A world in Amber

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

AuT Symmetry and asymmetrical charge

I failed to get any exercise yesterday, storms and an unwillingness to expend the effort to go to the gym. After a series of perhaps 10 days without a break I don't feel too bad about that.
Today is quiet in advance of a series of steps to move forward on marketing.
I am now editing book 4 which is a significant undertaking because of the concentration on symmetry, editing the press release which is a big part of the second phase of the marketing and for which I will have to make a big push by the end of next week, production of the audio book(s) now pushed back perhaps a month and whatever else comes up in the interim...waiting for what should have been given to me a few weeks back on the romance book, we've talked about that.

This, however, is a continuing discussion of other articles and symmetry.

The Higgs Boson Has a New Friend http://flip.it/F0Biia
and
Curiosity — Scientists Discovered That the Pressure Inside a. .. http://flip.it/0gf4Fp

I downloaded these two articles, to show support and non-support for AuT only to realize they both support AuT.
Lets talk about the articles generally: one is more Higgs nonsense and the other on how there was more pressure inside a neutron than in a neutron star with the idea that one (the neutron star) supported aut - showing as it were the complete packing of ct3 states in a neutron vs the incomplete packing of ct4 in a neutron star (complete ct4 packing would add the dimension and be a black hole) and the higgs one that says if you ram millions of electrons and positrons together you get a peak somewhere which they can call something because it shows up at a consistent place.

Then I realized they both must support AuT and here is how the "Higgs/quark) does it.

The same building model (above) can be used because just as the electron and proton combine to make the neutron by reducing the free cloud as shown above; so too should the electron and positron theorized to differ by the loading vs unloading feature of the ct2 to ct3-ct2.
Unloading leading to the electron proton pairing (since there is necessarily more of that in an expanding/unwinding universe) and the net loading reflecting the positron/anti-proton pairing. To go further, the basic idea is that charge has to come from ct1 (the only place where charge occurs) but it is carried by ct2 states, so you have these stable intermediary states reflected first by information arms (we're dealing with 2^4=16 information arms at ct4/neutron building) and you have, because of the offset equality of 7:9 (vs equality 8:8) information arms a net proton-electron pairing which is not two particles as pre-AuT physics would have you believe, but just an average).
There is, of course, no single mass carrier, any information arm loading is atom building and the ct3 minimum (single arm) alignment has as much to do with mass as the very last one to form a complete neutron which is both logical and totally inconsistent with the standard model, sorry.
Anywho, the idea is that when you isolate these differently charged t4-E states and ram them together at light speed (which is just part of the unwinding process where we think we are taking an independent role, but I will get to that shortly) you get a t4-3 and t4-4 pairing as well as t4-1,2,5 and 6 sub-electrons because you are tearing apart the t4-7 (t4-e) partially filled arm. What the accelerator is showing is only a bunch of pieces of an electron which has plenty of pieces and they are using the standard model to assign the pieces values which they do not deserve having done nothing to be punished in that way.

Also on the way are: a section on absolute values coming up, how this takes into account the -1 building in prior models, a section on radial vectors (spinning) as I continue on with the lack of symmetry in the universe, which you, of all people,understand since we would be together if there was any symmetry at all in the universe. (radial vectors are only vectors because it is over several values of x, a whole lot of them given the seconds wee use to measure) that they have no true symmetrical component which is why we cannot see the true asymmetric experience.)
There is a part on how much entanglement there must be in the universe to lead to observed phenomena and the driving force behind all the bizarre things we do and our basic, self centered view of our role in all this and why despite the insane result, proven by our insane actions (if you do not believe we act insanely look at how many people died in wwi and then realize that was not the biggest mass killing up to that date not to mention recent elections, pollutants, etc) we are merely reflecting the underlying unwinding below our view of symmetry which is so absurdly dimensional

My hopes that the audio book would be ready have been crushed, that coming on the 15th of next month at the earliest, probably the 25th from a practical view, probably the same time frame as the second, short Audio book.

The book launch is today.
The first phase of the book launch begins today. There are problems with it that I will admit I have not made any effort to correct, but the book is out there and letting people know about it is important even if it is a poorly targeted and slightly defective stab in that direction.

Monday, June 4, 2018

symmetry 2 scale 1 marketing and questions

The sky turned a martian red yesterday evening as the setting sun played off the huge thunderstorms. It was a beauty that was lost because there was no one like you who could appreciate it with me.
I went outside it to take it in, the day was still hot, no cold air from the stratosphere was brought down and the sweltering heat remained in control.

