Waiting makes absolutely no sense in a non-linear environment. If you're putting something off, ok, if I'm putting something off, waiting for something else to happen, understanding the universe perhaps more perfectly than anyone else, what does that say about me?
Or, is first irrelevant even though it already happened? There are, occasionally, situations where things must be done in order. You cannot, for example, eat your omelet before you make it. You can't eat tomorrow's breakfast today because then it would be today's meal.
So waiting is illogical in once sense and a necessity in another. This is a paradox of linear perception. It's a pretty lame excuse for not doing something, but those of us who put off things while waiting for things to happen are made as miserable as the innocent who suffer with us.
None of that helps, there is something called opportunity cost, the price of not taking advantage of the opportunities that are available. Opportunity costs are the highest costs in life.
This morning has dawned breezy and surprisingly cool. I have an excellent cup of coffee and were it not for the obvious health issues, obvious to me, and the massive opportunity costs, also obvious to me, today would be very different from what it is.
How do we modify the Euclidean equation for higher states?
The area of the lens is a function of area of the circle itself, pir^2. The amount of one circle overlapped by another defines the area which is shared and is, not surprisingly, being the second stage of dimension the function of change over both the angle and the radius over a given period of time where R in this case is the distance to the edge of a given line (the edge of the circle). Since we are now dealing with linearity, we have to look at the "movement" of this Radius from non-linearity (zero) to its actual length R. So this part of the equation is I (integration) from 0 to R of rdr. However, we are only dealing with a part of the circle within the lens, so we must also limit it by the angle that defines the two lines R intersecting the circle at either point where the two circles overlap. This two is linear so this angle must be calculated from an angle 0 (corresponding to overlap at a single point) to O (the actual angle in degrees) or I angle (Ia) from zero to O. This is the definition of only half the lens so the actual equation is:
Ac(O)=2Ir(0 to R)Ia(0 to O)r dr da or R^2
O.
Where Ac(O) is the area of the lens formed by the overlap of circles with a radius R and where the angle between the two radius to the two points of overlap of the two circles (which we will get to in the next post except for a reference to which you will be directed shortly) where they overlap.
This suggests for spheres a fairly simple modification:
Av(O)=3IR(0toR)Ia(0toO)Iz(0toR)drdadz which is in formula for the lens and then adding the next intersecting lens in 3 dimensions over the number of intersecting lenses. First, we are no longer working with an "area", instead we are dealing with a volume. Volumes are vastly different from areas. Superficially, we are only integrating over an additional variable, but the qualities of the resulting dimensional characteristic and the number of points that can be found within a volume as compared to an area vary according to different features.
Informational changes are 2^n. Integration suggests the addition of features r^n. This suggests that r=2. But we're about to look at something spookily similar and very different.
Now, this is not precisely the lens calculation we are looking for but it is a very simple version of the calculation (solving it for the volume of a circle (where there is complete overlap in every direction of every circle in a sphere) would yield the equation for the volume of a sphere (4/3 * pi*r^3) which is another way of describing the equation 2^2/3(the number of derivations) times pi (the constant mandated by a spiraling coordinate process) time the radius^3; in this case the radius itself, the radius of the angle O and the radius of the angle of the spherical element. This is, necessarily a function of integrating to determine the very issue of quantum coordinates (whether the quanta be inches, meters, points or any other quantum unit).
If there are multiple ways to combine the circles, then you have multiple types of resulting informational states, just as you have multiple amounts of overlap of intersecting spheres. The question of whether this type of diversity is possible. Even in our complex universe, there have to be quantum limitations or the variation in materials would be greater than what we observe. There are infinite levels of two dimensional overlap, imagine the diversity of three dimensional overlap. While the increasing complexity observed in going from space to energy and energy to matter suggest quantum changes in the amount of overlap, there are limitations suggested by the limits of observed phenomena.
It is of some concern because this formula (4/3pir^3) yields a different result than that required for compression (10^4) in this case vrs r^3 it is important to note that what we are looking at here is a static volume and the volume we're dealing with is of dynamic (moving) time which would add another dimension to r, that of time. While interesting, the equation that follows 2*pi*r^4 isn't as easily resolved.
We see a number of interesting variations. Let's look at the volume equation as we move forward.
2pir (circumference-the line)
pir^2 ("area" of a circle)
4/3pir^3 ("volume" of a sphere)
16/4pir^4("new dimensional feature" of a black hole)
32/2pir^5("new dimensional feature" of a compressed black hole)
While the features of information theory are absent from the volume side (increasing 1 coordinate change at a time), the exponential equation (information theory) does appear in the equation leading to the volume.
So we have R varying with n and the numerator changing at the rate of 2^n
This suggests that the solution is .
If we know that compression of a single point in three dimensional euclidean circles and 3 coordinate time we end up with an equation that can easily look like this:
P(point of photonic energy)=A(O)[as derived above]=E(10^2);
P(point of wave energy)=E(10^4)
P(point of matter)=E(10^8)
If we put these together we get a very different result than you may be thinking (unless you've thought about this). The reason is that a single point is only one part of a dimensional characteristic. The dimensional characteristic here is r. So....using the most simple linear equation (a spiraling line):
2pir=Tot(p) where p is the quantum unit (inches, meters, points). Thus the point equation becomes:
Tot(p)/2pi+tot(p)/(pir^2)+tot(p)/(4/3pir^3)+etc=r where r is the fundamental quantum unit of information. The interesting feature of this equation is that it does not require an analysis of time, but it does suggest that we can determine from the amount of gravity (points of every type) in the universe what r is if we know what the fundamental measure of gravity is which is covered in an earlier post somewhere. The remaining question is do we have to include integration over time to get to the value of r? The answer may not be yes, if we assume that a measure of all volumes in the universe (one dimensional on up) includes time which is suggested since we're really talking about measuring points of information, not points of information at any given point in time.
