up; putting my insights down on paper.
With the pool closed exercise is the dry, earthly kind that does not appeal to me.
I think I have come a little closer, recognizing the value of time, that thing which doesn't exist at the quantum level.  No one has tried knocking down my door to force a nobel prize on me, but there is some progress.
There is an order to things and that is a key after a fashion, how to do things in the right order, but that won't be explained here; it was explained in the last patent and will be explained again in another way in the next patent and perhaps another in the one after that.
I wrote a letter recently, and this is an excerpt from that for you who I haven't written to in a while.
***

This is a new model of thermodynamics.  If this is accurate there has to be a certain amount of post discovery obviousness.  Observe:

The first is that is has to be right, we see this because there are observed iterated equations and resulting fractals, fundamentally the denominator of pi and the resulting golden ratio.

The second is that the model must be durable, in the face of observations it must hold up.  There are innumerable examples from solving Zeno’s paradox to wave particle duality to explaining time and force.  In this case the best example may be how easily it unifies force.  You can do this with a hand calculator and the relative value of forces (e.g. from Wikipedia)  using 2f(n)^2^n where n=1, 2, 3, 5, 8; the first 5 solutions to the Fibonacci series or golden ratio.

Folding from 1:2 yields the relative value of gravity, from 3:5 yields the mass energy equation (e=mc^2); 5:8 folding yields the strong force.  The other forces are internally reconciled by the standard model as electromagnetic phenomena, although what that means is explained with more detail.

The third observation given here is that the model is confirmed by otherwise unexpected observations.

MIT in October of 2019* found smoking gun evidence of what we proved mathematically in 2013 and applied to fractals at the end of 2018.  Equally important, the evidence of the model surrounds us, just hidden at the subatomic level by time.  Time is defined as a dimensional result of pre-time change by this model with great specificity.  As a result, energy is also defined in a new way which changes its manipulation exponentially.

Equally important, the model must have some use.  This model explains why fusion has not been achieved, except in bombs, and how to solve that problem.  In the patents it is shown to be widely applicable.

We have been invited to file a full phase 1 NSF grant on our fusion project which we plan to file the first of the year.

AuT could be called "not just fusion."  We have a new approach to fusion, what some call a 10 trillion dollar industry* (* https://cen.acs.org/energy/nuclear-power/Fusion-start-ups-hope-revolutionize/96/i32).  We have also redefined quantum mechanics and fusion is the tip of the iceberg despite its importance.

***

What do you think of that?

There is a mistake I see, or saw.  It is the ultimate in obviousness, but is it really only obvious in light of AuT?  Are there not aspects of it that were obvious before?  But then if no one could see it without the science; maybe it is not obvious at all.
It would make me nauseous to see all the crackpot fusion projects being funded when the one based on real science languishes, but I am sick anyway and this is just another sick, such is the problem with technology, such is the problem with life.
I now have enough material for the next patent to be filed the first week of January; indeed it now screams to be filed.  "Quiet patent, quit screaming, it is too early."
It is surprising how quickly that date is coming up and attempting to get ready for it is a growing challenge, the more I do, the closer I get; the more there is to do.
Each step is handed to me, after a fashion, the model forces its solutions on me, deliver the plasma and what to do afterwards, therefore how to do it.
While the work for this specification technically has been done and the science essentially disclosed, there is enough new material to include the new specification and it will be very and specific in conjunction with the requirements for actual construction; why does it have to scream at me?
Pause for an advertisement, "Looking for the perfect holiday gift?"

The goal is to build it within the nsf budget in a form that will have initial combustion if not continuous combustion.
There is every reason to believe that it can be done.  They are throwing hundreds of millions of dollars into total nonsense and I am targeting a solution for a fraction of that.
If the nsf budget is not forthcoming, well that is a different story.  Disappointment hounds me, snapping at my heels.

Here are a couple of articles, the first showing the weakness in terms of strength of the standard model.
https://www.quora.com/Why-must-quantum-physics-and-general-relativity-be-united-Isn%E2%80%99t-that-like-uniting-the-behavior-of-a-human-with-the-cells-that-make-up-that-human

The second rendered total nonsense by the relentless logic of AuT
https://www.quora.com/What-are-electrons-made-up-of-Are-all-electrons-made-of-the-same-material

Back to the past for the future one of two, perhaps

A dry post for a dry morning.  I stepped away from this blog and may not come back.  I am not sure where I am going from here, perhaps it is the pool being closed for so long that disturbs me so much.  I leave it to you to determine this.  I dont care how much i weight right now or what i am doing for exercise.  even what i eat does not seem to matter much or how much coffee it takes to get me through the day or how much my stomach hurts as a result.  It is not so much surrender, as it is the need to continue for the sake of putting one step in front of the other, the actions of the doomed man walking through a desert without hope of succor and yet walk on he does until he finds the place where his bones are destined to bleach over time.

