On the water with antimatter

A white tug is pushing a coal barge beside me along aninnercoastal. Itloooks empty, a robot could be the only operator althogh it is large enouggh to house 40 people.
Earlier a saw an old dark skinned man casually walk across the interstate in a rural area, i glanced to the side and saw a break in the thick brush indicating he was on a trail often used.
These things i share with you because you will never see them.
There are so many things i see that you are blind to,  so many you see that i will never share, but perhaps if i do what brave people do one day we can share what we have seen.  Here is something that i see unclearly:
There are two ways to approach the anti-matter question.
The most immediate approach and convincing one is that antimatter is an abberration,  something that can happen, even in large amounts but which is crushed statiscally at all times by larger overall quantities of matter.  The base of negative 1 yields  this easily.
The other approach is that there is an equation in terms of production that yields the same type of expanding and contracting results in quantities that compression/anti compression features that drive gravity and thereafter the other forces.  This is also convincing given the conceptual fseries building that shows up in the ct1 building equations.
Now a smaller barge, perhaps with some liquid cargo in metal tanks passes by, a much smaller inland tug pushing it, one that is perhaps a third the size of the other and still no sign of people on deck.
These boats distract me, like a hole in the roof where  the rain gets in.
I am lost, i know where everything comes from and where  it goes, but i am lost.
Even if you were here i would be lost, but perhaps then it would be ok.  I dont know.

What really matters and what anti matters

There is going to be something
I had a dream last night, so real I woke up disappointed.
I am exhausted by events, it is only Wednesday but it feels much later.
I am waiting for results this week that should portend the whole summer
Indeed they should be momentous, but in which way remains to be seen
It would be nice for there to be a smooth path, but taking a path is what matters
Moving, it is all that matters, waiting for things is what anti-matters
If I have plumbed the depths of the universe then my life should have some relevance for the other ants crawling on the surface, although it also looses all relevance as it always had.
I plan to spend a lot of time this summer writing books about love, there are two of them that need to be finished, both having very common themes, I suppose I will work to complete the more commercial version first, then the factual one.  Then there is the question of the pornography which requires but 20 pages to finish or perhaps recharged in some respects after a long break, its been almost a month, I can finish the longer version.    Would you go to Turkey and China for research with me I wonder, after everything?
I used to wonder somewhat about authors that poured out work but I understand it better now, they need only support and a good editor, I think.  Would that I might have that for these last years.
Enough of that for now, there is this end of the year thing which must be done and it will kill the time between now and when those events play out.  After that, always after this or after that.  It has become far too much after and not enough now, although if things play out right, perhaps there will be some reward in it.  I think not, I think nothing can be worth waiting a decade, let alone 3.  Waiting is the great killer.  It reminds me of what Eisenhower  said upon arising in England in WWII, "This is a long tough road we have to travel. The men that can do things are going to be sought out just as surely as the sun rises in the morning. Fake reputations, habits of glib and clever speech, and glittering surface performance are going to be discovered." 

We all wait too long to write, too long to solve this problem of the mechanism of the universe, far too long to live and saying, this week now, it must pass, is the thoughts of a fool.  There is only now, only today, if I have proved anything in physics other than the futility of all things, it is the importance of the quantum instance which is preserved forever in some fashion, especially in the relatively closed systems that are important to us.

               

The AMOUNT OF ANTI MATTER vs Matter

This, without the drawings, shows how complicated the model of the underlying universe, the pre dimensional portion of the universe, gets even before you add compression.

While it would make a great deal of sense to include the drawings, It is hard to tell which ones provide clarity and which ones are misleading.  I included the easiest to include here, one from a spreadsheet, so that the conceptual basis for all of the drawings could be set out in some form.  

It is time....

          To address the whole idea of matter and anti-matter, we have to make certain assumptions about how things work in the pre-dimensional universe.

          Space is not a problem because there is no space.  Solution order may be shared by different points.  Charge shifts.

          We don't see antimatter, but eventually the universe will begin to contract.  Will we see it then?