Not very complicated, eh? (Eh is my new word for everything, apparently) so we'll call this new unit of quantum gravity R or quantum information R an "eh unit" of information
It is important, therefore, to differentiate between a model of NLC information theory and NLC dimensional theory. One deals with a dimensional representation of something which is non-dimensional; the other suggests that information compresses according to the dictates of information theory as more simultaneous changing points are added. In this case, each dimension is the equivalent of a data set (+/-, 1/0,etc) so every time you add one you take 2 to a higher power by one regardless of whether you change the euclidean geometry of the model for representing it. Instead the change in the model reflects the way the increased information is expressed on a quantum level.
Notwithstanding that, the overlap of dimensional theory (one unit of dimension at a time) with informational theory (one +/- data change at a time) yields overlapping results which isn't shocking, it's just a function of the addition of units one at a time in an exponential equation.
They have some theories that "spiral around" this more correct model. One of them can be found here:
Is the Universe Bubbly? Searching in Space for Quantum Foam http://flip.it/BOI2b
The difference between foam and tiny circles lies in how the spirals come to exist and what they represent. In the foam analysis, space time exists independent of non-linearity. It becomes a little less clear what happens to the analysis when you begin to examine flat surfaces (holograms) where NLC got its start.
NLC is much more specific. The information stays the same. The singularity doesn't change. The information is displayed linearly based on some "quirk" which is the cosmic cd player, I suppose, and gravity and linearity are the result. Linearity is illusory, but the illusion has certain qualities. (1) One is that for every action there is reaction, vibration. (2) Another is that it is staged based on information theory, apparently. (3) Another is that it appears to exist as a spiral as a result of the first stage which is rotation and anti-rotational. (4) The fourth is that when rotation begins to spiral (albeit at a very very very small angle due perhaps to the very very very small size of the rotating singularity (technically there are two singularities, one which appears to rotate and the other which doesn't which may be just a relative way of looking at the same one) the reaction to this action is gravity which ensures that the spirals approach circles as opposed to straight lines. (5) The universe has a specific amount of information which means a specific number of quantum points and a specific amount of time. There are many other intermediary features, but (6) the completion of the circle lies in the transition to CT(x) where x is equal to all the information in a single quantum moment of the universe where we're back to everything happening at once.
This is all pretty simple, too easy to digest I suppose. You're looking for something to make it harder to digest. Let me see if I can do that in the next post.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Monday, June 29, 2015
NLC-the circle flux capacitor part 5-where do circles come from
This month we have been focusing on the theory that we're made up of quantum spheres which are made up of quantum circles. Now we address the question of where these circles come from and, more importantly, why.
For those of you waiting for the last post, waiting a little longer won't kill you, at least not quickly.
As has been set out previously, pi is one of the many things, like infinite division, that proves we live in a quantum universe. While this is generally known to every student of geometry, I explained that there was a solution to pi, even though it is a very long solution because once we get to the total amount of information in the universe in terms of decimal places, the solution to pi ceases to have any relevance. This isn't a solution, but recognizes that, in conjunction with the Xeno paradoxes in support of Parminides that dimension is illusory.
We have also determined that circles form a crucial model for our universe, allowing for lenses of two dimensional concentration of information which in turn allow for three and successive dimensions along the same framework. More importantly, this type of solution allows for the existence of the smaller quantum units within a larger quantum unit (energy and space within mass, mass, energy and space with black hole stuff, etc). But where and, more importantly, why do these quantum circles exist.
There cannot be true circles, that would require a solution to pi. So quantum circles are actually quantum spirals where the differences between true circles and spirals are so small that they are not easily observed,
Pi is like a sign post pointing quantum physics in the right direction. We don't need a sign post because we're all pre-programmed. If physics tells us anything, it is that randomness is just another word for not having sufficient information or understanding to plot a predetermined outcome and it turns out these outcomes are curved.
To fully understand this, you have to go back to a prior post which discusses what the pre-universe looks like. It is a very, very high gravity point which has left non-linearity the only way it can (since it has no dimension yet) It is spinning. It is spinning in every direction at once and so fast that the only way we can calculate its speed is to assume that it is spinning at the rate of all quantum moments in the universe (past present and future) at once and since it is spinning in every direction at once, it appears motionless (but don't touch it!). This spinning is a type of dimensionless, and essentially timeless playback of the entire universe and it continues to exist, it is a type of vibration without movement as we perceive it. When we talk about the next state of the universe, it is only a perceived state, something is going to "touch" the universe and "project" our existence. What is this event? What is this thing? You ask too many question. It's like asking how long will this take and will you be there when it is finished. Its a very good question, but the answer is unsatisfactory already, why dwell on it? And why is that relevant anyway?
The point where the vibration ceases to be non-linear is upon us.
We talked about points being composed of dimensional and force characteristics. The euclidean analysis suggests that the points are vibrational in nature; going in one direction yields spirals resembling circles, the movement in the other direction generates force characteristics, at least gravity.
Not immediately upon us but close enough. But we're talking about the transitions from non-linearity to linearity. Something touches the singularity, now set into motion and the vibrations transition from in place to linear and gravity comes into existence. In this model, the movement from non-linear spinning vibrations to linear vibrations happens on a quantum scale and the movement, following immediately as it does from the spinning (and returning to the spinning) is in a quantum spiral. Hence the framework for the curvature of space, the framework for the spinning universe and the framework for the quantum solution of pi are all necessary. Now, why does the universe as we perceive it curve primarily along an axis if the initial point spins in all directions at once? The only solution that suggests itself is that the application of non-linearity is at a point along the vibrating singularity. Going back to our "cd" analysis of the universe, the cd is set to spinning and the information is accessed by a laser contacting the cd at one point in its rotation and information is pulled off from this one location as the universe cd spins by this one point. The information comes off in lines that are curved at such a quantum level (the speed with which they come off is a non-linear speed and are not governed by speed of light considerations, but instead are limited by the amount of information involved.
This spinning shoots off spirals and these spirals turn to curve in on themselves due to gravity which, must also spiral at the quantum level in the very tight minimum size for pi type spiral since gravity is vibrational counter-movement to linearity. These are informational changes, data changes, since the singularity remains constant but they exist for us, nonetheless. This means that while we argue that gravity is a straight line force, it is not, it just curves at a very very small quantum level.
