Turning my back on peace

I made a decision which affected my Thanksgiving holiday to beat my plowsheers and pruning hooks into swords.  It is important when one undertakes an adversarial role to pull ones mind from the diversions of peace and focus them on the enemy.  I do not use that word lightly.  It is not an enemy I made, but instead one that that made its corporate mind up against me.  I am baffled to be its selected target, but it is time to place my natural timidity aside and so I have begun to spend my time on other undertakings.  The process towards the floating car you are hoping to get from me has come to an end for a time, or at least is hampered, except to the extent that the war will direct me to come up with weapons of intellect in place of those brutal ones of metal and words.

I cannot ask anyone to support me in this undertaking who does not want to, anymore than I can truly be upset that no country has built me a laboratory in some dormant volcano.  But I have to harden myself against those who will not support me just as I must harden myself against those feelings of compassion and peace which are anathema to the warrior.

So do not ask of me what you would not ask of someone else who is at war, for it is not in me to do everything and not everything at once.

NLT-antigravity, the new Jetson and Richard Feyman one of more than one

I don't know that I should care about the results of my endeavors.  I will end up dying on a desert sea and my indifferent readers are as faithless as my fickle lovers.
And yet, the only chance you have of a "jeston car" will come from this work, from me.  You know the absence of a hidden, fully equipped (jacuzzi?) cave laboratory will slow this process but you do nothing
But you don't care to be inconvenienced, to have to worry about anything.  You want it handed to you.  You want to know, how is it possible?  How happy it would make me to hold this from you, to deny you the pleasure of getting something for nothing, the only price of admission a look into my tortured soul.  But you don't even care for that, it is merely something to go through before you get to the explanation.
First, understand it is probably not possible.  But there is a theory.  To start with, let's talk a little about how we solve equations for non-linearity.
The gravity of bodies is governed by the inverse square of distance and the product of mass
g(m1*m2)/r^2.  G is a constant, the gravitational one.
We know in NLT that distance (r) is a function of changing time coordinates relative to one another and relative to a standing singularity.  We know that mass is solved for compressed time coordinates and is visible only when they change.  These can all be reduced to changing coordinates and the gravity extends from the initial change of one coordinate at a time, but gravity does not increase no matter how much coordination is present because there is no added time, just compression.
Hence both the top of the equation and the bottom of the gravity equation are governed by NLT concepts of changing time coordinates and compression.  We also know that the gravity of the two masses dates back to the non-linearity of the initial movement from non-linearity.  The initial change of one coordinate from non-lineairity to linearity carries forward no matter how many states of compression follow, no matter how much the time coordinates change.  Equally importantly, there is only movement from the singularity in response to change.  If the coordinates ceased to change, no matter where in the universe, the coordinates would be in the singularity, without gravity and while memory of space might remain, the fact that particles do not go non-linear and then linear again (at least not that I've observed yet) it means that this process is unnatural except at infinitely dense time compression when linearity loops back to non-linearity, a c^infinity type of compression.

A body reacts to a force by changing its velocity over time inversly to its mass, the more mass, the slower the change.  Velocity is a function of time being the change of coordinates over time.  It is an absolute being a function change for non-linearity.

The feature of this combination of gravitational "force" to mass means that the rate of change from non-linearity remains constant, while the rate of change relative to other compression states varies.
Gravity can be said, therefore to decrease over distance, but is a constant regardless of the amount of change.

If we can figure out a way to either "borrow" the change from non-linearity from the future, or store it up from the past, using the interrelation of the other features, we may be able to have a temporary non-linearity (non-gravity) substituted for a future increase in non-linearity.  To say that such a product would be easy from a position of creatures who have no understanding of the environment of the non-linear environment is a bit naive, but there is one person in this blog who does have an understanding of it.

Floating by borrowing from further gravity or increasing non linearity and  then releasing it later and over "time".
Because one fundament of NLT is that we exist in the singularity and that change in coordinates is not actual  but is, instead, pre-ordained, illusory change, who is to say that we are not pre-ordained to have this ability to change.  Well that was poorly put.  Who is to say that I am not pre-ordained.

NLT-A peak into the land of god 8 of 10 why don't the numbers line up perfectly part cat

NLT is all about solving problems.  It is also about internal consistency.
We've eleminated the Higgs Boson.  But we still have this whole question about reality.  Oh how irritating it is to have to handle these issues without a secret cave laboratory!
Anyway, you are sitting there thinking this whole NLT doesn't work because it explains other situations, black holes, gravity and such, but what have I done for reality lately,the boring day to day life you have to live because you are not mad like I am.  Well, there's an explanation for that.

