Pages

Thursday, August 18, 2016

article review - we're all still bozos on this bus

Still looking for bozos?
http://www.universetoday.com/130333/physicists-maybe-just-maybe-confirm-possible-discovery-5th-force-nature/
Yes, I know they are bozons, but what a load of crap.  You'd think physicists could do better.
It's hard to believe the key to physics was disclosed 2600 years ago on the quantum level and that scientists were confusing the solution for the next two millennia (until me of course...and you who pointed this out to me).
The crazy thing is that AuT explains reality in a way that ties all the minutia of life to a very simple starting ppoint, but equally important to a fairly simple ending point.  It allows you to look at where you'll be in six week or six millenia and to understand that the physics which ties this day to that one is nothing more complicated that getting from one answer to another where each step is directly related to next.
All the old fashioned pre-AuT physics geniuses are looking a shadows and trying to breath life into them because they cannot accept that the genius that is within each of us, is also a part of that solution.
The idea comes to mind that given the need for a crazy solution at the far end, it is possible for us to come up with a sane set of steps to get there. And yet, because AuT is not taught, people bumble along more or less randomly.  Of course, sticking man-made religions which are absolute nonsense in AuT even if god isn't mucks up the work, but monkeys are a superstitious lot and the rubber bands and pins that hold the universe together and which are stacked together to get to the next universe don't easily release us to logic, apparentlyrequiring stupidity, hatred and superstition to get the windings and unwindings required to get from one spot to the next.
As long as I'm not with you, I can hardly complain about the stupidity of everyone else.

The boy in the ambulance

The need for term limits and more particularly a state constitutional convention is rendered obvious by the realities of what I'll call the "bush legacy" even though it could be blamed on a series of failed policies some of which date back to Nixon and which have been embraced by republican and democrat alike.  Ok, you could go back to Kennedy or anyone after Grant.
And yet, despite the lessons of history, the best we can do in the current presidential election is no better than the worst selection for congress and congress as a whole is filled with a retch worthy group that even condemns itself.
Our enemies are assisted by our government because it is all about their own personal agrandisement.

Perhaps when this shows our children, although  in truth these are all our children.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/syria-boy-ambulance_us_57b55e68e4b095b2f5429032?ir=WorldPost&utm_hp_ref=world


Tuesday, August 16, 2016

building an algorithm 8

AuT is better at providing a complete explanation  for quantum phenomena because it is worked out in both directions.  That being said, it continues to be a moving target.  Changes have been made to issues as fundamental as everything happening at once to the potential for any point by virtue of an algorithm durably held in whatever is the singularity.
It remains possible in the signularity that the infinity that equal parts positive and negative states at the final turn of the ingoing F-series spiral would exist.   While we scoff initially at the idea of the infinite being in existence, that is only becauase in our universe of false space time it is impossible.  Of course, if it's possible in g-space than the religious crowd have another argument in their arsenal for some type of god, although I remain convinced that a "caring god" one that gives a god-damn one way or the other is an oxymorn in the present universe.
Terse little summaries keep coming out of this work in progress.  Here is one.  Force is merely the result of requiring a certain next state solution as x increases leading to very long chains of events to achieve simle compression or expansion results.  This summarizes the earlier discussion that a million people acting together to create an event, say a nuclear device, are only acting in that way because the decompression of the fissionable material was destined by the solution of x at that later point.
I want to focus on the quantum states at the beginning for a moment.
There is no reason why, within each triangle, there isn't a change with every change in the value of x.  Indeed the constant change requirement almost ensures this is the case.  This means it isn't a straight F-series building, but it is an F-series building of quantum points which change within their own features at each change in the value of x.  It also takes us back a step to time dilation by virtue of state changes since matter changing from 0 to 5 along the F series would take twice as long as space to cover the same type of circuit (0,1,1,0 vs 0,1,1,2,3,5,0).  While this alone doesn't explain time dilation, it might play a role.
The drawings themselves while instructive are mileading because they are only an initial model of how two time states would add together.  How this shifts the "nodes" at which connections are made and which node or nodes are points of attachment are the next area of inquiry.
While the changing angles indicate that only a single node would be the point of attachment for each two states to make the next state, the possibility for some sort of overlap might result from the shifting of angles and may be responsible for many of the features of compressed states (ct2, 3, etc).
An attachment at a node is necessary because there is no actual line or space between the notes so only nodes are locations where anything can join.  The distances are illusory but show how dimensions are generated by the formula.
Each point will exist in a spiral defined by it's position in the f-series, but no spirals actually exist..
So one triangle in the drawing lasts in its current state, permanently kept in state for as long as the sprial in which it appeared lasts  Where two points exist in a spiral building block, they both live the same length or more correctly with no length at all other than one which is a solution to a mathematical algorithm..
Compression indicates and expansion of the univeerse indicates that some space will cycle quickly, some will cycle for a very long period of time which argues that the subsummed solutions remain and continue to change along with the individual building blocks in each one so that the converging infinite series of a positive and negative cancelling each other when x=infinity remains viable.
The suggestion is that adding spirals means that states never change, but it appears that they do change for each subsequent arm of the spiral even if preserved in the original less gravity be lost and less all be fixed.
I am not pleased with your silence.



