NLC-me and you fixed together or apart

I'm working hard to get this edition, now over 300 pages finished.

AS teh storm washes over me, I think how this isolated place is conducive to finishing this work.  I am, as I implied, working hard to go out west, to the point where I may have to take unilateral steps. I'm waiting for other work to be done, but I'm also working hard to do my own.  

There are two ways for the work to occur, the set path and the independent path and that applies to my actions as well as the choices open to those who work with me.

How grand it would be, however, to take a Mark Twain adventure and no time would be better than now when I have such an twainian opportunity with such a twainian outcome.  I must continue to work towards that because it would also give me time to finish.

I will lay out some of what is new, below, but first I have to say that as the waves of a storm build, so does my sense of separation, but the flames which represent my feelings, as much as the spiral the algorithm of NLC, have not abated in the slightest.  It is, I fear of a match with the antiquated presentation found in "if winter comes".

And my mathematics, philosophy is the wrong word, dictates that we are fixed, either together or apart.  I betray not myself, by mathematics itself, every day we wake up apart, every night we do not sleep together, every story we do not share, every conservation lost in a fixed eternity to the universe.  Can there be a god that finds anything more interesting than when we are together, or one so cruel to envision a perfect universe where we are apart.

On feature of the algorithm for displaying fixed information which is reflected in the equations identified as CT2 is that two coordinates can change at once because of the shared space along the spiral and the related compression of data (ct1-2^1 to ct2-2^2).  This allows for exponentially greater information to be displayed at the one point where ct2 occurs over ct1.

It is theorized that the traditional view of the coordinates as being along separate axis is incorrect.  This requires a view of dimensions where the expression of change and not dimension occurs.  For example, as information from a data source is processed, it can, by virtue of the process, be displayed as anything, color, sound, or picture for example.  The variation is controlled by the mechanism by which the fixed information is displayed.  If we are only looking at one “bit” at a time (2^1) there is a minimum amount of information that can be displayed.  If two bits are processed at once (2^2) then the corresponding amount of information is exponentially greater, but the total amount of information is unvaried. 

The information is fixed in a singularity without dimension.  An algorithm expresses the information in a form that appears to be along a spiral (viewed from within the spiral of information).   The purpose of the algorithm is to give a beginning and an end to the information just as a movie plays from beginning to end.  Unlike a traditional movie, this one varies in complexity from a state of complete disorganization, back to a state of complete organization.  This does not, however, affect the singularity, but is only a method of expressing it.

It is therefore as predictable as physics that a given outcome will occur, there is no potential for varying the movie unless the singularity is varied in the primary embodiment.  In the earlier embodiment, however, it was speculated that the spiral could vary, even to the point of varying the shape of the spiral, which would allow for different incomes based on a set amount of data.  This alternative view is worth considerable attention because it would provide that the information can be expressed using different algorithms to give different result even in a universe where the amount of information is finite. (The exact amount of information is estimated later, but is a function of the total gravity of the universe, each quantum of time/gravity/data-interchangeable references to the same thing) totaling to the total amount of information.

Information at any point along the spiral can be discussed in terms of the nature of “x” as a function of the equation x=2^n.  In this equation, so far, as n starts as 1, x is represented by nothing other than space.  The amount of x, x(tot) has a cognizable amount of gravity in our current universe because the transition from x=2^0 to x=2^1 is viewed as the point where gravity is created.  Since all the information is available at any point along the spiral irregardless of combination or compression, the total amount of gravity and the total amount of change are unvaried as the spiral moves is followed inward.

Again, while we can envision mathematically a spiral algorithm, actual movement is absent.  Also, X(tot) never changes.  This means that the amount of combination must match the increased amount of change possible in order that nothing be invented or lost.  One can imagine information being lost from the spiral, but one cannot imagine information being lost from a singularity.  Since the spiral is only a formula for expressing linearity from an singularity without linearity no information is lost unless the “rules of the spiral” say it is lost.

For this reason, we can change the exponential value of change, but whatever is the stuff of the singularity, it remains constant.  What changes is the number of coordinates of X that can change simultaneously at a rate corresponding to compression.