AuT The list video and the thorny problem of time

This is the 4th video in the works (no audio yet).  It covers "the list" of items which were mysteries before AuT but are mysteries no-longer.
They are no longer mysteries although the details remain largely shrouded behind, shall we say a lack of funding instead of a lack of intellect?
Anyway, the video of "The List"

https://youtu.be/o2PnTlodtzU

AUT defines how dimension is created, why there is gravity, even what time is and why it dilates.
It is up to better minds than mine to figure out the details of the process.
Indeed, there are a number of potential paths to cross and as the sole path crosser at this point in time it is up to me alone to look at these issues which when finally resolved may have profound practical implications.
There are so many paths to explore and perhaps someone not so intellectually challenged will be able to narrow them down with intellect alone.

Here is a little vignette from book 3 on the thorny problems of dimension and time

Prior theories had problems defining why gravity and the other forces differed.

AuT provides that these are math results and hence field theories will not show those results.

Gravity is the tendency of ct0 (-1 and 1) to change into a state with more differentiation (fpix) and the tendency of that state to fold.

The sin using -1 and 1 derivations of pi (to correspond with the ct0 -1 and 1 solutions) indicate that the result is folding of ct1 to trap ct0 states between them at the maximum rate of 256:27 or perhaps even that precise rate.  The amount of ct0 in the universe can be infinite since it is not tied to dimension or time giving rise to large values for folding.

          The effect of ct0 folding is to create fpix ct1 solutions.  AT this point, predictions can be made concerning the amount of information in the universe and how it is performing with a little more specificity.

The basic choices are that every time x changes another ct1 (as -3) is created.  This is the model that is chosen because its easy to work with.

A similar mode would be to say that every “3” changes a -3 is created.

Another way of looking at this is to say that a single ct3 is created an every time that x changes it remembers the original -3 and that after a time (3 changes?) it adds a 5 and so on.

The exact methodology should be capable of determination.

Since these are both offset and of opposite charge (periodically the same) a situation is created where  positive and negative pairs exist, with or without intervening same value states.

Intervention is so fundamental to the model for gravity and dark energy that intervening same pairs matched with other pairs is almost necessary.  There is no fundamental limit here, but there appears to be a practical limit.

-3-3-3-3,5,5,5,5 is one way the pairing could occur.
Another is-3,5,5,-7 and so on.

Another way is that -A,x,y,z,,+B could occur where the positive or negative value of x,y,z can change between A (a minus value) and B (a plus value).

The “trapping” of the intervening states takes on a very different function depending on which model is used and this can control the number of “trapped” states involved.

Looking at ct2, there are 256 sets which can be viewed as 128 positive (B) and 128 negative (A) with or without trapped ct1 states of dissimilar charge and potentially with ct0 solutions trapped between them.  This is the gravity transition.

After this transition the numbers of A and B states grow exponentially (according to 2f(n)^2^n and the trapping of states becomes more prevalent.

How this occurs at the ct1-ct2 (space to photon) stage has a lot to do with how gravity is generated and how anti-gravity (dark energy) will later be released.

Because the process goes on constantly and in both directions, long periods of net gravity can exist, although over time there should be shifts, the amount of gravity we experience today should be different from what was experienced 1 million years ago at a noticeable transition.

Because the values of fpluspix are very large, however, these are not necessarily as large as they might otherwise be.  We experience them as fixed because the changes in time (as wave information) are relatively fixed from one value of x to the next.

There are ct1 transitions within the matrix and there are ct1 transitions that take them out of the ct2 matrix.

Past the gravity field, there is more transitional material but only at the ct3-ct4 level is the compression high enough to allow the types of internal exchange that give rise to the perception of time.

Why is this possible at 3 dimensions?  The reason is because these lesser transitions occur in the “trapped” information within the ct3-ct4 matrix which includes the ct3-ct2 matrix and ct2-ct1 matrix (and to the extent it exists the ct1-ct0 matrix) all of which differ substantially, but where the ct2-ct1 and ct1-ct0 are substantially different in derivation; thereby creating the differentiation between gravity and other “forces” reflecting higher ct state arm loading and unloading.

Video 1-Final as of 4.27.18 Reposted!

https://youtu.be/wTI_HNSMLAs

Ok, there is the final as of whatever date.
Not sure what happened there but haven't seen an error message like that in a while.  The hand of god and all that.

It takes a moment for the audio to start.
Go ask your mother.