          It appears that contraction and decompression both relate to ct1 release or binding to higher ct states, initially ct2 information arm compression.

          But ct1 has another feature, charge, which is left without a purpose unless the net charge of the universe gives it a purpose.

          Let’s start by looking at the exemplary models of ct2, comprised of ct1 states.   This model assumes that charge is an underlying feature.  This makes logical sense.

A closer look at ct1 (space):

This first drawing shows what ct1 might look like if all we looked at was the total number of charges:

This next shows how positive and negative charge are added to get to the first drawing, with a neutral charge being a result. One can easily see that if the charges are reversed, an anti-particle is possible.

	2x(-/+)	-1^x=ct0
	x=1
cancel	+/-	-/+	--------->
	+/-		add +/1
			add +/1
	x=2			x=3			x=4
cancel	-/+	+/-		+/-	-/+		-/+
	-/+		--------->	+/-			-/+
	-/+		add +/1	+/-			-/+
	-/+		add +/1	+/-		--------->	-/+
				+/-		add +/-	-/+
				+/-		add +/-	-/+
							-/+
		x=5					-/+
		+/-	-/+
	--------->	+/-
	add +/-	+/-		--------->
	add +/-	+/-		add +/-
		+/-		add +/-
		+/-
		+/-
		+/-
		+/-
		+/-

          The next drawing shows the use of ct1 as a building block, the way that we see things in our view of the universe.  In this case you have an extra -/, then an extra -/+ and then no extra, and this pattern repeats itself.

          One can easily imagine an anti-particle based on this construction where the only difference lies in the beginning triangle, yielding an extra +, then +/-.  This doesn’t fit well into the equations using -1^n but does fit well into the graphic view of the result.

          The points marked a and d show how a single point shifting between states can control the lifespan of that state and then to the next one so that the generation of ct1 states constantly feed state a and shift to state d once it has made the circuit of a ct1 state.

          If the pulse is 1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5 a question is raised whether the 3 and second 1(d) are at the same time which would affect the tempo of the universe, tying all the states together.

          And the next drawing shows how a photon can end up with a negative charge based on the prior drawings building blocks, noting that the total charge of the photon is 128 negative quantum charge units.

          The obvious question raised would be how to compress a ct2 state to ct3 without an anti-photon built with anti-space,

          Another question raised has to do with charge.  This shows a negative charge, negative electromagnetism as it is put onto ct3 information arms, where is the positive charge?

          Moreover, the solutions for each are thought to change back and forth over time.  One sees crowding in these solutions but ct1 is solved in a dimension free environment.  All of these things change the way this might be interpreted.

          Note that if the ct1 building model is used there are 128 trapped free states for 256 compressed states.  Could these make up the ct1 that is compressed to eliminate space during compression in some manner?

          These drawings show how complicated a model might be for these otherwise alternating positive and negative results. 

          Multiple potential states are possible:

1)   Charged results

2)   Free Charged results

3)   Combined results with a net zero charge

4)   Combined results with a net charge

5)   Combined results destabilized by changing charge

6)   Free negative ct0 states

7)   Free positive ct0 states

8)   Compressed results containing the features set out above

9)   States trapped within compressed features

10)        Shared features (a/d) within different ct states.

          This list is not set out as complete, only to show how complicated the model becomes even though we are looking at the simplest state in terms of construction in the entire universe.

          The value of the trapped states can be net positive or net negative, although this shows a largely balanced amount of charge in most cases.

          This allows that the state of the trapped ct1 is still controlled by some net, could it be the net within the trap and for the universe and regionally

          Do one of these states control the matter vs antimatter question or in there another option?

The paired portions of the universe create a stability

          The amount of matter to antimatter may decrease and increase, perhaps shifting the entire universe to an anti-time universe at some point during a decompression cycle.  It appears likely that the underlying universe may compress or decompress as a net anti-matter or net matter universe as net ct1 positive or negative and net compression or decompression remain separate.  Likewise, the two may be tied together so that only if the universe could fully compress or decompress; an unlikely scenario, could the matter/antimatter balance shift.

