So here is some of the language from page 56 of NLT (published in September 2014): This is where I say the "Higgs Boson" Doesn't exist, despite the "Nobel prize stuff". Yeah, I'm going to milk this for all its worth, even though it offends all my readers, but I went out on a limb telling the physics cabal they were all wrong, that's a pretty big leap of faith, and my concept is still the right one. We'll see what tomorrow holds. For now:
From page 56:
To
understand this we need to look at some additional measurements and
we’re going to examine something “huge”, the Hydrogen atom.
First, however, we’re going to stick with the individual particles.
We’re going to look at Planck length (above) a little more; and
fundamental particles. http://www.benbest.com/science/standard.html
and http://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/numbers.html
can be viewed as a reference
Despite
the enormous (relative) size of fundamental particles, as we break
them down, we end up with sizes where dimensional features begin to
break down (see the size requirements of electrons, for example).
There
are at least 16 predicted fundamental particles. Since NLT doesn’t
care about fundamental particles as particles, the number and type is
largely an unnecessary fiction, but like the larger particles, an
important fiction. The “17th” fundamental particle, the “higgs
boson” doesn’t exist in NLT and isn’t a fiction worth
considering (in NLT). This doesn’t mean that a time state can’t
be found that could be mistaken for H-B particles; just that the
Higgs-Boson is one of many “crutches” pre NLT physics needs to
explain things which are intuitive in NLT.
No comments:
Post a Comment