The last days of the New Orleans zombie, Charge 2, ionic/convalent and Rotting

So the screenplay has a name.
Two days of 2200 yard swims (1200 im) after a 33 minute stair, 2 sets of weights workout; then another 32 minute stair and 3 sets of weights workout then a swim tonight.
Weight at 176 this am seemed a little high under the circumstances.  I am having weight problems, portion size problems.
I am also having rot problems.
The environment is rotten, there are things in my life which are rotting.
And there there is this.
My hammock is so moss covered as to be unusable, at least estetically.
I have a chair swing which was set up to take in when not in use, but it was let out and now is in tatters.
It is as if my life is rotting around me.
I have been gathering stones from the yard, but many are too large and buried too deeply to easily gather up.
While some trees have been cut away, there are two dead trees standing and several that have fallen over that yet live but need to be converted to firewood.
There was a time when I would have had greater energy regarding these things.  I would have found my pri-bars, saws and shovels and gone about the business of cleaning these things up.
I know the source of many of these problems, but not all of them.
I have been working hard on science, pushing so deeply the mud threatens to swallow me.
I think many of my drawings have to change to reflect the fractal nature of things and I see the combinations coming to light in ways that surprise me, but should not.
I am approaching the 1/3 limit in the editing of the science of nostradamus.  It is something of a struggle, it needs a lot more work than I had hoped for.

But let's talk about charge, covalent bonds and the like.
In the last post we defined some things and that set us to looking at other things and these pictures showed up.

Figure 1

This first one shows the result of the application of AuT to observed phenomena.  It also shows an overlap which is very important.  The overlap, 1/2 of the two arms, forms a specific grouping, a central compression circle with two half circles (1/2 the diameter) on either side.

Figure 2

 This figure shows how in a bar spiral galaxy that same internal pattern is presented.  Fractally, if it was absent it would be cause for concern.  The overlapping area is in the region of the galactic core, jsut as it is the human core in the trademark (first picture) above.  what is significant about this is that it suggests that an atomic core must follow the same rule fractally with exponentially less compression; but with a more perfect appearance.
This woudl be a neutron core (big circle) surrounded by a proton core (smaller two circles) followed by the electron in the form of the spiral arms.
While there are traces of a third and fourth arm, but primary spiral arms are only two in number, one coming off of each of what we are calling the half circles.

figure 3

This view of ionic bonding (it could also be covalent) may not withstand the first two pictures, becuase what they suggest is that the hydrogen atom would look like this:

Figure 4

In this very rough drawing, you have the red as one electron and the blue as the other.  Overlaping the middle you have (1) for hydrogen the large inner circle radiating the two arms.  In Helium, you have the inner circle represeenting the province taken over by the neutrons and the two hydrogens occupy the half circle from "between which" the two electron clouds extend.
This gives a much different view of balance than the view given by Figure 3, but it suggests something that is facinating.  While the green circle becomes avalable as the next core from which the 8 electron shell arms can be built, it can readily bee seen that there is another location (the 2:2 location of the f-series) within the green arm which is available for this purpose.

Figure 5

You can see this to soem extent in this extended drawing, which shows how the size of the area for each successive arm building can be expanded based on the Fibonacci series.  In this case the base A, base B and Base C locations all provide for expanding growth of electron shell origins which can achieve differing levels of compression (2 electrons shown as the two primary arms with 8 for the A-A, 8 for the B-B and then whatever for the shells which are further out, all built outward according to a common inner fractal arm.

Since there are 2:8:8 this suggests that the number of lesser circles defined by the b-b and c-c elements are 2^3 features which is potentially troubling snce a 2^2 and 2^3 feature would be more in line with the underlying mathematical structure.  The better idea is that there is somehow room, given the two arms of 2^2 and 2^2 on each of the two arms which only have 2^1 electrons in the arrangement shown.  This can be easily drawn, but there is more than one way to do this; but we are doing fractals.

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8 or Figure 7 reimagined

Above (figure 6) you can see the center which have the overlap and two arms.  Then you see half of the pair coming off 2 of each of two arms and then you can two more.  This is fractal design and it works up to a point.