          Even the relative lifespans of each ct1 state relative to another are subject to shared points and therefore variation.  While these lifespans are all “up to” two beats shorter than the next higher state, there is, at either extreme one that lasts for perhaps 1 beat and one that lasts for perhaps 10^100 beats.

          Net positive and negative features suggest that adjacent, dimension independent ct1 states cancel each other out, so that only the net values of ct1 control the charge of the universe at any point in time.  This raises idea of “dual universes.”

          A universe may have varying degrees of net charge yielding a larger or smaller amount of compression of either matter or antimatter universes in a time and dimension free base environment and the universe as either matter or antimatter can have varying degrees of compression or decompression related to the dimensional state of the universe.

AGE OF THE UNIVERSE-Two New APPROACHES

I pray before I eat.  for someone who has proven that faith has no place in the universe this may seem out of charcter, but I am a superstitious man and while I reject man made religions and the idea that the universe may be changed I feel like i should still be thankful for the good things around me and those from which I am separated.
I pray for us too.
That you will be happy.  I also sometimes, that we will be together, but i do not believe that prayer should be a selfish thing, even so I have pleaded to be saved from myself and events and my prayers have been answered sometimes; or so it seems.
I fixed the elastic band that allows me to swim outside in a still very cold but very short pool, i swam a good swim although of  uncertain distance it compared in terms of time with a 2200 yard swim.  Then I cleaned the filters and brushed and shocked the pool.  If there were true answers to prayers I suppose someone would have done that for me.
Then i at a cold, over salted mean which I am grateful for because everything is cold and tasteless without you, the simplist meal a feast if we share it.

For the last few days I have worked to work out the antimatter problem in lieu of recording because I believe this issue to one of importance for the existence of antimatter or not and how the fpix solution governs this are important questions which when answered will more fully define the model and that in turn will answer more questions.

While I am not at all satisfied that I have improved the model, I do feel comfortable that a theoretical basis for antimatter and the preponderance of matter given the ability of the equal amounts to cancel each other in a time and dimension resistent enviroment of ct1 easily explains tthe imbalance while proiding for at least regional appearances of anti-matter as well as providing a model for what it is and if god is willing if there is a good, then perhaps I will dictate it when I wake up early because there is no reason to sleep if I cannot dream we will be together.

This has been presented before, but since it was put together in book 3 and will be presented in the compression section, I submit it for your comment and review and after I finish with the section on matter and antimatter, I will edit this.

In terms of age, we are talking about AuT age, the age between compression states.  Here are two early calculations, not yet fully reconciled, but well worth considering presented previously, but perhaps the first time together  in Book  3.

a.  AMOUNT OF DARK ENERGY

Based on the entire age of the universe (estimated based on 40 billion years for our current universe) it would be around 3.8x10^30 years.

Let me explain that.

First of all I'm assuming that our universe will expand for 7 billion years and then contract for 20 billion years (roughly).  There are calculations for this in the books, the best one is probably based on the rate at which expansion is shrinking although there is one where we're 31.7% of the way to the reduction based on there being 68.3% of the energy being dark energy.

  Based on this number, we can say that the universe is 1/3 of the way through the expansion phase, meaning we'll contract in around 27 billion years. which yields a much older universe.

The simple truth of this is that the period of half of the information is 36 billion years, and this says the average overall for the universe is 36 billion years between transitions although within that time frame, some of the younger particles of information will change trillions and trillions of times, just averaging shrinking over time.

You have to get the average age of universes by taking this 80 billion year old universe, and divide it by 4.   Since the first universe transitioned immediately from positive the negative and this one transitions at 40 billion (1/2 of around  80 billion) the average universe lasts 20 billion years (1/2 of 40 billion).

Another way of looking at this is that there were 20 billion universes (including some inconsequential.  (average age is half of the longest plus half of the shortest) of 40 billion years which as a rough number of universes since each one is rough twice the one before it...well you get the idea.  The average lifespan is really long which is why we don't see information states changing all the time even though we do we don't see it en mass.

