As those of you who keep up already know, I am no fan of string theory and I'm beginning to doubt holographic physics except as a nice model for understanding the time dimension physical model.
Lest you get your feelings hurt, I also question the time space model since I consider the model to be properly determined only in terms of time, space being a mere manifestation of the sequential nature of time.
The question of whether time expands, is an infinitely thin expanding bubble or, as I would suspect, that it is not expanding, but that expansion is also a manifestation of the linear nature of time as we observe it.
Likewise, rather than seeing matter as taking up "space" as is the case with string theory and other theories, I suspect that matter and it's twin brother energy as nothing more than the tendency of time to return to the singularity from which it springs.
The parts of physics that are keys to this are (1) what is g-space; that is when we go back to the big bang (the beginning the linear appearance of time giving rise to the appearance of space as we experience it); what happens before that. The question of why time exists and what the singularity from which time springs or from where it is manifested, which should be the same thing as what existed immediately before what we call the big bang, that is what is 14 billion years ago.
Without a complete understanding of what exists before 14 billion years ago, physics is just a method of explainging what we believe percieve, i.e. the practical application of time-space. While critical to a practical understaning of things; it is only a tool, just like newtonian physics is a tool to understand what is manifested by the Einstinian time-space universe.
Happy New Year
No comments:
Post a Comment