The question that NLT will answer today (without the cave) is why NLT makes your trees and flowers possible even though time remains non-linear.  We live in a universe of quantum phenomena, but we keep find them as waves when we look closely.  Yes we call the waves strings, well I don't but some people do,  But they're still both quantum phenomena and non-quantum phenomena...or aren't they?
The reasons why large systems have quantum aspects that disappear is because of...exponential compression and the transitions they represent.   That is, these are quantum phenomena, they are quantum items of compression, but on close examination, if you look close enough one quantum system breaks down into the prior system.  As long as compression remains the quantum elements exist, but as you get to small enough states, as you divide them, you see the previous time state, that is once the compression level is small enough, you loose sufficient concentration to remain stable.

And so the end game is to figure out how to generate a state where it is sufficiently non-linear to overcome gravity, a negative gravity state so your cars will float like the Jestons.  It will definitely happen faster if I get the the cave.

NLT and the end of popular fiction

At last the next paper on NLT is finished.  The holiday season will be spent putting into the second edition.  It is good that this is available in advance of the 4th when it is due to be delivered.  There will be more on that including more in the series that have been started.
For now, however, I plan to just relax and write something fun, perhaps I'll publish the whale lawyer.  And there is other work which has been ignored and I have to deal with those things.

Why is it that now all I want to do is write poetry?

The Science Behind "Interstellar" Revealed - Chinatopix http://tinyurl.com/ky9bm3o shared via www.newshog.co

NLT promises features of interstellar travel far in excess of those represented by wormholes, but the promise may not be recognized and it firmly establishes that a wormhole doesn't exist, at least not in the form provided by science fiction.
NLT does provide a permanency that can be either threatening or comforting depending on how you view life in general and your own life in particular.  While there is hope for life, the greatest recognition of hope comes to those who have the greatest courage and, to a lesser extent, the greatest recklessness in living life.

kayak the vanishing Colorado

. i want to go before it's too late.  The secret of climate change is that it is uncertain.  This is not only the story of discovery, beauty and thirst, but it is the story of the uncertainty of rainfall.
We spend all of our time worrying about global warming.  And it may kill us all.  But global cooling would almost certainly kill us all.  And the one thing we can be certain of is that we will experience both global warming and global cooling eventually.  That we will all die and all we can do is to live rightly because even death is an illusion and life is an illusion and it is within the power of each of us, powerless as we are, to decide how we do them.

Record Drought Reveals Stunning Changes Along Colorado River http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/11/141123-lake-powell-colorado-river-drought-water/

NLT-A peak into the land of god 7 of 10 why don't the numbers line up perfectly part tres

There are few clues why we do not see simple transitions of linearity between clock time states.
First let's look at the history.
We cannot look for just patterns because photons and space have no real comparison, nor do photons and waves. Only at the transition of energy to matter do we begin to see quantum effects clearly.
While the equation e=mc^2 (ct3 to ct4) is familiar enough, the equation energy=photons*c (ct2 to ct3) is not well known, nor would it be easily understood if it was observed.
The much more complicated transition space=photon*c^1/2 (ct1 to ct2) is not only unknown but impossible to fully comprehend based on observations since we do not see transitions of this type.  And then we have Non-linearity to linearity.  Since the fractions can go infinitely in either direction c^ infinity or c^1/infinity non-linearity appears less as a starting point and more as an intermediary state of force that we only perceive as a starting point because we do not understand transitions or linearity.
We suppose that quantum gravity is a critical place because quantum gravity seems to be largely consistent from non-linearity forward.  However, we may also look at linearity and non-linearity as merely transitional states among the many others that we perceive and understand better but which are not terminal in either direction.
Therefore, we can take the initial linearity as a base equation and gravity as a measure of quantum change and transition.  We should be able to identify a feature of gravity that corresponds to 2^n transitions, but we should look for something that is more irrational.
What we are seeing here is a potential failure of quantum theory once we get beyond non-linearity.  It also contains the only possibility for true randomness, because consistency is built into the non-linear/linear transition.
In such a case, even linearity becomes little more than the force by negative ct(0).  All of our conceits must give way.  Even Non-linearity becomes nothing more than a time orbit, the very existence of time itself is only one step back,  Where it goes back to is unknown, but go back further it must in which case all of CT states are merely extension of this pre-linear foundation and perhaps, in that foundation, lies the fundamental particle which can be traced using exponential notation.

