Another look at time dilation

In the last post it was mentioned that both velocity and gravity compressed the electron bundle "slowing" time.
In this video an explanation of how that occurs is being put forward and, yes, it involves ct1 exchange.
it also involves place.
Before we get to the explanation, lets talk about scales and such.
The minimum current speed (calculated in books 8 and 2) is around 790,000 mph (I think) reflecting galactic circulation.  Certainly there are other speeds involved, circulation around a universe core and potentially multiple ct6 circulation centers around ct7, etc beyond the scope of our observational limits, but this is a good number to start with.
The next number is 10^42 which is the number of ct1-ct2 changes per second giving an apparent linearity to time that hides supersymmetry from us, well from you or some of us, whatever.  Certainly there are physicists who stop reading this blog.
Then there is the "averaging" of expansion to contraction  that allows us to have stable orbits and such, that is while there is a net expansion of the universe, there is simultaneous compression in approximate amounts.
The reason this is important is because all this activity smooths out the view on a gross level.  On a small level we see the transitions, but on a gross level we do not, everything seems to move in a stately fashion, if pretty fast by our sandards.
The final thing to look atbefore getting to the details is place.
If we look at 2222 and we convert it to 1222 and 1000 that is the equivalent of breaking a rock in half.  If on the other hand we take 2222 and convert it to2221 and1 it is the equivalent of throwing the rock, albeit not much of a throw.  The idea is that place being exponentially larger using fseries compression, we can drain from the ones and tens place and get velocity.
So what does this tell us about this compressing time dilation thing?
The "trapped" ct1 (and higher) states are wound up over thousands if not trillions of big bangs and knotted in the spiralling balls of stuff so that when they begin to decompress the come out dragging the knots with them.  These knots are fibonnaci compression knots so pulling them apart yields these beautiful spiral galaxies, the exact amount of spiraling being offset by localized recompression and even net compression locally.  The idea is that at the ct2-ct1 level as these knots are pulled apart, the amount of ct1 states decrease effectively compressing the higher ct state knot.  We see this as creating a knot like when you get a tangle in a shoe string and pull the wrong string, its the same process although in AuT the pulling is coming from inside as the ct1 states exit the knot.
This same ct1 compression occurs in high gravity, again the ct1 states are vacating, yielding a more compressed state whether electron-proton pairs going to neutrons or  a star collapsing to a neutron star or black hole.  Why, however, is the time reflected by passing the information from quantum moment to quantum moment slowed by these two related processes?
It appears that the slowing is because the amount of movement from one quantum state to the next is reduced by reducing the ct1 states which allow them to move.  It is like if you slow a movie, eventually you would see one frame at a time, this is the exact same process.  There is less change from one quantum universe state to the next.
Again. AuT suggests a solution to a problem that is logical and provides a frame of reference type solution that can be reconciled with the less precise observations of Lorentz and Einstein.

And in the words of JimCarey, "can you feel it?"

Temporary video II and observations on time dilation

This is the second temporary version of the video.  While still not complete, it was uploaded with the new, shorter version of the second slide audio.  Thank you for watching this rough video, probably by the end of the month this first video will be finished andthe next one can be started.
While almost as long as the prior one, it has shorter per slide videos and some of the parts of video for slide 2, now at a reasonable 4 or 5 minutes, have been moved to other video or to the erata section which is part of the version on my computer but not this one.
https://youtu.be/1ivLB92VTWg updated 4/25/18

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) defines not only the source and effects of Quantum Mechanics, but the origin of dimension and the subsequent creation of what we refer to as time and which is distinguished from the underlying, time free change that controls the universe.
Algorithm Universe Theory Books 1-2 contain the most up to date information on the theory.  Books 7 and 8 compare AuT to the standard model.  The intervening books cover other areas and the third edition of book 3 will cover this slide presentation in detail.
The universe can be thought of as a very complicated string which is constantly being bunched together and pulled apart at every point, a string of math solutions where the results allow the perception of stacking and unstacking the results to create multiple “places” changing together giving the effect of dimensions for “net” areas of the string.

While this may sound too simple, the underlying symmetry of the universe explains many things.  When you look at the entire population and say, for example; “we’re killing ourselves, how can we be so stupid when individually we are so smart?” AuT provides an answer.
Hard as it is to believe, when we launch a rocket into space and I use the voyager probe as one of the fastest and farthest of our undertakings we are not actually choosing to do this on a quantum level, instead we are following the dictates forced upon us at the quantum level.  Worse still, every individual is governed by this underlying symmetry.
Indeed, we probably do not have the technology to affect this since our actions are time and dimension dependent and the ultimate control of the universe is at a time and dimension independent level, even though it is simple.  The change this, we’d have to be able to break or change the underlying algorithm.  While probably impossible, it is an undertaking worth studying.