Saturday, August 13, 2016

building an algorithm 7 xx

The hard part for us to accept is that when an atomic bomb is exploded, it is based on this same simple algorithm, albeit with whatever permutations allow for compression and the like.  The rough drawings that were done earlier showing how the spirals can build and interact is only half of a very large, but not overly complex puzzle of how interaction occurs.
So let's pick an obvious example of expansion from a compressed state to an uncompressed state.  We could look at the sun instead for the opposite, but it's too easy.
When the physicist using pre-AuT math figures out how fission works, that is part of a long spiral process.  In following stages, other physicists join in the planning, chemists and engineers also begin working on the problem, then miners and prospectors get involved, military leaders ask for funds, politicians grant them, carpenters build buildings and on and on.  All of this effort is directed towards the ultimate process of exploding the bomb (assuming it is exploded) which is not so much of a 'goal' as a natural effect of the process which appears to have enormous amounts of self determination and discovery, but which is actually just a reflection of what is shown to be a fairly complex formula.
As the sketches show (I'll copy one here) even with a tiny, tiny value of x, one so small that it has no significance in our universe, something that includes only a hand full of space quanta of information, is so rich and complex that it appears that a very high value of x would be unimaginably complex and, indeed, that is what we see when we look at examples of how the process works in our univese.
We, well technically all the physicists before me, lose track of the math trail and fail to see that every movement we make is part of this integrated process based on a very simple algorithm.

What we're looking at may be only half of 4 to 5 quantum of space.  If you can imagine that complexity times 4^4^6^8^10^16 then you get to but a single quantum of matter, perhaps what we call a single quark.  Once you see this scale you begin to understand how these states may interweave to give the appearance of self determination and randomness which seduces even relatively intelligent people into the belief in something more complicated, like classical physics.
Lower states continue, in this model, to exist with a higher state.  The how is that it builds just like others do.
We know that the exponential stacking is of the next lower state, not from the lowest state.
The 10^16 for matter is 10^16 wave energies, not 10^16 space or photons.
0,1,1,2,3,5 means that wave energies are 6^8 photons and photons are 4^4 spaces.
This suggests the building looks like this:
0,1,1 space
1,1,2 photon
1,2,3 wave energy
2,3,5 matter
3,5,8 black hole
Just looking at this it can be seen that each higher state is literally the addition of the two preceding lower states so that the historical maintenance of states exists, but fades just as history fades in this
history 1
history 2
history 3=history 2 plus 1
history 4=history 2 plus 3 but 3 is 2 plus 1
etc.
Hence, the gravitational element is preserved notwithstanding the change in state and the relative slowing because of the number of changes inherent in the solution (they are spirals if you draw them out but they are just solutions to a math equation if you don't) last longer (3 movements take 3 times as long as 1 movement).  And, yes, the 0 transition you see in space has some weird effect.  It is not a plus or minus type of solution and for this reason gravity appears separate from other energies reflected in these relative movements since it is the change from this place of non-linearity to a linear solution.
The reappearance of the F-series is not coincidental and while it is dictated by math once you accept the model, I didn't go looking for it even though I knew it would be there (you did too if you've been reading my work) because the algorithm can only grow more complicated by building on itself, new mathematics cannot come into play spontaneously because that isn't how our universe works.  We have a simple universe based on a single algorithm changing in response to a single variable.
The number of changes thereafter can be counted understanding that only one change happens at a time for any quantum of information which is a major leap from classical physics, perhaps the most important, understanding that what we call speed is an illusion, as is time dilation.  This doesn't mean they do not exist for us, only that we don't know...well we didn't know, what we were looking at till now.
This is hard for you to understand and you'll reject it just as religious fanatics cling to their ideas of god in the face of circumstances that indicate how pedantic that is.  However, it is the interconnectivity of things that creates all of the forces that pre AuT physicists see as driving the universe and which they rely on to allege there is no true randomness  The problem is that those classical physicists think their "forces" are the driving elements, all operating separately with some "oooohhh mysterious" connection between them and between them and gravity.  AuT shows the connection to be relatively mundane and easily explainable and shows how all these different forces acting across the illusory vast differences can yield a very complex interwoven series of events to accomplish individual acts of compression or expansion which are pre-ordained to happen as x changes.
The rejection of the insights of AuT are the result of little more than superstition.  I have the same problem, but for some reason my spirals are a bit more on the receiving end of intelligence rather than superstition.  Still, if you go back a dozen or two posts, you'll see my enumeration of things I accepted as part of this theory and then had to reject in the face of overwhelming math to the contrary and others will come and go as the model is perfected if I don't abandon this line of inquiry or die but that solution is also given.