I am continuing to work towards the campaign for AuT which should start in a couple of days and be supplemented substantially after a week.
I will be tweaking what I already wrote, to make it a plea for review and not acceptance.
I think I will probably have two or three separate posts and not just one.

And I will ask some questions, like these:
You have been selected to review the summary and for comment. This is presented in several parts, each with a short survey and your participation is invited but not mandatory.
What questions do you have about this theory
What bothers you about the theory
Did you take time to watch any of the videos: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

Did you look at any of the books associated with the theory: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

If you would like more information you may request it and the most recent version is in book 3, 4th edition available on amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07DCLKYV6

Did you take time to consider the entire article

Do you agree that separate informational states of compression (ct states) can coexist with their own dimensions remaining while appearing in more or less dimensions from our 3 dimensional perspective

If you wanted to be added to the mailing list, you could, of course, let me know; but you will mostly be given it here first and have the opportunity to warn or counsel in its regard.
It should start in 3 or four days, but only as a general presentation to the general public who may or may not have an appetite for something so unique.

I continue to see large downloads as someone reading this theory finally gets it and I would greatly appreciate your ordering a book instead (book 3 being the only fully upto date one although by no means comprehensive) but whatever.

The second tier of marketing will be targeted, probably via mail chimp, a strangely modern way to go about it, but there it is. This is the dicier part.
The cost is ratcheting up a bit, maybe to 250.00 which is an interesting change in things, but not necessarily one to be concerned with. The whole mailchimp thing bothers me not a little, its cost, its invasive nature, its reliance on contracting out to 3rd world countries, but if I spread the wealth a bit and it works, no harm done, if I do it and it somehow backfires, I will deal with it when the time comes. Apparently the universe has decided on this path and I agree in principle.

My theory absolves us all of individual fault, which does not make our bad choices any better.

Back To Symmetry and Scale

If the laws/of/nature have a definite scale, does this effect extend from super symmetry and how?
This is one of those areas where the answer seems so obvious that it is perhaps too clear for comfort.
The whole idea of material science, the different attributes of materials and the different effects of scale have to do uniquely with force which is not force at all below the quantum level.

What do angular and time non-symmetry tell us? Both involve a common destabilizing factor, time. In AuT because time doesn't exist at the quantum level symmetry has to be differently considered. There is no spin and there is certainly no time in quantum moments.
This does, however, allow us to look at symmetric and asymmetric results in a different way. Not as changes over a time which can be manipulated at least on the quantum level in theory by tweaking the charge results, taking the unraveling strings and re-raveling them through the application of post super symmetric strings, a sort of false suspended animation (false because it has to allow the changes of ct1 and non really suspended but constantly corrected), but as changes over values of x where there is not real symmetry in anything other than change in x. If you reverse x, you reverse the entire universe so you have symmetry, undetectible, of a sort. If you reverse anything after x, you basically don't really have symmetry because everything moves through space at a bare minimum and things change relative to their fuse for charge change.
Likewise when looking at things like angular momentum on the quantum level, you are rotating objects about something which requires an examination of the different dimensions involved (ct10,ct2 1, ct3 2, etc.). Angular momentum is quite different in AuT.

AuT gives us a unique knowledge of interaction.
Gravity as the stacking of non-dimensional space onto the information of photons, photons also being the breakdown in a time free environment of waves, waves being uniquely original to time but in one less dimension and the molecular forces as being involved in the states past time, past the atomic which includes time almost of necessity but is past gravity which has a most indirect but important effect.
The interplay of these different dimensions, different quantum results, different compression states and different experiences of time and especially three dimensions where we tend to focus contain an extraordinary conceptual framework for scales.

It will take more than two post to unravel this, but the stage is set and this is all going into the 3rd edition of Book 4, what I am now hard at work on.

The storm has come now, filled with lightening to a rather frightening constant extent, continuously lighting the tall trees whose swayingtops are backlit by the clouds and then front lit by the near constant bolts.

It is impossible to love someone else, to even want anyone else if you are truly in love with someone. i believe this although love is different for everyone and what i feel is uniquely my own.

The storm has now been joined with rain and even a break in the heat, at last. The lightning is still constant, beautiful and scary and like the strange light from earlier, it makes me think of you.