https://youtu.be/0xfa-gGeNcI
The next slide show will probably be directed to the problems solved by AuT which can largely be found in one of the later books 4,5 or 6, I would think.  Maybe its even seven, but if I was a betting man I would say 6.  Actually book 5, so much for being a betting man.
One of the issues that will be addressed is time dilation.
i picked this idea to go over while I swam a miserly 2000 yards although i worked hard at most of it and did the im part in its entirety surprising myself.
This has to do with the single string expanding model.
Here are some thoughts on time dilation.
The first, and perhaps least important thought has todo with place (see book 2 if you don`t understand).  Losing ct1 during the unraveling suggests that the 10s place and ones place are the points of primary transition during expansion.
The more interesting thought has to do with the pulling that goes on when an embedded ct1 going negative pulls a mass apart from the inside as a part of acceleration.
The idea is that relatively speaking the more ct1 pulling, the slower time.  This has to be similar to the "crushing" of time (the electron bundle) during high gravity.  The idea is that there is a type of crushing due to the time pulling the ct3-ct4 together as it pulls outward, creating the same type of pressure as the crushing of gravity which has the effect of slowing time.
This purely Aut way of looking at movement and gravity yields a commonality between velocity and gravity that is absent otherwise.  why exactly this crushing slows time is undertain although the movement of the electron bundle internally is slowed in both cases and perhaps that is where time is slowed.
There will be more on this with some sketches in book 3 and perhaps an answer to this question.

dark skies audio4 fading mind

I walked early this morning, clouds darkened everything, there was some early morning coolness, but the walk warmed me quickly.
I thought about this first video
https://youtu.be/1ivLB92VTWg updated 4.25.18

There is nothing educationally wrong with it.  Maybe the name, Algorithm Universe Model would make more sense.
I have failed my first audio test by making the second video too long.
The good news is that I can break up the video (I think) and make it into 5 regular length slides.
 although I think I will have to redictate it first.  The lecture is quantum parts and the 30 minute version goes into details that are unnecessary.

Here is the 4th slide Audio:  https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide4

The too long audio with slide 2 describes the parts instead of just listing them like the slide shows.  It will require butchering the audio, but I can do that with a copy or I can redictate it.  this new slide is only a minute.

I thought about it or maybe it was the next slide, my walk, but I'm having trouble remembering what I thought about.  Something to do with the layout of the universe, the constant change that makes things look so fluid, problems I'm having with velocity time dilation, although that last is looking better.

The weird in time dilation is that there is no acceleration or velocity in super symmetry which destroys the whole general/special relativity distinction. The frame of reference, however is magnified by having quantum frames of reference for all points.  In due time it will be clear.
But I digress. What I forgot, I think it was whatever i thought about before those things.
Maybe book 2, now released, will help with the velocity time dilation issue which has to do with the release of ct1 because that is, after all, what velocity is; but why does ct1 release slow the higher state conservation of information within the electron bundle?  How does that change the number of frames, increasing them, for the higher state matrix that is releasing ct1?  How does this change when ct1 is being absorbed during compression?  More insight will come from that answer.

Why do my memories hide just out of my reach?  Could it have had to do with astronomy?  Maybe if I walked back to the same place, beside the church with the working shutters, but it can't be anything earth shaking, the theory is too complete to need that.

I'm going to have to figure out how to do this efficiently, I have in my mind an inefficient way.  also, I have to figure out what goes with slide 2. Just those elements and not the descriptions.  And then I can move on although apparently i already have.

Slide 3 and A short note on randomness and a special treat (at the end)

Einstein's 'Dice of God' Has Been Used to Generate Truly Random Numbers http://flip.it/zg0xbA

This is yet another reason why AuT is important.  Lets say you have a really important encoded secret.  In AuT it is not secret at all, because under super-symmetry there are no DOGs.

As you read/listen to this section, you need to be thinking, "oh but the universe is so rich and beautiful and we are so spiritual that even were there an equation it would have to be impossibly complex" which is total bullshit.  I'm not complaining about spirituality, by the way.  I'm merely expressing the opinion of AuT, not to be completely confused with my opinion since I have a hard time believing this myself. I merely observe that it fits too well not to be ignored.  Worse still with the high rates of change possible and the massive amounts of information you can get to where we are.

I spent 10 minutes (actually about 2.5) on the issue of timing slides, found the transition settings and set up the first two slides and while you might say, well aren't you special, the truth is that these are supposed to be 10 minute lessons and while slide 1 is only 1 minute, slide 2 waddles up at an overweight 13 minutes even after editing and without a lot of detail if you think about it. The point is that if I can't shorten everything it will play but be incredibly boring.  So will the first movie

I can probably cut it back after the other slides are finished, parsing out the information, but I think for now, the focus is on producing a youtube/powerpoint video of this first 10 slide video, the old slides of which are all posted here.

Slide 3 is helpful to me because it lays out a little better what is going on from a mathematically modeled background.  There are two operations

Operation 1 is generating quantum points and assigning them positive and negative values generating the features from which gravity and antigravity come.
Operation 2 is taking the results of operation 1 and generating compression features which result in the states (ct states) and the folding that yields the forces we experience.
Its worth noting that from a programming standpoint it looks something like this:
Operator 1
1) change x by adding 1 to x
2) for each change in x generate -3
3) for each -3 after abs(val -3) changes in x multiply by -1 and add 2 if positive or subtract 2 if negative
4) repeat step 3 for new value substituting new value for -3 as long as x continues to change.
This rough description of operator 1 generates all the points in the universe and gives a net value of gravity vs antigravity for any value of x; keeping in mind that x probably has a value scaled at least to 10^100 as you read this.

