AuT-Building an algorithm 8 absence of symetry

The idea of a "true" big bang from a singularity is a pretty unlikely idea.  The "big bounce" concept is close, but flawed.
What is "proved," really proved mathematically, by AuT is that the universe only partially compresses.  This is because the compression process is necessarily like the converging pi series and hence it only goes half compressed and then half expanded between inflection points.  This suggests that even though the amount of information increases, the maximum size of the universe decreases.
The K-P ignorance can only partially explain this.  Increasing compression in AuT allows for infinite increase in information while decreasing towards but never reaching zero space, i.e. two fully compressed states.
What is "cool" about this, however, is that space may cease to exist in favor of photons.  The reason is that as space is eliminated, eventually all of the space would have to go.  Then the separation would have to be by something other than space.  Some explanation has to exist for this process.  One possibility is that space doesn't ever get smaller, but that all other states compress relative to space just as all other states "move" relative to space.
This would suggest that inflection points are inflection points for higher states of information (higher ct states) but that ct1 doesn't have inflection points but continually gets larger.
The math for this model is more complex, but as shown below, while the basic model is fairly easy to define the asymmetric model of AuT gets complicated fairly quickly.

Unlike K-P, there is no symmetry by definition in AuT.
Each universe changes based on the two before which changes any possible symmetry.
It seems likely that there is a negative universe generated for each positive universe.
Each of these universes is slightly different in size than the other.

http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/10/14/astronomers-may-now-fully-understand-why-the-sky-is-dark-at-nigh/21582286/

It is also positive that what converging symmetry exists in AuT uses "both" positive and negative spirals at each convergence.
The degree of convergence is also capable of multiple renditions.
Let's look at just the first three convergence models using both positive and negative spirals about a single point of origin without "aging" any of the involved spirals.

This shows one at a time addition of dual (positive and 

negative) spirals using a rough converging series

This shows f-series addition of dual (positive and 

negative) spirals wit opposite converging series.  Even at 3 it is vastly more complex

and continues to get exponentially more complicated

If you add the aging of the spirals (moving a spiral along its length about the model quickly gets complicated enough to explain the diverse universe and the apparent randomness that we experience.