And if you liked the romance insert, please consider ordering the first book:

Sunday, June 3, 2018

Charge, entrapment, symmetry 1 and simulations and flying terns

The two related and big areas that remain to be determined with more particularity are charge and the presumably closely related entrapment issues of trapped states vs aligned states.
These can be broken down into a number of components:
1) The range of entrapment (of eg ct1 within ct2,3 and 4 states-free vs aligned)
2) The stability of entrapment
3) How entrapment upsets transition states
4) How entrapment sets charge
5) How charge defines the status as matter or antimatter

What I figured out, in the last 12 months, given what was done in the prior 5 years, see aut is only 5 years old, not 7; is that all these things keep their dimensional status; space 0, photons 1, waves 2, matter 3, black holes 4 and so on if there is a so on.
That leads to the universe being a non dimensional string that has bunched up to trap all those dimensional states in its folds and the big bang is merely the process of the string moving towards an unfolded state. The whole spiral thing is the evidence that the whole fpix thing means that it never completely compresses or unravels, although the jury is still out on many of those issues.
The movement away from the very quantum to the larger elements allowed for these insights and that is why I am doing a real launch of the theory, not wanting to be obnoxious, but just wanting to drive stakes in the ground for when I destroy the standard model, I want there to be no questions about who ruined the party. I really just want to get my life on track, I'm serious, it all has to do with that and I could do that without all of this, but...I need something.
I am currently reading the memorable thoughts of Socrates (circa 4 or 500 bc I'd guess) which is a bit of a research book, but he lived the life of an impoverished philosopher, but he had his great wisdom to fall back on. What I have done, with no wisdom, oddly enough I did it with brain of a garden snail, is to solve the space time continuum problem which is quite staggering really, but other than my small audience around the world, I am hardly recognized and that has to change if I am to live the rest of my life as a comfortable aesthetic.

So this comes from 2013ish, one of my early unpublished posts: Why e-hologram theory, not just hologram theory? That refers to the fact that this theory had its roots in the idea that we lived in a state where everything happened at once and that time was perspective, i.e. we were in a Hologram.
That was some time ago,
The question might now be phrased, "Why algorithm and not simulation?" The difference from a simulation is that the universe is the solution to an algorithm in quantum points. A simulation can change any points in any way, there can be any number of symmetries. In an algorithm driven universe, especially a single variable algorithm, all the symmetries stem from the quantum variable.
Originally this post looked this way:
1) differentiate from s-hologram theory: By way of resolution it turns out we are not in a fixed environment although it is fixed in terms of a specified result, it is not Einstein's everything happens at once without time. Eliminating dimension, even as we live in dimension, showing that all the states of dimension exist together and how and why that drives the expanding (and otherwise contracting universe) is what makes AuT something different, unique, 'better' than everything that came before and the foundation of everything that comes after.
The old post continued with this line of query:
2) Einstein's time prediction-This is taken care of in figuring ot what time was and what it wasn't, all the confusion surrounding time and space is so much nonsense in a foundational sense. However, if I had not looked at Einstein's prediction, applied it to the hologram and sought the foundation for reconciling these we would not be here, not that we're happy with where we are at. At least we are in a state of truth, if not of satisfaction. And yes, I'd take satisfaction over truth.
And the final sentence from the prior post, the 2013 that was never published.
3) black holes are main proof and they need not exist under pure e-hologram theory but do according to predictions of the universe by Einstein. This is a curious statement, it looks like me just digging for a problem that didn't exist. Black holes are, therefor both theories accept them. The difference is understanding what they are, the additional fold they represent (or set of folds) and how they play a role in the expansion and contraction of the universe, not as gravity repositories, but merely as highly compressed results, waiting for their turn to do whatever comes next, a turn in terms of time independent turns, quantum solution turns where the universe can turn into something different, where black holes can turn into less compressed states because gravity does not have some ultimate hold over everything but where gravity is only a term for a result that is driven below the level of symmetry where force, no matter how great in the result, is turned weak.
And yes, I intentionally and confusingly overused turn and term and misled with the reference to the bird for your entertainment or mine.
Whatever.
It is a hot, unpleasant day without you to explain it to. Turn to me in the long term, forgive my turns in the short term, as it were. It is still too early to worry about audio book, no word yet.

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Promotion for circulating to physics and astonomy departments

So, here's a second draft.
Still needs some polish.
Any ideas?
Note that no purchase is necessary since the outline of the project is available on youtube and much of it appears here.
Still no word on the audio book, but that may be available soon.

Algorithm Universe Theory is the most comprehensive theory of physics you have never heard of.