The electron-proton conundrum

I am not post this drawing because it isn't necessary to the post and you can see it on the videos although they may change slightly between the current and final version.  I think Inow only have two more to put finish the video and the first video will be complete.   My hope is that it will happen tomorrow.   I have one outlined and the other should not be too long to outline since i am trying to be general and then get more specific in the detailed videos which are posted but without audio.
This post gives the info for the audio so that you can see the way I go about this analysis.

This is a fairly complicated analysis and it bothers me not a little because it is an attempt to deal with the electron weight problem which at best is off by a factor of 20, but there are ways to approach that issue and the way it is dealt with below, althoughoff by 20x gives a great deal of weight to the electron and explains the weight in terms of theseparation of the proton and electron which is observed, even creating a type of "anti-compression" force in that the extra weight is what prevents the compression which is an amazing concept that fits extremely well into AUT, provides a mechanism for compression vs non-compression and is reasonable in the sense that it allows a way of viewing electrons and protons in a way that allows us to use them as semi-stable states.  It does not perfectly distinguish the other information arm loading possibility, but it does show a mechanism for this unique compression ratio which if imperfect, at least can be used for further consideration.

Where are you when I need you?

Without further ado...

The drawing on the left shows the relative compression between the ct3 wave and the ct4 neutron.

          The drawing on the right shows what it might look like if an electron was compressed with a proton into a neutron based on the different filed information arms between each.

          Equal: The “in each if equal” shows what balanced information arms look like, in ct4 each would have 6.25x10^14 ct3 states or (6.25x10^14*16=1x10^16). 

          The ratio of the electron as 1 to the proton as 15 is 1:15 and this ratio drops (e.g. to 9:7=.77778) as the electron gets bigger. 

          To get to the 1:1836 when you use the relative mass of the two, the difference may be explained by the “electron bundle”.  Using mass, the electron is 1:1836 of a proton.   

          At the 1:15 ratio, this suggests there is 122 times the information in the “bundle” vs the electron itself. 

          Building:

          If the information arms build, however, the first arm would only hold 10ct3 states and the last would hold 1x10^16th. 

          Unequal arms have 10:10^15 at 1:15 (one arm for the electron to 15 arms for the proton) which doesn’t work.  The second ratio doesn’t work any better than the Equal measure.

          However, if you look at electron as 7 arms filled and the proton as 9 arms filled, the numbers begin to align better.

           If each arm builds there is a ratio of 1:100 at 7:9 and 1:10,000 at 6 arms to 10 either set making a complete neutron. (7:9 is 7 arms for the electron to 9 arms for the proton, for example).

          Averaging these (7:9 and 6:10) you get 1:5100 which is, at least along the scale of 1:1838, but still unsatisfying.

          So how do we reconcile these and improve AuT as a model?

1.      Eliminating trapped states to get compression:

          A better analysis occurs if you look at what is happening as you go from 7:9 to 8:8, a matched set.

          Looking at the drawing above you can see the representation of loose states to those within a bundle.

          To get the electron weight up from 1:100 to 1:1800 you would need 18 times the amount of information in the bundle vs the electron itself.  This can be treated as momentum or other features of the mass of the electron, but the point is that there is a lot more of this “trapped” information than actual electron information.  You could take into account the inadequacy of mass as a way of comparing the two, you can arguably change the 18 to 16 but that is unsatisfying.

          A better view is to try to understand what the difference is between 18 times and 16 times the number of intervening lower ct states

          The electron in this case is being viewed as the uneven c3-ct4 state at 7 arms, the proton being the uneven ct3-ct4 at 9 arms.

          The electron bundle (electron cloud) of trapped lower states is 18 times the electron itself so that there are more than 2^n times the stable information lower states trapped between the proton and electron.  If the 18 times is reduced to 16 times, then the separated electron/proton pair can collapse into a Neutron. 

          Put another way, 2^n lower ct states can be between stable next higher ct states which is a satisfying if largely forced result.  It is satisfying because if accurate it can be used to predict how lower and higher states work in terms of intervening lower states.

          The logic of the 7:9 ratio is the only “unequal” balance between a collapsed electron and collapsed neutron.  It is actually a nice place to hold these two.  As you “squish” the 2 times lower states out, you bring the two halves together and eliminate time.  The elimination of ct1 states leads to time dilation as discussed later.

          This allows that the unstable 2x part of electron bundle to be squeezed out when a neutron is formed.  An alternative is that it is compressed into or trapped into the final neutron.