Dark energy universe calc  

second 1.07E+37 

age-CURRENT  13,800,000,000.00   days

year's worth  31,536,000.00   365

points  4,656,605,760,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00  

length 4 

max length  18,626,423,040,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00  

avg length 9.31321E+54 

avg length in years  27,600,000,000.00  

1  

% more dark energy  0.68  

% to 50%  0.18  

passed already 0.32 

Age of 32%*.18/.32  7,762,500,000.00  years till collapse starts at 51% 

  gravity over dark energy

b.  EXPANSION Rate Change

          We want this number to come out the same as the number for Dark Energy.

That is, we want to use logic (maybe false logic) to show that we're 64% of the way to the universe beginning to contract.

          Earlier we came up with some older periods so we're going to revisit all of that in this post. (9/8/16 was the original).Now let's forget the rest of that post for a moment.

The farthest object is 13.3 bln light years away.  In a universe that is 13.7 billion years old that means it's essentially at the edge of the universe and it took 13.3 billion years for it's light to reach us which was some 420 million years after it formed.  It's essentially at the edge of the universe, but whether we're going to stick with 13.3 billion light years or the 13.7 doesn't matter much because the extra distance isn't important for rounding this off.  If you really want to put an alarm on your phone and it will handle the numbers, you can try to get more precise, you'll have the math.

According to relativity the distant galaxy is moving at (1) 3c relative to us.

          We're going to ignore the rotation net speed (CBR or CBM) which discusses the fact that we're moving all over the place even if we stand perfectly still.You and I are in a galaxy that's moving at the relatively slow speed of 627km/s.  Earth is actually moving slower than the galaxy relative to cbr but if you start comparing apples to pomegranates you're going to end up with a fruit salad

          These old universes are only 400 million years old.

          We're a mere 25,000 light years from the center of the 13.7 billion light year across universe.  We're only 1.9x10-6 of the way to the edge of the universe.

For purposes of estimating we'll say we're essentially at the center.

          Now let's talk about what is happening because of this.  The other galaxy is not really moving at 3 times the speed of light or even at the speed of light.  It was when it's light started to come to us a 13 billion years ago, but it's subject to the same average inflection point that we are, we're just 13 billion years down the road from it.

Earlier we looked at the universe slowing from expanding during that 13.7 billion years from the (1) relativistic speed of 2c (599564800m/s) or (2) the real speed of light (299782450 m/s) all the way down to 627,000 m/s today.

          But if we go back to the observation, it's slowed from 3c to (from 1c to 627,000m/s)  or it's slowed it's expansion by essentially 2/3.  You can get more precise, but we're a little uncertain about all the numbers so we're just going after an estimate.

          This means we're 66% of the way to a dead stop, re-compression universe meaning (if the universe is 14 billion years old) we have 7 billion years left before the reversal which is, because of common rationales in part,  the number used for dark energy vs non-dark energy.

          What this means is that we can use the concept of AuT to create a self-checking system (based on two entirely separate observation) to time the period of expansion of the current universe.

is there antimatter 3

This post is a little complicated, but will conceptually lays out the AuT-Matter/Anti Matter argument by way of example.  While a single model is used for reasons given below, other models, loosely within this framework, can exist.  This will likely end this series which serves the purpose of providing a possible mechanism for defining how AuT addresses the issue of matter and anti-matter.

IDEA: The idea is that the "state" of fpix drives Matter vs anti-matter.

FRAMEWORK: To make this argument, we have to understand how fpix states build.
How do the positive and negative results at the fpix level (ct1 space) build.

We already know that actual compression is loading of ct2 arms with ct1.  So the only effect that fpix solutions can have is how those arms load or what the resulting charge of the loaded arms equals.

If we look at the model there is are two sides of each arm, the 2 if the 2f(x) portion of the compression equation.