"If you begin to read this book, by the time you are finished your view of the universe will be completely altered."

Algorithm Universe Theory Book 3: Kindle Version US
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07DCLKYV6
Promo: Youtube videos outlining the theory are available (see below)
Just as Energy and Matter are the same thing, Space and Energy are the same. We are made of space. This is a minor example of what this theory reveals.
Algorithm Universe Theory (AUT) explains how space and energy interact and why we experience that interaction; how we see the constant interaction of space and photons as acceleration and deceleration.
AuT explains in mathematical detail dimension as the folding of non-dimensional space in sequential compression states. Movement is trapped space decompressing or unfolding from higher states. Photons compress and decompress from wave energy. AuT explains wave particle duality, space, dimension, blackholes and the big bang.
AuT explains what time is and how history exists in a quantum universe environment. Algorithm Universe defines super-symmetry, the symmetry of the universe below thermodynamics.
Aut describes dimension and force more fundamentally than the Standard Model.
Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from facebook
Video overviews can be found on facebook: Youtube Channel: www.youtube.com/channel/UCxK8BwhzafIi1Jd0yE8mQXQ

Speaking engagements available.

www.gmfpc.com

what next, brain waves and a "romance" insert

So I talked about this post a while ago. I've come back to it. Its about us. Well, the whole human race and AuT's proof via shared time as ct3 clouds which is part of the whole Nostradamus thing.
I will shortly get back to symmetry, but it is the weekend, so I will talk about some of the more pleasant things.

I'm working on (play the intro to the low spark) the science of Nostradamus.
I'm about 50 pages into the rewrite. Its 147 pages and just over 60,000 words, but it'll probably top out around 170 when I'm finished. It could be much longer, but it is designed to be a digestible form of AuT for the general public.
I think it was in the low 50's when I started editing. I am fine tuning quite a bit, getting the perfect story together is something of a struggle. I need more comedy in my work, it comes across to serious, but I think that is not because I cannot do funny, it is because of the enormous pressure that seems to follow me around like a cloud. And using squid pro roe in place of quid pro quo is not really funny without the property set up and delivery, timing comedy in writing requires a set up and delivery without inflection, except that which you can plant in the mind of the reader.
It doesn't help that Science of nostradamus is just another love story, that is what scorned lovers do, they write uninspired loved stories and quantum mechanics. Everyone knows that.
But we were talking about humor. Humor is not tough. Basically you just build up tension some way and then release it. The more you build it up, the funnier when you release it. You can even do it in stages, like if you are in a crowded elevator and you need to fart (helps to use funny words). Now that is the set up. What happens next is the 'release' of the tension.  You can let out one really big loud joke and that is sort of funny, or you can let out little puffs of humor, perhaps building to a cresendo where everyone slowly gets the joke and then you milk it.
And whether it is everyone passed out as you exit or everyone else is rushing out leaving you alone you have to deliver on the punchline.
It doesn't really seem like it should be funny but picturing all those people collapsed behind the person obliviously escaping a prison of his own making is somehow humourous. The lightening of the mood comes from how you exit, although the door opening in an explosion, perhaps after someone to the horror of the other passengers prepares to light a cigarette, also is a release of sorts.
So there you have a set up on the physics which follows, a bit on humor and now some romance. I'm getting ready to finish book 3 of the romance/porn series. Got a 5 star rating on one of the earlier volumes, go figure. I am waiting for my co-writer who basically takes my work, reformats and it and probably hasn't even added the additional sex scene which I wrote and then i have to edit at least the next 100 pages. The waiting for little enough from my co-writer is particularly troubling.

I know this is a physics blog, but let me give you the porn setup. It combines a bit of humor with the romance. A hurricane is coming and I decide that all the non-main characters need to get laid. There is this one rich lady and a banker (also female and younger) who is hoping to become the protege to the rich lady. The younger female is thinking she is about to have a lesbian encounter and at least thinking she is straight. A young surfer who plays a minor role in two of the books makes a limited appearance with his friends (did someone order a pizza with extra pepperoni? That is a standard porn setup line, humorous, a double entendre).
All the characters, young and old, are beautiful in the book, no one is ugly and decrepit like me. I wonder if people would like reading about ugly people in a romance novel. We need love too, although I don't get it. Perhaps there is an element of romance in the Hunchback of Notre Dame, but who gets laid in the end of that book? Anyway here is the scene, I wonder if it will be inserted, at least that would be something.
Here is the note to my co-writer. I basically did this scene as a snub because my co-writer said there was enough sex and I thought it was just an excuse to do even less....