Thankful and disgusted; slides 6 (revisited) and 7

Non-linear time theory was an early version of the project that became Algorithm Universe Theory.
Books 1,2, 7 and 8 took enormous strides.  Book 3 was a little weak but will arise from this video undertaking as a famously illuminating work (NOT YET).  Books 4-6 have tons of worthwhile information, if a little out of date. 
So, Why do people keep ordering Non Linear Time Theory?  I suppose when I publish Book 3 I'll have to call it NLT and add it as the second edition of that just so that when people order that ridiculously out of date book they will get some of the right stuff.
I pulled a print copy of the book out so I can try to find what on earth people are looking for there that they cannot find here.

Anyway, we're here to finish the videos and in truth I am thankful for any and all book orders.   Perhaps I will be able to afford a can of beans tonight.  Please, if you order books, 1-8 (not 3) should be ordered and keep an eye on this blog for before you know it book 3 will be ready and much improved even over the other books in terms of the slideshow presentations.

The first 100 pages (now a total of 235 and bound to get longer) of Book 3 are going to be heavily edited (are already heavily edited to page 37) to support 4 different slide shows that are not being put together:
1) The overview-soon to be complete
2) Compression-the same as the overview with more detail
3) Time Dilation
4) The List-the entire A-S list of things that are mysteries which are solved by AuT from the origin of the big bang to black holes.  While those of you who read these will know the answers and you can find them already published (although a little out of date) in Book 5.

The next post, already written, will cover in a much clearer edit the electron-proton conundrum.

Slide 7 audio: https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/algorithm-universe-theory-autslide7


I have moved on, but here is the last of the support for Video 6, slightly amended from earlier posts.

Main Hypothesis.  Space and Mass are the same thing, and this is only logical.

Space and subsequently dimension including its forms as photons, waves, mass and black holes (inter alia) arise from consecutive compression states which in turn represent mathematical results of a single variable algorithm.

The proton and electron are two transitional states to the stable ct4 state.

           The features of this algorithm assume some aspects of offset F-series intersecting spiral algorithms when it is subject to compression.  The offset is defined by an evolving definition of pi and based on the fundamental (f(pix)) features present in the derivation of pi in light of the observed relationship between F-series compression (1,11,111) and information theory (Fseries(n))^2^n.  The infinite expansion of the f-series is offset by compression.

          Draft hypothesis: The universe is an information based system based on a self-generating single variable algorithm of the following rough form: Sum(x=1 to infinity) Fseries/Information interaction (defined by each element changing (with x) but also the sum of all (changing) elements begin added in the prior two quantum embodiments to form the current quantum state of the universe) where each of the embodiments are offset from each prior embodiment by a definition of pi changing based on an infinite converging series restricted and modified regionally by the value of x, the single variable.

          Curvature is relative change between compression states, folding and the consequent trapping of lower states within higher states of compression.  In uncompressed quantum states there is no relative change, no curvature, no dimension. 

          Change occurs in a dimension free environment, but it manifests itself as dimension much as information is stored in one way and projected in another.  This is much like Hologram theory it occurs in a dimensionless environment, but occurs based on the order of movement.

          As you read/listen to this section, you need to be thinking, "oh but the universe is so rich and beautiful and we are so spiritual that even were there an equation it would have to be impossibly complex" which is total bullshit.  I'm not complaining about spirituality, by the way.  I'm merely expressing the opinion of AuT, not to be completely confused with my opinion since I have a hard time believing this myself. I merely observe that it fits too well to be ignored. 

Algorithm Universe Theory: Updated Video(s)

I deleted all but the Most recent version of the AUT initial Video
https://youtu.be/1ivLB92VTWg updated 4/25/18.  There appear to be some long pauses and a minor amount of repetition in the posted video, not present on the original, but I believe it is bearable and I'll try to look into these features in the final which should be the next one posted.  At that point in time, I expect to work towards a presentation.  Some of the slides may change slightly just as a few slides have been added.
I tried to go back to the older posts and redirect these, but if you saved a link to the old video, well, you might come up empty.

There are 12 slides and I think I am getting better at narrowing down the narration to under 5 minutes.
Its currently about 30 minutes long.  There are 4 slides that have no video yet.  That means 20 minutes or less will be added to the slide show.
1)   There is a graphic (7) on all the information arms, probably a pretty short video given the compression video I'll be producing (see below).
2) There is a graphic (8) on the electron-neutron conundrum, maybe a little longer, but also covered in more detail in the compression video.
3) There is a graphic on the universe as a string (9) which will be a little longer, but not too long.
4) There is a "second" graphic of the release of lower time states (11).  This could be a little longer, but it doesn't add too much to video 10 so it should be short.
I could put all of that information in here, but there is enough already in this blog and the books that are supported that it appears unnecessary.
I am guessing that the final will be 40 minutes more or less, 2.5 minutes per remaining slide.