Operator 2 is discussed in slides 5-7 but it can also be set out roughly
1) Determine a proximity ratio (PR) for photons info arms (probably 0)
2) if PR achieved match sets of ct1 data based on positive adjacent to negative as the limit of separation between matched sets approaches PR align
3) set the number of information arms at 2^n where n=2
4) determine a PR2 for information arms (probably also 0, but certainly a higher function after ct1-ct2 transitions)
5) if pr2 is met between matched sets then begin to fill an information arm, filling being 2^n matched sets
6) repeat steps 1-5 as n increases.
Now operator 2 appears to be more complicated than operator 1, but the only feature that is missing is the equation for how the PR(s) are obtained.  Its worth a small wager to say that the equation is based on the next lower information state.
For example, in the ratios for sin of pi-1 to pi1, you generate a ratio of 27:256.  This 256 is the same value for compression for ct1-ct2.
This suggests the PR for alignment of positive and negative ct2 states to begin the ct3 generation might be 256 or a function of 256 but we'll use 256 for the moment.  That means you can have 256 intervening ct2 states between each ct3 fold or information arm.  Perhaps it also means you can have matched ct2 states separated also, certainly you would end up with separation of the higher states between positive and negative values because of the intervening lower states.  One easy choice would be to say the plus minus separation was 27 and the information arm separation was 256 but there is no reason to have this type of broad separation at the ct2-ct3 level because the ct1 separation is not particularly relevant.  Allowing ct2 states to begin to align with 256 intervening ct1 states is important, however, since the generation of electromagnetic fields is a function of incomplete information arm filling along the very large compression scales for waves (1.7x10^6) which are covered in slide 7.
At the early stages of the universe, the flux between these features would be such that it would be a mess and there is not time to evaluate it, only changes in x.  Since the number of changes in x within a second are enormous, the lowest number being on the scale of 10^39, until you get very high values of x, things change too fast for stability in the system.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide3

And last, but not least, the special treat.  I hope it works:

https://youtu.be/1ivLB92VTWg Updated 4/25/18

A work in progress, of course.

Audio Slide 2

So I went back and updated the audio now that you've had a chance to listen to "rough" video and while the content doesn't change, the language is cleared up.

I did this before work hours began, groggy and very stiff and tired despite a better than average nights sleep (any sleep seems better than average) and despite a long, but mediocre in scope swim.  My eyes have blackness swimming around them so that I don't know whether I'm being swarmed by insects or if it is just my vision.  Very disturbing, at least in the winter I knew there were no bugs.

Perhaps the biggest issue relative to the description of slide 2 is that it is very long, taking steps towards portions of a later slide.  While I could, conceivably, whittle it down to be very precise, for these purposes, I think it serves.

While I'm changing the link in the other post, I decided to put it here also for whatever it is worth.


https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide2

It seems like I can do a recording one day and then edit it the next along with my other work which is quickly coming to a head one way or the other.

Here's a strange picture of book 2 third edition, perhaps the most complete and up to date version of Algorithm Universe Theory weighing in at 160 pages.

The next slide, slide 3 has gotten a little messier but I like all the art in it.  Certainly if things go well I'd hope to have a rough draft of the audio tomorrow.

AuT Slide 2 with finished auido

I somehow swam 2500 yards, even 1000 im but the whole thing seemed to be in slow-mo.  there was never that burst of anerobic energy and it seemed like i was standing still while everything moved around me.

Even now I am exhausted.  I am only sleeping a few hours a night. I woke at 2 and sat and did nothing or as near to nothing as is possible.

Things are at an inflection point.   Which way will they go?

I did a rough edit on the first part of  the audio with slide 2, so you can listen for the first minute and a half and then it will shift to an unedited version.

I will update this audio later, but thought it would be interest to hear it before it was filtered, sound adjusted and fully edited or maybe not.

I did not prepare my remarks for this video so it rambles a bit.  I can unramble it in the edit but for this most general of the videos I don`t think it will matter much.  You can tell me what you thing or you cannot.

There is a lot of opinion on the theory in this, a lot of the "itistimetopickaroad" but AuT is all grown up now.  It is what it was always meant to be if unfinished.

I hope you enjoy it, it is all you are going to get for now.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide2
This includes the updated Sound for this slide, reduced in size by 3 minutes and equalized.

Link to Audio for slide 1

So I posted this on facebook-pretty easy.
Not sure how it sounds or will playback there, but as the Joker of Physics, I need to be ready to do something weird.
So here is the sound for the first slide:

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/autslide1

Note that I'm just learning on this software and the purpose of this is to put together is to have a road map for what will be professionally produced (I hope).  So this is all a little messy.