If space were real, then we would observe it, but since space is merely the expression of non-linear information, the only way we see it expressed is the curvature of "space-time." This provides an intermediary answer to why and how much space is curved by gravity, but what's one more nobel prize winning theory more or less compared to the time apart, eh?
For those of you waiting for the last post, waiting a little longer won't kill you, at least not quickly.
As has been set out previously, pi is one of the many things, like infinite division, that proves we live in a quantum universe. While this is generally known to every student of geometry, I explained that there was a solution to pi, even though it is a very long solution because once we get to the total amount of information in the universe in terms of decimal places, the solution to pi ceases to have any relevance. This isn't a solution, but recognizes that, in conjunction with the Xeno paradoxes in support of Parminides that dimension is illusory.
We have also determined that circles form a crucial model for our universe, allowing for lenses of two dimensional concentration of information which in turn allow for three and successive dimensions along the same framework. More importantly, this type of solution allows for the existence of the smaller quantum units within a larger quantum unit (energy and space within mass, mass, energy and space with black hole stuff, etc). But where and, more importantly, why do these quantum circles exist.
There cannot be true circles, that would require a solution to pi. So quantum circles are actually quantum spirals where the differences between true circles and spirals are so small that they are not easily observed,
Pi is like a sign post pointing quantum physics in the right direction. We don't need a sign post because we're all pre-programmed. If physics tells us anything, it is that randomness is just another word for not having sufficient information or understanding to plot a predetermined outcome and it turns out these outcomes are curved.
To fully understand this, you have to go back to a prior post which discusses what the pre-universe looks like. It is a very, very high gravity point which has left non-linearity the only way it can (since it has no dimension yet) It is spinning. It is spinning in every direction at once and so fast that the only way we can calculate its speed is to assume that it is spinning at the rate of all quantum moments in the universe (past present and future) at once and since it is spinning in every direction at once, it appears motionless (but don't touch it!). This spinning is a type of dimensionless, and essentially timeless playback of the entire universe and it continues to exist, it is a type of vibration without movement as we perceive it. When we talk about the next state of the universe, it is only a perceived state, something is going to "touch" the universe and "project" our existence. What is this event? What is this thing? You ask too many question. It's like asking how long will this take and will you be there when it is finished. Its a very good question, but the answer is unsatisfactory already, why dwell on it? And why is that relevant anyway?
The point where the vibration ceases to be non-linear is upon us.
We talked about points being composed of dimensional and force characteristics. The euclidean analysis suggests that the points are vibrational in nature; going in one direction yields spirals resembling circles, the movement in the other direction generates force characteristics, at least gravity.
Not immediately upon us but close enough. But we're talking about the transitions from non-linearity to linearity. Something touches the singularity, now set into motion and the vibrations transition from in place to linear and gravity comes into existence. In this model, the movement from non-linear spinning vibrations to linear vibrations happens on a quantum scale and the movement, following immediately as it does from the spinning (and returning to the spinning) is in a quantum spiral. Hence the framework for the curvature of space, the framework for the spinning universe and the framework for the quantum solution of pi are all necessary. Now, why does the universe as we perceive it curve primarily along an axis if the initial point spins in all directions at once? The only solution that suggests itself is that the application of non-linearity is at a point along the vibrating singularity. Going back to our "cd" analysis of the universe, the cd is set to spinning and the information is accessed by a laser contacting the cd at one point in its rotation and information is pulled off from this one location as the universe cd spins by this one point. The information comes off in lines that are curved at such a quantum level (the speed with which they come off is a non-linear speed and are not governed by speed of light considerations, but instead are limited by the amount of information involved.
This spinning shoots off spirals and these spirals turn to curve in on themselves due to gravity which, must also spiral at the quantum level in the very tight minimum size for pi type spiral since gravity is vibrational counter-movement to linearity. These are informational changes, data changes, since the singularity remains constant but they exist for us, nonetheless. This means that while we argue that gravity is a straight line force, it is not, it just curves at a very very small quantum level.
If space were real, then we would observe it, but since space is merely the expression of non-linear information, the only way we see it expressed is the curvature of "space-time." This provides an intermediary answer to why and how much space is curved by gravity, but what's one more nobel prize winning theory more or less compared to the time apart, eh?
Saturday, June 27, 2015
NLC-the circle flux capacitor part 4: spherical overlaps and the end of time;
it is, perhaps, time stop writing this blog. Have I covered enough? Is it time to move on to something else? Is it purposeless to write to you?
It has been asked "if the euclidean approach is only a model, what is the purpose?" The answer is that we know that these infinite series are the analysis that ties our perceived reality to the singularity where everything happens at once. But everything doesn't happen at once in our perceived reality and it is likely as not that everything that we can control is obvious within the euclidean lenses, those of two dimension, those of three, four and five dimensional overlaps where exponential concentrations of information are possible.
But that is not the important lesson in all of this. The important lesson is the lesson of Lucretius. That is that if everything happens at once, over and over again, if each moment is constant, then how much sense does it make not to live, not to love for the moment. Who is living life correctly, a person who lives every moment as if they were on a stage, who takes to the stage with every moment in reality or someone who lives life safely?
There is too much of my life spent in waiting, and yet there is so much that I am waiting for, so much that involves accomplishing much in a short time, but which is not accomplished yet. So much waiting backstage, and you don't know what I mean so you cannot judge fairly, but you can certainly judge.
It was Napoleon who said if you cannot do great things, then do small things in a great way and that is much of what I would like to say that I am doing, but if life is an indication of anything, it can be said you must take what life is and most immediately seize the moment and do what must be done to take that pivotal role in things.
I would propose to ask for a short wait for so little do you know what is right around the corner because you give up my confidences for want of a willingness to share the mediocrity which is the consequence of living life waiting for something else to happen.
Wait, don't wait. Read don't read. Write don't write.
