Rewritting a writing of time-to my friends in eurasia

As I re-write the entries of this blog into a novel, it seems like the level of clarity increases.  Soon enough another viewpoint entirely, though originating with these writings will emerge and be published as a whole volume.  But even that will only be the basis for something greater which you will write. 

The chapters fall like leaves
as I rewrite parts of this blog
soon enough I will be done
when leaves hit the ground
these take on a new order
they did not have on branches
of this initial writing
only when they had time
to dry, to brown, to fall
and time will come soon enough
something may grow from these
after they have decayed
seeds planted by someone else
will give them true clarity
and from the initial decay
something beautiful may grow
this is all we can hope for
that we will lay the smelly bogs
from which true wisdom springs

other nights

Raining again
like everyday
flash and bang
splash and swish
distracting me
from obligations
The other night
I saw the end
of everything
of value to me
the end of time
and all because
you were gone

The universe as a hard drive-editing e-hologram theory

E-hologram theory was developed over several months and many of the original concepts have to be "re-written" to take into account developments as "The Einstein Hologram Universe" is edited for publication later this year.


In the prior conversation of the hologram universe, we discussed that since the universe is nothing but a projection on time, quantum tunneling is explained because there is no real distance and hence moving through barriers is only moving the time of one quantum of matter (tendency) through the time of another quantum of tendency.

 The existence of the universe as a program on a hard drive is not an elegant one, but discussions of quantum tunneling lead to this discomforting analogy.

Quantum tunneling (applied to e-hologram theory) shows that when one set of time coordinates passes through another set of time coordinates, the type of space defined (whether matter or energy) is altered, at least temporarily.  There is no barrier probability (a probability that something which is a mere tendency to return to the singularity can pass through).  The need to pass through time coordinates of another tendency is not difficult because tendency to be anywhere in the hologram is just a function of the coordinates of the time of the tendency after all.

This may be equated to data on a computer hard drive.  The data is given coordinates on the hard drive where they can be found again.  This coordinates can be changed to shift the data from one point to another.  On a display this moving data can be used to project 3 dimensional pictures.  The movement is a function of time, the “move” being at some rate or no movement occurs.  This analogy must be very similar to what happens within the singularity where tendencies (data) are exposed to time to give them coordinates where they are displayed along the time.  Tendencies may be a function of time since only Einstein requires that everything happen at once when time is “coiled”.  In a very real sense the uncoiling of time is the equivalent of running of a program moving data on a hard drive.

love in college

I've had this feeling before
a long time ago, far away
Towering trees reaching up
toward distant mountains
pregnant cloud filled skies
the science was there then
the books spread out unseen
the test deadlines and math
the inability to concentrate
the need to learn anyway
what goes worse together
than the destruction of heart
and complex understanding
which is a type of learning
that requires not memory
but a rearranging of thought
merging the mind with cosmos
but this is more than learning
it is the feeling of being crushed
during the evolution of thought
and yet the choice must be made
there is no surrender to despair
only a fight to the last heart beat
knowing no matter how brave
it will not be the last battle
triumph of thought and life
over emotion and longing
until nothing is left
no heart, no college, no wisdom
only the void the heart failed to fill

