AuT-Building an algorithm 8 absence of symetry

The idea of a "true" big bang from a singularity is a pretty unlikely idea.  The "big bounce" concept is close, but flawed.
What is "proved," really proved mathematically, by AuT is that the universe only partially compresses.  This is because the compression process is necessarily like the converging pi series and hence it only goes half compressed and then half expanded between inflection points.  This suggests that even though the amount of information increases, the maximum size of the universe decreases.
The K-P ignorance can only partially explain this.  Increasing compression in AuT allows for infinite increase in information while decreasing towards but never reaching zero space, i.e. two fully compressed states.
What is "cool" about this, however, is that space may cease to exist in favor of photons.  The reason is that as space is eliminated, eventually all of the space would have to go.  Then the separation would have to be by something other than space.  Some explanation has to exist for this process.  One possibility is that space doesn't ever get smaller, but that all other states compress relative to space just as all other states "move" relative to space.
This would suggest that inflection points are inflection points for higher states of information (higher ct states) but that ct1 doesn't have inflection points but continually gets larger.
The math for this model is more complex, but as shown below, while the basic model is fairly easy to define the asymmetric model of AuT gets complicated fairly quickly.

Unlike K-P, there is no symmetry by definition in AuT.
Each universe changes based on the two before which changes any possible symmetry.
It seems likely that there is a negative universe generated for each positive universe.
Each of these universes is slightly different in size than the other.

http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/10/14/astronomers-may-now-fully-understand-why-the-sky-is-dark-at-nigh/21582286/

It is also positive that what converging symmetry exists in AuT uses "both" positive and negative spirals at each convergence.
The degree of convergence is also capable of multiple renditions.
Let's look at just the first three convergence models using both positive and negative spirals about a single point of origin without "aging" any of the involved spirals.

This shows one at a time addition of dual (positive and 

negative) spirals using a rough converging series

This shows f-series addition of dual (positive and 

negative) spirals wit opposite converging series.  Even at 3 it is vastly more complex

and continues to get exponentially more complicated

If you add the aging of the spirals (moving a spiral along its length about the model quickly gets complicated enough to explain the diverse universe and the apparent randomness that we experience.

AuT-building an algorithm 10-dimension in a non-dimensional environment

At this point in time everybody but you should just say, ok, he's done all the hard work, it's just up to us to pick up the pieces.  And that is true, but since you can say I'm not worthy of this; you being the cause of all of this hubbub as it were, and since K-Physics has lots of whining physicists who want to cling to their practical applications and deny what is, let's face it, undeniable interpretation; we're going to, now that we've figured out where movement comes from, translate it into dimension.
All the hard work has already been done.  In fact, much of it appears around page 132 and again on page 214 in Spirals.  It is, of course, a work in progress.  Rome wasn't built in a day, since time doesn't really exist and SCT (standard clock time) only exists relative to CT1.
A blog in the future, will talk about methods for looking back into space from an environment where times are stacked up together, but that's for historians to wonder about, not physicists.  And while we're at it, BAA (building an algorithm) 8 exists, it's just not as relevant at 9 and 10 so it'll be posted in due course, assuming I live long enough.
Let's instead talk about how space exists and how it changes to give the impression of movement in more than one direction.
Baseline movement cannot change, we know it can only speed up and slow down relative to ct1 (or another ct state).  We know this because there is a single variable algorithm defining the universe.
If velocity is the result of coordination with different CT1 states, the substitution of one ct1 state with another, and the resulting changes in standard clock time, then these changes can also explain the features of three dimensional acceleration we experience.
Space defined by movement along ct1.
Ct1 movement can vary according to several built in parameters
1) Moving from one ct1 to another ct1
2) Moving from a "expansion ct" intersecting spiral combination to a contraction ct1 intersecting spiral combination (or vice versa)
3) Moving from a positive ct1 spiral to a negative ct1 spiral (or vice versa)
"Moving" in this case appears to be a substitution of one ct1 spiral for the aligned ct2 spirals at the rate of one substitution (per 256 ct1s in a ct2) each quantum instant (1.07x10-39th of a second or each change in the value of x in the single variable algorithm).
The same moving occurs in higher ct states, and in ct4, where fewer substitutions occur per 256 ct1 quanta in the ct4 group, the speed is reduced through space and aging (according to standard clock time) increases which is called time dilation.  There is an upper limit for time dilation which is one ct1 change per all ct4 quantum which is the equivalent of standing still in the universe and not expected.  Bla, bla, already covered, been there, won that prize.
The importance of this is that it allows us to translate non-dimensional solutions into velocities and distance.
By way of example, a single photon on an outward moving spiral arm would go the same speed but would continually (every quantum moment) shed a ct2 spiral for a ct1 spiral.  That transition from one space to another would be interpreted by us as movement.  These would have formed, probably what we'd call billions, if not trillions of years after the first movement outward and perhaps after billions of big bangs.  Early in the universe, big bangs would happen very quickly, in fractions of a second initially.  They would, however, have no dimensional features since they'd be space recycling.
By the time photons started to form, big bangs would be further apart, but since photons only require 256 ct1 states, they might occur relatively early in the process.   Certainly things would slow down by the time ct4 states occurred.  This universe is very different from the current big bang models or even the big bounce models, because the amount of information is increasing and the amount of concentration is increasing steadily and not all at once.  Singularities don't exist after x=1.  Certainly ct5 (black holes) have nothing to do with singularities which was proven early in AuT theory, even in NLC that became obvious.  That idea was moronic, but since I had it too for a short period of time (EHT held to it) I can't be too hard on anyone else.  It took almost a year to disprove it completely, maybe 18 months.
Likewise since compressed states unwind over time, photons are generated on far out timelines and follow them on inward moving spirals as well as outward moving spirals.  The same is true of matter and wave energy and black holes.
The net effect of all of this is a universe where the average moves in one direction or another, but vast amounts move in multiple directions depending on the net direction of the spirals which are substituted.  Of course the substitution changes more rapidly where more ct1 states substitute.
In the next post, we'll follow a couple of photons around this process using items 1-3 above, or maybe in a couple of posts I'll do it and we'll see how the combination of outward and inward spirals can translate into perceived lateral movement to define the illusion of dimension that we cling to so desperately.
Or maybe I won't who really knows?

