I ate a can of soup. You can vastly improve a can of soup, if your stomach is up to it, by adding fresh hot peppers cut up in tiny pieces. But that's another story.
You should never pass up the opportunity
to write your lover a poem
or tell her that you think of her
remind her that you wrote her a song
or dedicated something special to her
or that she provides you relief, release
or whatever she provides
if you're lucky enough a reason to live
and if your even more lucky a reason to love
nothing lasts forever
so you should capture your gratitude
your passion, your fondness,
and if things last forever
what is better to save
than what you would say to your lover
what you would say about her
what she does for you
what you hope you do in return
what you wish you did
why you are a better person
and if you are not because of your lover
a better person than you were
then perhaps you shouldn't have one
because if you cannot write poetry to her
tell what is special, what is grand
what is greater than life,
what is greater than death
about what you share
and what you want to share
than you don't have a lover
and so you not neglect your lover
lest you find that you don't have one
lest your love suffers from neglect
which would make you less
even as your actions prove it
so take a moment
in your busy day
to reach out and do something
anything, anything special
and remember that life
is made of special gifts
and exquisite punishments
and love is something of both
and a lover is someone
who shares those with you
lessening the burden
and helping you
to embrace the pleasure
and allowing you togther
to understand it all
as something greater
than what either of you
would have apart
Saturday, November 22, 2014
ya me canse one of two
'I've had enough,' says Mexican attorney general in missing students gaffe
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/09/protests-flare-in-mexico-after-attorney-generals-enough-im-tired-remarks
I am trying to decide if I've had enough...or not.
There is no limit to what I can withstand for the moment.
My law is that we must live according to the theory that every moment must last in eternity to be lived over and over again. How then, must you live your life.
I cannot say that my justice requirements compare at all to those of the Mexicans, but if we let small injustices occur then we can be nearly certain that we will see larger ones follow. Those who would enslave us in little ways will eventually enslave us as far as they can.
Today I rode my bike 6 miles, swam a very easy 2500 yards (only 800 im) in between and broke a period of relative inactivity that threatened this week and my continued existence.
I do not know what the balance of the day or of my life holds. I do know that at some point in time I must figure out what part courage plays in my continued existence, whether it be real or illusory. Somewhere out there is a decision.
I listened to a song which seemed to hold a truth for me, but now I cannot remember it clearly. But it said something about the need to explain myself to you. And though I am ready to do that, I do not have the words.
I am trying to decide if I've had enough...or not.
There is no limit to what I can withstand for the moment.
My law is that we must live according to the theory that every moment must last in eternity to be lived over and over again. How then, must you live your life.
I cannot say that my justice requirements compare at all to those of the Mexicans, but if we let small injustices occur then we can be nearly certain that we will see larger ones follow. Those who would enslave us in little ways will eventually enslave us as far as they can.
Today I rode my bike 6 miles, swam a very easy 2500 yards (only 800 im) in between and broke a period of relative inactivity that threatened this week and my continued existence.
I do not know what the balance of the day or of my life holds. I do know that at some point in time I must figure out what part courage plays in my continued existence, whether it be real or illusory. Somewhere out there is a decision.
I listened to a song which seemed to hold a truth for me, but now I cannot remember it clearly. But it said something about the need to explain myself to you. And though I am ready to do that, I do not have the words.
NLT-A peak into the land of god 6 of 10 why don't the numbers line up perfectly part deux
Scientists love a puzzle, so we have come to the part of this discussion where I will give them one.
First, why do we need a puzzle? After all, we can be pretty certain that CT1-CT5 exists, not just because of the math involved but also because it lines up well with information theory? The answer is that math is not reality. Math is just math. As long as the math explains reality, it's pretty helpful, but the prior post shows that what we like to think of as reality is much more complicated.
So what is the puzzle? The puzzle is what is the proper scale to measure clock times? We have shown that using mass is not a great way to do it. First, at CT0-CT3 states mass doesn't really mean a whole lot. We know why CT states all have gravity, but we don't know why some show mass differently. It is all fine and good to argue that CT coordinate shifts are inaccurate because mass doesn't work perfectly on scale, but that attributes an inordinate amount of "weight" to mass. Mass doesn't deserve unless we can attribute mass to space or non-linearity.
Another candidate is dimension. This candidate is a little better because coordinate change translates well into dimension. The problem that comes up, however, is very similar. Space appears to have no dimension (changing in only one coordinate at a time it wouldn't be very space like). Even so, a type of dimension is inherent in a coordinate based system. The problem with our traditional method of measuring lies in what happens during coordinate shifts. Black holes, for example, are point sources in the universe, at least potentially. We have shown earlier that "large" dimensional black holes are merely point sources which are separated by space, energy, matter, and the transitional forms that these transition between that are discussed above.
The universe is incredibly complicated, but NLT is elegant. Somewhere the transition between elegant and complex has to be explained. We know that NLT requires a steady state universe, one that has no entropy or randomness, yet we experience a transition of events that we interpret as entropy and randomness. We even experience and "act" as if we have self awareness and self determination. In a NLT universe, which clearly appears to be the case, even these features appear to have a "dream like quality" in that they do not exist, and yet we perceive them.
I write about us "changing the code" but in an NLT universe, we've already done whatever we're going to do. We can't change the code, we cannot escape the matrix. If we did, the theory goes, we would not exist. It isn't escaping the universe, it is only escaping linearity.
So the question of what the proper measurement is becomes problematic. The "information" theorists say, largely correctly, that we are measuring "information". Obviously, CT states are information states to some extent, they act like information in terms of exponential function. But information is as vague a description as time coordinates.