The two parts, the five.4 t6 and the fractal arrangement suggested work together.

The following two figures show different ways of approaching graphically the outer orbitals of atoms which will bear further consideration in the posts that follow.

Chapter 16

Levee storm doors close sealing off the city

Dr. Chang from Memphis drives across the lake, the water is high on the bridge.  They were stopping cars from going over the long causeway from the north side of lake Ponchetrain to New Orleans but he zoomed around the roadblock and no one chased him.  In his rearview mirror, he saw an officer waving at him wildly and another with both hands on his hips and looked back just in time to prevent his car from crashing into the concrete sidewalls.

On his radio, the news is talking about vagrants who have been attacking tourists.

Oh god, I may be too late. 

Just as he exits the bridge, he hears sirens.  On the other side of the bridge, police cruisers sit on an empty bridge going north with their blue lights flashing.  He hears someone yelling and passes by someone who had to jump out of his path.

He looks behind him.  Large metal doors, as tall as a house are closing the gaps between the levees that are normally open to the lake.  The storm, of course.  They are closing the bridge and the gaps in the levee in case the river rises.  What next, he wonders out loud?

Charge-the core of understanding between ionic and covalent strengths

There is a great deal of insight that comes from charge.
This takes us to science that appears in the patents, but not in this blog.
It quickly gets us somewhere fairly specific.
The idea that protons and electrons spew and absorb the same feature despite the compression difference is intersting.
The fact that a different type of absorption of spew occurs at the neutron is also relevant to the insight.
This takes us to ionic and covalent bonds, something that is covered in the patents, but not here, at least not in the same detail.
In order to give some context, photons are given the features of t6 and electrons the feature of t12.
In this way, charge becomes the net absorption or spew of t6 and orbitals are the arrangement of t12 states, remembering that an electron is 5.4 (roughly) t12 states meaning that an electron contains vast quantities of pre-t12 states, but all of which together are not equal to one half of a t12 state, also 5 t11 states by way of reference as an approximate.
When we talk about ionic and convalent, we are talking about the sharing of t6 states, possibly 5 plus in a single photon as the ionic portion and the sharing of t12 states for the covalent.
Based on our force equations, we would see an order of magnitude between these of 10^6.
What observation tells us is this:
Ionic lattice energies typically fall in the range of 600–4000 kJ/mol (some even higher), covalent bond dissociation energies are typically between 150–400 kJ/mol for single bonds.
This raises a number of questions.  One is that the ionic bond would initially appear to be the weaker of the two based on force considerations.  The second is that while a factor of 5-10 (or more) energies are shown, the scales are not that much higher.  Is it a logarithmic solution instead of an exponential one?  What are the factors that give rise to the bonds?
To begin we have to look at the new model, where the electron is not a fundamental particle, which would be absurd, but is instead a largely pre-time collection of particles.
Ct4 transitional states are responsible for both.
These are also superimposed over ct4-5 transitional states.
Ionic and convalent bonds are creatures of atoms, although Hydrogen, the pre-atoms also have covalent bonds.  In AuT, the "electron shell filling" is replaced with a core fractal structure in the nucleus (two protons) surrounded by a corresponding stable fractal shell, two 5.4 t12 spirals feeding off of one another and the core protons which, while heavier, are exponentially smaller due to compressive energies.  Because the electron components are too small to see, we only see them as net effects, part of the wave particle duality feature of electrons.
Molecues are co-valent in nature, shared electrons which in this case means shared fractal structures of t12 states (mostly) rather than shared orbitals.  The main difference between molecules and Hydrogens lies in the core of neutrons which give strucure to the protons, but this difference is enough to allow the distinction of Hydrogen Bonds outside of the stronger co\valent molecular bonds.

Ionic matrix share something stronger, but it still is the absorption and spew of t6 associated with charge.  In this case the factal structures affected are not in the electron fractal, but between teh electron fractal and the proton fractal.  What this means is that even though the absorption and spew is of a lower ct state of enormous magnitude, the compression involved is exponentially higher.