Aut-Building an algorithm 9-the connection between speed and information

This could be call an Einstein moment.  Those of you who don't think I'm a genius, can write this date down and copy this blog post and say, you knew me back when.  Of course, if it's wrong...
But never mind that, damn the icebergs, full speed ahead.
Years from now, philosophers will say that since my prior post was about god's mind is g-space that this was some sort of reward, but if I'm right here, then perhaps I should be given a different reward, you have to agree with that, that I should get what I want and not some equation for an algorithm, right?  Of course, the universe is, as a matter of definition in opposite spiral theory, defined by irony (things going in and out of sync according to a fairly random algorithm) so we'll just have to see how just the god of AuT g-space is.
Anyway, on to the math.
One change per item compressed state is defined as maximum aging and is the equivalent of being still in the universe.
As discussed before, we are moving very fast through the universe.
Let me see if I can get this right the first time, if not, I'll come back to it.
Hence, light speed can be redefined in terms of information theory:
ct1=0,1,1=2
ct2, the first speed affected type always moving at the speed of light (not always but we will discuss that later) is (1,1,2)^2^2 or 4^4=256.  So one ct0 substitutes for one of 256 ct2 (photon states) each quantum instant.
ct3 is (1,2,3)^2^3 or 6^8 or 1,679,616 and at light speed there is one ct change for every 256 of these.  This means each "quantum" wave has 6561 changes with ct1 every quantum change.  That takes care of wave energy.  How about us?
We're talking quantum mass here, not electrons or some such, but the informational building blocks.
anyway, we know the scale, e=mc^2.  But this is just the transition to the next lower state, so it gets a little complicated.
We can say if only one change occurs, one exchange with ct0 (space) every quantum instant (10^-39th of a second more or less) then we are still in the universe.  That isn't really possible, but it's the idea.
Anyway wer are 2,3,5 or 10^2^4 or 10^8 or 100 million wave forms which equates to Approx 1.68x10^14 wave quanta which means at the speed of light there are  6.561x10^11 exchanges between ct0 and ct4.
We could continue this analysis for black holes and we will, but for the moment, let's look how speed and change equate.
The speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s.  Not really blistering, but there it is.  Keep in mind a second is 1.07x10^-39th of a quantum change if memory serves.
If each quantum change at standing still is one ct0 per 1.68x10^14 wave changes for each 1.07x10^-39th of a second for matter then we are able to define the rate of change by putting these figures together.
Now you're expecting me to go through this math and find out if I misplaced a decimal or if maybe I converted photons to matter right or maybe if I left off a step and didn't convert waves to photons before I did my calculation.  If so, you'd be wrong, but it's all there, right above, more or less and that is enough for now.  If you want to check my math for errors so far, feel free to comment.