We can assume these arms are positive and negative fpix states for ct1 loaded onto ct2, but which side is positive and which is negative can vary and this variance can give rise to the matter/antimatter difference, by way of example. 

There are extensive discussions regarding this already set out in books 1-6 of Algorithm Universe theory. 
The net positive vs net negative results in terms of quantity give a reason why we might observe more matter than anti-matter although the exact mechanism and how it is tied to sequential solution order is a more involved question.

BASED EQUATION: Let us look at the parts of the fpix equation:
1) The equation itself: (-1^x+2x(-1)^x-1)
2) The results 
     a) Alternating positive and negative solutions
     b) Separation of results equal to 4x (-3 to 5 is an absolute value 2*4=8, for example.  Note 1 to -3 is 4)
          Note: fpix solutions can start for x=1, although this draws a solution from -1^0
     c) x as a counter for marking separation
     d) Possible common solution orders
     e) An absolute total (compare to the separation total of non absolute) as a f(x) solution.
    
EXAMPLE: The idea is that this relatively simple equation with a single variable generates a number of different results.
The number of ways these results might be generated is also subject to many different conceptual framework and for comparison purposes, several are give below,  but if AuT has taught us anything, what it teaches is that the model must match observation and must be consistent, it must generate the observed results.
For this, the generated result for Fpix must generate a Fibonacci framework and, thankfully, this can occur from this equation.

x	ABS Sum
	Also Total	fpix
	0
1	3	-3
2	8	5	-3
3	15	-7	5	-3
4	24	9	-7	5	-3
5	35	-11	9	-7	5	-3
6	48	13	-11	9	-7	5	-3
7	63	-15	13	-11	9	-7	5	-3
8	80	17	-15	13	-11	9	-7	5	-3
9	99	-19	17	-15	13	-11	9	-7	5	-3
column sum		-11	8	-9	6	-7	4	-5	2	-3

The example above shows one way in which Fpix can generate Fpix to f(x) solutions using this single equation and memorized results.

This chart shows a very early universe, x=9.  The universe at x=1 would only have the first two columns filled with 3 and -3 respectively.  For x=2 you would add the second column starting at 8.

As can be seen, if you do the absolute sum of any row=sum of abs(x-1)+fpix.  While not strictly an f-series equation, it works according to the same basic principle.


Here are some features of this simple chart:

4*x	regular sum	difference	sum	x
separation	each column	from	all columns
from prior	d-k	prior m	c-h
4	-3		-3	1
8	2	5	-1	2
12	-5	-7	-6	3
16	4	9	-2	4
20	-7	-11	-9	5
24	6	13	-3	6
28	-9	-15	-12	7
32	8	17	-4	8
36	-11	-19	-15	9

It is worth noting before we discuss this chart that it is one of many ways to look at how this combination occurs.  This is the most simple method.  While other variations are discussed below, there is not enough information from which to pick one or the other at this stage.  Instead, the intent is just to pick an example to show: 1) how fpix can transition to f(x); (2) how fpix can lead to either a single value (all negative in the 4th column above) or to alternating periods of net positive or negative (column 2 above) and to show how the separation can increase between individual solutions but lso how they can transition from net solution.

Moreover, the solution can have common solution order by column (or even row) relative to other columns giving a situation where there is a dimensional character and a non dimensional characteristic based on these ratios.  Going from left to right you have the first 3 columns totalling 1) -3, 2) 2, 3)-5, 4)4, 5)-7 so if you were able to combine rows, you would have a net -1 for the first two, just by way of example.

This whole idea of having solution order govern but having the ability to "bunch solution order" so that you have two different solution orders working together further complicates the model and serves as an example of how this seemingly simple algorithm can yield extremely complicated results and where transitions embodied within them can lead to extender solutions which are positive, increasingly one negative, etc.

Just one example the sum of all columns never goes positive.  If this was driving the concept of how matter vs antimatter is generated, then this would provide a mechanism eliminating antimatter.

It also shows where the total of any row or  column or sum of rows can change as positive or negative and can steadily shifts upward (here by 2 from the next lower similar charge).