But live, but love. Immediately and with reckless abandon.
Anyway, let's review the clock time equations adding in the Euclidean formatting.
CT0-non linearity: No dimensional equivalent, everything happens at once (concentration level is 100%)
CT0 goes pre-linear-point linearity (10^2^0=10). A single point spinning without dimension at the speed of all time and space, but space and time now exist.
CT1-point geometry (space and gravity formed from the transition from non-linearity to linearity) becomes possible (10^2^1=100). A transition point for CT0. The changes are so fast that they appear invisible to us in a CT4 state and we see the informational state as an invisible substrate which is it not, instead it is just the building block of future states moving faster than we can measure in terms of coordinate change. Everything remains in the singularity, we are able to watch the "movie" play for the first time, even though it is invisible and we call it space.
CT2-linear (not planar) two dimensional geometry possible (10^2^2=10,000). Photons possible but nothing more complex. The first transition from all things happening at once to a time based system, the speed of light becomes the speed limit. The transition and light speed do not appear to be functions of space, but that's possible. This is still a series of lines, but they are perceived to "move" in any direction because they are now moving slow enough to be perceived since the two changes are happening at once. Because the lines can occupy two dimensions they can bend into circles and do so using a uniquely non-linear function pi, which is not subject to definition in a linear environment except as a function of the maximum amount of time possible.
CT3-electromagnetic forces possible (10^2^4). This is occasioned by the "lines" of CT1 and CT2 begin to curve and begin traveling in circles and, theoretically, by the overlap of the circles forming areas, lenses where the circles overlap, where concentration is possible. A background framework (space) allows for this because the lines may form in two dimensions. This is the first three dimensional time state and the first where the speed limit becomes transitional.
CT4-mass energy conversion is possible (10^2^8=e=mc^2) as the overlap becomes of "lenses" of energy in concentrations sufficient to form a stable informational state exponentially greater than the first. Speed is now slowed down sufficiently for us to measure the time fluctuations. The overlaps of circles are exponentially greater, contain lenses of exponentially greater density due to the number of circles forming the lens and can be thought of as spherical overlaps, since we have a name for 3 dimensional pi functions.
CT5=The first five dimensional state (10^2^16). Black holes form and disappear from our perspective and the time changes slow down so much as to appear to disappear just as space is invisible due to the speed of change in the opposite direction. We no longer understand exactly what we are looking at because he have a fifth dimension of overlap which is outside of our comprehension. Compression states arise from change in a dimension we do not experience through the overlap of spherical overlaps overlapping. This process will continue until a state is reached where all points are changing at once which brings us to the "end of time" where we are back at a singularity state.
Mathematically the progression is an information exponential progression based on the compression of information for 2^n from n=0 to 2^n=total amount of information (past, present and future) in the universe.
And still every moment has to count, so what am I doing? What are you doing?
It has been asked "if the euclidean approach is only a model, what is the purpose?" The answer is that we know that these infinite series are the analysis that ties our perceived reality to the singularity where everything happens at once. But everything doesn't happen at once in our perceived reality and it is likely as not that everything that we can control is obvious within the euclidean lenses, those of two dimension, those of three, four and five dimensional overlaps where exponential concentrations of information are possible.
But that is not the important lesson in all of this. The important lesson is the lesson of Lucretius. That is that if everything happens at once, over and over again, if each moment is constant, then how much sense does it make not to live, not to love for the moment. Who is living life correctly, a person who lives every moment as if they were on a stage, who takes to the stage with every moment in reality or someone who lives life safely?
There is too much of my life spent in waiting, and yet there is so much that I am waiting for, so much that involves accomplishing much in a short time, but which is not accomplished yet. So much waiting backstage, and you don't know what I mean so you cannot judge fairly, but you can certainly judge.
It was Napoleon who said if you cannot do great things, then do small things in a great way and that is much of what I would like to say that I am doing, but if life is an indication of anything, it can be said you must take what life is and most immediately seize the moment and do what must be done to take that pivotal role in things.
I would propose to ask for a short wait for so little do you know what is right around the corner because you give up my confidences for want of a willingness to share the mediocrity which is the consequence of living life waiting for something else to happen.
Wait, don't wait. Read don't read. Write don't write.
But live, but love. Immediately and with reckless abandon.
Anyway, let's review the clock time equations adding in the Euclidean formatting.
CT0-non linearity: No dimensional equivalent, everything happens at once (concentration level is 100%)
CT0 goes pre-linear-point linearity (10^2^0=10). A single point spinning without dimension at the speed of all time and space, but space and time now exist.
CT1-point geometry (space and gravity formed from the transition from non-linearity to linearity) becomes possible (10^2^1=100). A transition point for CT0. The changes are so fast that they appear invisible to us in a CT4 state and we see the informational state as an invisible substrate which is it not, instead it is just the building block of future states moving faster than we can measure in terms of coordinate change. Everything remains in the singularity, we are able to watch the "movie" play for the first time, even though it is invisible and we call it space.
CT2-linear (not planar) two dimensional geometry possible (10^2^2=10,000). Photons possible but nothing more complex. The first transition from all things happening at once to a time based system, the speed of light becomes the speed limit. The transition and light speed do not appear to be functions of space, but that's possible. This is still a series of lines, but they are perceived to "move" in any direction because they are now moving slow enough to be perceived since the two changes are happening at once. Because the lines can occupy two dimensions they can bend into circles and do so using a uniquely non-linear function pi, which is not subject to definition in a linear environment except as a function of the maximum amount of time possible.
CT3-electromagnetic forces possible (10^2^4). This is occasioned by the "lines" of CT1 and CT2 begin to curve and begin traveling in circles and, theoretically, by the overlap of the circles forming areas, lenses where the circles overlap, where concentration is possible. A background framework (space) allows for this because the lines may form in two dimensions. This is the first three dimensional time state and the first where the speed limit becomes transitional.