256	256
1,679,616.00	6561
100,000,000.00	6.561E+11	1.68E+14

AuT-where is god

In editing Spirals in Amber, large edits are being made.  While Time dilation is correctly discussed, the methodology is much more refined.  Large sections of almost every page, often almost all of several pages are deleted.  The re-write is not complete, but enormous.
But on page 138 there is a chapter that doesn't change much.  This is the discussion of what G-space is.
The main change in that section is the insertion of this sentence.  G-space is the mind of god.  If you want to know what the mind of god is, you can the page of that chapter.  If you wait, you will, god willing, be able to read it in the next edition.
I've given the first half of the book to a typist and hope to have the second half ready to edit next week and to get it back from them.
Separation and speed are discussed in more detail for the first time although those things will appear in this blog to some extent or another before the publication.
I am shooting to have it available by December 1.
It's been a busy month so far, but the biggest issue is waiting for the typist to finish so I can do a last run through and insert the 40 pages developed from the new information in this blog since the last publication date.
Hold your breath, it will be a tight race with the calendar.

Aut-Time in a bottle 7 summary

So what does all of this add up to:
1) The basic universe is build on 0,1,1,2 type base algorithms on which are built 0,1,1,0 cycle space type information designated at ct1, but basically information with only one coordinate changing in a coordinated manner.  It forms what is believed to be a dimensionless matrix known as space.
2) At certain concentration, multiple states stack to form 00,11,11,22 photonic cells associated with a reduced number (or one) ct1 state.  The stable concentration is also according to an f-series algorithm F(n)^2^n where n=2 and F(n) in this case is (1+1+2).
3.  This method of compression associated with a reduced number of ct1 states 000,111,111,222 for ct3 (wave energy) and so on for matter ct4, black hole material ct5 (3+5+8) for f(n), and so on.
4.  Separation and Curvature of space is defined by offsetting each alternate spiral by a converging series possibly 1/1+1/3-1/5 changing the numerator for each ct state so that it is 4/1... for ct4 to define pi based on the number of applicable x states in question which may be x total (all of the quantum bits of information) or perhaps limited to a particular ct type.  The exact methodology for the evolution of pi remains to be determined
5.  To determine compression and expansion of the entire universe inflection points are defined by  by averaging compression or expansion of individual ct states.  It is uncertain whether there is positve and negative ct1 states, but it appears likely this is the case for higher ct states.   The solution defined by whether these matched spirals (possibly offset accroding to the fashion of item 4 where positive and negative elements are required in order to have the series converge) has expanding or compression states for spirals.
6.  Coincidence (apparent since there is not actual coincidence) is generated by individual spirals coming together and randomness, similarly is individual spirals within a converging series going to an expansion phase which happens on such a small scale from our perspective that they are undetectable but both of these generate an illusory randomness in the flow of events.
7.  Hence information is consolidated in a very inter-related and complex fashion at least from ct1-ct5 (or 6).  Further at net inflection points the universe as a whole goes from net expansion to net compression allowing for a repeated "big bangs" with greater amounts of compression at each subsequent one as the amount of information increases.  It remains possible that each addition of x goes through a complete cycle, but it seems more likely that the net inflection points result from enormous changes of information based on continually building a new universe based on the two prior universes in a reflection of the F-series equation and that the extra information is visible from quantum points as historical references which would not be possible in a quantum universe built any other way.
8.  Inflection points mean that at a given point the universe goes from net expansion to net contraction.  The most likely model is a version of capacitance although the driving feature has nothing to do with storing charge and everything to do with spirals compression and expansion related to opposing intersecting spirals.
9.  All ct states are necessarily informational in nature allowing them to exist but be dimensionless solving the parmidian remedy of what happens when you keep splitting distances in half-eventually you get to "yes/no".

So where does love fit into this?  Unresolved love is the greatest irony and provides the power which is necessary in order to bring these matters to light.  The greater the irony, the greater the decompression within a compressed state, the greater the insight till it reaches some mental inflection point where everything goes from genius to madness.
Is it possible that this can be corrected, that it will mend itself, that things will one day turn right or will it continue to become a more powerful irony until it drives me mad until I'm selling star nuts to the sun?

https://youtu.be/TipSO1Pta3M

AuT time in a bottle 6

How do we get rid of all the extra information.  One way is to have the main spiral defined only by ct1, space.  That is, space curvature is only a function of ct1.
Another way is to do away with size as we know it.  Perhaps the other information is beyond what we see as space, too far away for the information to be visible looking for it using K-Physics.  That, however is too much a KP exercise  Hiding in plain site as history makes much more sense and is clearly observed, we just don't see it correctly because we're looking for information to be solid because KP tells us we're solid but we're not, even KP if they admit it understand that.
Several things about time can be expressed by this:
1.  The past is as real, as solid, as the present which is built upon out of the past so that the past remains as the present is built from it.
2. The ct standard appears to be even more true than originally prediction.  CT1 space is defined as basic information.  Higher ct states achieve their distance and their age by the lenght of time they are attached to a specific ct1 state.  Ct1 changes only relative to prior ct1 and it appears that ct1 has no real dimension and therefore may not define any separation in the absence of higher ct states.
This co-dependent relationship between higher and lower ct states would have far reaching consequences for understanding dimension as well as the more obvious features related to creating compressed states of information.