It is easy to see other examples, but since this not been accomplished with any mathematical precision, the prior example taking precedence only because it gives a possible mechanism for shifting between fpix and f(x) the following is just to give some perspective and is of limited value.

THEORY:  The most important aspect is that if you pick a range of solutions anywhere within this matrix, you will have a net value as positive or negative and for that area of space, this is the charge state of the space.  Whether matter or antimatter is formed at that point in space is controlled by that net charge for the entire space around a given particle and if it is not properly balanced, the two states cancel each other out and compression loading cannot occur and it remains as space.

CONCLUSION:  In conclusion the argument is that the positive and negative values form some net arrangement locally and overall that defines how much loading occurs based on a net negative value of fpix regionally and how much loading occurs based compression possible within that space is matter or anti-matter based on a net charge value of that same space.

While it remains possible that the amount of matter to antimatter will decrease increase, perhaps shifting the entire universe to an anti-time universe at some point during a decompression cycle; it appears more likely that the underlying universe may compress or decompress as a net anti-matter or net matter universe as net ct1 positive or negative and net compression or decompression remain separate.

          It also appears likely that because of this net feature, that adjacent, dimension independent ct1 states cancel each other out, so that only the net values of ct1 control the charge of the universe at any point in time.  This raises idea of “dual universes.”

          A universe may have varying degrees of net charge yielding a larger or smaller amount of compression of either matter or antimatter universes in a time and dimension free base environment and the universe as either matter or antimatter can have varying degrees of compression or decompression related to the dimensional state of the universe.

***

OTHER EXAMPLES JUST FOR CONCEPT PURPOSES: look at it in this way: plus,minus,plus,plus,plus,plus,minus,plus,plus,minus,minus,minus.
This is how at any point in time the universe can appear with the variations being wildly skewed.  There can be billions of pluses (or minuses) in a row when x is high enough and there can be periods where they alternate, although it seems likely that alternating forms that were adjacent at high levels might be rare.
There is, as always, an attempt to look at this which has already been done for very low values of x.

There are some other comments worth considering
The fpix adjacent (solution order) change 4 points apart, but for lengths that are very long.
Looking at 1.4x10^8 for example the -1.400000002x10^8 corresponding next negative state will change to positive in this:
-3,-3,-3,5,5,5,5,5,--7,-7,-7,-7,-7,-7,-7,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9,9 by way of example, so the length of time between these shifts gets very convoluted and long over time, negatives and positives at very high numbers would be largely unrelated.
This may be complicated by the regeneration of numbers, the -3 are generated by every change in x so that the 5s come after every 3x and a -7 after every 7 x changes and this creates a very complicated picture.
Looking at just the simple example above it may look like this (1 is added in this example, although the model allows for both -1 and1 which may cancel each other out.
111-31-31-135-135-135-135-135-135-71-35-7...and as is clear at very high numbers these transitions would get very long and might look many different ways. since where the -3 are added changes like this, for example, now with -1 and 1added.

is there antimatter 2

If you have read the books, you are aware that underpinning the fundamental mathematics of compression is the preliminary algorithm populating ct1 or space.  This math, based on observed features covered extensively in books 1 and 2 of algorithm universe theory is fpix, which yields the denominator for the infinite series that is in the denominator for pi.

Originally these were thought to directly deal with gravity, but looking at where linearity in terms of dimension actually occurs the purpose of fpix seemed primarily a mechanism to stagger positive and negative results to give the appearance of staggered time to different points otherwise changing at the same rate as a single variable changes the results for all points together.

An examination of matter and antimatter has opened a new and exciting reason why these results as either positive or negative might be important.