To use the galactic example, one can see it in this way:
A spiral galaxy has two arms which serve to balance the core of black holes.  Each of these arms represents a higher fractal form of an electron.  One can see that the galaxy appears more balanced with two of these arms than one; otherwise the "center" of gravity, the center of ct1-2 interactin would be offset and rotational unwinding would be irregular.  If one were to speed up this process, the galaxy could be expected to fall apart, the same being ture of the smaller fractal.
The arrangement of the two arms involves an enormous amount of information but is fractally the same as the arrangement of the two electrons around the hydrogen two proton core.
Lets new go towards the center of the galaxy.  Now we are looking at ionic features, the highly compressed exchange of information at the interface of arms with the core.  In a true ionic exchange, the exchange is between the arms and cores of different galaxies.  What this indicates, however, is that the amount of compression between these two is very high and the factal balance is at least potentially less important in more complex galaxies than in the interaction between the cores and the shells.

This sharing between cores, as opposed to the sharing of outer shells, can be compared to the accumulation of gravitational force which makes it appear very large in the aggregate although it is very small individually.  It mght also be compared to dark energy, the negative form of gravity which gives the overall entropy to the universe even though locally net features allow for greater organization.

The invitation

It would be better for reveryone if my physics was not right.
I look for places where randomness would fit it, the enormous potential that exists a higher ct states almost demands it.  The problem is that the potential falls apart at the quantum level.
To understand this, you can consider a molecular reaction at the ct4-5 level where relative compression states vary greatly, electrons in constant motion absorbing and regurgitating ct1-early ct3-4 states while interacting together and with the spew of multiple nuclei.
The exact moment of compression or decompression in such an environment is impossible to calculate.  Indeed, Schrodinger's approximation are a way to average this in such a way as to get even a cursory grasp.
How in such an envirnoment can a single, relatlively simple equation hold up?
The answer is terrifyingly simple.   Everything happening in that complex environment is merely reflecting what that simple equation is doing in a time and dimension free environment according to a very rigid set of rules and possibly the rigid 256:27 ratio suggested by the sinpi-1 to sinpi1 solution.
That is the problem, at the quantum level with 10^150 points in various states of flux, but having massive continuity due to solution order and high fuse values, you end up with exactly what we observe, something largely consistent, but impossible to accurately gauge at the high compression levels where time exists.
It destroys the magic of creation, the hopes and dreams of science and personality, not in the expression of the person as a whole, but the actual personality, it takes away the genius that brought it into the light, my genius if you must.

I am working on the new audio book, the first chapter is posted a post or two back.

An invitaton was sent to submit an aritlce.  The part on time is the first section of the book, although reading and editing will take some time...and I have a fiction book I want to audio-ize also.

But let's talk about that article for a moment.
An overview of one element of this longer article was submitted and was questioned because of the following features: ",,,articles must be of high quality and scientific interest, and be recognised as an important contribution to the literature."
This is something only to be corrected with the entire article, but I want to stay focused and wonder if it is worth the trouble.

I mention this because I think it is worth considering whether this work, albeit produced over 7 years, fits these criteria.  Is it better to suffer the slings and arrows, as Shakespeare asked?  My suggestion is that inherent bias against new models is the primary problem with the time article. The objection to the article had no mathematical basis, the article itself, while very focused has a very specific mathematical basis and addresses any number of otherwise mysterious features of the universe. 

If the objection had been "The math appears "too simple" to support a complex universe," I wold have agreed and lamented the truth and falsity of that claim.
That was not the problem, the problem was that "rigorours" understanding of the model has to occur after it is understood and, in this case, no one even tried.

 However, the math is "observed" throughout the universe and the results are hard to rebut.  Since the model defines all features of the universe from gravity to black holes to time it is important and should be of interest.  It is radical, in its underlying simplicity and its bredth, but it is probably correct because the universe necessarily must arise from relatively simple phenomena in order to fit without "our logic system."  That being said, while this article clearly defines what "hidden variables" control the universe, there is a second layer hiding behind this article.  That is the layer where the quantum count arises, where it is maintained and where the results are remembered.