Which brings us to time and the subject of this post.

AuT goes pre-Einstein to sove the Einstein dilema.
The goal of post Einstein physics was to use a modification of space time in order to do two things, 1) justify a fixed rate for the speed of light and 2) support observed physics, namel y Maxwell's equations.

The speed of light is defined by aut not as speed per-se, but post time change rates observed at the level of the photon, ct4t9 perhaps being the most likely element although the energy equation ties this more closely to the ct3-4 transition.   Recent studies suggest that the speed of light can be controlled in certain environments which makes this element less important.

Maxwell's equations are a set of coupled partial differential equations that, together with the Lorentz force law, form the foundation of classical electromagnetism, classical optics, and electric circuits.  It is a durable model, but really is largely just a series of equivalents applicable to systems operating wthin the narrow transitions of ct4t9 within a ct4-5 transition state universe.  It uses change over time and therefore ignores the pre-time elements of change.

The so called Lorentz-Poincare (care-long e) group of "transformations."
A fairly strong argument could m made that both Lorentz Equations and Poincare observations are too deep for me to examine; but that would be to ignore the fact that inserting aether back into the mix simplifies, rather than increases the complexity.
An exemplary article can be found here for those of you interested in such things.  https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/10/3/52/htm
In truth both L and P do nothing more than ignore pre-time change and instead remain fixated on the post time effect of time based change L focusing on C (the speed of light) and P focusing on the dissasembly of light into into its post-time effects.

The keystone of L is (1-(v^2/c^2)^1/2) which is a way of ignoring pre-time change by saying that everthing is tied to the relationship of velocity to the speed of light; a relativistic concept that leads to all sorts of misdirection and falacies like time travel which are previously disussed in too much depth to recover here.  Suffice it to say that qunatum change means that whatever the rate change of individual groups of point relative to time, the fixed march of quantum change is unaffected, making the universe a much more barren and unexciting place; but then you knew that deep down inside.

P focuses more on the variations possible for dimension given particular velocities and works well as long as pretime elements are not considered but begins to fall apart outside of the molecular ct 4-5 transitions and more or less completely falls apart at black holes which are so easy to deal with in AuT,  again discussed in detail in the most recent verions of Aut.  Neither provides a ready explanation for dimension which is accepted as an approximation within the narrow range of change (defined between zero dimensional change and the speed of light) for which the complex equations are observed.  
The L-P-E approximations are just a way of smoothing out the ct3-4 transition and largely ignore what goes on within the higher dimensional framework of ct4-5 transition except to the extent that these contain the lower ct3-4 transitions and makes the mortal sin of ignoring ct1-ct3 transitions that generate time as a dimensional framework from which the other dimensional states are observed by those 3 august if inaccurate mathematicians operate; ignoring the fixed values for pi and change which otherwise are observed and obvious if only they had continued to peer at the ct1-3 aether instead of getting lost in observed time based changes.

neutrinos

Saturday Morning.
The pool is closed for 3 months, perhaps to extend it by 4 inches which would be weird, but is a thing I learned about far from the pool itself.
For the moment I am filling in with non-outdoor swimming activities; but the future remains unclear.  There is also the whole 5 days when the gym will be closed for observance of superstitious practices.
So the day before it closed, I swam my last 2200 yards, the next day weights, then yoga.  Today, I don't know.  It is no longer early, but I am moving slowly.

I have a team if it stays together which is impressive and covers all the areas which it needs.
A world class mathematician
A capable phd candidate CE
A phD EE
A PhD ME
There is also a chemist who may be conflicted out and a physicist who is agreeable but has other issues to contend with.
There is also a search which remains outstanding until the end of December; a short time, but an important time frame.

One of the problems with explaining aut in terms of observations is dealing with outdated language.
In the article which follows one of those, the neutrino, is discussed.
The "mass" of the neutrino is discussed in terms of electron volts, a measurement itself which is fraught with problems since it involves both pre-time and post time elements.  The whole idea of measuring with energy or mass is fraught with observation issues, whereas AuT is a more pure system which allows measurement in bits.
That being said, we are not able to do much with bits yet, so it becomes almost as fanciful as the electron volt which is decidedly limited to a narrow range of ct6 or ct9 exchange, a rather random place from which to make a determination.
Then you have the other problem with the "standard model of particle mass" which is that even the standard model accepts that fundamental particles like electrons are not particles at all.  Rather than use the precise explanation of AuT that provides the ready explanation in terms of accurate pre and post time elements; the SMOPM ("smop-em") uses probability fields which is a way of estimating what AuT requires, the latter giving a better view of quantum instant states and allowing for superior manipulation as a result,of course.