Even though there is no audio (yet), the compression and dilation videos are nice by themselves even though they are just drafts.

Compression
https://youtu.be/CTCNCSNf9qc
Time Dilation
https://youtu.be/xkiFIX6PQMA

Information Arms, the solution to the electron/proton cunnundrum with a dash of time dilation

In solving for The electron, it becomes much easier to show how the electron bundle is affected during gravity and during velocity.
It also becomes likely that an electron is a 7 arm ct4 transitional state and a Proton is a 9 arm ct4 transitional state.  A neutron is merely a 16 arm ct4 state.
There are two versions of the previous slide and I go back and forth between them  One shows the same number of states on each information arm, the other shows a steady increase; these alternatives are possible for each of the ct states.  That is you can either increase them steadily using the f(x) function or spread them out  no matter what the value of x, a feature of the fibonacci number, I suppose, in conjunction with 2^x.
The two slideshows below cover how this affects (1) compression and (2) time dilation.
There is no Audio to these yet, although I will add that as soon as I finish the current video.

I figured out time dilation in AuT, I think and normalized it with Lorentz.  I figured out what the structure of the electron and proton are and how that works with the neutron.  I figured out what time was.   That is pretty worthwhile conceptually.  Very strange.
I suppose with predestination as a key component, looking for some sort of recognition is absurd.  If it is destined to come, it will.  I have to overcome every physicist in the world to get my ideas accepted, not much of a  challenge, lol.  The sad thing is that I expect to be successful, to prove we have no more control over our little place in the universe than a rock.

Anyway, enough happy stuff, here are the two powerpoint presentations, I made preliminary movies, I have now fought the good fight with google and they are available at these links and under Algorithm Universe Theory on Youtube.  Certainly with my newfound recording expertise, they will be available avec audio next week sometime.

Compression
https://youtu.be/CTCNCSNf9qc
Time Dilation
https://youtu.be/xkiFIX6PQMA

And here are the slides, although maybe a little harder to read than with the youtube vids

Compression

Time Dilation

Audio for slide 5 and a lot of new information

Compression and decompression of information in the universe allows space to become mass and mass to have velocity.  It not only allows the universe to compress prior to a big-bang event; but it also leads to the movement away from a compressed state giving rise to features like force, velocity and time in the universe.
This chart lays out the basic scale of compression and decompression witnessed and how it corresponds to place and dimension.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide5

There is an awful lot going on in the next slide.  So much so that I decided to take a serious look at updating book 3 to bring it in line with the most recent advances in AuT and the slide show before I tackle the one that deals with this deceptively simple drawing:

1) Information arms reflect alignment without so much intervening underlying un-aligned lower information states to prevent alignment.
2. An information arm can be defined as: a) aligned states of the "next lower information state" (nlis) b) a "specific low number" (SLN) of intervening "second lower information states" (2lis).
3) The result of information arms is the f-series compression of the next lower information state (nlis)
4) Each information arm holds up to 2f(n) of the next lower information state.
5) The number of information arms is 2^n
6) The intervening next lower information states and all "even lower information states" are folded within the information arm.

The example above shows the information arms for ct2.  There are 2^2 information arms or 4 information arms.  Each of these information arms can hold 2f(n) or 4 of the next lower information state represented by the next lower arm.  The first arm can hold 4ct1 states, the second arm 4*4=16 of the ct1 states (or 4 of the ct2 first arms states) and so on to give 256.  It remains possible that these information states are spread out equally over the information arms, but the electron-proton model for ct4 neutrons indicates that it is less likely and that the electron, by way of example, has the lower order number of ct3 wave states while the remaining proton arms have multiples of these higher states in the preferred analysis.

Ct2 states exhibit charge.  One mechanism for this charge is shown here in the form of unbalanced alignment between the underlying ct1 states.  In this example, an anti-photon would be unbalanced with the opposite charge.

And last, but certainly not least, here is the updated information in Book 3, third edition (unpublished) bringing book 3 into alignment with the first slide.

1.      Slide 1 A thermodynamic free universe

AuT is non-traditional information theory but traditional information theory has features that speak to AuT.

1.          There is no “size” in AuT because dimension is an effect and not a property.  Measurable dimension appears only after space is folded to make what we would call 1 dimensional photonic compression or ct2 (ct1 is space).

2.          3 dimensions only exist in the presence of ct4 compression, the existence of ct4 information arms.

3.          CT states are balanced states of compression and unstable transitional states bridge the gaps between ct states.