Friday, August 12, 2016

building an algorithm 6

http://phys.org/news/2016-08-nasa-fermi-mission-dark.html
Here's a wasted billion.  I figured out why they'd never find the higgs boson.  Don't believe me?  Read back in the old  posts, you'll not only see the prediction and the reason but you'll see me cry "bullshit" when they said they'd found it before they admitted they didn't.
Same with dark matter.  Idiots spending a billion dollars to find something I already told them what was.  Incredibly stupid.
Anyway, the big bang is another issues that was explained away (albeit the route led to the big bounce type of methodology although I explained it whereas the big bounce theory is just more 3 dimensional idiocy.  But we see three dimensions.  Why the third dimension?  It is to prevent to types of information from occupying the same place at the same time. Because they close in (converging infinite series) there is no overlap in 3 dimensions although as the drawing shows there would be in two.
It has been shown that alignment and not overlap seems to work.  Why?  Because if you look at those triangular drawings you think in terms of space.  However, the triangles are only representations of non-linear environments, they are only yes/no or in the case of the triangles 0,1,1,0 drawings.
The drawings in the prior page show a single spiral which is interesting because it goes back and forth, but it isn't as inconsistent as it looks because the single spiral (each two prior states added to make the next one) include within them all the echos of those prior spirals states so you have both a single main spiral and as many sub-spirals as there are values of x!  Not surprising, but there it is.  This suggests that movement of each point or at least along each point 0to1, 1 to 1, 1 back to 0 and the negative for each point in space as each change is made is logically included, although this requires a great deal more discussion of those drawings and you'll have to wait for that.
The movement from 0 to 1 is the movement from non-linearity to linearity which is where gravity can be found (as opposed to the mythical particle they spend billions to find.  Likewise, mass necessarily comes from the same function which is why looking for dark matter is so inane when we're surrounded by it, it being the information in this half in/half out state.
Since everything has mass, we can also posit that other states maintain this so that, for example, photons are not just 1,1,2 but are instead 0,1,1,2; wave energy being not 1,2,3, but 0,1,1,2,3.  There are problems with this, because the sharing of the 1 state makes the wave/particle duality of energy attractive because of the shared state, but it's worthy of consideration both ways.
The other seductive quality is that this allows us to "slow" change.  For matter you have one change at a time so 0,1,1,2,3,5 would be slower to occur than 0,1,1,2,3 but this is probably a "red herring" in the universe.  Instead the 1,1,2, the 1,2,3 and the 2,3,5 exist individually just as other F-series functions do and the compression of states reducing the interaction with the lower states controls the dilation of time.  Again the sharing of the 1 state in all prior states (space, photon and wave) might keep them aligned better in terms of speed although the compression function of AuT almost has to control (you can find it ad nauseum in these posts or in the book).
Both need to be developed.
It's pathetic because if I had 1% of the funding for any of those projects where they're looking for something I've already told you how to find I could finish the several plots necessary to determine the exact mathematical derivation that best fits the observed universe just as I fairly handily with no money from anyone figured out how compression works, how that makes the big bang operate, what dark matter was, and the fundamental way in which the universe is built from a single variable universe, history included.