AuT is now working on a new line of inquiry as to a much more important function of fpix.  The theory is essentially this:
First, the way that the fpix solution changes leads to very long periods where the results are positive vs negative or negative vs positive.  The result is that at very high values of x, such as those required to generate a universe with the number of quantum results observed in our view of the universe (along the scale of at least 10^100 points) you have periods of very high numbers of fpix solutions which are positive compared to the negative solutions and at an inflection point these results would flip and the number of negative solutions would for long periods of time be greater than the positive.
This is similar, but not identical to the rate of compressive results (compression building) vrs decompressive results which give rise to a universe  which is expanding or contracting, entropy based or anti entropy based, which is a function of the solutions of ct1 loading on ct2 information arms which in turn is an effect of fpix.
The changes in fpix that give rise to the loading of information arms arises from whether it begins with negative or positive results.
This leads to this possibility for matter and antimatter
1) when the negative fpix loading originates compression, it yields antimatter and when it originates when positive fpix loading occurs, matter is the result.  This is a function of solution order and the changing values of fpix solutions.
2) the direction of change over time (whether it is ticking towards postive vs negative as x changes) can also affect this in the same way that the actual solution values can.

What is intriguing about this concept is that the net amount of fpix like the resulting as positive or negative and as moving from a negative to a positive value or from a postive to a negative value as x changes is constantly changing and slightly altered net compression/decompression varies wildly from a max to a minimum.  It is also possible that in the universe where we live right now, because of the destructive interaction that what we see as mostly matter is the "net" positive fpix solutions after the destruction (actually just the "netting out") of the total negative by a more or less matching amount of the positive, that we end up with a net postive balance of information.  The two cancelled matched positive and negative results (which coudl be cancelling by being adjoining for low ct1 states, would appear invisible (not actually destroyed) due to the interaction with the opposite state.  This may be what we see as space, this destroyed/offset part while everything else is compressed to yield the unbalanced or net positive/negative particles that we do see.

In other words, AuT offers a possible solution to the balance of information observed between matter and antimatter based on the features that we are already looking at.

The most likely way this would work is that ct1 states that are offsetting at the ct 1 level cancel each other out and provide space as we observe it, while those that are unbalanced, as for example being plus plus or minus minus result in the observed compression states and depending on how they load produce matter or antimatter and that because these solutions allow for any value of x a very high and long period of net positive vs negative building, more matter than anti matter would result in a net matter universe which would eventually shift to a net antimatter universe.

Without adding any new theoretical underpinnings AuT then provides not only  a mechanism for matter and antimatter but also a reason for the balance between the two; merely applying what is already there to the new concept for gravity (still based on ct states going linear, just recognizing the new way of looking at ct2 photons, with ct3 arm loading being electromagnetic force, ct2 transitional states not being magnetism as suggested by pre-aut physics, at least in part, and that ct2 arm loading (with ct1 space) is where gravity and antigravity(unloading) come from) and by saying the order of arm loading is reversed by the underlying ct1 values (as set out above).

This mechanism, being in constant flux would allow for pockets of antimatter to form although the mechanisms for the cancelling out of matter with adjacent solution order mechanism would require a more extensive modeling to fully understand.

is there anti-matter part 1

The universe is out of balance and nobody knows why. https://googlecom/newsstand/s/CBIwrorX2Do

I woke this morning wondering if I should tackle the irregular universe or not.
It is early and I have been lucky enough to find something other than a waffle house or its equivalent for coffee.
I feel self doubt within me.
There is a certain amount of futility associated wtih all human activity and performing to this audience is sometimes feels too real to me.
Diracs model of the universe and teh standard model does not impress me, but the audience does.
I wonder if it is not more about the audience than the truth for people.  While that may sound irrelevant we are surrounded by examples of that. We can start at the president who I am not condemning outright, but he is a cartoon character, kratocracy, I believe, is the word for government by the worst.  The audience, not the truth, at least in that case.  Is Trump evil or does he rail against the publich, "The truth, you (the american public) cannot handle the truth."
Opera to an empty audience and packed houses for something, everyone can pick something, they do not like. does it lower the value of the opera, is this evolution or is something else going on?
I have been bullied for my physics, that is something which I can understand, the baseness of people and something I cannot understand, why would anyone close their minds to a theory.  Does anyone deserve an audience or to be bullied or does everyone earn what they get?
The Dirac universe says we earn it, the AuT universe says it is assigned to us.