Not to make to fine a point of it, in a fractal model the NS is like a proton and the BH is like a neurtron.  We can infer the universe is fractal because of the presence of multiple iterated equations, the denominator of pi, the gold ratio, 2^n; iterated equations giving rise to fractals.

Since Neutrons hold atoms together through the absorption of space (which is many different things after a fashion) for one not to increase in size it must radiate something.  The same fractal requirements say that the BH does the same thing.

Magnetic fields suggest that space is absorbed and pre-photons are spewed by planets, stars, neutron stars, pre-photons being a transitional state between ct3 and ct4 the most dense form of space before transitional states between ct3 and ct4.
Charge appears nothing more than matching absorption and spew of two very different ct states, but it also may involves other states being absorbed and spewed which have no charge characteristics and this is almost certainly the case, of course, under the model (see the old audio book below for more on this).

BH spew plasma and neutrons spew something which is a less compressed state of matter but somewhat theoretical in nature, something you would think would be more dense than pre-photons, but not giving the effect of charge; although an argument exists it is more dense than information, but less dense than pre-photons, what I would call ct3, for exampele.  This would also work fairly well for a BH, although the plasma ejection of BH suggest the former result.

The pre-photons are what the standard model associates with magnetic fields, but energy (as opposed to force) is only pre-time changes in information seen from a  post time perspective.  This is a concept I am still getting my hands around.

One more supporting article, they are getting closer...to plagiarism and copyright infringement.  For the moment, this article is so wrong and confused that it cannot be held accountable for anything other than being an embarassment in light of AuT

https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1179126/big-bang-theory-universe-time-big-bounce-the-universe-meaning-what-is-the-big-bang

Christmas trees

174.4
The benefits of a largely vegetarian diet
And stress

The world is like a christmas tree in the dark.
When you are there, the tree is lighted
And when you are gone
the power is off and lights are out

Love is you
in the room
when you are gone
so it is

The universe on the other hand is a  mystery
But it is a mystery with a couple of very clear clues.
One clue is the denominator of pi which is ubiquitous.
Another is the golden ratio
The third is the relationship between the first two.
All of these things force the universe into a fractal model.

That is so obvious that I have to wonder what is going on here.
I have some publication questions
I get proposals, double blind
but does publication even matter at this point
Perhaps patents matter, I'm not sure.

I have insights at times, but I forget them as often as I remember to write them down.
Sometimes I put things that are not relevant to physics.
My poems to you? No, that is physics.
I write this because I forgot something insightful that came from somewhere.

https://soundcloud.com/greg-friedlander/intorduction91619thepushings

Spirals, Quantum Mechanics and Chapter 14

Why spirals?
Spirals are a secondary effect, but they were the initial model.  Where did they come from?  Early in the process I was looking for a fractal model, not calling it fractal, but instead something that would explain quantum curvature.  Gravity is not a straight line force, but is, instead, a spiral force.  Hence it was selected because the first model was a spiral model.
The use of fibonacci spirals was initially just one of several spiral models, but it gradually took hold due to its observation in nature and its alignment with mathematics.
Modern physics has spent so much time coming up with complex explanations, when a simple one comes along they choke on it.
I am happy to choke the greater physics community and I don't expect them to come around any time soon, it is a process where the further I go, the more significant things get.
Since...well since people sensed time they have wondered what it was.
Fate plays a big roll also, the fickle finger which having written,a time thing, moves on, another time thing.
People have called time many things, a dimension, an illusion, something that can go in both directions.
But in a true Quantum Universe, time is something very different and this was an early observation of AuT, you can find it by searching the early posts concerning the einstein hologram universe (EHU or EHT) where it seemed likely that all time states had to change at the same time...and yet time differed as shown by things like time dilation.  Indeed the differentiation of time change was almost necessary to the changes in dimensional state having their various effects and yet those two thing were so different and so inconsistent.
Probabilities over time further complicated the analysis.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/quantum-physics.html

There are two problems discussed:
separate rules for how quantum objects behave when we’re not looking at them, and how they behave when they are being observed.
Aut explains this by showing that what we call "observation" is actually separating pre-time changes into 2 things: 1) energy 2) net positon.  Everything else about this is absurd.  AuT explains this in the most recent books, but a new book on time and atomic structure will be coming out soon that goes into detail on both and will include an audio edition.  Interested?  Let me know.

