when we are looking at stuff it changes-because we must be at the point where things happen. waves/particles-if we are a projection then we are waves.
This projection is different and similar:
The similarity is that it comes from a single source, what is called the singularity because it is where all gravity drops out of the projection. It isn't a singularity in the sense that it has a lot going on; essentially everything here at once, at least according to Einstein.
The difference is the burning nature of time. It is like the singularity is half of the equation, time is the other half.
It could be order burning to disorder in the most general sense, it could be a continuous loop with everything being projected and then it reaches the point where the projection begins again. It appears to us that things change and that we have a role on a very small level on that change so that the burning aspect of time seems more relevant than the pure projection. But without an equation, c+o(2)=co(2), the explanation is conceptual only.
Some unexplainable aspects using pure matter theories (such as double blind splitting, where an electron goes through both holes showing wave principles) is explainable where matter exists only as a tendency, time expresses that tendency away from the singularity.
We think we are watching particles and waves, but neither is relevant because the type of burning we are watching is the watching of tendencies away from a singularity energized by an infinitely thin layer of time.
We observe the source, the singularity, but only as it burns in time.
The next question to address is whether time runs forward or backwards. That is, does what we observe represent the runing of time in its natural diection or are we seeing it backwards. While we can laugh about that conceptually; if everything has happened, then time can run either way.
This projection is different and similar:
The similarity is that it comes from a single source, what is called the singularity because it is where all gravity drops out of the projection. It isn't a singularity in the sense that it has a lot going on; essentially everything here at once, at least according to Einstein.
The difference is the burning nature of time. It is like the singularity is half of the equation, time is the other half.
It could be order burning to disorder in the most general sense, it could be a continuous loop with everything being projected and then it reaches the point where the projection begins again. It appears to us that things change and that we have a role on a very small level on that change so that the burning aspect of time seems more relevant than the pure projection. But without an equation, c+o(2)=co(2), the explanation is conceptual only.
Some unexplainable aspects using pure matter theories (such as double blind splitting, where an electron goes through both holes showing wave principles) is explainable where matter exists only as a tendency, time expresses that tendency away from the singularity.
We think we are watching particles and waves, but neither is relevant because the type of burning we are watching is the watching of tendencies away from a singularity energized by an infinitely thin layer of time.
We observe the source, the singularity, but only as it burns in time.
The next question to address is whether time runs forward or backwards. That is, does what we observe represent the runing of time in its natural diection or are we seeing it backwards. While we can laugh about that conceptually; if everything has happened, then time can run either way.
No comments:
Post a Comment