http://gizmodo.com/we-were-very-wrong-about-the-number-of-galaxies-in-the-1787750693

Aut Time in a bottle 5

The two biggest mistakes (well two of the biggest mistakes) of K-P (kinder physics or physics before Aut) lie in (1) assuming the universe is balance, when clearly, even to an idiot, it is not and (2) the closely related lie of thermodynamic.  Now all of you classically eductated sissies don't get your slide rules in a bunch.  IT doesn't mean that we don't perceive disorder, it only means that disorder is a reflection  of a univeerse which tends towards a more ordered state even during periods of expansion (localized or otherwise) where it appears to move towards disorder on a grand scale.   during contraction, of course, the universe moves towards order and two steps are one together and along the lines of any other infinte converging series which is, after all , what the universe is.
One of the idiotic results, is that physicists say stupid things that I have to spent months figuring out that they are wrong about, like "gravity collaposes" at black holes or the rules of the universe don't apply before the big bank and on and on.  Once you realize what is really happening, everything clears up quite a bit, but problems remain.
One of the problems has to do with multiple high ct states alligning with individual ct1 states to give the impression of time and all the stupid rules, time particularly tied to the appearance of entropy/thermodynamics, that we associate with our grand place in the universe which we now now we're just a solution to an intersection spiral model, nothing too grand about that.
But we're going to explain compression and the base and exponential nature now in a little more detail.
To do that, we're going to look at our f-series friend but with a twise.
1,1,1 is going to result in 0,1,1
11,11,11 in 1,1,2
111,111,111 in 1,2,3
1111,1111 in 2,3,5 (matter)
and lastly
11111,11111,11111 in 3,5, 8
In other words the "magic" when ct4 (matter) converts to ct5 (black hole stuff) is nothing more than the f series going out one additional interger.  All of these, 1, 11,111,1111,etc resulting in F-series although when you apply base 10 to them they get messy.  As long as you don't take all that "human math crap" and screw up the numbers, these F-series operate together (1,11, or 111) just like 0,1,1,2,3,5 operates alone.
We will, in the  next post discuss this further, but  only by taking what I've already pointed out and putting it in context.

AuT time in a bottle 4

On the eve of this apocalyptic political year, I will ignore politics and, instead, explain some of the issues that were not handled earlier but were referred to.
Earlier, a few posts back, I asked where the extra information was if, as it must be, the universe is built on each successive universe.  This type of growth from one information state to the next is massive and is expected in models of the early universe where massive expansion is predicted but where it thereafter slows, we have to decide where the other information can be found, because it can be found.
Where?
The answer in summary is that the successive near doubling of information can be hidden in several places: 1) each bit of information builds on itself so that information is hidden in the complexity of the web of information 2) It is in the expanding universe or (during the contraction phase) by increases in compressed, higher ct states that are expected with space and all of its contents compacting, but it is also hidden in 3) velocity (change of location is equal to information especially where the old location continues to exist) and, closely related, 4) history.
Part of it is hidden in the expanding universe, but as we know (post k-p) the universe is only expanding for a short time longer (it's also calculated a few posts earlier) and then it will begin to contract.
So, where is the information which is F-series expanding every quantum moment.
Part of it is hidden in acceleration.  The change from one quantum state to the next, the spiral nature of the solution and the increases in information all counsel in favor of a perception of movement.
It is, in fact, the reason everything appears to be moving in a quantum universe.
The extra information forces it to appear likes its moving along.  Movement, includes spin and all the other symptoms of movement.  The other place it is hidden, in plain sight, is history.  Since the F series solution is n=n-1+n-2 history is inherent in this model, otherwise we'd look back and see nothing nor would there be any prediction.  Knowing how old times lead to new time, predictability is inherent.  It also is inherent that the amount of information almost doubles with every quantum change.
Another place this massive amount of information  is hidden is in net values.  The net amount of information is balanced by positive and negative intersection spirals.  To some extent these may cancel each other out.  The positive and negative time states cancel each other out to some extent in providing a solution, a net value, hence the expansion we see "shows some of it, fusion type reactions hide more of it. When the universe arrives at a net compression phase, a type of hyper compression (not just compression of existing states, but compression to more ct5 and ct6 and, eventually, ct7 or beyond).
Hence the increase in information is all around us and it must also be reflected in what we observe, and, of course, AuT being correct and everything before being (not wrong, but different), it is.
Where do we observe the compression of information on our illusory, but present state of existence.  One place is first in books and later with electronic information being generated and instead of contacting multiple ct1 states as it would moving through space and changing randomly, books increase information in a fixed state.
The electronic information is "frozen" within circuits so that it vibrates with the lessening of sct of ct1 states experienced by each electronic pulse (photon or wave).  Therefore we can observe that we are able to create additional information by doing nothing more complicated than complying with the pre-ordained rules governing information and expansion.  All life, in fact, increases organization in this way and the reason that it is pre-ordained that it must do this, lies in the same features of the f-series equation which force things towards greater and greater organization.
Compression is a reflection of this quality of increasing information along base clock time states and the clock time states that are built form those information states.
In time perhaps these theories will provide a basis for a logical way to approach things, not only of mathematics but of philosophy because AuT destroys so much beautiful philosophy and it will be important if it is ever accepted, to come up with a way to protect as much of what is good as is possible.
It is also important to note that the existence of predestination does not excuse our actions.  If anything it makes the wrong decision we make more permanent and for that I am concerned, because there is so little that I have done that is right.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrWqDv3Kfsg