CT4-mass energy conversion is possible (10^2^8=e=mc^2) as the overlap becomes of "lenses" of energy in concentrations sufficient to form a stable informational state exponentially greater than the first. Speed is now slowed down sufficiently for us to measure the time fluctuations. The overlaps of circles are exponentially greater, contain lenses of exponentially greater density due to the number of circles forming the lens and can be thought of as spherical overlaps, since we have a name for 3 dimensional pi functions.
CT5=The first five dimensional state (10^2^16). Black holes form and disappear from our perspective and the time changes slow down so much as to appear to disappear just as space is invisible due to the speed of change in the opposite direction. We no longer understand exactly what we are looking at because he have a fifth dimension of overlap which is outside of our comprehension. Compression states arise from change in a dimension we do not experience through the overlap of spherical overlaps overlapping. This process will continue until a state is reached where all points are changing at once which brings us to the "end of time" where we are back at a singularity state.
Mathematically the progression is an information exponential progression based on the compression of information for 2^n from n=0 to 2^n=total amount of information (past, present and future) in the universe.
And still every moment has to count, so what am I doing? What are you doing?
Thursday, June 25, 2015
NLC-the circle flux capacitor part 3-fulfilling the promise
You are probably thinking that I don't stand behind my promises. I've done what I can for now. There is more that could be done with cruelty in mind, but I've done what I can and whether it is enough or no is my problem not yours. I know it isn't enough and I'm not asking you to perceive it that way. I asked for friendship without deserving it or expecting it, that is what I need for now. What happens next, happens next.
The promise at the beginning of this series, was that while there are several approaches to this graphic representation. The crucial part is that any dimensional representation is necessarily flawed since it requires space time. However, the universe we experience is experienced in a linear format, so there should be some relationship which shows the transitions in a way that allow for exponential compression of information, but also phase shifts through matter and beyond.
What we are looking at here is merely a representation of linearity, what happens when Non-linearity is expressed a linearity. In the prior post we looked at the transition from non-linearity to linearity, something that is really rather unique. Now we are expanding linearity.
I promised some interesting features association with the ratios we were dealing with and now I am going to keep that promise since it is the easier promise to keep.
First you must remember that a line has no area. It does have length. The point that we begin with (space is point time or CT1) lacked even length. So the first two transitions are CT1 (space) and CT2 (length without area). No we see that off of these points and lines we are going to create CT3 which will have area. What we are looking for and what we will get is exponential grown (n=2) and the r^2 equation present in all area calculations reflects this (a box is length times width and if both are equal it is l^2. We are also going to look at the lens that is created in the overlap which must have the same area features. The area of a circle (piR^2)=(pi/O)AreaO for the lens. This, of course, defines the relationship of the angle O to the radius squared.r^2=O/areaO or r=(O/areaO)^1/2 which is, not surprisingly, the exponential information equation, but this is nothing more than moving from one dimension to two which is necessarily an exponential relationship.
If we require the circle to be filled with the prior states, the equations fail and for this reason we have to assume we are dealing with models. In this case, the most likely definition of the lens is one where the lens is defined by the area as the angle O approaches zero where there is no overlap other than width of a single line and the circle itself is composed of a line moving in a circle. In other words, the single quantum point evolves as follows:
1) The point begins to spin rapidly (see the prior post for the speed) and thereby achieves linearity at the point of the big bang.
2) The point begins to rapidly move in a linear direction with no dimension but thereby creates many very fast moving lines.
3) The lines begin to curl into circles as the point density along the line increases as it spends more time at a given location along the line, (CT3) at compression of 10^4
4) The circles form lenses where they intersect.and we see 10^8 compression states.
The next step (5) is fairly obvious, the lens formed by intersecting circles begins to have circles incorporate the lens in multiple dimensions. The lens is important because at that point lines have overlapped and that is where you would find compression, the existence of an intersection of two lines might have a similar feature (ct3) but only where they overlap to form a new area would concentrations be expected to be exponentially greater. The amount of overlap in this model could account for different features/energy levels. Since unconcentrated time changes more quickly, it may be perceived as more energetic.
The moving forward to the cube relationship does not hold true to this model, not directly.
And you were thinking there wouldn't be a relationship.
For more information on this topic from the Eucliding perspective (which doesn't mention NLC because NLC didn't exist when the article were written, I direct you to: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~breech/contest.inet.fall.12/problems/intersection-2circles.pdf
CALCULATING A HORIZON CIRCLE: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/528872/area-of-
The promise at the beginning of this series, was that while there are several approaches to this graphic representation. The crucial part is that any dimensional representation is necessarily flawed since it requires space time. However, the universe we experience is experienced in a linear format, so there should be some relationship which shows the transitions in a way that allow for exponential compression of information, but also phase shifts through matter and beyond.
What we are looking at here is merely a representation of linearity, what happens when Non-linearity is expressed a linearity. In the prior post we looked at the transition from non-linearity to linearity, something that is really rather unique. Now we are expanding linearity.
I promised some interesting features association with the ratios we were dealing with and now I am going to keep that promise since it is the easier promise to keep.
First you must remember that a line has no area. It does have length. The point that we begin with (space is point time or CT1) lacked even length. So the first two transitions are CT1 (space) and CT2 (length without area). No we see that off of these points and lines we are going to create CT3 which will have area. What we are looking for and what we will get is exponential grown (n=2) and the r^2 equation present in all area calculations reflects this (a box is length times width and if both are equal it is l^2. We are also going to look at the lens that is created in the overlap which must have the same area features. The area of a circle (piR^2)=(pi/O)AreaO for the lens. This, of course, defines the relationship of the angle O to the radius squared.r^2=O/areaO or r=(O/areaO)^1/2 which is, not surprisingly, the exponential information equation, but this is nothing more than moving from one dimension to two which is necessarily an exponential relationship.
If we require the circle to be filled with the prior states, the equations fail and for this reason we have to assume we are dealing with models. In this case, the most likely definition of the lens is one where the lens is defined by the area as the angle O approaches zero where there is no overlap other than width of a single line and the circle itself is composed of a line moving in a circle. In other words, the single quantum point evolves as follows:
1) The point begins to spin rapidly (see the prior post for the speed) and thereby achieves linearity at the point of the big bang.