How much of e-hologram theory is really new

As the name implies, e-hologram theory derives from existing models.  It can even be said to be a discussion of existing models, but that might be slightly disingenuous.  This has been set out in earlier blog entries, but this idea of novelty or repetition is worth looking at because the differences have a great deal to do with gaining control over what Einstein and Hawkins (and others) would call the universe and what e-hologram theory would call time.
An analogy (maybe an unfair analogy) would be to say that the Einstein and Hawkins model would have you trying to rope an entire corral if you wanted to control it, while E-H theory (e-hologram could easily use Einstein-Hawkins although that would be a little unfair to those discussed otherwise who contributed to the initial formulation of hologram theory) would have you trying to throw a rope around a clock standing in the center of the corral.  This is really the crux of the difference.  Einstein and Hawkins (to a less extent perhaps) are stuck with a singularity (Einstein's prediction of black holes and Hawkins and Penrose's singularity before time) and then a universe.  Einstein actually touched on the E-H theory when he stated that time only existed to give linearity (see the quote in earlier blogs). 
The difference is then one of the "misapplication of time".  H-P theories (or P-H theories if you would) saw the singularity, but then get lost in Einstein's "space-time".  They failed to see that time might exist in a different form in the singularity and that what we experience as "space-time" does not have to take us out of the singularity. 
The evidence (discussed in earlier blogs and in slightly more detail in E-Hologram Theory, the textbook coming soon) is overwhelming that the singularity not only exists, but that you can get to it from many locations in the universe (assuming you can travel at some multiple of the speed of light to get there before your starve or run out of oxygen).  In fact, at least at the center of each galaxy you have an opening to the singularity, regardless of how far apart they are.
This, in turn, suggests (actually screams it rather loudly for anyone listening) that we are not out of the singularity except by perception.  Separation by dimension is therefore only useful for Newtonian observations.  We obsess on Newtonian observations only because everything we do relies on those, without them we'd be in the singularity. 
This, in turn, suggests (screaming perhaps even louder) that dimensions are merely an illusion caused by something.  In order to measure dimensions (as the math discusses earlier) you have to "move" along them which implies time.  In earlier models, this movement is taken as a given to some extent or another.  It is accepted.  In the P-H theories you have 1) the singularity (without time or with a different time) and then you have 2) the big bang, space & dimension with time as we understand it.  This is an equivalent of e-hologram theory "at the transition" point.  Where the two begin to separate is in the acceptance of P-H models of a "post singularity" universe.  Early E-H theory also looked at this, but it is counter-intuitive.  How do you have zero distance between the centers of galaxies (the black holes in the middle) when the galaxies are so darned far apart?  The answer has to be that either the black holes go to different singularities (why bother with such a complicated universe?) or that they all go to the same one (whoops, no distance).   I wouldn't rule out different singularities (or near singularities if you run out of math getting to the middle of the black hole); but it makes for a pretty poor model of the universe compared to a simple, elegant one (elegant only because it's simple) where you can "strip" dimensions from space and have everything go to the same place. 
This in turn suggests (maybe the universe continues to scream) that dimensions may be stripped with time which in turn says that dimensions come from time by virtue of the fact we have to travel along them using time to experience them.  Since all space (matter, what is called vacuum and energy) relies on dimension, everything becomes time and since this means that dimensions are illusionary, we can find that there is no "post singularity" P-H universe, but merely a singularity where time has begun projecting the dimensions by some process which is referred to as burning, uncoiling, etc.
Now "worm-hole" math does suggest that we may move through singularities between different points in space and this blog is on "what's really new".
All this "screams" that E-H theory is not really "new", but is merely the final surrender of all the artificial constructs that the other theories come back to.  We no longer "force" there to be multiple wormholes to different points in the universe (we have better observations now then when those theories were formulated) and we don't have to have a post "big bang" universe with time.  We keep our little singularity, thank you very much.
Singularities (which E-H theory would scoff at since there is only one) are best defined as places of infinite curvature (see the infinite series discussions previously) so that dimensions sort of fold in on themselves and cease to exist by this.  Again, the difference with E-H theory isn't actually different from this at all, but merely states that this is a function of time curving in on itself (coiling and uncoiling of time) which is only experienced as three dimensions (the number 3 is used only to help you Newtonians understand this, the number of dimensions of uncoiling time is relatively unimportant to the fundamental theory).
P-H look to a very dense singularity.  It is infinitely dense, perhaps.  Perhaps changes to "pashaw" in E-H theory.  There is zero density because mass and energy disappear with dimension.  We have an infinitely light, infinitely small singularity because there is neither mass, nor energy, nor space.  Worse still, as indicated above, the observed universe is "screaming" this at us.  There is nothing unobserved in E-H theory, no hidden energies, no "beyond" the universe as we observe it.  It's just time.  Getting back to our original analogy, you lasso time, you lasso everything!   That is what's different about E-H theory in a nut shell.   Now that doesn't stop me from cooking breakfast every morning, but it does mean that I've already cooked breakfast before I start in the singularity and that to one extent or another I'm still in the singularity (along with Hawkins and Penrose and Einstein and YOU, theoretically) a place which would be pretty crowded with all of us in there together except that there is no space, no dimension to separate us, no time to separate us.  This gives rise to how time comes to exist as a circular argument which is covered in great detail in earlier blog entries and remains on the planks from which we will ultimately be able to understand and control time.  This single steering knob, the clock that is lassoed in the corral where everyone has been casting their ropes explains the difference of how much (or how little if you would) is really new.  And it doesn't even matter whether it's new or not, who can tell with all that screaming, anyway?
This is not to suggest that anyone is wrong or that there is any originality in E-H theory.  It derives from what is already out there, it doesn't contradict math, it does mean that not only should be study time more carefully, but that our studies of virtually everything else have been a study of time.  We are looking at the smoke to study fire and once we begin to actually study the flame we gain a different understanding of the same science.

time apart

If I said that I love you
and you did not hear it
the first time you told me
that we could not be together
the stones were put in motion
that would bury us here today
every time you took another lover
another stone was laid between us
mortared with the memories made
in our stolen moments as friends
behind the wall my love survived
you cannot let yourself believe me
and I cannot tell you how I feel
there is too much weakness
in me, in artificial separation
but not in you, you abide all
strong because you must be
but the time alone weakens us
behind the pain that you feel
for every day we are apart
it cuts me deeper than you
because I have my pain
and also I have yours
now and forever

Why Study Time

Aside from the conclusions that our universe is made of little bits of time; the question of why study time is worth considering.
First, time has not been as fully examined as it should be given the fact that it is inherently fundamental in every equation of physics.  While in recent times, more effort has been made to consider time and while time has been the subject of science fiction (perhaps everyone knows of the classic "The Time Machine"); most science historically and even recently accepts time as a constant.  It is accepted.  Time is the "t" in the equation.  We work with time as it passes mathematically relegating past time to historians some of whom are poorly suited to the concepts in this blog and in the soon to be released "The Einstein Hologram Universe" (Watch for it on amazon).
As set out in this blog and as discussed in more detail in "The Einstein Hologram Universe" fundamental physics springs from time more than any other feature.  Space (dimension and the contents- mass and energy) and gravitational attraction are directly linked to time at a fundamental level.  The evidence set out within the E-H-U empirically shows that space and its contents must stem primarily from time, and at least mathematically from a "singularity" which exists without dimension or time as we experience it.
In a future blog (and in later chapters of the book) we explore the ethics of thought in a universe where thought gives rise to time.  This "circular argument" springs from the fact that infinite series which we experience indicate that similar circular math could control the singularity.  If this is accepted, I would propose that a "pro-life" stance is suggested but wrong.  That is to say that all thought producing life would have value (i.e. we can't eat anything smarter than a turnip if we are true to this theory) when I think the suggestion is that the concept of the long term protection of "good thought" is more important.  The reasoning is that there was already sufficient thought to give rise to time (this is a mathematical, not philosophical theory in E-H-U theory) so that creation or protection of thought for the sake of making enough thought would be unnecessary. This, however, is for another blog entry.