No, time coordinates, time information, whatever "word you use is inadequate to the task. For one reason, the words don't describe the feature changes. The addition of dimension, mass, energy and whatever is shown by the compression of black holes, even the explanation as to why the is inconsistency in units, the creation of mass and then the failure of mass to work internally (the failure of Planck mass vs observed quantum matter) and externally (the failure of the mass of black holes to properly correspond to exponential combinations of minimal mass, even though it appears to correspond largely to Planck predictions). But in this, there are clues. The clues, for example, include the fact that Planck mass doesn't correspond with observed mass. It shows that the interaction of different informational states involves much more than a simple observed quantity. Instead it has to do with something that is not observed clearly and not directly related to dimension or to mass, not to energy or to anything else that is tangible, but relates directly to each of those.
So there is your mystery. And we must solve it in 4 posts. So what do you think?
First, why do we need a puzzle? After all, we can be pretty certain that CT1-CT5 exists, not just because of the math involved but also because it lines up well with information theory? The answer is that math is not reality. Math is just math. As long as the math explains reality, it's pretty helpful, but the prior post shows that what we like to think of as reality is much more complicated.
So what is the puzzle? The puzzle is what is the proper scale to measure clock times? We have shown that using mass is not a great way to do it. First, at CT0-CT3 states mass doesn't really mean a whole lot. We know why CT states all have gravity, but we don't know why some show mass differently. It is all fine and good to argue that CT coordinate shifts are inaccurate because mass doesn't work perfectly on scale, but that attributes an inordinate amount of "weight" to mass. Mass doesn't deserve unless we can attribute mass to space or non-linearity.
Another candidate is dimension. This candidate is a little better because coordinate change translates well into dimension. The problem that comes up, however, is very similar. Space appears to have no dimension (changing in only one coordinate at a time it wouldn't be very space like). Even so, a type of dimension is inherent in a coordinate based system. The problem with our traditional method of measuring lies in what happens during coordinate shifts. Black holes, for example, are point sources in the universe, at least potentially. We have shown earlier that "large" dimensional black holes are merely point sources which are separated by space, energy, matter, and the transitional forms that these transition between that are discussed above.
The universe is incredibly complicated, but NLT is elegant. Somewhere the transition between elegant and complex has to be explained. We know that NLT requires a steady state universe, one that has no entropy or randomness, yet we experience a transition of events that we interpret as entropy and randomness. We even experience and "act" as if we have self awareness and self determination. In a NLT universe, which clearly appears to be the case, even these features appear to have a "dream like quality" in that they do not exist, and yet we perceive them.
I write about us "changing the code" but in an NLT universe, we've already done whatever we're going to do. We can't change the code, we cannot escape the matrix. If we did, the theory goes, we would not exist. It isn't escaping the universe, it is only escaping linearity.
So the question of what the proper measurement is becomes problematic. The "information" theorists say, largely correctly, that we are measuring "information". Obviously, CT states are information states to some extent, they act like information in terms of exponential function. But information is as vague a description as time coordinates.
No, time coordinates, time information, whatever "word you use is inadequate to the task. For one reason, the words don't describe the feature changes. The addition of dimension, mass, energy and whatever is shown by the compression of black holes, even the explanation as to why the is inconsistency in units, the creation of mass and then the failure of mass to work internally (the failure of Planck mass vs observed quantum matter) and externally (the failure of the mass of black holes to properly correspond to exponential combinations of minimal mass, even though it appears to correspond largely to Planck predictions). But in this, there are clues. The clues, for example, include the fact that Planck mass doesn't correspond with observed mass. It shows that the interaction of different informational states involves much more than a simple observed quantity. Instead it has to do with something that is not observed clearly and not directly related to dimension or to mass, not to energy or to anything else that is tangible, but relates directly to each of those.
So there is your mystery. And we must solve it in 4 posts. So what do you think?
Monday, November 17, 2014
homeless children
Child homelessness surges to nearly 2.5 million (+video) - Christian Science Monitor http://tinyurl.com/k6cm8sq shared via www.newshog.co
can this possibly be right? are we really this horrible?
NLT-A peak into the land of god 5 of 10 why don't the numbers line up perfectly
This post has the info from a prior post to put everything into context. The problem addressed is why don't the numbers in any physics inquiry line up properly. The discussion of exponential compression or exponential organization or whatever you want to call it raises an age old problem in physics. We get Planck lengths which are not only different from one another (there is more than one way to skin a Planck length cat) but are inconsistent with observed phenomena.
Somehow we have to reconcile these inconsistencies with a relatively well known and observable universe. While NLT is elegant, it doesn't solve every problem, but it does give several ways to approach these types of problem.
There is a unique inquiry afoot. The answers to the fundamental questions of the universe continue.
Somehow we have to reconcile these inconsistencies with a relatively well known and observable universe. While NLT is elegant, it doesn't solve every problem, but it does give several ways to approach these types of problem.
There is a unique inquiry afoot. The answers to the fundamental questions of the universe continue.
We have the solved the question of the event horizon. To recap, the event horizon reflect matter
falling into an orbit about a black hole which is a high gravity ct5 state as a
result of 10^32 matter or energy-a question yet to be fully explored, but to be
answer in principle here, into a single particle of clock time 5. The way to determine the very interesting question
of scale is to see what the minimum size of a black hole is. What are there two choice and why does it
appear to be 10^32 fundamental particles of matter?