2) The point begins to rapidly move in a linear direction with no dimension but thereby creates many very fast moving lines.
3) The lines begin to curl into circles as the point density along the line increases as it spends more time at a given location along the line, (CT3) at compression of 10^4
4) The circles form lenses where they intersect.and we see 10^8 compression states.
The next step (5) is fairly obvious, the lens formed by intersecting circles begins to have circles incorporate the lens in multiple dimensions. The lens is important because at that point lines have overlapped and that is where you would find compression, the existence of an intersection of two lines might have a similar feature (ct3) but only where they overlap to form a new area would concentrations be expected to be exponentially greater. The amount of overlap in this model could account for different features/energy levels. Since unconcentrated time changes more quickly, it may be perceived as more energetic.
The moving forward to the cube relationship does not hold true to this model, not directly.
And you were thinking there wouldn't be a relationship.
For more information on this topic from the Eucliding perspective (which doesn't mention NLC because NLC didn't exist when the article were written, I direct you to: http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~breech/contest.inet.fall.12/problems/intersection-2circles.pdf
CALCULATING A HORIZON CIRCLE: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/528872/area-of-
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
ncl-the circle flux capacitor- part 2
It is with some difficulty I pick the pen up
it feels like I am looking through blood
I swam in the thunder, the rain choking me
hoping that the lightening would come down
and spare me the pain of having not courage
nor wisdom, nor even the folly to chose
love of love, love of friendship, love of family
So I cannot think, except of the blood I see
And in that blood you are mixed with everything else
My vision never good to begin with
is clouded even further
the water going by threatens to drown me
but instead disappoints.
It is important to know that the circle and Euclid do not live alone in a non-linear invironment. It is tempting to see points within a circle, but then you must have something between the points. It is all fine to say that we are not dealing with real geometry, nor anything past a real point, but that degrades the model. So we must envision two dimensional lines from which there is no space, the line begin un-bisect able just as the singularity is not. So too we must envision the circles which come off of the lines or surround them as being filled so as to have no space, filled with points turned into lines so that there is no space between them, the lines formed by an infinitely fast moving point along the lines.
Now we can get to the point immediately after linearity, immediately after the big bang. The singularity has now taken on dimensional qualities in the form of spin and the time of the universe is defined by the rate of spin which we can calculate to be the rate of all change in the universe, past, present and future per quantum moment, the nearly infinitely hot point of pre NLC phsyics, but now defined with specificity within a model. the point them moves to an infinity of lines so that spacing is not a problem but ct1 exists and so does space. Circles form containing the space and allowing for dimension for the first time and now we must deal with Euclid and NLC. Euclid was the great thinker of circles, a Greek pi maker if there ever was one and someone who spent a great deal of time measuring lines within circles.
if a circle begins at the center of another circle of the same diameter, how much of the area of the second circle is outside of the first circle. This MC Escher drawing is calculable and being so determinable and the shape formed in a perfect lens reflecting in shape the approximate shape of the universe as we observe it today.
The area of the lens is a function of area of the circle itself, pir^2. The amount of one circle overlapped by another defines the area which is shared and is, not surprisingly, being the second stage of dimension the function of change over both the angle and the radius over a given period of time where R in this case is the distance to the edge of a given line (the edge of the circle). Since we are now dealing with linearity, we have to look at the "movement" of this Radius from non-linearity (zero) to its actual length R. So this part of the equation is I (integration) from 0 to R of rdr. However, we are only dealing with a part of the circle within the lens, so we must also limit it by the angle that defines the two lines R intersecting the circle at either point where the two circles overlap. This two is linear so this angle must be calculated from an angle 0 (corresponding to overlap at a single point) to O (the actual angle in degrees) or I angle (Ia) from zero to O. This is the definition of only half the lens so the actual equation is:
Ac(O)=2Ir(0 to R)Ia(0 to O)r dr da or R^2O.
Where Ac(O) is the area of the lens formed by the overlap of circles with a radius R and where the angle between the two radius to the two points of overlap of the two circles (which we will get to in the next post except for a reference to which you will be directed shortly) where they overlap.
I will go into this equation in more detail if the mood strikes me, if I am not electrocuted which is what I would rather happen than suffer this madness, but that must wait, apparently, not tonight.
From this group of interlocking circles must rise a series of circles in the third dimension to form spheres. spheres of information.
For those of you who cannot understand how everything can come from circles, you have to understand that until we get to spheres we are only dealing with Energy. For those of you who say that energy is much to diverse to be represented graphically in this fashion, I was looking for the right example, and so I direct you to this article on folding circles: http://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/vismath/hansen/index.html
Therein lies all the variation of energy and matter.
Monday, June 22, 2015
nlc-the circle flux capacitor-in control or out of control-part 1
I envision a universe where everything is governed by physics and therefore the feelings I occasionally feel where things are out of control make sense. However, I also have some insights as to what I think I need right now, whether it suits your purpose or not I have to say it. My need is for the unique friendship which predated the passion. It isn't a rejection of the love, but merely the need that it be tempered in its time, just as it is readily withdrawn.