I wanted to add this scene. Maybe you can dress it up a little and find a place to put it. If terna and Janice are already getting laid put this with that scene and I will separate them out appropriately.

And finally, the scene:
Terna, the beautiful banker for the whirled project sat in the dark listening to the storm and watching the room light up. The power was out, Janice had insisted that she go herself to get candles leaving Terna alone in the suite. She had nervously taken a shower and put on her sexiest, laciest underwear on before putting on a casual dress over it. She had never done anything like this, but she wanted the job that she felt despite all the failings, Patti was in competition for; that of being the billionaire Janice Love's personal assistant and protege. She wondered where Patti was, no being able to help hoping she might be swept away in the storm.

Sitting on the couch she thought about Janice, older, but still terribly attractive and fit. There was a soft knock of the door and she jumped. Walking quickly to the door like a butler who had been caught napping she opened. It was dark outside.

Janice laughed at something and for the first time Terna realized she wasn't alone.

"This is Carr and two of his friends. They were stuck in the general population downstairs. I know Carr's parents, terribly wealthy. I told him that they could stay inthe suite through the storm."

"Of course," Terna stammered.

The two young men with Carr sat on a couch and Terna sat in a chair across from them confused.

Then Janice took Carr's hand, "You have to tell me what your mother is doing," She said. "And let me show you around the suite, where everything is." With that the two of them went into one of the bedrooms.

Even as Terna stood and sat between the two young men, their bodies hardened by youth and surfing, one golden colored from the sun, the other a natural ebony, she realized that what she had to do for Janice was quite different from what she had been planning. As she sat, her perfumed bottom sinking into the couch, between these two young men who had now started breathing heavier, she couldn't help but be a little disappointed.

Funny and sexy? I don't know.

books 1 and 2 in that order.
Back to physics:
I put together a new tag line, "The most comprehensive theory of quantum mechanics you have never heard of" to go with the one about going for a walk and your view of the universe changing by the time you are finished.. What do you think?

You know I really figured out the underlying symmetry to the universe. There may be some mistakes, maybe some big ones, but that list video, the reason I finished that was that I needed to make sure I had this thing licked. Oh words...
You know I am not happy. I'm about as discontented as a person can be who has solved the underlying symmetry of the universe. I don't get why it is just not flashed all over the frigging internet. I know my readers have some access. That's sort of what this marketing push is about. Light things up a little. Of course, I can't expect this to be done without a lot of input from me, that's why the videos, the audio book (still no word there), book 3, 4th edition and so on and so forth.
But its time to have some fun. I mean serious, right now I lose myself in my writing, primarily the physics which is not a ton of fun over the last month, I exercise to the point where I can't stand the heat any more, then I collapse and fall asleep for maybe two or three hours then I am up, too tired to write, worrying about things. I have had a couple of breaks the last day or two which if they go my way will minimize my risks some. I really need that.
And then there is this whole question of "what am I doing?" I figure if I solved the US of the U that should be enough for a while, but for some reason, no.

I find the whole concept of inflection points applicable here. Things changed the shoe went to the other foot. The decisions shift with it, after a fashion. At least for a time. I wonder how much of an influence all of this has on my work. Obviously it is the source of the work.

It's based on research that has found people's brain waves sync upwhen they're in each other's presence. So if you want to become a funnier or more physically fit person, Cerf's advice is to seek out funny or physically fit friends. You'll naturally start becoming more like them.
http://www.businessinsider.com/neuroscientist-who-studies-decision-making-reveals-2017-9

and, of course, this is entirely consistent with the aut definition of time as shared and disbursed ct3 in the ct3-4-5 matrix.

Friday, June 1, 2018

The antimatter question and symmetry

I opened this and it was blank.
A clean page.
My big coming out, scheduled for yesterday has been delayed until 6/6/18 but by then I may have the audio book which would be a nice touch (or maybe not).
You see, you don't have to support me. I'm doing the writer thing on my on, the physicist part too. I don't know if it will work, probably won't but I can write, I know that. Turning out a book once every couple of months and having something finished and edited once every 4 or 5 months. If I can stay away from the physics, sort of just consolidate things, like the symmetry part of this post, probably going into book 4, maybe I can do. I'm outlining new books all the time. You don't have to pay any attention to this, that's intentional, but I can't help hoping you do. My plans...how am I supposed to have them?

Anyway, we were talking about the physics come out that is now scheduled for 6/6 (hopefully it will get pushed up.