AuT Time in a bottle 3

If SCT is following a single thread of CT1, then sharing 2 threads of CT1 should involve sct at half speed.  This doesn't mean that a vibration between two would have this effect because the method of sharing is complicated.
Also, if a ct4 state moves back and forth from a ct1 state, it isn't necessarily sharing just 2.  There is so much time in any space, that the sharing in vibration should be enormous and ct1 states change all over.
However, when ct1 states are concentrated at gravitational (high ct state) wells, the number of different ct1 states may increase so that the amount of sharing increases or it may be that the shifting between ct1 states increase so that time slows down.   If greater time dilation occurs at high gravity states, then the first result appears to be the case.
If this is the case then it stands to reason that if you accelerate two watches, one using straight acceleration in space, the other vibrationally by heating its environment, it is likely that even though they were moving at the same speed the dilation of the heated would be less because at least some of the ct1 states would be shared.
indeed, compression, higher ct states that have time appear to compress because they share a common ct1 state for the time during which they are compressed.
so a group of 256 ct2 states sharing a common ct1 state are a photon. LIkewise, a group exponentially larger using F(series n)^2^3 where n-3 is wave energy as long as they share a common group of ct1 or perhaps a common group of ct2s but when they vary, the break into photons until they join back with a common group of ct1 or ct2  and so on.  This exact mechanism while it has to be better understood, this feature of the algorithm stacks one F series on the next lower to form the missing part of the compression algorithm.

AuT Time in a bottle2

The solution to time orbits and the solution to what time itself is (standard clock time and not the constant change of x) is the change of multiple other time states in conjunction with one (or a group) of ct1 states.

Looking at our old friend above, you can take the longest dual spirals which are the ct1 state.  As long as the ct4 state (in this case the spiral coming directly off the ct1 state changes so that it moves with the ct1 state it is aging as quickly as the ct 1 state.  For this common movement to exist, it requires that there be sum(n=2-4)f(series)*2^n d(F) information states concurring with a single ct1 information state to be a stable matter particle (of minimum size) or sum(n-2-5) for ct5 black hole material to remain stable and have a common time.

No one time strand can carry that many ct states so time is slowed down vastly for every ct4 state in motion, but acceleration is nothing more than varying (with others or between two) ct1 state changes on different angles presumably from one another according to evolving pi(s) and therefore on slightly different planes.  Velocity is nothing more than the change from a single ct1 association to multiple ct1 states for a single quantum of ct4 states.

This transition that slows standard clock time and accelerates (of necessity) the movement of the matter will be shown in the next post which requires another drawing so stay tuned.