And so, whether this works for you or not, I will discuss an alternate view of the NLC flux capacitor, replacing the lines with points and the points with circles.
first we must be mindful that the points move along the lines and that at each point there is gravity and this is a representation of the time experienced based on the perceived change of position as all particles must move. But we start with space which has no place to move from except non-linearity While we "say" space is everywhere, that presumes a linear universe which NLC rejects as unworkable. And so we start our NLC FC with a series of points, infinitely small, touching each other and being everywhere at once. But something unique is happening because to create a universe the points are touching, but they cease to overlap, a quantum space appears between them. This isn't the space of separation, but is instead the space of informational separation. It is, in effect the big bang, points having a quantum separation and gravity pulling them all back to a non-quantum point. At some point in time, this quantum separation (10^2^1) becomes large enough that a second quantum diameter is formed and at each point (10^2^2) along that quantum diameter gives rise to a second circle of the same size. Now we come to our first puzzle. Does the circle come off of the first circle or does the circle bisect (hitting it twice) the first circle. Does each second circle come off of the first circumference or does it merely leave momentarily and come back. Either embodiment requires that as the circle leaves the first circumference (at least most of it must, and a unique ratio, which I will come to in the next post is established by the portion within the first circumference and the part out assuming that it goes all the way to the center of the first circumference) that part which has left must be filled with quantum points sufficient to fill the circumference to the extent not contained within the first circumference, but both are the same size. Many of you are beginning already to picture the synergies of this model, but before we discuss them, we must discuss the next circle which is formed when enough of the second circles are formed (10^2^3) to allow for additional compression and a third circumference and in this way the gravity comes off of the points within each circle in much the way they come off the points of the line, and the lines jump off when the single point has, infinitely quickly (because it isn't subject to space and time) forms concentrations along the line to jump to the next highest informational state, but now the point is moving about within the circles exploding outward in a spin as it expands around the ever increasing diameters formed thereby.
Now some of you are observing, quite correctly, that the concentrations appear all over the universe and not just at specific points, but you are missing the true nature of things which is that they exist within a singularity and the separation is merely the expression of the information that necessarily must be a part of a universe built on exponential growth of 2^n concentration from a point of perfect concentration back to that same point as discussed previously.
Now how do we reconcile friendship that I need with love that we want and how do we determine whether the circles originate from the surface of circumference outward or as circles originating their circumference from the middle of the first circle and moving outward? For those answers, you will have to wait for the second part of this discussion.
And so, whether this works for you or not, I will discuss an alternate view of the NLC flux capacitor, replacing the lines with points and the points with circles.
first we must be mindful that the points move along the lines and that at each point there is gravity and this is a representation of the time experienced based on the perceived change of position as all particles must move. But we start with space which has no place to move from except non-linearity While we "say" space is everywhere, that presumes a linear universe which NLC rejects as unworkable. And so we start our NLC FC with a series of points, infinitely small, touching each other and being everywhere at once. But something unique is happening because to create a universe the points are touching, but they cease to overlap, a quantum space appears between them. This isn't the space of separation, but is instead the space of informational separation. It is, in effect the big bang, points having a quantum separation and gravity pulling them all back to a non-quantum point. At some point in time, this quantum separation (10^2^1) becomes large enough that a second quantum diameter is formed and at each point (10^2^2) along that quantum diameter gives rise to a second circle of the same size. Now we come to our first puzzle. Does the circle come off of the first circle or does the circle bisect (hitting it twice) the first circle. Does each second circle come off of the first circumference or does it merely leave momentarily and come back. Either embodiment requires that as the circle leaves the first circumference (at least most of it must, and a unique ratio, which I will come to in the next post is established by the portion within the first circumference and the part out assuming that it goes all the way to the center of the first circumference) that part which has left must be filled with quantum points sufficient to fill the circumference to the extent not contained within the first circumference, but both are the same size. Many of you are beginning already to picture the synergies of this model, but before we discuss them, we must discuss the next circle which is formed when enough of the second circles are formed (10^2^3) to allow for additional compression and a third circumference and in this way the gravity comes off of the points within each circle in much the way they come off the points of the line, and the lines jump off when the single point has, infinitely quickly (because it isn't subject to space and time) forms concentrations along the line to jump to the next highest informational state, but now the point is moving about within the circles exploding outward in a spin as it expands around the ever increasing diameters formed thereby.
Now some of you are observing, quite correctly, that the concentrations appear all over the universe and not just at specific points, but you are missing the true nature of things which is that they exist within a singularity and the separation is merely the expression of the information that necessarily must be a part of a universe built on exponential growth of 2^n concentration from a point of perfect concentration back to that same point as discussed previously.
Now how do we reconcile friendship that I need with love that we want and how do we determine whether the circles originate from the surface of circumference outward or as circles originating their circumference from the middle of the first circle and moving outward? For those answers, you will have to wait for the second part of this discussion.
Sunday, June 21, 2015
NLC-sunday morning with the flux capacitor
Today was actually supposed to include a post on worm holes. That will come in due course, but the article is proving elusive or, rather, the version of blogger I am saving it with appears to be malfunctioning. Suffice to say that while they hem and haw about the strange "new" idea that worm holes may go to the same "mysterious" place through entanglement and even hint at the idea of holographic phenomena at play (http://flip.it/RsMb2), I described the process three years ago in The Einstein Hologram Universe. They will undoubtedly give the nobel prize to someone who re-writes what I already did (not doubting their originality, just their timing) three years ago just as I have already moved far past that initial concept which someone else will probably do in 5 or 10 years getting another nobel prize.
At that point, of course, they will realize it doesn't matter who gets the Nobel and that is when they will probably parade my books around saying things like, since it doesn't matter we might as well acknowledge that this guy was hacking at it, but relegating me to sad role of science fiction writing, secondary in status to everyone other than maybe the unacknowledged write or poetry.
And that thought brings us to the subject of today's blog. The Flux Capacitor. I will, of course, need to come up with another name. The more descriptive A Graphic Representation of Non-Linear Coordinate Theory Showing the Transition Between Compression States seems a bit wordy. Sadly, I have taken all the "spook" out of "spooky physics" the sp being a term used by pre-NLC physics wannabees (most of whom have advanced degrees in physics) who are trying to explain NLC concepts like quantum entanglement without Non-linearity which makes it all pretty obvious. Of course, I have covered all that before, both in blog and in book and in the third edition I only clarify these issues.
So today, I'm going to describe the NLC-FLUX CAPACITOR so sharpen your pencils get out a piece of paper and prepare to draw in two dimensions the representation of dimensionless non-linear time. Prizes will be awarded to those submitted the best drawing. It is important to note that this is a representation of a dimensionless singularity giving rise to the illusion of linearity in which we live and hence the winning prize appears within these parenthesis (). Correct, it is nothing. However, the second place position is still open and the empty non-space doesn't make for a very entertaining Flux Capacitor, so prepare to draw, pilgrim. Literally draw, of course.