Having warmed up, let me tackle the idea of matter and antimatter in aut.
AuT does not really have anti matter.  This is a problem in a world where matter and antimatter seem to coexist after a fashion.  For almost the entire two or three years I have tied myself to the idea of explaining anti-matter, somehing which exists only in theoretical frameworks to explain what is observed in super-colliders and what is interpreted in space observations, two very strong arguments for its existence, just as the Higgs Boson was "spotted" by looking at a super collider showing in my theory nothing more than a transitional state aberration so too must anti matter as it is seen in AuT morph intosomething the theory can accept.
The post will not conslusively deal with those issues.  There are two books (AuT  7 and 8) which deal with the story behind the Higgs boson and I have not even begun the inquiry in earnest behind mattter and antimatter because I blindly accepted antimatter until now, just as most physicists blindly accept the standard model and its accompanying nonsense (I have to concentrate on truth and not the audience, sing opera to the empty theater; I already prostitute myself in another venue for a living).
So we have to start by looking at what AuT predicts and what we observe.
An Anti particle has to be looked at also.
AuT predicts a wide variety of matterish states.
First there are the slowly filling information arms of ct4 adn then the molecular arms of ct5.
Then there is the electron/proton connundrum which leads to the deconstructing neutron idea that for some reason that I have not explained yet, the proton and electron are ct4-7 and ct4-9 arms begging the question, why not ct4-6 adn ct4-10 arms?  is it because of averaging or some other method where all of these perimeter states can exist, are they somehow invisible to us, part of the energy that we experience around us perhaps part of the energy experienced around the atoms that we recognize?
Part of the answer to this lies in the idea that we don not properly see what w are looking at, a math solution looking around it and finding self importance is illogical, but that type of self analysis does not answer any questions.
So I have to start with the idea that the unbalanced universe has some issues which have not been addressed and the AuT universe has some of the same features.  A new look at atomic and mollecular structure that offers to explain what the electron and neutron are without explaining the missing elements surrounding them is as flawed as the model which cannot explain the missing anti-matter predicted and I accept that as part of theAuT model that remains undetermined, but which can be mathematically determined by one of those explanations above or one that has not be proferred yet or which might undermine a theory which has at least as many grains of truth as the standard model.
So auT has a model for the creation of dimension and ultimately matter which defines a specific type of matter and loosely looks at unbalanced states as charged states where charge is only one element out of balance in a very large number of elements and hence the difference between a proton and a neutron is only one arm of 16 which is only partially loaded.
Aut holds that next higher ct states must be constructed, at least loosely, by complete next lower states:
To build ct4 you cannot use ct2, you need ct3.  The ratio of compression is 1ct4:10^16ct3.   Since force is not a feature of AuT the solution relies heavily on the idea that just rigidly controlled mathematical solutions give rise to what is observed, not some preaut force model. That is part of the problem in looking for answers both to the proton-anti-proton problem as well as the electron proton cunnundrum in the standard model and AuT respectively.
So where we find ourselvees is that for some reason the positive and negative aspects of both AuT at the EPC balance and the antimatter is positive to negative at this point primarily.  AuT does have the governing underlying positive and negative tendency which does not have another place and this is important here because it lost its importance in other places.
Early on AuT tied the fpix solution to gravity and then, as it was studied further tied gravity to the ct2 arms filling or unfilling with ct1, a related but different function and one that fit better within the concept of going linear or going dimensional from a non-dimensional state.
This left the whole fpix converging series (as x changes) from net positive to net negative open, dangling without a purpose but as certain as any other infinite series in the model.  And here, it comes down to roost at last, an explanation, purely math driven.
At different points in the universe, irregardless of whether it is expanding or contracting the net local and net universal value of the underlying ct1 states are positive or negative.  This underlying state changes.  This then suggests that right now that underlying state is of such a charge that anti-matter is discouraged and  matter is encouraged and no feature has to be added to get us here.
Thus endith part1