As I've mentioned innumerable times, NLC is both light years ahead of all other theories of quantum physics and irrelevant.
This is not the irrelevance of man as a temporary creature, because man is not a temporary creature, at least not the way that we perceived it before NLC. Oh no, every stupid thing you've ever done and every moment we've spent apart or fighting goes on into eternity. We are more permanent than we ever imagined.
What makes it irrelevant is that at best we are some bizarre type of movie for some "superior" being. One has to imagine how boring it must be for such a thing to create us. That's the best case scenario.
Non-linearity contains all of our past and future as well as the present. There is nothing that is not fixed in place. While physicists knew this deep down inside, there was not a mechanism before NLC to completely rule out randomness. We assumed we could make decisions independent of physics properties notwithstanding the stupidity of such a conclusion. The reason, primarily arrogance, was that we couldn't admit we were irrelevant. Archimedes running naked down the street after making conclusions about comparative density is amusing, but predictable. Asimov came close, but he couldn't imagine away randomness. Many religions have come close. The Zorastian ones do, after all, look at the universe as a plaything of the gods, created for his entertainment. That part, at least survives the feasability test of NLC, defining our universe as a model assembled from a box by some so complex entity that we'd have to say it is impossible for such a complex system to exist except our universe exists which is also impossible.
The religions, of course, fall far short because they rely on faith and faith is a function of linearity and true self determination. In the universe of physics that we live in faith is the dumbest of things. A belief because we believe god wants us to believe assumes the creation of a non-linear universe leaves such things to chance. Yes, we may be the result of intelligent design, but we are pre-set automatons who can't even control 3 dimensions, because the "movement" of those 3 dimensions has already been both determined and carried out long "before" any of our prophets or priests told us how to think.
NLC doesn't allow for true linearity. Our universe must be non-linear, everything must happen at once, the past, present and future must exist together because physics so dictates. The great spiral must be something else, so what is it?
My thesis this morning, sleepless and lonely, is that it is the initial rule by which linearity is perceived. It is a rule of perceived (Not actual) linearity just as every other law of physics is. The rule is that when linearity is applied to the singularity, the first step is to create a beginning and end where the two spiral together. It is like a pulse or a bulge, but it is only a projection of a pulse or bulge since the singluarity isn't truely affected. We see the first result of false linearity as gravity. I say we, what I mean is those of us living in the singularity who think we are moving and controlling (slowing down or speeding up but not changing direction) the universe around us. We all know, deep down inside, that it is physics on the quantum level moving everything around, rule one being the "great spiral". There is no reason you cannot jump around on the spiral, but no matter where you decide you are at any one moment, you still pass to the next moment, no wiser or dumber than you were before. It isn't time travel, its just being one place or another on the spiral.
Rule 2 is that because the spiral, spirals, you go from a less compressed state inevitably back to non-linearity by increasing compression. Everything else comes from this, that's it. Two rules. The universe in a nutshell.
The great understanding of NLC. You don't matter, I don't matter, the theory doesn't matter. So why do I miss you so much? Of course, there is an easy answer to that, which does nothing to render the universe less irrelevant.
So what is our purpose? What goal should we aspire to? There is only one that makes sense to us. We have to determine how to control our illusory self determination to make it something less illusory. We have to attempt to come up with ways to actually alter the singularity. It is, of course, impossible, since physics dictates that we've already done whatever we've done, so we have to attempt to prove that physics has allowed us to do this already. If it is possible, then it basically means that we are probably the creators of ourselves which makes absolutely no sense.
The problem with NLC is the problem with all linear physics. It doesn't tell us anything about g-space (you'll have to look for it in earlier posts, it's all over the place there and in the books). G space is what really matters and without a "logical" explanation (and our physics can't yield an explanation) we might as well stop looking and just say "god did it" like everyone else who has run up against a brick wall. The universe, even as a singularity cannot logically exist, not using our physics. So there must be another type of physics which allows for the existence of complex things. I know this because my physics demands it. My physics demands there must be another type of physics that allow for the universe and everything that any of you know or think is irrelevant unless you have been pre-programmed by our physics to determine how to manipulate g-physics and then only if you are capable of leaving our physics and becoming a part of g-space.
Well, I've solved none of our problems today, although the pre-programmed universe appears to be treating me particularly well right now (oh, if only our god was not the god of irony), so who knows what tomorrow will bring, and the answer is that certainly something knows, even if it is only physics.
And even though I know it doesn't matter, I'm still looking for that nobel prize.
No comments:
Post a Comment