The place to start is with a line with arrows on both ends and labeled S for "space line". This represents the initial twang of the universe with a single particle of non-linearity moving along a single line without true time or dimension and therefore with no speed limit, however it does have an illusory speed limit. The illusory speed limit is very fast and is something like a multiple-1) however many quantum particles exist in our universe times 2) the speed of light. This limit has nothing to do with the singularity, but it does affect us. All the gravity of the universe is created and therefore there is a second line (this one may well only have an arrow in one direction) which comes off of the line at one point only although technically it comes off at all points. Since this point has very little to do with anything immediately (but will be very important and exponentially longer at one point which we will get to momentarily) it goes off at a 45 degree angle to the line.
At certain points along this line of near infinitely fast movement (certainly it is as finite as time itself) a sufficient number of points are changing together to form photonic compression and these points are represented by a single P-line running perpendicular in both directions with an arrow on either end to the first line. P-lines ultimately would run along every point on the S line but at any quantum moment, they only appear where photons or larger appear and since you are reading this and drawing it in a moment, you can try your hand at this as the eternal, pre-ordained, linear creature we all are. This is NOT the singularity (which I already drew above) but is merely a representation of the linearity in which all the clown physicist (those disagreeing with me-100% in this case) think and plot our existence. I'm not trying to make friends here, I'm just writing a blog. Some of my best friends are clowns...and a couple of physicists too.
Anyway, while you have been reading this, your more industrious co-pre-ordained cohorts have probably finished their drawings, so let's go on.
At an angle of 45 degrees from this P-line comes another force line, but this one goes in two direction, an arrow on either end. Now looking at this today, I'd draw the W line off of the P line perpendicular (and therefore parallel to the S line) but that didn't seem right to my subconscious which apparently thought that this perpendicularity would indicate some relationship between every other state so it is drawn at right angles to the F line. The F line in this case is exponentially longer than the first F line so you might want to get your eraser out.
This process continues only through another few renditions (the M line, the BH line in this case) but it could go on for a while if you were bored and had a long enough piece of paper.
However it is Sunday morning and describing a drawing with as little artistic value as this one hardly seems to be a worthwhile use of my time, especially since every moment of it will go on forever.
And, of course, that makes them all to valuable to waste, especially on fighting with you.
At that point, of course, they will realize it doesn't matter who gets the Nobel and that is when they will probably parade my books around saying things like, since it doesn't matter we might as well acknowledge that this guy was hacking at it, but relegating me to sad role of science fiction writing, secondary in status to everyone other than maybe the unacknowledged write or poetry.
And that thought brings us to the subject of today's blog. The Flux Capacitor. I will, of course, need to come up with another name. The more descriptive A Graphic Representation of Non-Linear Coordinate Theory Showing the Transition Between Compression States seems a bit wordy. Sadly, I have taken all the "spook" out of "spooky physics" the sp being a term used by pre-NLC physics wannabees (most of whom have advanced degrees in physics) who are trying to explain NLC concepts like quantum entanglement without Non-linearity which makes it all pretty obvious. Of course, I have covered all that before, both in blog and in book and in the third edition I only clarify these issues.
So today, I'm going to describe the NLC-FLUX CAPACITOR so sharpen your pencils get out a piece of paper and prepare to draw in two dimensions the representation of dimensionless non-linear time. Prizes will be awarded to those submitted the best drawing. It is important to note that this is a representation of a dimensionless singularity giving rise to the illusion of linearity in which we live and hence the winning prize appears within these parenthesis (). Correct, it is nothing. However, the second place position is still open and the empty non-space doesn't make for a very entertaining Flux Capacitor, so prepare to draw, pilgrim. Literally draw, of course.
The place to start is with a line with arrows on both ends and labeled S for "space line". This represents the initial twang of the universe with a single particle of non-linearity moving along a single line without true time or dimension and therefore with no speed limit, however it does have an illusory speed limit. The illusory speed limit is very fast and is something like a multiple-1) however many quantum particles exist in our universe times 2) the speed of light. This limit has nothing to do with the singularity, but it does affect us. All the gravity of the universe is created and therefore there is a second line (this one may well only have an arrow in one direction) which comes off of the line at one point only although technically it comes off at all points. Since this point has very little to do with anything immediately (but will be very important and exponentially longer at one point which we will get to momentarily) it goes off at a 45 degree angle to the line.
At certain points along this line of near infinitely fast movement (certainly it is as finite as time itself) a sufficient number of points are changing together to form photonic compression and these points are represented by a single P-line running perpendicular in both directions with an arrow on either end to the first line. P-lines ultimately would run along every point on the S line but at any quantum moment, they only appear where photons or larger appear and since you are reading this and drawing it in a moment, you can try your hand at this as the eternal, pre-ordained, linear creature we all are. This is NOT the singularity (which I already drew above) but is merely a representation of the linearity in which all the clown physicist (those disagreeing with me-100% in this case) think and plot our existence. I'm not trying to make friends here, I'm just writing a blog. Some of my best friends are clowns...and a couple of physicists too.
Anyway, while you have been reading this, your more industrious co-pre-ordained cohorts have probably finished their drawings, so let's go on.
At an angle of 45 degrees from this P-line comes another force line, but this one goes in two direction, an arrow on either end. Now looking at this today, I'd draw the W line off of the P line perpendicular (and therefore parallel to the S line) but that didn't seem right to my subconscious which apparently thought that this perpendicularity would indicate some relationship between every other state so it is drawn at right angles to the F line. The F line in this case is exponentially longer than the first F line so you might want to get your eraser out.
This process continues only through another few renditions (the M line, the BH line in this case) but it could go on for a while if you were bored and had a long enough piece of paper.
However it is Sunday morning and describing a drawing with as little artistic value as this one hardly seems to be a worthwhile use of my time, especially since every moment of it will go on forever.
And, of course, that makes them all to valuable to waste, especially on fighting with you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)