This is not about the misleading test and it is not entirely new
It's just the best yet, something I sketched while waiting outside.
Here's a thought. In a pre-ordained universe there is no morality. We do good because the universe tells us to and bad for the same reason without choice.
And yet it is inherently right to us to be good, why?
I would argue it is an evolutionary feature, but evolution is a thing that is pre-ordained also.
Given that it is perhaps ok to cause a minimal pain for a maximum good; to, for example, push someone down if it moves them out of the way of a train or even to push them, safely, to get yourself out of the way of a train, how far does this rationale go?
If you do something which hurts someone incidentally in order to do what you feel you need to do, how much is a prior obligation an impediment and why should it be?
These are very practical questions.
I swam 3,000 yrds yesterday, 1000 im, and 2000 today with 600 im. That is essentially a mile im in 2 days which means very little, but the reason for it was to atone for a wrong that no one cared about.
We should talk about physics, the physics of pain is my job alone.
If you think you can find a difference in time by accelerating a satellite parallel and perpendicular to the plane of the universe, if you don't it is because the velocity is an absolute so that no matter which direction it comes from it is the same velocity, the same ct1 exchange. This is actually less clear than you might think, but the discussion of time will focus on what time is and how the movement of ct1, ct2 and ct3 interact along with ct4 transition states to create the history that we recognize as time.
That is already written and posted, but that is for another day.
The following is a waste of time, it's what is being deleted from book 4.
While this newest "view" of time will be new to the next published edition (after all this effluent is disposed of) the view of time in book 4 is surprisingly accurate and certainly the edition you can order today is years ahead of any other physic.
However, without further ado, here are some additional removed paragraphs from book 4 with goal of hopefully bringing the next and fully edited edition under 250 words. and with minimal repetition and irrelevant or misleading information, the first paragraph being the only one that I really like, I will use it somewhere.
The insult is inevitable death, but the knife twist is irony embodied in idle superstitions and demigods who plague us. The algorithm hides like monster clown who knows it can strike with impunity when it wishes rather than cowering like a scared child. It reserves that fate for us.
Time and history are redefined as constituent parts of the "effect". There is an "arrow of time" but it has more to do with the development of the universe in converging cycles than with the steady growth of information that x drives. History is built, but it also breaks down and then the parts are reassembled into the future. We live in a time of "Net break down." Unlike other theories, AuT assures a time of building up and compression. There is no alternative "ever expanding universe.”
1) The
increase or decrease in compression occur in quantum instances or inflection
points and change the way that information moves. It is theorized that changes in compression
state in lower states cause the breakdown of compression in higher states which
also has a net change at an inflection point based on the average of
compression states in the next lower state between positive or negative,
because of relative change between different states of compression preventing x
from being aligned with time.
The same thing happens in
time. When time compresses from ct2 to
ct3 as history, it does so with f-series compression and when it unwinds it
does the opposite. This is the way that history builds from prior results!
Derivation:
The
discussion from book 2 shows:
Pi is
defined in terms of -1 and quantum change until a F-series “place” is
introduced at f/f(plupix), in the example shown for pi=-1 and pi=4.
The conversion ratio for quantum
phenomena (1.185 or 32/27) yields the subsequent compression state for all
future Compression states.
32 is 2^5. 27 is 3^3 so you get this result:
N^(n+n+1)/(n+1)^(n+1)=ratio of
siny(pi1)/siny(pi0)
The effective ratio is:
N^(2n+1)/(n+1)^(2+1)
This can
also be written:
n^(f(n))/((n+1)^(2+1))
for n=2
Using the
logarithmic function (the opposite of raising one number to the other) to get
f(n) out:
Log(b)x/y=log(b)x-log(b)y
Log(b)(x^n)=n(log(b)x)
In this case that yields
f(n)(log(b)x for x=(n+1)^(2^1). In this
example, 1 can be replaced with n. In
other words, the equation is f(n)log(b)2^n.
Gluon features are
achieved through aging, the exchang of compressed features with adjoining
similar states, e.g. the transfer from an adjoining ct3 state between two ct4
states. One suggestion by the paired
model (positive and negative pairing to combine states which fall apart when
one of the two changes) is that this would be a similar net compression charged ct3 state.
Separation doesn’t exist based on
dimension because it does not exist at ct1, so it has to be based on relative solution
order (a, b, c, etc in Figure 2) so that a is at one point of separation from zero and d is 4 places removed from 0,
but d is only one place removed from at least one of the c places.
There is a center in the universe in
this model, 0’.
Even though each “circle” in Figure
1 changes with x, the order of the change provides the potential for defining a
separation of points in space once a higher information state is involved.
Each quantum point is preserved, but
these combinations are not preserved.
Compression occurs according to f(n)^2^n; and decompression presumably
occurs in the opposite direction.
The net effect looks like this with
curvature added based on the leveling out of the different competing states as
shown in Figure 3, but there is an inflection point change.
Figure 30 AVERAGE YIELDS CURVATURE
As
Figure 4 shows at point G, the inflection point changes for each of the
constituent quantum F-series states.
Figure 31
Conceptually, there
are net interactions of positive an negative time states which create over
higher compression states the effect of intersecting curved spirals we
observe. The two different versions of
this shown in Figure 4 and 5 represent the different effects that result from
the amount of alignment in paired states in Figure 4 and exchanged states in
Figure 5.
Figure 32 TRANSITION FROM NEUTRAL TO
NET POSITIVE