We are looking at light speed as a standard for scale, but we also know that scale doesn't work very well in any of the transitions, although there are reasons to believe that transitional speed in relevant to the inquiry. Let's look at the scale errors in the universe.  Will use what we most closely observe, the smallest such particle that is stable alone (at least for an extended time) being an electron which is at the scale of 10^-20 vrs that "accepted" Planck length of 10^-8. We are working with very rough numbers because exactitude would require abandoning mass entirely in favor of changing clock times and their effects.  This error is 10^12.

The next "error" is the electron (to allow a common scale) to BH which should be 10^32 (at most) and is instead 10^62 ( margin of error of 10^30; 3 times the error.  However using planck length as the common scale, the margin of error for the two examples below (from the prior post) are 10^46 to 10^42 which are, shockingly, the same as the scale of error (at least using the average) as the scale of error for the plank length to electron mass error.

Is this some coincidence or some sort of "scale" error that follows all transitions.  For example, is the Planck lengths to electron error of 10^12 a standard error of transition that would be found in moving from electron down to photons?  From Photons down to space?
Does it carry forward for the larger transitions?  And what would such a large factor represent?  A measurement correction, god bridging some space?

Remember too that this factor of 10^12 is NOT just 10 followed by 12 zeros.  No it is an exponential function x^n.   We assume that it is 2^n, but it need not be.  If Non-linearity is not an end point, then what else might fail in this intersection of information theory and quantum theory.  Let's look at the problems with coincidence.

3^n where n changes yields-0-1, 1-3,2-9,3-37, 4-111, n-etc
compared to 2^2 yielding     0-1, 1-2,2-4,3-8,  4-16,n-etc
Originally the numbers for 3 seem very far off, but if you ignore planck length and instead concentrate on a single building block (CT1, for example) if you back out all the prior states you get 111-37-9-3=62 or 10^62.  That happens to match up fairly well with what you might expect in terms of transitional size.
For the energy equation (which Einstein measured at 10^16) you would use 37-9-3=25
Still not very satisfying. So let's look at something different.  We know that the transition between photons and wave energy is difficult to imagine.  A 1^n is always going to be 1.  1^whatever=1
a 2 transition we know, as well as a 3.
a 4 transition grows very fast indeed, and is somewhat off the common scale.
But if we approach a number without arriving we get to a different type of scale.
In order to look at this, let's assume we use the next lower scale:
1 phase change=1 (1-0)
2 phase change=3-1=2
3 phase change=9-3=6
4 phase change=37-9=28
Let's combine the two, the next higher plus the next lower of higher change
CT(1)scale1(2)+scale2(1)=3
CT(2)scale(4)+scale2(3)=7
CT(3)scale(8)+scale2(9)=17 (close to the observed 10^16 scale)
CT(4)scale(16)+scale2(27)=43 (not so far off from the plank scale, but surprisingly close if you include the CT3 state (17+43=60) for the electron weight to the observed electron size.
These patterns are meaningless, however, even though there are reasons (negative times giving rise to energies,etc) to look for them unless you can find some reason for such a pattern.
The complexity of the analysis, however, should not detract for the fact that patterns may be intentional or accidental and the explanations for the transitions that we know must reflect those that are more subtle and based on the change in informational states.
We are down to three more points of inquiry...but first

Here is the set of equations and observations that we used in trying to select a proper scale:

What is seen is that much of this matter remains in orbit, increasing the gravity of the black hole (CT5) until a second unit of black hole is created (2x10^32 would be the starting point, but not the ending point.

The largest black hole is approximate 17billion times as large as the sun.

The smallest black hole is 6.3 suns.  So we can say that a "hydrogen black hole" is 6.3 suns, a "helium black hole" is 12.6 suns.  These very rough numbers can be worked backwards to get the size of fundamental units of other items (10^32 into 6.3 suns would tell you the size of the smallest particle of matter under this theory although that very rough number doesn't work any better than Planck Mass works for the smallest fundamental particle of matter).

Roughly, this yields the following analysis: 2x10^33g as the weight of the sun, 1.26x10^34g for a hydrogen black hole (hbh).  HBH^1/32=11.6 grams.