First, there are two choices because if you are talking
about decisions based on the simple formula 2^n as n changes from 0 to infinity
in whole numbers, the bit coordinate increase than presumably you are talking
about a decision based system where the number of possible outcomes are
directly related to the initial state.
However, this does not appear to be what is happening.
Instead, as the clock time states increase, the each clock
time state becomes the fundamental unit of change. That is you start with non-linear time and
2^0 which is 1, one bit, plus or minus.
Then you go to the photonic state 2^1 or 2 where there are two possible
choices reflected in a two dimensional state, but the resulting force is a one
dimensional force, gravity (it cannot pull dimensionally, it can only pull to
non-linearity). In a normal
informational system, a coin flip for example, the next example would be to
have 3 coins tossed at once, but instead the concentration appears to be that
of the compressed state. 2^4 of the two dimensional state. This process continues so that at the
transition between matter and energy you have 10^16 fundamental units of energy
for each fundamental particle of matter.
Keep in mind this is only a scale function, a question of what happens
when you go from 10^8 to 10^16, you see a transition in terms of fundamental
particles of one type to fundamental particles of the next. The same result appears to be consistent with
the scale of black holes. While ct5
particles (black hole individual particles) would be very large indeed if they
were merely 10^32 fundamental particles of energy, they appear instead to
follow the pattern set by matter (and presumably by the lower states) in terms
of the amount of concentration necessary to have a stable unit.
Around this incredibly powerful gravity source, matter and
energy are drawn, but even though they fall towards the singularity, they
cannot reach it. They cannot even
transition from their current states to a CT5 state unless they reach a stable
quantity, at least not permanently.
Laboratory data from particle accelerators indicates that temporary
black holes can form. These would be
high energy states where an isolated concentration of matter occurs which
doesn't have the concentration to be stable but is sufficiently concentrated to
attain features of CT5.
This would indicate that in the high concentrations around a
black hole, those at the event horizon and perhaps closer, the concentrations
approach CT5 states and the speed with which the matter and energy
"drop" towards the point get faster and faster flattening out the
orbits and creating a situation where it is presumed that (1) the concentration
approaches CT5 without permanently being able to arrive leading to an easy
transition between those states (matter and CT5 since the energy is
sufficiently compacted to transition into matter and (2) the "disk of
material (matter and energy changing into matter) approaches an infinite
flatness allowing for an easy transition to the two dimensional states of
energy and the flattened matter. (3)
Presumably in between you'd have a highly concentrated state of matter at such
a high energy state that it would be difficult to distinguish it from either
energy or CT5.
What is seen is that much of this matter remains in orbit,
increasing the gravity of the black hole (CT5) until a second unit of black
hole is created (2x10^32 would be the starting point, but not the ending point.
The largest black hole is approximate 17billion times as
large as the sun.
The smallest black hole is 6.3 suns. So we can say that a "hydrogen black
hole" is 6.3 suns, a "helium black hole" is 12.6 suns. These very rough numbers can be worked
backwards to get the size of fundamental units of other items (10^32 into 6.3
suns would tell you the size of the smallest particle of matter under this
theory although that very rough number doesn't work any better than Planck Mass works for the smallest fundamental particle of matter).
Roughly, this yields the following analysis: 2x10^33g as the
weight of the sun, 1.26x10^34g for a hydrogen black hole (hbh). HBH^1/32=11.6 grams.
This suggests that a fundamental particle of matter would be 11 grams
(that’s a lot since an electron is 9x10^-28 grams and a proton 1.6x10^-24grams). We can make this worse. Using an electron as the minimum size (as
opposed to any of the other quark particles) this suggests a conversion rate of
2^64 which implies an intermediary stage or a jump in quantum size of
compression 2^16 (2^4) jumping to 2^64 (2^6).
This progression of 0,1,2,3,4,6 has some frightening
characteristics. For example 0+1+2=3;
1+3=4;2+4=6 suggesting the next progression would be 3+6=9. There is no basis for a non linear
progression that comes to mind, but this would still be a patterned progression
and if it turns out to be accurate, it would be worth additional study.
Using Plank Mass (PM)
you get a conversion rate of 10^38 (sun) vs 10^-8 (Plank mass which is 10^46th
and which is probably outside the astronomic margins of error for 10^32. However PM has been calculated using magnetic
flux as 2.5x10^-4g http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0707/0707.0058.pdf. This yields a factor of 10^42. For electrons the scale appears way off
10^-28 to 10^34 which is 62, very close to the 10^64 integer jumping 2^6.
So you have PM which, while far from perfect, is at least a
little closer.
The deviation for matter minimum size to Planck minimum size is smaller (10^20) than the electron minimum particle to black hole prediction-(off by 10^29) but both show predictions wildly off from observations.
The deviation for matter minimum size to Planck minimum size is smaller (10^20) than the electron minimum particle to black hole prediction-(off by 10^29) but both show predictions wildly off from observations.
For electrons to BH you have 10^62 and for protons or
neutrons it would be 10^58 in terms of a pure mass scale. The “obvious” question is what is half way in
size between a black hole and an electron where you have the so called “missing
link” of matter. We can find some candidates. One possibility would be a black hole with no acretion disk, no populated event horizon. While such a "point" would have some "size" (fundamental particle size for a black hole just as we have the different types of fundamental particles for matter) it would be very hard to see. Unfortunately, it woudl also likely be at the center of several solar systems (from collapsed stars of a size 1/2 the size of 3.6 suns). Now these solar systems would be hard to see since they are dark so we cannot rule this out completely. There are more important aspects, however, that we should look harder at. Fundamental particle size is variable. From Plank Mass to electron to proton to neutron to quark and, god forbid we go off on this tangent, strings (see the article above for a more thorough discussion of going in for harmonics vs something more). The concept of orbits allowing the formation of several intermediary stages of matter and the concept that we have "massless" formations (EMF and Photons, not to mention space, but we mentioned it) and then "jump" to mass at the matter to energy transition indicates that mass is the wrong "scalar" for tracking change.