4.          The standard model of quarks and the like, is not part of AuT and, while not politically correct, is considered ridiculous by comparison.

5.          Neutrons, for example, are a stable ct4 state.  The electron-proton pair are a largely stable transitional state being effectively a ct3 cloud between partially and fully populated ct4 arms.

6.          Molecules, for example, are largely stable ct4-ct5 transition states tied to the effects of ct4 in the presence of ct5 taking on a ct5 level of compression while maintaining their ct4 properties in terms of ct3 exchange rates.

7.          Trying to use “mass” to determine concentration is confusing because photons are said to have a rest mass of zero.  Likewise, electrons as seen from a pre-AuT analysis have substantial momentum that is a part of the overall mass of what is called the electron cloud or bundle associated with the proton.

8.          Rest mass is not a thing since at any quantum moment, all features of the universe are unmoving.  Mass and momentum are features of time and time is an effect of changes within the electron cloud in the ct3-ct4 transition.  Mass and momentum and time are as inaccurate as saying “space is empty.”  Space is neither volume nor empty, but merely is a math solution providing both a positive or negative value of a determined number of changes in x and a solution order.

9.          All forms of force and mass and dimension are merely different states of space although space also has predecessor elements

10.     All elements change at the same rate, the quantum change of x and all change together.  However, because many of the changes do not change the positive or negative value (only getting closer to the change in value), there are inflection points that we would perceive as change only when that number of changes corresponding to the fpix value occurs and then suddenly and all at once.

11.     Nevertheless, the exchange rate at which space and Photons interact can be tied to light speed at a maximum rate of 1:256. 

12.     The expanding Velocity of light appears to be tied to the release of ct1 states from ct2 states at this rate.  A contracting velocity of light appears to be tied to the compression of ct1 states into ct2 states.

13.     Changes over multiple values of x are non-quantum results and express comparative positions and states and requires removing or injecting ct1 changes into a compressed information states to arrive at the next quantum result.

14.     Force: Photons (ct2) may be electromagnetic stable ct2 states, but modeling indicates that EM force is the loading or unloading of ct1 states onto ct2 information arms over values of x at the scales of time changes.

15.      It is misleading to think of time and x as directly related.  X can change without generating time or a change in time.  However, once time exists, it is affected by localized changes in ct1 which gives rise to time dilation which is dealt with specifically in the next slide show and in later chapters of this book.

16.     Force: Stars increase ct4 compression as part of the transition from ct4 to ct5 states.  An increase in sharing of ct4 states along ct5 carrier arms is perceived as fusion.  The ct5 strong force state can be created only in the presence of ct5 carrier arms compression.

17.     Force: The weak force can be viewed as the force presented by ct4 carrier arm population or depopulation. This strong and weak force result distinguishes AuT from the Standard Model.  Since the SM of quarks and other non-quantum features assigns to these forces (strong and weak) a non-carrier arm feature, the Standard Model is considered in error.

18.     Force: Fusion and Fission can occur with ct4 states alone, but molecular (as opposed to atomic) features can only exist in the presence of ct5 carrier arm solutions.  Neutrons can form in the presence of ct4 solutions only, atoms of more than proton or neutron require a ct5 carrier arm solution.

19.     Dimension: Ct1 (space) is predicted to increase in quantity based on the change in the value of x, one extra ct1 state for each change in x.  It remains possible that space increases at a slower pace.  CT1 is considered to have a minimum value of -3, although a minimum value of 1 is just as likely.

20.     Dimension: F-series exponential compression is reflected not with more space but with a higher number of coordinates changing at once (1,11,111,etc.).  Compression increases the entrapment of ct1 states and thereby eliminates velocity.  When higher ct states decompress, ct1 states are released with increases in velocities over multiple quantum solutions. 

21.     The Spirals idea that was initially carried over of substitution ct1 states is abandoned in the new view of compressed space in AuT.

22.     Einstein already proved that neutrons were interchangeable with energy.  There are lingual mistakes, for example, the “destruction” of information which doesn’t happen.  In a single variable universe of the type we inhabit, if you destroy anything, it’s the amount of compression or decompression. 

23.     Electrons do not move at the speed of light in a vacuum because for electrons, a ct3-ct4 transition state, to move at all they most move based on a release of ct1 from ct2 states.  An electron, in terms of place, looks like this: 1234 and velocity would change on a quantum level from this 1234 to a 1233 type transition meaning that very little “area” of the electron is subject to rendering velocity at any point in time since only the ct2 states can yield velocity while the ct3 states (the 2 place) can only break down to ct2 and not directly to velocity.