The other problem is that we don’t agree on what it is that quantum theory actually describes, (the example is "an electron in terms of a “wave function,” which collects the superposition of all the possible measurement outcomes into a single mathematical object"). This, again is pre-AuT nonsense since AuT describes why this is the case.

Well enough nonsense, on to..nonsense

Chapter 14

Action levee overflows

 “I was watching the news, there was no problem near the city.

No, but you can see the bridge is acting like an underwater dam.    The water is almost over the levee.

A radio crackles.  Yes, what is it

You better come here boss, we’re at the 5-mile maker above the city.

I’m almost there.”  Climbing into a heavy-duty golf cart, the coast guard captain signals his lieutenant.   Let’s go.

After turning a corner, they come to a rare site, water is flowing over the top of the levee.  It’s not too bad, I am sure the pumps can handle it.

It begins to rain, fat droplets.  The lieutenant gets under the roof of the cart, but the captain stands there as the rain increases looking at the steady flow of water over the top of the levee.

The muffin Man chapter 15

So some of you wonder, did I stop working out?  Did I get fat?
The answer is no, although I have gone from the 174 plus back to the 175-176 range although I have been able to get to  173 and change.
I am on my second cup of coffee which I badly needed today.
I have a lot planned and I did not swim yesterday.
Today should be a gym day, that takes me to 1:00 because it opens late because of god.
Well, not god, the superstitious belief system which runs our world.
If AuT is taken to its logical end; religion dies. 
That is not a good or bad thing; it is a wonderful and horrible thing.
It frees us from nonsense, eliminates large quantities of false evil; but it takes away purpose and morality.
But that is what AuT is, after a fashion.  It is the death of randomness.  it is an extreme and, can I say vexing...no that word is no longer relevant, depressing result.
The only issue that remains after aut is can we control ct1 changes, for if we cannot, then we cannot change ct2, 3 or 4...except as part of the strange feedback loop that is energy and to a greater extent life.  We affect ct...4 transtion states, probably not 1,2 or 3 although that remains to be seen with certainty and thereby achieve what we call self-control, consciousness, self determination...exccept that we don't.
You can say this:  "We expllode a bomb, we increase space locally, we effect ct1."  That is a lie, however.  I would have dwelt on that philosophically before, but now I see that what we call space, is actually ct1-early ct4 transition states.  Do we, when we explode a bomb get to ct3?  Perhaps not, perhaps we don't even get close to ct1,2 and 3.  Perhaps the "space" we work with is ct4 transitions states below ct4t6, the proposed photon state; understanding that it could easily be an even higher transition state.  If that is as far down as we can get, then life is meaningless.  I type for no better reason than that the universe demands it of me and those who jihad and killing based on the least of things, ignorance and superstition.  That last, at least, is certainly true as much as I would like it to be different.
The more I know about the universe, the less of it I control.  That is a curious thing.
And yet, there is zero meaning unless we can get to ct1, although ct3 would make me god.
We'll see.
Until then there are "utility issues" that I have to address.
I am a chemist, the source of many of my problems.  Should have gotten a physics degree I suppose, but chemistry can be called applied physics, just as chemical engineering can be called applied chemistry, mechanical engineer applied chem e, etc; or you can go the other way and say that math is theoretical physcis.  I have a lot of math in my pocket, don't believe me?  Turn me upside down and shake me.
But we were talkign applied this or that.
Covalent bonds vs stable fractal structures
The first problem that has to be addressed is the structure of the electron and the electron stable.
The easy covalent concept looks at a simplification of this process where the electrons move.
Filling the outer 8 electron shell is the easiest to view.
What about ionic bonds?
This idea is that electrons are lost by one and gained by another.
Again there is a fractal structure that makes sense at the proton level which forces the stability at the electron level.  It is not "shells" that define the stability, it is the shape of the shells pulling these electron shells together.
This is a net spew and absorption issue vrs a fractal structure.