Since we know that an electron is a scale smaller
than planck length of 10^-20 we can say that a lot more goes into the analysis
of minimum particle size than a little math error.
We end up with some choices. First you can reject Non-linear time
entirely, but that requires a rejection of Einstein and I’m not ready for
that. Another is that you skip states or have intermeidate unobserved states which seems to work fairly well (10^-28 to 10^34 is a scale change of 10^62
which is very close (in terms of galactic hand grenades) to 10^64 which would be
two states larger than matter (2^4 to 2^6).
The next higher state suggested (10^512) would take a whole mess of
black holes to reach, but so would the next linear state of 2^6. The final and best choice relates actual
observation to mathematical calculation.
We find these discrepancies for plank length vs fundamental length of
particles observed. There are different
ways to calculate plank length and different ways to define mass. It means that the reliance on the electron scale or Planck Mass scale is unwarranted.
If we reject Electron Scale, Proton/Neutron Scale and Planck Mass scales we are left with nothing more than informational states, but there are worse places to be in terms of a starting point. We know, for example, according to relativity that photos have gravity but no mass. The transition of states (2^n to 2^n+1) must have features converting matter in ways that are not immediately obvious because they stick into “dimensions” that we don’t perceive or come out of dimensions that we don't perceive. Perceive may include understand. Some of the length can be seen going outward into places that we do not accurately measure in black holes. Finding these locations, determining how informational states yield position, understanding how weights vary in terms of theoretical stability (e.g. Planck Mass) and actual stability (electron and quark products) and will be important. Will we find different informational state, will the interaction of states change the way that the end product is measured and weighed, how it is stabilized and destabilized? We are only up to 5 of 10.
If we reject Electron Scale, Proton/Neutron Scale and Planck Mass scales we are left with nothing more than informational states, but there are worse places to be in terms of a starting point. We know, for example, according to relativity that photos have gravity but no mass. The transition of states (2^n to 2^n+1) must have features converting matter in ways that are not immediately obvious because they stick into “dimensions” that we don’t perceive or come out of dimensions that we don't perceive. Perceive may include understand. Some of the length can be seen going outward into places that we do not accurately measure in black holes. Finding these locations, determining how informational states yield position, understanding how weights vary in terms of theoretical stability (e.g. Planck Mass) and actual stability (electron and quark products) and will be important. Will we find different informational state, will the interaction of states change the way that the end product is measured and weighed, how it is stabilized and destabilized? We are only up to 5 of 10.
Likewise there is no intermediary particle observed between
a black hole and a concentration of matter having characteristics of stability;
but that doesn't mean that such particles do not exist.
So what is this 17 billion sun version of the black
hole? Clearly it is not much different
that a larger atom or a molecule perhaps.
In between the individual units of the black hole you would find the
compressed type of matter that you find around the event horizon. This compression is such that there is not
much room for space, photons or energy, but those states would probably be
transitional states.
This model gives rise to the question of what you would see
around a helium atom. We have been led
to expect that there's a lot of space in there.
While the gravity is not enough to join everything together, we know
that there are unique forces at work and it is possible that the forces at work
are such that energy is held within the minimum matter state in a similarly
fluid arrangement, presumably transitioning between photonic forces and ever
temporary matter states. Of course,
because there gravitational effects are less, we might want to discount that,
but we're working with the same equations and as r becomes very small, the
effect on the masses makes them approach infinity whether we like it or not,
that is we are at very small separation distances compared to the mass and
there are reasons to believe that some similarities exist.
In fact, it seems likely that the very substance of matter
is related to the transition state, the matter-event horizon and the relatively
fluid transitions that can occur here.
To better understand the coordinate dimension disconnect, a
simple example can be examined. To do
this we will look at linear changes for a single point with 4 coordinates where
each point changes with the addition of 1.
This is vastly oversimplified where you have compression states and
negative states corresponding to positive states, but the example works well to
understand time. For this example you
have a point (P) having coordinates (x,y,z,t)
Pa(1,3,5,6) to Pb(2,4,6,7).
What can be seen here is that an observer at coordinate t might not
experience a change as it moves, but would observe the change in the other
points. Since only the change is
visible, the movement of the points is what we perceive and what we perceive as
time. The three that are seen are the changing
together or the perception would not be possible. The change must be common for multiple
particles through compression in order to observe change on a large scale.
So dimensions are not dimensions.
Coordinates are not dimensions
Multiple coordinates identify the position of one quantum
time point relative to another, but there is always some separation unless
compression is sufficient (temporarily or permanently) to allow new forces to
come into play, or to amend the existing forces, by increasing the
informational efficiency of the clock time by a complete state (integer 0, 1,
2, 3, etc) as each ct state transitions to the next. In between transitions, there appears to be
sufficient concentration to allow for transitional states to exist, at least
for high density matter (radioactive isotopes) and high enough density black
holes to have quasar characteristics.
It can be presumed that the force changes that allow black
holes to stay together, super-dupe strong and weak forces for lack of a better
name; correspond in some way or derive in some way from the strong and weak
forces holding energy together in sufficient concentrations to be stable and,
when sufficient amounts of matter are formed in proximity (radioactive
isotopes) to create transition states.
