Aut but not bitter

Bitter?  No, too early in the process to be bitter.
http://www.universetoday.com/131128/2016-nobel-prize-physics-complicated/
This raises the question not of gravity waves which are not the same as other movement, but movement in general
All of what we call movement is, by definition even to Kinder P, change relative to ct1 solutions.
Actual change (from one universe state to the next) is actual variation of the universe.  The choices for this variation are broadly:
1) Current universe made from stacking two prior universe (where's all the extra weight from this information?)
2) Current universe made from cycling each quantum state and increasing the amount of information by increasing x by 1 (while you don't have the weight problem, you also depart from the information solution)
3) A combination of 1 and 2 by having some but not all states stack
It could, of course the nobel prize announcement, be written at the last minute that I came forward and explained these other guys didn't even know what they are looking at, but all in good time, right?
Kinder P believed in the fantasy of balanced mathematics.  AuT believes in infinite converging series (actually knows the universe is powered by those, but we don't want to embarrass the nobel prize committee).  Kinder P believes in positive and negative energy (represented by matter and gravity being balanced) while AuT recognizes that there are alternating spirals but that gravity is only the effect of state change and matter is only the compressed information of space.
The "perfect balance" that Kinder P looks for in the universe is absent, but it's hidden in the high value of x and the resulting approach towards a solution that is never reached to curvature and equal parts positive and negative spiral convergence.
One way of dealing with item 1 which is the suggested approach is to ignore the stacking of all information and instead only stack new information.
Looked at another way:
x
x
xx
xxx
xxxxx
is the appearance of true F-series history.  At values of x that we experience the next value of x is very high.  But you can also have a change reflected this way:
x                             x xx xxx
xx                           xx xxxx xxxxxx
xxx                        xxx xxxxxx  xxx.xxx.xxx
and so on.  In this way, x is only increasing by 1 on the stacking state (the left hand column), even though the total amount of information is growing exponentially.
What we experience directly is reflected by the increase in x by 1 while indirectly the amount of information is stacking up and increasing according to the F-series.
It is also possible that the stacking of the universes only occurs at inflection points.
This is one of the more important concepts because history in a quantum universe requires that stacking occur of history would be invisible, but how it is stacked is critical.
One suggestion is that only space is stacked.  Space occupies an important place because we know that movement is accomplished only relative to this state of information even though all other forms of information arise from this one.
There is an answer, but apparently no one is giving me the nobel prize this year, they're giving it to people chasing bozos and misconceptions.  That's ok, they really don't have a choice.

Building an algorithm-unbalanced energy

In Kinder Physics, it was felt that the positive and negative energy of the universe was finely balanced so that a perfectly expanding universe was possible and every positive had a corresponding negative so that the universe could, in theory collapse and make nothing or double if you'd like.
Early NLC and EHT predecessor to AuT adopted this foolishness, foolish because such a universe would cancel itself out or continuously double.
Instead the AuT universe we live in has a slight offset between positive and negative 'information' which gives the universe its curvature and allows staking without a collapse.
Another suggestion, which is intriguing but apparently not supported (emphasis on apparently) is the "cycling" of the AuT universe. Unlike Kinder Physics you don't have this "magically ridiculous one big bang (there's sort of a big fizzle at the very beginning, but not really a bang).  Instead you have a big bounce, but not a silly Kinder big bounce, but a more subtle, more elegant inflection point bounce.
The rarity of these inflection points (we're 14 billion years into ours and if you look at prior posts you see both how far we have to go going out and can estimate the same length of time going back-and this is based on observations, not fancy mathwork although the fancy mathwork is what makes clear what just confused Kinder Physics) is a pretty good answer to why we have so much in between time, but the idea that each increase in x leads t a complete recycling of the universe cannot be completely ruled out.  99.99999etc % ruled out, but not completely.
I'm shooting for late October, perhaps as late as December for the second volume of Sprials in Amber, clarifying and correcting huge amounts of information.  I'd say the first 100 pages are now 50 pages or less.  Put it on your christmas list.