https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/129?utm_campaign=weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_source=emailalert

1.1 ev as mass vs a minimum of 8x10^-3 based on M^2 of each mass state.
What you see here is yet another proof of aut where compression states changed based on 2f(x)^(2^x) which AuT predicts comparing favorably to observations.  Its important to remember that amounts of cloud are not measurable even using an energy standard although they are important for understanding function.
This is easily given a rough ct comparison using the millions of ev (10^6) of other ct states which suggests that the Neutrino, in terms of the electron (t12) component is a ct4t6 range component state; something which is potentially supportive of the photon being a ct4t9 state which is a place where I have been leaning for some time given the newly determined proton as a ct4t15 state thing which is also supported in part by these electron volt measurements, although one can readily see minor discrepancies that arise when EV and mass are reconciled. 

energy equivalence of rest mass of electron	0.5109906(15) MeV
energy equivalence of rest mass of proton	938.27231(28) MeV
energy equivalence of rest mass of neutron	939.56563(28) MeV

What this tells us is that neutrinos are manifestations of pretime states which "oscillate" between the the ct4t states in question, all of which appear to be in a determinable range.
The problem arises because anytime you use energy as part of the analysis what you are really doing is comparing pre-time and post-time states and when you use decay characteristics you are ignoring much of the pre-time information and categorizing the rest, especially here, where it is categorized as a single particle to force it into a model as opposed to specific mathematics.

The range concept is Its important to remember that amounts of cloud are not measurable even using an energy standard although they are important for understanding function.

The idea is that what is called a neutrino is a post time “flux” measurement (like the electron field conceptually being called an electron vrs the 5.4 ct4t12 plus cloud states) and as will be shown this appears likely to be a 5.x cloud of ct4t6 moving between a ct4t5 and ct4t7 unstable (odd exponent) matrix.

The same conceptual framework can be used to fully evaluate the reaction of the components in the article and a very similar conceptual framework appears in the patents, sorry, it will not appear here; but the evaluation of this reaction is well worth considering:

 A gaseous source produces tritium atoms (3H${}^3\text{H}$) that undergo beta decay into helium-3 (3He${}^3\text{He}$), electrons (e−${\text{e}}^{-}$), and electron antineutrinos (ν̄ $\overline{𝜈}$)

The newest editions of zombie christmas and science of nostradamus, but I am going to rewrite it.  Keep your eyes open for the next edition of Counselor's sinful kiss, that is also coming.  

A Christmas choking

The fatal, hateful rise of choking during sex http://flip.it/Ny2.uR

Ok, I had to find a post that actually made sense to me tonight.
You can look at it and see how old it is, I've done enough today.
I am not able to concentrate too much, certainly not enough for physics so I've been working on my books.
Not one, moving from one book to the next, a paragraph here or there.

So, tonight.   Yesterday it was bike ride and weights, today it was 2200 yards, 2x400 im and 2x200 im so there is the 1200 im.  I was down to 177 pounds and while that is still over 2 pounds over the target; for the moment it barely qualifies as thin waist and broad shoulders.

I'm 7 chapters into Christmas zombie, 2 chapters into Nostradamus, and i keep reediting the first half of the first chapter of last days of the new Orleans river zombie.  I have been working on this or that, but I have no intention of finishing anything.  You have to focus on something to have an intention regarding it.

That is what happens when you lose focus.
You can swim, but you can't write
You can't have an intention, but you can think
You can stay awake but you can't get untired
I am tired.
You can be conscious, but you can't focus on anything
I'm not focusing tonight but you get this weird blog post.

What is love if not....

Writing porn together:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGRKeMkW6-0

I might be done with porn, this is for someone else.

I am doing christmas but since I finished this other than it being a terrible rough draft that i cannot get past the first chapter, I am going to keep going with the posts.

    Levee Board

Events will bring captain and guy from memphis together to plan to save the city

Outside there is a steady flow of water, up from the drains, in the middle of the streets and down from the sky.  Inside the control room of the levee board various monitors shows the success and failure of the pumping stations.

The commander looking at the monitors asked, “This report says that we can’t even start on levee repairs until after the storm and there is at least 10 places where the water is topping the levee already and several potential failure points.  Can things get any worse?”

“The damn storm is coming this way.”

“Everyone said it was going to just brush by Louisiana.”

“It stalled, now they say it’s going to turn north and move up the Mississippi.”

“What do we do?”

“We’ve opened the spillways, the 9^th ward is going to flood.  The pumps are still holding up, mostly, but if we don’t get some relief, they won’t for long.”

“We lost the army pumps.  Any word on survivors from the second bridge collapse?”