Here's what it looks like:

"If you begin to read this book, by the time you are finished your view of the universe will be completely altered."
Algorithm Universe Theory Book 3: Kindle Version US
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07DCLKYV6
Promo:
Just as Energy and Matter are the same thing, Space and Energy are the same thing. We are made out of space.
Algorithm Universe Theory (AUT) explains how space and energy interact and why we experience that interaction constantly. We see the constant interaction of space and photons as acceleration and deceleration.
Movement is space decompressing from higher states, in particular photons which in turn decompress from wave energy.
AuT explains specifically what time is and how history exists in a quantum universe environment. It gives the symmetry of the universe below thermodynamics explaining the big bang, wave-particle duality, black holes, the nature of space and all other mysterious phenomena in easy to understand terms.
Aut is a description of entropy and force more fundamentally than the Standard Model.
Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and my author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from facebook

Amazon USA
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07DCLKYV6
UK
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07DCLKYV6
DE
https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07DCLKYV6
FR
https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B07DCLKYV6
ES
https://www.amazon.es/dp/B07DCLKYV6
IT
https://www.amazon.it/dp/B07DCLKYV6
NL
https://www.amazon.nl/dp/B07DCLKYV6
JP
https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B07DCLKYV6
Br
https://www.amazon.com.br/dp/B07DCLKYV6
CA
https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B07DCLKYV6
MX
https://www.amazon.com.mx/dp/B07DCLKYV6
AU
https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B07DCLKYV6
IN
https://www.amazon.in/dp/B07DCLKYV6

Hard Copy: https://tsw.createspace.com/title/8552508
'
Interestingly, there are two published issues of book 4 and this link is to the wrong one in my opinion, the only difference is the cover, but what can I do. I launched the ship and cannot call it back.

Let me make another comment about the links.
Now, no one is reading this blog post: https://youtu.be/huQ-UybSFPE
I think its a pretty cool video on this science, short, I just don't get it.

So here is the first part on symmetry.
Symmetry is considered to be the state where you can act on something and it looks the same afterwards as it did before.
The idea of turning a vase which is symmetric, it looks both ways the same after spinning.
In super-symmetry this is both true and false because all things change with each value of x so nothing is ever symmetric in the sense that acting on it leaves it the same at the quantum level.
At the same time, there is only one action on each thing in supersymmetry, the change in a point which says the point is one step closer to a charge change or has done so.
So what does this say about the idea of anti-matter and matter; charge in particular which in AuT is synonymous with an asymmetric solution leaving either net plus, net minus, charge never being net neutral except as the absence of charge.

The symmetry of Algorithm Universe is perfect, and totally asymmetric at the same time. This is obvious from the unique standing of every point.
The more compression you get, the more symmetry is possible, so not only is it tending to higher compression states, but also greater symmetries.

This will be important.

More evidence AuT is accurate?

Part of the problem with pre-aut physics is that you look up in the sky and you see things and don't know how to interpret them:

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/new-type-galaxy-just-after-big-bang-has-been-discovered-1623193

This article seems to say that black holes were in existence 900 million years after the big bang. Now that is a long time, but not long enough for suns to burn out of the size envisioned by pre-aut astronomy and collapse unless there was some pretty dense stuff around and not just a bunch of elementary stuff like energy.

That being said, it is entirely consistent with AuT and the absence of these early quasar/dissolving black holes are pretty much a requirement of AuT.

My promotion of book 3 was apparently delayed, at least as of now being labeled "late" although it is still 5/31 when it was to be delivered and I am not concerned yet. I was told to wait for another 24 hours which is no problem.

The weekend is probably just as well for this type of thing. I hope it is not delayed further, although I have so much to work on right now, that I could well spend the weekend on press releases, edits to the fiction version and the like.

I put a clean recording up, I may have spoke too soon about the audio book because the review period is 10-14 days and I think next week only gets to the beginning.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/why-is-aut-different-edited

I was unhappily awake at 3am this morning, realizing I was not getting any closer to a resolution with the problems I faced with this ongoing nightmare west of here, the equivalent in some ways of the slow moving lava in Hawaii, but with only me in its path and decided to attempt to deal with it from the standpoint of minimizing the problem if possible.

I did that and now I am waiting again; because nothing can happen in the middle of the night. I am tired of being patient, tired of being distracted by these ancient problems in the middle of the night and very much ready to move on. I must wait for that, I suppose and hope that June is a better month.