AuT Time in a bottle1

If you evacuate a bottle, the bottle moves through space even though nothing is in it.
What happens to what is in it?
This question seems to be a nonsense question, but we actually observe that things act differently in a vacuum, but they still move.
What this indicates is that space, the emptiness itself, is not the background.  What is "inside" of the bottle if the bottle is fully evacuated does not have a velocity because it does not move, and yet the bottle itself moves with its cargo of non-moving items.
If a ball is suspended, as with magnets, within the evacuated space, then the ball has features of acceleration, velocity and age that are identical to a ball outside of the vacuum.  I.e. if the ball was replaced with a watch, the watch would show time passing.
CT1 then is not the "emptiness" within the bottle but is instead the resulting equation for the space which changes as the bottle moves through space.
The "CT1" that has to change to provide velocity and which changes to slow the "aging process" observed when CT1 changes occur relative to higher time states has to be positional in nature and not a function of the observed absence of other things.
The obviousness of this solution is observed.
Dx/dt is our definition of velocity.  This dx we call dimensional changes while dt is time.  The higher dx, the slower the aging and the faster the velocity.  In relativity as dx approaches infinity or dt approaches zero a phase change to energy is observed and the operational limit of the relationship is the speed of light (e=mc^2 is the equation for the relationship).
Dt in AuT is closely related, being a change in the value of x which is a quantum variable in the algorithm, meaning it changes one unit at a time and is observed by us as around 1.07X10^-39th of  a second, the definition of an instant.
Dx, however is not dimensional in AuT.  Instead it is a solution to algorithm for any quantum unit of any ct space relative to other ct solutions because they are added together as an F-series so each informational bit for any value of x is that bit's position in one quantum state universe combined with a prior quantum state universe for the current quantum state universe.  It can be said that this relationship is a potato/po-ta-to relationship since velocity is the result from either.  The "predictability" of the change is where you begin to find interesting features.  Also, the inter-relationship of space and time, recognized in relativity; also becomes a feature of higher clock time states because they are solved by a variation of the same equation and their "presence" at any point is governed by the same relationship of Position at x=solution at x-1 plus solution at x-2 for the algorithm.
Hence, the position for any solution to CT1 is achieved in the same manner as the solution for ct4 so the emptiness in the bottle is undergoing the same changes in position as the bottle itself.  The space, however, does not age while the ball in the bottle does.  This means the aging process is relative to the position solutions for ct1 rather than any place.  The CT1 in the bottle, must change with every solution for x and that change is the same no matter how fast the bottle is accelerated.
This means that ct1 is not space but is the variation of solution for the matrix from one quantum instant to the next.
The ramification of that result is that energy and us are mere compressive states are merely relative variations of the solution from one quantum instant to the next.
More on this later.


http://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-just-created-the-world-s-first-time-crystal

Building an algorithm-building a matrix 1

P=Sum(solns)F(series)=S(slnspos)F(s)(pi')+s(slnsneg)F(s)(pi')dx
F(s)=f(s)^2^n for compressed states
Somewhere in this equation "regional" geography is present.
One possibility for this comes from matrix solutions although pi' being an evolving value of pi provides for a limited amount of dimension.  Another element suggested is that for any value of x, each separate universe is altered for that value of x.  By "stacking" the universes you have the following:
1) A changing alignment
2) A changing value for each spiral for a given point
3) A matrix formed by one universe stacked on the prior universe.
Because the algorithm defining the universe is consistent, defining these matrix type solutions can be relatively simple for the initial universe, but change dramatically after even a few increases in x.
Compression occurs where solutions for a given group of numbers in the Matrix have common Positive and Negative Spiral Solutions at a sufficient concentration of the next lower compression state to form those compressed states.
When a group of people (government, institution) create a temporary compression state that is equivalent to a black hole (which is not stable unless it is exponential in size which is why we don't have tiny black holes swallowing planets as taught in K-physics) they are creating something they are compelled to create (including the billions of years of evolution to create the individuals involved) by this stacked spiral model.  This is why self determination is so seductive, we are working with such high values of x and in such concentrations, that the underlying features are completely hidden from our view.
So, using a simple example:
0,1,1,0 is one cycle plus 1 for space.   For this post (and probably any subsequent post unless I really work hard) we can never get to a matrix which is large enough to have even a single state of compression at the ct2 (photon) level.
For purposes of this example we are going to use "words" instead of drawing.
The first 0,1 transition uses a pi factor of 1.  It is worth nothing that the correct pi factor might be 4, but 1 appears to work better due to the evolving geometry of space, but for the K-physicist reading this we don't want to confuse them too much.
The second transition is also positive for pi although it is suggested it is negative.  So it's either 0,1 with a pi factor of 1+1/3 or 1-1/3 or 0,-1 with the same pi factor.
The third transition is also 0,1 if the second transition is negative or 0,-1. with the next pi factor, however by this time, the first transition of 0,1, the second is either 1,1 or -1,-1 .
Anyway we are only at 3 transitions.
There, however, another algorithm operating in the background.
This is the F-series which is not cycling and for the first transition is 1,1,2 at the point where the third transition has occurred.
There is one more element which is a little "too" k-physics for me, but it would have a more balanced universe where the first spiral also had a negative element.
In this case the first spiral would be "both" 01 and 0-1 then 11,-1-1; then 11,-1-1, the 00.  You would have this "space" "ride on" another underlying spiral going 1,1,2 or -1,-1,-2 which overlap to provide the features of compression or decompression whether the positive and negative features are approaching or moving away from each other for a given solution.
The enormous numbers explain stability since the solutions for these "carrying spirals" for these initial spirals have essentially infinite (from our perspective) stable lines before transitions seeing each right hand turn in the example below as a transition and growing according to the f-series equation.