The lower the clock time of the point in question, the fewer
simultaneous changes define the position at once but the faster they can occur.
Coordinates correspond in function to information on the
location of a point and to a bit of information with two states.
We theorize this process continues indefinitely, each
transition occurring where r goes to zero (in the gravity equation) meaning at
an infinite concentration of the prior state which much "jump" from
this near infinity to the next higher clock time. At some point in time, the transition
"jumps" to non-linearity and we start the process over again.
This, of course, is an over simplification, but all the
operative components are present.
The "measurement" of the these relative black
holes (point black holes vs the orbit of neptune) provides additional support
for the theory, because the "space" perceived must be occupied by
something, in this case the transitional material at high concentrations, true
for black holes, and presumably true for lesser energy states, even those as dispersed
in terms of concentration as wave energy.
There appears little dispersion in photonic states and photons appear to
be point sources themselves, but we should not be fooled by our prejudices
since we know that a unique transition of force occurs from the prior
discussions.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
NLT-A peak into the land of god 4 of 10 views of godspace-the answer to all your questions?
There is a unique inquiry afoot. The answers to the fundamental questions of the universe continue.
We have the solved the question of the event horizon. To recap, the event horizon reflect matter falling into an orbit about a black hole which is a high gravity ct5 state as a result of 10^32 matter or energy-a question yet to be fully explored, but to be answer in principle here, into a single particle of clock time 5. The way to determine the very interesting question of scale is to see what the minimum size of a black hole is. What are there two choice and why does it appear to be 10^32 fundamental particles of matter?
First, there are two choices because if you are talking about decisions based on the simple formula 2^n as n changes from 0 to infinity in whole numbers, the bit coordinate increase than presumably you are talking about a decision based system where the number of possible outcomes are directly related to the initial state. However, this does not appear to be what is happening.
Instead, as the clock time states increase, the each clock time state becomes the fundamental unit of change. That is you start with non-linear time and 2^0 which is 1, one bit, plus or minus. Then you go to the photonic state 2^1 or 2 where there are two possible choices reflected in a two dimensional state, but the resulting force is a one dimensional force, gravity (it cannot pull dimensionally, it can only pull to non-linearity). In a normal informational system, a coin flip for example, the next example would be to have 3 coins tossed at once, but instead the concentration appears to be that of the compressed state. 2^4 of the two dimensional state. This process continues so that at the transition between matter and energy you have 10^16 fundamental units of energy for each fundamental particle of matter. Keep in mind this is only a scale function, a question of what happens when you go from 10^8 to 10^16, you see a transition in terms of fundamental particles of one type to fundamental particles of the next. The same result appears to be consistent with the scale of black holes. While ct5 particles (black hole individual particles) would be very large indeed if they were merely 10^32 fundamental particles of energy, they appear instead to follow the pattern set by matter (and presumably by the lower states) in terms of the amount of concentration necessary to have a stable unit.
Around this incredibly powerful gravity source, matter and energy are drawn, but even though they fall towards the singularity, they cannot reach it. They cannot even transition from their current states to a CT5 state unless they reach a stable quantity, at least not permanently. Laboratory data from particle accelerators indicates that temporary black holes can form. These would be high energy states where an isolated concentration of matter occurs which doesn't have the concentration to be stable but is sufficiently concentrated to attain features of CT5.
This would indicate that in the high concentrations around a black hole, those at the event horizon and perhaps closer, the concentrations approach CT5 states and the speed with which the matter and energy "drop" towards the point get faster and faster flattening out the orbits and creating a situation where it is presumed that (1) the concentration approaches CT5 without permanently being able to arrive leading to an easy transition between those states (matter and CT5 since the energy is sufficiently compacted to transition into matter and (2) the "disk of material (matter and energy changing into matter) approaches an infinite flatness allowing for an easy transition to the two dimensional states of energy and the flattened matter. (3) Presumably in between you'd have a highly concentrated state of matter at such a high energy state that it would be difficult to distinguish it from either energy or CT5.
What is seen is that much of this matter remains in orbit, increasing the gravity of the black hole (CT5) until a second unit of black hole is created (2x10^32 would be the starting point, but not the ending point.
The largest black hole is approximate 17billion times as large as the sun.
The smallest black hole is 6.3 suns. So we can say that a "hydrogen black hole" is 6.3 suns, a "helium black hole" is 12.6 suns. These very rough numbers can be worked backwards to get the size of fundamental units of other items (10^32 into 6.3 suns would tell you the size of the smallest particle of matter under this theory although that a very rough number).
So what is this 17 billion sun version of the black hole? Clearly it is not much different that a larger atom or a molecule perhaps. In between the individual units of the black hole you would find the compressed type of matter that you find around the event horizon. This compression is such that there is not much room for space, photons or energy, but those states would probably be transitional states.
This model gives rise to the question of what you would see around a helium atom. We have been led to expect that there's a lot of space in there. While the gravity is not enough to join everything together, we know that there are unique forces at work and it is possible that the forces at work are such that energy is held within the minimum matter state in a similarly fluid arrangement, presumably transitioning between photonic forces and ever temporary matter states. Of course, because there gravitational effects are less, we might want to discount that, but we're working with the same equations and as r becomes very small, the effect on the masses makes them approach infinity whether we like it or not, that is we are at very small separation distances compared to the mass and there are reasons to believe that some similarities exist.
In fact, it seems likely that the very substance of matter is related to the transition state, the matter-event horizon and the relatively fluid transitions that can occur here.
So dimensions are not dimensions.