Spirals in Amber-A Halloween Ghost story

Here you are, just like I promised.  One day I will sit with you and read you all the things I wrote you and all the things I wrote to you, but until then you will have to be satisfied with this Halloween Ghost story, although I know you are not satisfied and that you find your satisfaction where you will. But that is my cross to bear and I digress.
In the last e-mail I explained that because of the method of building the universe that a pre-most recent big bang civilization could, in theory if they had someone as smart as me, send a message from the past to us in the future if we just knew how to look for it.
This same conceptual framework allows for the idea of ghosts and even messages from the dead if not from the future.  So grab a cup of hot chocalate, add a liberal dose of bourbon, sit by that wonderful fireplace of yours and get ready for an AuT ghost story.
While I write this the moon is brightly lighting the world outside.  Clouds are backlit by it and from out of the darkness come all manner of night winged creatures, birds of prey large and small, and bats.
I suffer from a great melancholy because I have lost the love of my life and I think, if only there was some way that someone could have warned me of the wrong paths I would take over and over in my life, if only I could send some message back, but there is no way back so perhaps I should look to the future.  But how can I communicate to the future?
Then it hits me, that there have been many messages from the past that were passed to the future.  Long ago, a pre-human we now call Lucy (of Al 288-1) rose up and sent a message down over three million years of time.  Al 288 told us her story despite the clouds of time.  She sent a message, even though she was a primitive australopitecine pre-person with no known knowledge of stacked universes and quantum moments.  She communicated like a ghost, finding the appropriate source to extract her information like a white coated seer or ghost reader and the message from Lucy was, "I am your distant ancestor, I feel from a tree and broke a limb and from this I died.  It was probably raining when I died and I covered myself in mud to hide from wide animals because I could not climb back up in the tree, but I could not survive and I died.  Remember me."
And those bones you point to and say, "no ghost," even relativity, that antiquated way of looking at information theory, are nothing but a compressed form of energy, the vibrations sent through time in a form that you call hard, but which a black hole material being would see as nothing more than a sprite and which AuT would call information which in  any form is just that.
Another ghost with a more recent past and perhaps a little more information is Otzi, the ice man found in the alps.  He died a mere 5,000 years ago.  He tells the ghost whisperers "I ran from my enemies up into the mountains, but they injured me.  Perhaps I was a raider who attacked them and who could not keep up with my companions.  Perhaps a neighboring tribe attacked me, but it is of no great moment, because I ran into the mountains and died, but I died with all of my tools and weapons so you would know more about me and my people, but I am dead nonetheless.
Great men and great women tell their stories even though they died without writing anything while other ghosts like you and me have a great love story that will never be fully written and is known fully only to us.  Some ghosts try to give a purpose to life, suggesting perhaps that the purpsoe of life is to generate these moments, some good, some terrible in their agony and grief.  AuT suggests that the world is nothing but a formula, but perhaps the purpose of that formula is to play itself out, to leave this trail of stories preserved like ghosts from the past to the future.
And who knows what ghosts we will find when we know what to look for, ghosts with longer stories to tell than even that of Al 288-1.  Perhaps we will find that we are, perhaps that everything that we call the universe, is nothing more than a message from one lover to another if we just find where to look.

Building an algorithm-a cold, super hot universe

One of the great misconceptions of pre AuT mathematics comes from the idea of 'heat.'   Even Kinder physics understands what heat isn't.  Heat isn't hot.  It's movement.  Moreover, it isn't real movement like the changes reflected by the changing value of x.  That would be gravity.
Instead heat is movement relative to ct1.
  Since movement is illusory it's important in F-series stacked, offset, intersecting spiral theory to understand what movementt is, or more particularly the difference between change (the value of x changing) and movement (the change relative to ct1 of higher ct states.
This is the reason why space does not appear to move even though it has to "change" at the same rate as any other state change.
Kinder physcis doesn't distinguish between these two types of change since it did not realize there were two different types of change.
Hence, at the time of the initiation of the universe (a long, long time before the big bang kinder-p talks about) the universe was very, very cold (not very very hot) because all clock time was ct1 (all information was uncompressed) so there was nothing to be hot because there was nothing to change relative to ct1 except other ct1 which change is equally (exactly equally) as important, but not heat.
Hence, time and heat are inter-related in some sense just as movement and time dilation are inter-related.
We're obsessessed with movement relative to ct1 (or more exactly with large numbers of ct1 information states) because that gives us our illusory sense of time and it also gives us warmth in the absence of being together, yes that's for you to think about.  But CT1 is changing, but in a dimensionless environtment that allows it to seem to be changeless, when, instead, it is a pure type of change since it is only changing relative to an absence of change.
This is crucial to our understanding of not just heat and standard clock time, but even fundamental existence of our universe so it will require more than one post; but, as always, you heard it here first.

Building an algorithm-living in an algorithm

Here's an interesting article discussing whether we live in a simulation or not.
http://aol.it/2d0fYa1
The beauty of this article is that it supports strongly (50%) the AuT version of the universe.
The difference between the concept and the proof is that AuT provides a viable mechanism for the simulation.  It is hard to give a more concrete example of what AuT adds to the general consensus.
Of course, and idea without a mechanism is science fiction, once the mechanism is defined it is science.  The only science fiction in AuT is g-space where the algorithm originates.

Changing curvature and speed and compression all relate to how clock time states interact and how they generate the quantum results that are stacked to give the regional and general inflection points that give rise to the richness of our universe at a value of x which is so high as to be impossible to fully conceptualize except on paper.
NLC-time orbits after the application of Fibonacci F-series part 7 contains some of the spreadsheet results, but the bottom line is that the F-series number after only 349 overlaps is 3.865*10^72.  That is when x=349, the resulting amount of information from which this 349 quantum universe can draw from has risen to 3.865*10^72 bits because of the stacking process.
The overlap at this point in time in the universe (the part leading towards or away from compression) is this same number. While this looks fairly stable given the fact that 10^39ths of these are necessary to form a second show that this universe exists in a very unstable fashion.
The entire size of the F-series number is not relevant, since only a choice from this enormous number is expressed at any quantum point, but the possibility for stability at this point in time is fairly high.
At x=349, however, there is only enough information to form a single photon, albeit with 100 quanta of space.
I continue to drag through the first edition of spirals in amber, probably cutting out half the material in the first 100 pages.  It's a mess.