Aut and Aging Part 2

A quantum instnt is defined in AuT as 1.07x10^-39th of a second (the derivation is in the book).
This suggests a couple of things and one of them is that Time in its purest sense is the contact of a higher state (ct4 for example) with one CT1 state 1.07x10^39th times in one second.  How contact is defined in an offset universe gets us to the idea of time orbits where a shared orbit is equal to contact.
If you accelerate cycle after each increase in x-strange spiral equation,
In this way, as you "accelerate" you are changing the number of ct1 states that are solved in the orbit.  Even if you're just "vibrating" you're moving between two sets of ct1 states which is enough to interrupt the resulting time.
Hence velocity can be defined not as dx/dt but as dct1/to whre dct1 is the number of different ct1 states over the number of time orbits (quantum states sharing a common solution for ct4 in question and the associated ct1 states).  Now many of you are saying this is just a semantic difference and I agree completely, but it is a semantic difference by properly identifying what you are looking at.  The are both quatrapeds but one is a horse of a different color.
One gives a very specific reason for time dilation, the other takes the reasoning for granted and merely recognizes that it is happening.  The actual "change" for any quantum remains constant, but relative contact with ct1 is "experienced" as aging and standard clock time.
One issue raised by this analysis is the possibility of strange inflection points.  One way to view the universe is to say that the inflection points are dependent only on x.  The universe expands and contracts according to the solution to the average solutoin for all curves as being either expanding (going away from their negative spiral) or contracting (going towards their negative spiral).
The introduction of time adds another possible wrinkle that might explain why we don't see space doubling with each historical quantum change inx.
In this solution x still changes the direction of the universe at inflection points, but wihin the universe defined by ct1, you have a universe which fully cycles based on the fixed amount of x at the time of the last inflection point.   This secondary cycling is based on SCT which is, in fact, a secondary time frame to CT(0)-CT(1) transitions.  This would allow for a more infinite cycling (ct 0-1) to ct(0) could exist with universes cycling within this pre-universse ct state.
At low  values of x this pre-ct1 inflection point cycling would occur frequently.  But at our size universe, the cycles would take place over bilions of years (I believe I calculated before about every 40 billion years) and given the size of x, the universe would have an almost incalculable age.  Actually it would be relatively easy to calculate  based on the information we have but its really old.  The answer is determined this way (assuming our cycle is 40 billion years for the cycle (check an earlier post where I give the exact number).
If you have the number of quantum units (total gravity reduced to quantum size using the 1.07x10-39 figure) and then you use the F-series to see how many different universes this yield and then multiply that number by 40billion/2; you'd get an approximate age for the universe.  It's pretty darned old, but that only gets you to the age of the ct0-ct1 universe and if there's one before it, well throw out the calculator, because you're going to need a bigger one.
This is a result which is almost mandated by age being  equal to the amount of common/fixed space ct1 encountered by any quantum point of higher ct state over a given value of x.
Is it just the next lower state, ct1 or all of the related lower states that gives the effect of aging? This is a question that remains to be solved with certainty, but the changing position of ct5 over time indicates that it is ct1.
Velocity is anti-aging, that is to say it is anti fixed ct1 contact.  This strange feature of the universe is not so strange when we understand that gravity is the change between two quantum universe states.
All of these things are intertwined and create confusion when viewed without reference to the underlying algorithm which is why AuT provides such clear answers to such puzzling questions of prior theories.
So the movement observed of all things through ct1 (space) ages them with greater speed as the ct1 states in contact increase.  In other words if a ct1 state stays in contact with a ct4 state for longer, the ct4 state ages faster than if it changes ct1 states constantly.  This is observed and aging then can be defined as the relative sharing of quantum states with a given ct1 state.