Coordinates are not dimensions
Multiple coordinates identify the position of one quantum time point relative to another, but there is always some separation unless compression is sufficient (temporarily or permanently) to allow new forces to come into play, or to amend the existing forces, by increasing the informational efficiency of the clock time by a complete state (integer 0, 1, 2, 3, etc) as each ct state transitions to the next. In between transitions, there appears to be sufficient concentration to allow for transitional states to exist, at least for high density matter (radioactive isotopes) and high enough density black holes to have quasar characteristics.
It can be presumed that the force changes that allow black holes to stay together, super-dupe strong and weak forces for lack of a better name; correspond in some way or derive in some way from the strong and weak forces holding energy together in sufficient concentrations to be stable and, when sufficient amounts of matter are formed in proximity (radioactive isotopes) to create transition states.
The lower the clock time of the point in question, the fewer simultaneous changes define the position at once but the faster they can occur.
Coordinates correspond in function to information on the location of a point and to a bit of information with two states.
We theorize this process continues indefinitely, each transition occurring where r goes to zero (in the gravity equation) meaning at an infinite concentration of the prior state which much "jump" from this near infinity to the next higher clock time. At some point in time, the transition "jumps" to non-linearity and we start the process over again.
This, of course, is an over simplification, but all the operative components are present.
The "measurement" of the these relative black holes (point black holes vs the orbit of neptune) provides additional support for the theory, because the "space" perceived (in the largest example outward to the orbit of neptune) must be occupied by something, in this case the transitional material (matter transitioning to energy CT3 states which may also transition to lower ct states and ct5 states) at high concentrations, true for black holes, and presumably true for lesser energy states, even those as dispersed in terms of concentration as wave energy. There appears little dispersion in photonic states and photons appear to be point sources themselves, but we should not be fooled by our prejudices since we know that a unique transition of force occurs from the prior discussions.
We have the solved the question of the event horizon. To recap, the event horizon reflect matter falling into an orbit about a black hole which is a high gravity ct5 state as a result of 10^32 matter or energy-a question yet to be fully explored, but to be answer in principle here, into a single particle of clock time 5. The way to determine the very interesting question of scale is to see what the minimum size of a black hole is. What are there two choice and why does it appear to be 10^32 fundamental particles of matter?
First, there are two choices because if you are talking about decisions based on the simple formula 2^n as n changes from 0 to infinity in whole numbers, the bit coordinate increase than presumably you are talking about a decision based system where the number of possible outcomes are directly related to the initial state. However, this does not appear to be what is happening.
Instead, as the clock time states increase, the each clock time state becomes the fundamental unit of change. That is you start with non-linear time and 2^0 which is 1, one bit, plus or minus. Then you go to the photonic state 2^1 or 2 where there are two possible choices reflected in a two dimensional state, but the resulting force is a one dimensional force, gravity (it cannot pull dimensionally, it can only pull to non-linearity). In a normal informational system, a coin flip for example, the next example would be to have 3 coins tossed at once, but instead the concentration appears to be that of the compressed state. 2^4 of the two dimensional state. This process continues so that at the transition between matter and energy you have 10^16 fundamental units of energy for each fundamental particle of matter. Keep in mind this is only a scale function, a question of what happens when you go from 10^8 to 10^16, you see a transition in terms of fundamental particles of one type to fundamental particles of the next. The same result appears to be consistent with the scale of black holes. While ct5 particles (black hole individual particles) would be very large indeed if they were merely 10^32 fundamental particles of energy, they appear instead to follow the pattern set by matter (and presumably by the lower states) in terms of the amount of concentration necessary to have a stable unit.
Around this incredibly powerful gravity source, matter and energy are drawn, but even though they fall towards the singularity, they cannot reach it. They cannot even transition from their current states to a CT5 state unless they reach a stable quantity, at least not permanently. Laboratory data from particle accelerators indicates that temporary black holes can form. These would be high energy states where an isolated concentration of matter occurs which doesn't have the concentration to be stable but is sufficiently concentrated to attain features of CT5.
This would indicate that in the high concentrations around a black hole, those at the event horizon and perhaps closer, the concentrations approach CT5 states and the speed with which the matter and energy "drop" towards the point get faster and faster flattening out the orbits and creating a situation where it is presumed that (1) the concentration approaches CT5 without permanently being able to arrive leading to an easy transition between those states (matter and CT5 since the energy is sufficiently compacted to transition into matter and (2) the "disk of material (matter and energy changing into matter) approaches an infinite flatness allowing for an easy transition to the two dimensional states of energy and the flattened matter. (3) Presumably in between you'd have a highly concentrated state of matter at such a high energy state that it would be difficult to distinguish it from either energy or CT5.
What is seen is that much of this matter remains in orbit, increasing the gravity of the black hole (CT5) until a second unit of black hole is created (2x10^32 would be the starting point, but not the ending point.
The largest black hole is approximate 17billion times as large as the sun.
The smallest black hole is 6.3 suns. So we can say that a "hydrogen black hole" is 6.3 suns, a "helium black hole" is 12.6 suns. These very rough numbers can be worked backwards to get the size of fundamental units of other items (10^32 into 6.3 suns would tell you the size of the smallest particle of matter under this theory although that a very rough number).
So what is this 17 billion sun version of the black hole? Clearly it is not much different that a larger atom or a molecule perhaps. In between the individual units of the black hole you would find the compressed type of matter that you find around the event horizon. This compression is such that there is not much room for space, photons or energy, but those states would probably be transitional states.