Building an Algorithm 5

How will we define g-space?  Quite simply we will define it by what it does and what it shows.  Matter and energy and time as we understand them have absolutely nothing to do with what it will be like.
On the physics front what we've been doing is working forwards (from non-linearity) to see if we can meet what we did working backwards from observation.  It is working surprisingly well so far, but there are snags, because going from a non-linear environment to one with dimensions has a number of variations which is what we'll discuss here.
The separation of phenomena must lie in the addition of separate phases which is also the thing which seems to connect past events together.  These are logical outcomes, but the strange one, history, seems to be no more of an issue than the one that seems so common, dimension.
So let's look at our math, which is a poor starting point, but it's what we have, and figure out how this works:
Pi*1 radian=180
so if pi is approx 3.14etc then 1 rad=57.30  approx
Now in AuT we have a changing, but precise pi.
In this case pi can be defined exactly for any value of x.
So from our perspective if pi =4-4/3=8/3 then 1 radian is equal to 180*3/8=67.5  This represents a circle which is not curved but which is made up of quantum lines at specific angles to one another and the quantum is not an actual length but is merely one yes/no relative to the next.
The next value is 4-4/3+4/5 which if you do the math yields a radian equal to a more complex number 51.923...
For purposes of this exercise, we're going to go out one more place even though we are looking at the very, very early AuT universe, nowhere near where we are today
The next value is 4-4/3+4/5-4/7 yielding 62.171...
This yields the drawing that we've looked at, but when they are added, the result is a little more peculiar.  Assumptions are made to get this drawing:
0,1,1,0 for example
Also there is a baseline so that the difference in the value of 1 radian shifts the angle from a common baseline which may not be the case.  The drawings are approximate also so the angles are not exact but the left opposite facing triangle is approximately 3 times as angled as the right and this will see saw back and forth as does the solution for pi.


If all of the points had a single origin, you'd get the result on the left (common origin).  But the points come up sequentially so you get the much more complicated version on the right.  However, this is an F-series variation so the actual x=3 shifting origin might look more like this:


We're going to use the bottom x=3 even though I can give you a good reason for using the other version of shifting origin for x=3, but the results are similar.
Unfortunately, the amount of potential variation in the solution depends on what is changing other than the value of pi so that the number of potential changes is growing rapidly and the complexity of the resulting universe is rapidly changing.  I is not immediately obvious, but the change in the positive or negative result along with the changing angle will quickly result in a drawing that is a mass of lines so complicated that the relatively simple universe that we experience is overwhelmed.  Worse still there is no reason why the point of differentiation has to shift around a single point.  Adding two states together to get a fourth can vary a great deal particularly since every other change includes positive and negative elements.
You don't want to give any feedback to speak of but you want to see everything, so I will show you this.  
The image below shows this for a shifting point of origin on the right based on the approximate center and the one on the left shows a common point of origin.  Again, many assumptions (like the node point of attachment and roughly drawing the angle and not having the angle origin shift) are made to make the drawing more simple.
These are not, however, the most complicated version of this formulation.  The series based on a shifting point of origin appears to yield the more spiral galaxy version, a more gravitation-ally centered result, so we can pick that one over the other common origin point which makes less sense for several reasons.
These images show how compression can occur based on common direction of the spirals, but it is far from complete.
We have to have more dimension, so if it satisfies you, and it certainly doesn't satisfy me, we can have the same angles come out of the page where there is overlap giving us an additional varying dimension and three dimensional space based on a two dimensional environment.  To envision this, just think that at every overlap, the same angle off the parallel to this line:_____ comes out of the page that same amount and in both directions to reflect the positive and negative alternating variations in pi.





Thursday, August 11, 2016

Another break

Well, it's never enough for you but there it is
I've set out the fundamental equation for all time and space
I've laid out the basic principle and methodology for how things work
This along with compression, which I've yet to adequately address
and the unknowns of the fundamental from which springs these durable equations
and allows a new +/- equation and allows a solution to remain durable to the next
But those things will come in time to me because I am able to reach down into the hell
the one that I live in because I can't learn the lessons of my own brilliance
and as long as I can do that then I will remain 3-5 years ahead of everyone else
which is where I live.  It is 2016 to you, but it is 2019 to me
I control destiny, my own and perhaps yours
my sn project to bring tl to the world
but that isn't for you to understand, not yet
but it is coming and there is little that you can do about it
and all i can do is speed it or slow it down
and i understand as you are only beginning to understand
that no matter what I do, it is done and no matter how you believe you are there
you are nothing more than the inevitable
a solution to a single variable which I have laid bare, naked to the world
just as my soul lies bleeding from a mortal wound
my dying eyes, blind to all those things you take for granted
inviting being stripped of everything i own
so i can be free at last


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q