Building an algorithm among bozos

As you know, my lack of tact will probably keep me from winning the nobel prize even when everyone admits that I'm right and that everyone else who wouldn't give me recognition (or money) are just a bunch of bozos chasing bozons but I have to play this out my way.
The immediate prior post for the first time ever intimated the formula for transition between ct states and yet the internet did not explode.  When it does you'll know you're one of the first people who ever read that it should have.
Moving through ct1 states is a big part of the aging process in terms of speed and time dilation whether this is a cause or effect.
Putting the concept of regional compression together with time dilation and the conversion between compressed states and well as the effects of a broader general compression provides in concept a mechanism to work with exponention compression formulas to explain why higher ct states form and what conditions provide for this.
I am excited to be getting my book edited, but just to give you an idea of what you're getting I'm going to insert a page from it.

As you can see, you're not getting a lot of value from the old book.  Perhaps you should as me for a refund.  The new book...
Let me say that I could die tomorrow or worse perhaps, so to the extent you see how brilliant AuT is you can understand the need to put together a rough version and to publish it as I go along.  I can tell you, however, that the next edition will not look much like the first edition.  Most of the basics are there, but I'm moving so fast I cannot keep up with myself and I note the closer I get to the fundamentals, the more the universe throws in my path.
I am, however, engaged in some very interesting things in the real world and they may, in this case carry the day for me, or at least give me the shot at...well, that is for another blog, not this one.
Stay tuned, I expect the second edition will come out some time in October, perhaps I'll shoot for a Halloween publication date.  And fear not, the halloween post I promised is coming.

building an algorithm-not so unified field theory

Forces derive from visible events in AuT.
Gravity is the effect from stacking prior universes to form the current universe.
Photonic energy is the force resulting from the compression of spacial information into photonic information, closely followed by wave energy which is the result of the  compression of photonic information into waves, and the strong and weak forces which result from the ct3-ct4 compression cycle.
magnetism is also results from the interaction of ct3 and ct4.
The  requires that some unseen force which results from the ct4-ct5 state or the formation of black holes.  It stands to reason that we would possibly see the effects of this but could not see the force itself.  It is, however, possible that gravity is actually this force.  While you might say that this leaves blank the force that results from the ct0-ct1 (stacking of universes) you'd be wrong, because we can fill that in with "time" since it is as close to a reflection of a changing x as we're likely to see on a basic level.
This suggests a pre-big bang (most current) universe with expansion and contraction without gravity, but AuT theory actually allows for this.  Now the better suggestion is that the effects of gravity vary as they are positive and negative but the so called repulsive forces which allow for the prediction in classical physics of black holes and neutron stars (if you fully overcome the RF you have to drop out of space into a singularity according to pre AuT math (yawn) and if you don't quite have the mass/gravity for that you get a bunch of bunched neutrons that have almost yielded to gravity but not quite).
White AuT supplies a ready explanation (two sets of information cannot because of the offsets occupy the same answer at the same time although they can get very very close as x approaches infinity which from our limited perspective it largely has) These forces also supply a mechanism for the staggered compression of states consistent with an increasing x.  As x gets larger, the "separation of states" defined by the decreasing angle between successive states (converging series of pi) allows for closer and closer results of solution for given time states so they can get closer and closer together.  This is a way of explaining how with high values of x (and more perfect curvature of space through averaging of states) you can have more compressed states and provides a thankful mechanism for why higher ct states only form with higher values of x.  Until the curve is compressessed enough, the solution to the algorithm "separate" the resulting quantum points too far for the higher ct states to form but as the curvature increases as an infinite converging series the solution allows for compression of the "newer" universes because they are more curved.
This might even provide an alternate mechanism for spirals.
One o fthe big questions posed so far by AuT is whether or not you have true F-series spirals which would require for inidividual spirals long periods of stability, the parrallel lines before they begin to converge after diverging.

Something has to happen in order to have solutions comprised of both diverging and converging positive and negative information sets (we see this in pi because it involves adding and then subtracting sequentially unit skipping denominators) to get the "net averages" creating inflection points and changing an expanding universe to a contracting one without increasing the mass of an otherwise constantly expanding or contracting universe (although the total amount of information and therefore mass does change at every quantum point) and the spiral equation allows for this. A similar result can be obtained merely by having offset solutions to sequential F-series universe stacking, however, and until the final line is drawn on the final equation for the AuT universe (or actually stacked universes) we don't need to rule out anything.
One point of this amazing little blog post, is that the force which Einstein and company wrongfully tied to black holes and neutron stars of the repulsive force is actually a diminishing force (forces not being forces at all it's really just a diminishing separation requirement as the curvature of the space math solution increases) allowing for the higher compressive state of ct5 (black holes) to exist just as at a much earlier value of x (the single variable in the single variable AuT one variable equation) allowed for waves to get close enough together to have a solution for matter to exist and way way back several "big bangs ago" presumably allowed space to coallece into photons.
There's a lot more to this, but it will wait since time (or the increasing value of x) is in no hurry to deal with me.