This model gives rise to the question of what you would see around a helium atom. We have been led to expect that there's a lot of space in there. While the gravity is not enough to join everything together, we know that there are unique forces at work and it is possible that the forces at work are such that energy is held within the minimum matter state in a similarly fluid arrangement, presumably transitioning between photonic forces and ever temporary matter states. Of course, because there gravitational effects are less, we might want to discount that, but we're working with the same equations and as r becomes very small, the effect on the masses makes them approach infinity whether we like it or not, that is we are at very small separation distances compared to the mass and there are reasons to believe that some similarities exist.
In fact, it seems likely that the very substance of matter is related to the transition state, the matter-event horizon and the relatively fluid transitions that can occur here.
So dimensions are not dimensions.
Coordinates are not dimensions
Multiple coordinates identify the position of one quantum time point relative to another, but there is always some separation unless compression is sufficient (temporarily or permanently) to allow new forces to come into play, or to amend the existing forces, by increasing the informational efficiency of the clock time by a complete state (integer 0, 1, 2, 3, etc) as each ct state transitions to the next. In between transitions, there appears to be sufficient concentration to allow for transitional states to exist, at least for high density matter (radioactive isotopes) and high enough density black holes to have quasar characteristics.
It can be presumed that the force changes that allow black holes to stay together, super-dupe strong and weak forces for lack of a better name; correspond in some way or derive in some way from the strong and weak forces holding energy together in sufficient concentrations to be stable and, when sufficient amounts of matter are formed in proximity (radioactive isotopes) to create transition states.
The lower the clock time of the point in question, the fewer simultaneous changes define the position at once but the faster they can occur.
Coordinates correspond in function to information on the location of a point and to a bit of information with two states.
We theorize this process continues indefinitely, each transition occurring where r goes to zero (in the gravity equation) meaning at an infinite concentration of the prior state which much "jump" from this near infinity to the next higher clock time. At some point in time, the transition "jumps" to non-linearity and we start the process over again.
This, of course, is an over simplification, but all the operative components are present.
The "measurement" of the these relative black holes (point black holes vs the orbit of neptune) provides additional support for the theory, because the "space" perceived (in the largest example outward to the orbit of neptune) must be occupied by something, in this case the transitional material (matter transitioning to energy CT3 states which may also transition to lower ct states and ct5 states) at high concentrations, true for black holes, and presumably true for lesser energy states, even those as dispersed in terms of concentration as wave energy. There appears little dispersion in photonic states and photons appear to be point sources themselves, but we should not be fooled by our prejudices since we know that a unique transition of force occurs from the prior discussions.
NLT-A peak into the land of god 3 of 10 views of godspace-a cup of tea edited
I am sure that many of you are thinking
if you look for the right thing (not a hologram) a study of the transition zone of a black hole (event horizon) and at the surface of a radiating particle, the view should yield similar comparisons and perhaps something interesting.
Matter and energy and ct5 states are interchanging.
As is disclosed in EHT and NLT we see black holes giving off energy, necessarily involving the change of matter into energy. The scale of the transfer is enormous.
But that seems much of a rehash of yesterday's post which was done for the walrus cabal's amusement. It is Sunday and, as I often do, I turn to more ecleastical musings. This Sunday's "sermon" will be on the God of Abraham who, by coincidence is the god of the Christian and the Muslem and who has apparently commanded us, at various times and for various reasons, to kill one another merely based on our approach to him. However, this is not a religious text, but is instead a text of physics so let us look at him/her from the realm, not of g-space (pre-linearity) but let us instead look one step closer to us. Let us assume he is a god of linearity, in NLT, experiencing a "void" in the words of Moses (or whoever else wrote genesis, Sumarian, Babylonian, or perhaps a wandering Neadrethal, the last of his kind, remembering a neandrathal story that was told to him long ago by Adam.
So where do you experience the dimensionless void in NLT? For those of you who guessed CT0, congratulations for actually reading some of this, but you are wrong. Just as we experience 3 dimensions in our 4 dimensional view of things (CT4) so would our god in CT0 experience lineairty of time but no space whatsoever. The CT0 universe is the universe of the mythincal 3 year old who got a "c-" on her school project (the linear universe).
No, we're talking about a biblical god that finds himself (sex is irrelevant for anthropomorphising and who really wants to take sexual credit for this mess). He would have the capability of being everywhere (changing his one dimension at a time) and getting there relatively quickly because he could change that one coordinate realatively quickly, but he would not experience dimension, nor light, nor anything else. His only "force" would be gravity, pulling him back towards non-linearity; but he would change quickly.
Apparently, it is a powerful place to start from, because he would change gravity to make first light (ct2), then emf (ct3) before he created the heavens and the earth (ct4). The part where he makes black holes (ct5) is probably hidden in the bible somewhere unless that was considered less relevant for some reason.
But that god would age, because he lived in a place of linearity, not ct0. So is he still with us or has he whithered away. And if so, where did he whither too? How is he affected by the non-linearity which apprarently causes him to live each moment over and over again into eternity?
One of my favorite posts, to my favorite reader, was to show that while my poems are fairly lackluster, they can rhyme, at least a little. I should write a new one today, but my mouth is on fire, and eyes and nose are watering from cutting up hot peppers and putting them in my breakfast, and so I'm going to take a shortcut and reprint (you can find it alone in an earlier post)...in honor of the pope's comments on euthanasia. It occurs to me that he claims to be in touch with the god of ct1, but not CT0, so perhaps the ct1 god is not so right about these things, or right in his non-dimensional way, that causes us to fight when we should be tending our metaphorical garden (the earth, and with NLT the remainder of the vast CT(infinity) universe) that I envision. But enough science, on to poetry.
