non-linear time theory-dimensionless equivalence

The equations for equivalence are relatively simple:
A=B
/If B is more than one item, A=B+C, A=B*C, etc.  The laws of dimensional mathematics allow for infinite permutations.  For example, if B in the first example is written out, it may look like this:B=mc^2 and would therefore mean a=e for mass m (plus or minus permutations written out as constants. for example, if the mass has momentum (defined here as change in relative time coordinates,) then (pc^2)^1/2 fills the role of C in the second equation and it looks like this: E^2=(mc^2)^2 + pc^2) where p is the momentum of the mass which in turn is m*v (mass times velocity) so the equation looks like e^2=(mc^2)*2 + (m*v*c)^2 which begins to look a lot like a integration solution for the sum of the parts which change in coordinates according to time (time coordinate being inherent in both velocity (meters/sec) and in the speed of light and, by the nature of this formula in mass.
When used in Non-linear time theory, this equation changes further because forces are included in the equation.
QIQe (a fundamental particle of energy)=E(mc^2 plus or minus momentum)+Tc where Tc is clock time.
QIQs (a fundamental particle of space)=QIQe+Te where Te is Time expressed as nuclear force (electromagnetism or nuclear forces or both)
QIQt (a fundamental particle of non-spatial time-e.g. two dimensional space time)=QIQs+Tg which is gravity expressed by time.
The order may or may not be accurate, although it can be determined according to some of the prior disclosures.
For zero momentum, the equation may look as follows:
QIQt=mc^2+Tg +Te+Tc.  Since c=m/s it can be seen that time appears in all portions of the equation on the right which would be expected of this solution since all things must be related to time plus some constant.  This oversimplification shows that as Tc increases, for example, Te or Tg must decrease (or QIQt must change).  It should be noted that Tg, Te and Tc are necessarily formula that represent a change in time coordinates and are, to the extent that you force them into a three dimensional framework, different dimensions of time..
To take them from dimensions to coordinate changes alone, the equation could look like this: Tg(x), Te(x,y), Tc(x,y,z); or Tg(x), Te(y), Tc(z); or Tg(x,y,z), Te(x,y,z), Tc(x,y,z) where x, y and z are conserved relative to one another.  Under any circumstances, to have relevance in the universe the coordinates need to change so any of these are a measure of dt (the change of time) and not just time with static coordinates where dt=0 is non-linear time by definition.
This looks very much like multi-dimensional time as it should, but it is not the complete equation.  The difference is largely semantic, but dimensional time would be dx, dy, dz, this only reflects a change in a constant, t which is defined as being expressed in at least one dimension; but dimensions necessarily do not exist except as an expression of the change in time in one or more of its forms.
Critical in the analysis for our purposes today is that there need only be one form of non-linear time, a single point of non-linear time, which is expressed differently giving the appearance of dimension (and therefore linearity) where dimension and linearity do not really exist within this one point.
Hence the equations of QIQ above relate to a single body (a point body existing without linear time or dimension) which is repeatedly expressing itself in terms of linearity for every "point" within the universe.  While we struggle with this conceptually, arguing in our limited perspective that this makes for a "very busy" point, the fact that the point exists without time or dimension means it can work very casually.  The thing that is very active is merely the expression or linearity which does not exist in the perspective of the point even thought the entire universe created by this expression is, necessarily, in "motion" or a change in time coordinates in order to be perceived as non-linear (compare super-massive black holes where at least some of the universe is going non-linear, but neither adding nor subtracting from the one origin QIQ.
Perhaps you think I am digressing too far from the questions of dimensional equivalence, however just the opposite is the case.  A non-linear universe (like the one theoretically giving rise to ours) would, from our perspective at least, be a single point, non-linear in dimension and time, where everything happens at once, where dt=0.  At dt^1, the universe begins to happen so that the expression of dimension look essentially like the integration from zero to some number (possibly infinity) (QIQ) dt where QIQ is defined above and where dt may be broken out as dtx,dty,dtz and further broken down according to the forces created if one is not inherent in each coordinate change.
While three coordinate changes are used, there is no requirement that it be limited in a theoretical model since to the single non-dimensional point of origin, 10 dimensions are no less significant than 1,2 or 3 since it exists without them.  The only possible limitation is that as additional dimensional times are added, others must be reduced and whether this reduction can go on to infinity without having some strange theoretical effect is the subject of another chapter.