bonfire of the demagogsxx

I had a friend of mind condemned me because I was considering voting for the bonehead running on the libertarian ticket.
The word Demagog was written to define trump, whose platform is to appeal to the lowest thought processes of his followers and the prejudices that accompany it.
But Clinton is also a demogog, she's just a liberal one and a more intelligent, far more intelligent demagog.  And worse still she represents the horrid idea of a blood line. I had hoped that the one good thing that came from w. bush was to bury that concept forever.  There should be a law that says there is a generation between any blood lines closer than first cousin, even though the roosevelts might provide an example of why such a law should not be in place.
They both have extremist agendas, one not far from a Nazi, the other not far from a bolshevist neither appeals to me in the least.  Well, both have something to offer, one almost clearly the lesser of two evils, but why should I vote for an evil?
It is  the "anything other than the above" that makes me consider voting for the bonehead, that makes me not worry if my vote is "thrown away."  It looks like no matter which primary candidate I vote for, I'm voting for extremism and dishonesty.
Trump lies through his teeth so often, you'd think the spaces would be bigger.  Clinton is more subtle, changhing her opinions to meet what it will take to put her in office while her tactics of getting rich are almost as corrupt, if not illegal, as those of her opponent.
Clearly Trump made his fortune cheating people, even dumping his debt at a profit on unsuspecting shareholders, not to mention shorting contractors.  Clinton sold influence, directly or indirectly.  Why not vote for someone whose knowledge of foreign policy is restricted to knowing the world is round?
Clinton owes overseas powers, Trump is indebted to them.   The third party candidate doesn't even know who they are.
I am sickened by it.

AuT-do we agexx

Originally I was going to name this "do we have to age?" but that implies aging.
Information doesn't age so we don't age.   You look at my whithered form and guffaw, but you are like the bozo and particle physicists, looking but not seeing.
Information does not age.  It varies state, the states may change, it has a total solution based on proximity to anti-information, but it is either yes or no.  It doesn't become old yes or young no.
The changes that are called ct1 in AuT reflect a single variable (it is possible, but not necessary to have a second one) increasing by quantum changes and then the results that were obtained with the first preceeding and second preceding changes are added to get a total result for any moment.  Age, is not associated with this process.
Equally important, the system is forever moving to a more organized or at least more compressed state.  The fact that x increases can be said to result in a higher number, but that is not entropy, there is no entropy.  That is another bozo concept.
Because everything has quantum gravity, observed, we can pretty much guess that information remains constant throughout the compression cycle.  If that proves wrong later, well, we're all bozos on this bus.
So we do not age.  What we call standard clock time (here) is a relative change to space and that is all.  It is age to us, so you can say that we age, but even bozo or K-physics recognizes that while matter changes, it remains constant.  Once you replace the temrs space, energy and matter (and ct5-infinitiy) with information, the reason for this becomes fairly clear.
If the source for an increasing x stopped the universe would freeze at that point, but it wouldn't get older.  If the state that holds the algorithm so that the solutions appear a quantum events were to release the algorithm, the information might cease to exist, but it would not age.
No, age is the amount of ct1 contacted by any higher information state and that is that.  The more ct1 contacted, the slower you age, sort of an opposite of what you'd expect result, but it appears accurate.  As you get heavier and heavier you age faster and faster so  you'd age pretty quick in ct5 relative to ct4 (black hole material relative to matter).  This makes sense if you think about it, because the "end game" of the universe is total anti-information in one change and total information in one change (full compression)with no ct1 between them and therefore no separation leading to recompression.  This recompression doesn't happen because of the growing value of x being offset by the never-ending converging series.  Every time there is an inversion point at a higher state of compression you get closer to the unreachable goal, but you never get to it.  Alas.
Age being relative change, you can stop it, but to be exposed to full ct1  you have to have all geometries of the solution for a quantum bit of information be in contact  with adjacent ct1 states which requires the point of reference for non-aging to be a ct1 state which is why what you'd call accelleration (and I'd call touching more ct1 states per quantum change in x) results in a conversion to ct1 at high enough values by definition.  But there is no aging, we only grow old because of the relationship between compressing (intersecting)spiral solutions and the alternative (de-compression, moving apart spirals or parallel spiral solutions).
For those of you having a conniption fit about using the intersecting offset linear quantum spirals for a solution, you're welcome to come up with your own formula. It will still be my theory and that is ageless.

Building an Algorithm, relatively small

One major difference between AuT and other theories of infinite converging series is that because of the value of x increasing and compression, at the same time that the series converge to zero (never reaching it) the relative size of the universe and the size of the maximum fundamental particle (black holes to me and you or possibly super black holes, although I don't think we are there yet in any quantity) increases towards infinity.
This suggests that below the size of space, the same process may be continuing.  What is smaller than a yes/no answer?  It is, perhaps a different geometry that is somehow smarter than ours, where yes and no is a very complex answer.  It could be that we are really this close to the beginning of the universe  It could be that Einstein's universe where everything happens at once in the singularity can co-exist with AuT where everything is sequential.
There are many possibilities, but the only one observed is that with the infinite series converging to zero and the concordant perfect curvature of space, the amount of information in the universe and the size of fundamental particles increases to infinity.
And with that increase, the perspective changes so that the relatively small gets smaller.