A cup of tea with death
I swam 3000 yards
as I am wont to do
and afterward decided
to have a cup or two
I drank too fast
and choked a little bit
and as i made a gasp
death came to take a sit
I glanced into his sockets dry
and cape as black as pitch
showing death in all its forms
but not the suffering fits
there were fearful cancers
with flat malignant spread
canon balls and arrows
the fearfully aged dead
I knew some and some I don't
All the ways a person dies
and so I asked, 'a cup for you?'
"don't mind if I do," he sighs
Do you fear me little one
I answered not so much
his bony hand reached for mine
and held it in a clutch
Friend he said I'm here for you
whenever do you need me
I'm good for all in pain
of that I'm sure you see
I bring a peace to everyone
the emperor and slave
are equal in my gentle arms
from pain all do I save
The one who has too many kids
the ones who die alone
the ones with happy full lives
the ones without a bone
And all are treated equally
the sinner and the saint
the artist and the ditch digger
tell me if they aint
I relieve them of the loads
their burdens hard to bear
the work they think they have to do
their hunger and their fear
So tell me will you go with me
and swim that final mile
I put my hand on top of his
and gave a little smile
Not tonight my good old friend
Then I will wait for you
and when the world has been too much
we'll ride together we two.
if you look for the right thing (not a hologram) a study of the transition zone of a black hole (event horizon) and at the surface of a radiating particle, the view should yield similar comparisons and perhaps something interesting.
Matter and energy and ct5 states are interchanging.
As is disclosed in EHT and NLT we see black holes giving off energy, necessarily involving the change of matter into energy. The scale of the transfer is enormous.
But that seems much of a rehash of yesterday's post which was done for the walrus cabal's amusement. It is Sunday and, as I often do, I turn to more ecleastical musings. This Sunday's "sermon" will be on the God of Abraham who, by coincidence is the god of the Christian and the Muslem and who has apparently commanded us, at various times and for various reasons, to kill one another merely based on our approach to him. However, this is not a religious text, but is instead a text of physics so let us look at him/her from the realm, not of g-space (pre-linearity) but let us instead look one step closer to us. Let us assume he is a god of linearity, in NLT, experiencing a "void" in the words of Moses (or whoever else wrote genesis, Sumarian, Babylonian, or perhaps a wandering Neadrethal, the last of his kind, remembering a neandrathal story that was told to him long ago by Adam.
So where do you experience the dimensionless void in NLT? For those of you who guessed CT0, congratulations for actually reading some of this, but you are wrong. Just as we experience 3 dimensions in our 4 dimensional view of things (CT4) so would our god in CT0 experience lineairty of time but no space whatsoever. The CT0 universe is the universe of the mythincal 3 year old who got a "c-" on her school project (the linear universe).
No, we're talking about a biblical god that finds himself (sex is irrelevant for anthropomorphising and who really wants to take sexual credit for this mess). He would have the capability of being everywhere (changing his one dimension at a time) and getting there relatively quickly because he could change that one coordinate realatively quickly, but he would not experience dimension, nor light, nor anything else. His only "force" would be gravity, pulling him back towards non-linearity; but he would change quickly.
Apparently, it is a powerful place to start from, because he would change gravity to make first light (ct2), then emf (ct3) before he created the heavens and the earth (ct4). The part where he makes black holes (ct5) is probably hidden in the bible somewhere unless that was considered less relevant for some reason.
But that god would age, because he lived in a place of linearity, not ct0. So is he still with us or has he whithered away. And if so, where did he whither too? How is he affected by the non-linearity which apprarently causes him to live each moment over and over again into eternity?
One of my favorite posts, to my favorite reader, was to show that while my poems are fairly lackluster, they can rhyme, at least a little. I should write a new one today, but my mouth is on fire, and eyes and nose are watering from cutting up hot peppers and putting them in my breakfast, and so I'm going to take a shortcut and reprint (you can find it alone in an earlier post)...in honor of the pope's comments on euthanasia. It occurs to me that he claims to be in touch with the god of ct1, but not CT0, so perhaps the ct1 god is not so right about these things, or right in his non-dimensional way, that causes us to fight when we should be tending our metaphorical garden (the earth, and with NLT the remainder of the vast CT(infinity) universe) that I envision. But enough science, on to poetry.
A cup of tea with death
I swam 3000 yards
as I am wont to do
and afterward decided
to have a cup or two
I drank too fast
and choked a little bit
and as i made a gasp
death came to take a sit
I glanced into his sockets dry
and cape as black as pitch
showing death in all its forms
but not the suffering fits
there were fearful cancers
with flat malignant spread
canon balls and arrows
the fearfully aged dead
I knew some and some I don't
All the ways a person dies
and so I asked, 'a cup for you?'
"don't mind if I do," he sighs
Do you fear me little one
I answered not so much
his bony hand reached for mine
and held it in a clutch
Friend he said I'm here for you
whenever do you need me
I'm good for all in pain
of that I'm sure you see
I bring a peace to everyone
the emperor and slave
are equal in my gentle arms
from pain all do I save
The one who has too many kids
the ones who die alone
the ones with happy full lives
the ones without a bone
And all are treated equally
the sinner and the saint
the artist and the ditch digger
tell me if they aint
I relieve them of the loads
their burdens hard to bear
the work they think they have to do
their hunger and their fear
So tell me will you go with me
and swim that final mile
I put my hand on top of his
and gave a little smile
Not tonight my good old friend
Then I will wait for you
and when the world has been too much
we'll ride together we two.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)