Physics continues to chase my model:
Quantum Physics Is Fine, Human Bias About Reality Is The Real Problem http://flip.it/3x9USU
Run, run as fast as you can, you cannot catch me, I am already gone.

This remains pretty rough in patches here as I rewrite to clarify this and I am not really rewriting now as I have moved on to other things for a while.  I will be back soon enough.

Chapter 15

On the wrong side of the levee, secondary characters

Mason: “We need to get out of here.  We are slowly being poisoned by the gas.”

Dat be good, you be lettin em know boudreaux is good too, but there be no phone or transport over to dat side. 

Becky:  And if there was, we’d have to cross the levee where the gas is too thick. 

In fact, when mason looked over the levee he saw a cloud of the poison gas and dead bodies outside of the houses in a sufficiently horrific layout.  The cloud of gas was visible nearly to the top of the levee.

Is there any way over there?

There be a small piroux, but you have to be some kind of crazy to try to row it over there.

There is half of the bridge span, but the gas leak has caused everyone to evacuate.  We can go down to it and scale the bridge from the levee side and cross the bridge.

Fate and climate change

Time, and therefore fate, is tied to pre-time changes in dimensional states underlying the higher dimensionsal states from which are they built.
For whatever reason, the universe picked me to disclose this science.  It could have picked the least of the physics professors in the world in which case they would have been elevated to the pinacle of their profession and showered with rewards, but it picked me.
The winner of the fickle finger of fate award.  To him goes none of the glory but all of the heartache.

People are idiots, that is why we are going to die.
We would die anyway, but not so quickly.
Or maybe not, with AuT.
We could not survive as we are, but as we could be with an understanding of the underlying science.
Perhaps our universe reflects just such a survival by a race not led by idiots, not defined by the idiocy of the mass mind.  One led by a mind like mine own, picked out by fate.

This blog should wax eloquent on this idea of fate as pre-time change, but it will not.
So what is this blog post about?  Not stupidity, but why the suggested treatmens for CO2 removal won't work.
Let us start by talking about the source of CO2 and what has worked historically.
CO2 comes from turning stored carbon into burned carbon, burning being nothing more dramatic than adding Oxygen.  A lot of this comes as cellulose, i.e. plants; a lot comes from petroleum.

Ok, what has worked historically?  Basically this is putting it back where it came from.  Trees which turn into coal or oil; but also reef systems which take it out of the ocean where most of it is going.  We can plant the crap out of forests, but 3/4 of the world is ocean and we cannot plantthe crap out of reefs.  There is not a lot of room for them and acidification of the ocean is killing what is left.  Also,they are a slow process, millions of years of work.

So how about the dumbass ideas of taking it out of the ocean or air using technology systems?  Any moron with a cursory understanding of fluid dynamics (aka unit operations) knows that it would be impossible to pass enough air or water through these systems to have a significant effect.

So what are the solutions if we are not all going to die?

1) The biological solution:  This is a combination of trees and plants, population control and man made organisms that would survive in the ocean and incorporate the carbon into shells and sink to the bottom of the ocean.  This is a near term solution that might easily backfire, but has a snowball's chance of working.

2) The high technology solution:  This is some rendition of what we are already doing with the systems that would remove carbon from the air or water; but would work.  AuT has a suggestion here, to control the earth's magnetic field to make it cooler or hotter depending on the need.  This is more sci-fi than the biological solution.

The funny thing is that neither of these is likely to be pursued in time. There will come a day when people start dying from a lack of oxygen.  Then it will become important to some people and they will go through all those things that do not work and maybe begin on the ones that do.
But it will be too late, and everyone will die.
Or maybe, just maybe, the guantlet thrown down to me will be picked up, somehow I will draw this sword from the stone that the close minded sycophants of the inteligencia have placed around it.

The unconventional, new-age ways people are getting buried http://flip.it/6Kfe.Y