This suggests that a fundamental particle of matter would be 11 grams (that’s a lot since an electron is 9x10^-28 grams and a proton 1.6x10^-24grams).  We can make this worse.  Using an electron as the minimum size (as opposed to any of the other quark particles) this suggests a conversion rate of 2^64 which implies an intermediary stage or a jump in quantum size of compression 2^16 (2^4) jumping to 2^64 (2^6).  This progression of 0,1,2,3,4,6 has some frightening characteristics.  For example 0+1+2=3; 1+3=4;2+4=6 suggesting the next progression would be 3+6=9.  There is no basis for a non linear progression that comes to mind, but this would still be a patterned progression and if it turns out to be accurate, it would be worth additional study. 

Using Plank Mass (PM)  you get a conversion rate of 10^38 (sun) vs 10^-8 (Plank mass which is 10^46^th and which is probably outside the astronomic margins of error for 10^32.  However PM has been calculated using magnetic flux as 2.5x10^-4g  http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.0058.pdf.  This yields a factor of 10^42.  For electrons the scale appears way off 10^-28 to 10^34 which is 62, very close to the 10^64 integer jumping 2^6.

So you have PM which, while far from perfect, is at least a little closer.
The deviation for matter minimum size to Planck minimum size is smaller (10^20) than the electron minimum particle to black hole prediction-(off by 10^29) but both show predictions wildly off from observations.

For electrons to BH you have 10^62 and for protons or neutrons it would be 10^58 in terms of a pure mass scale.  The “obvious” question is what is half way in size between a black hole and an electron where you have the so called “missing link” of matter.  We can find some candidates.  One possibility would be a black hole with no acretion disk, no populated event horizon.  While such a "point" would have some "size" (fundamental particle size for a black hole just as we have the different types of fundamental particles for matter) it would be very hard to see.  Unfortunately, it woudl also likely be at the center of several solar systems (from collapsed stars of a size 1/2 the size of 3.6 suns).  Now these solar systems would be hard to see since they are dark so we cannot rule this out completely.  There are more important aspects, however, that we should look harder at.  Fundamental particle size is variable.  From Plank Mass to electron to proton to neutron to quark and, god forbid we go off on this tangent, strings (see the article above for a more thorough discussion of going in for harmonics vs something more).  The concept of orbits allowing the formation of several intermediary stages of matter and the concept that we have "massless" formations (EMF and Photons, not to mention space, but we mentioned it) and then "jump" to mass at the matter to energy transition indicates that mass is the wrong "scalar" for tracking change.

Since we know that an electron is a scale smaller than planck length of 10^-20 we can say that a lot more goes into the analysis of minimum particle size than a little math error.

We end up with some choices.   First you can reject Non-linear time entirely, but that requires a rejection of Einstein and I’m not ready for that.  Another is that you skip states or have intermeidate unobserved states which seems to work fairly well (10^-28 to 10^34 is a scale change of 10^62 which is very close (in terms of galactic hand grenades) to 10^64 which would be two states larger than matter (2^4 to 2^6).  The next higher state suggested (10^512) would take a whole mess of black holes to reach, but so would the next linear state of 2^6.  The final and best choice relates actual observation to mathematical calculation.  We find these discrepancies for plank length vs fundamental length of particles observed.  There are different ways to calculate plank length and different ways to define mass.  It means that the reliance on the electron scale or Planck Mass scale is unwarranted.

http://thewestsidestory.net/2014/11/22/21589/space-researchers-may-found-albert-einsteins-black-hole-object/

NLT and Berkley Square

This movie has as good a description of NLT as most scientific texts I have seen (1933).  I hate to misquote it, but it has a beautiful description of the constancy of time.
The movie is basically about an Engish scientist who goes back in time to have sex with a cousin and then falls in love with someone else.  What a very strange premise for a movie, but one which I think should be remade.
However, the description of NLT:
He describes to a modern (1933 modern) a description of non-linearity:
Imagine a man on a river who passes a tree.  After he passes, the tree is still there.  Imagine sitting in a field of clover nearby.  The clover remains.
Then imagine flying over it all in an airplane.  You can see the tree and the man in the clover.
Of course, to really show non-linearity the man in the plane would have to see the other person in the two different positions, but it is still a wonderfully strange movie.
It shows the most interesting discussion of how people from different times with different expressions would interact, but from a starnge perspective, post revolutionary and quoting Lincoln is the 1787 range.  It is quite amusing in its use of expressions.
Amusingly the counterpart from 150 years before changed places with the character from the future, but the story of his presence is only shown through a few words of a maid and the occasion comment from someone else.