31017 AuT pp20

This post is a special one so I saved it till it was at the beach.  The one after it, dealing as it does with coordinate history make a pair, but I'm not sure that the idea of coordinate history isn't already dealt with sufficiently to make any further discussion of it less relevant.
This post is only slightly different; but it does give the reason why the universe at quantum points is the F(series) function observed as n+n-1+n-2 rather than n=n+1+n+2 which is a point which bothered me somewhat even though it was known to be correct and it matches the historical mandate that each quantum universe had to result from the sum of at least one prior universe meaning that it arises from the sum of all the prior universes.
It's a curiosity, but its one that is fairly easy to understand.

22 Historical reference points

If you are wondering how the level of complexity can grow from the F-series growth in the prior post, let me explain it in terms of the original language.  Everything happens at once, but only for each quantum instant.  Separate quantum instances happen sequentially consuming prior states and creating the ability thereby to observe history.

Each of these building F-series change with each change in x, which means they all are a part of this universe, each affect the others to yield a level of complexity that renders something as “unique looking” as earth predictable.

You have a box, interacting with two boxes, interacting with three boxes and so on and so forth until you have these multiple universes which exist one right after and interacting with each other.

You can have a fixed, quantum state universe in this way, while you have an infinite universe growing past it to create a new view of the universe based on this method of building.

Our quantum universe remains fixed or it continues to change, but as part of the next quantum universe.

It yields the appearance of happening at once because it happens in a time independent environment.  In fact, however, there are sequential changes in the time, dimension independent environment.

This is both suggested by the model and impossible as we view sequential events.  The difference in our experience and the underlying reality is that we are time dependent and the universe is based on an equation instead of time and dimension as we experience it.

This means that our "fixed data" universe, will be next to and affect the next out universe while being fixed in connection with all lower states but without a dt (change in time) between the states.

The building process suggests that each spiral can be seen as coming off of the adjacent spiral just as compression occurs at turns. 

The growth of adjacent universes of set information combine to form more and more complex, exponentially larger informational universes, but each coming to a fully compressed state where the otherwise overwhelming information is visible as history thereby allowing the current solution to appear substantially smaller than if the historical building blocks were major elements of each succeeding state.

Compression allows for multiple points of one type to be built off of data of another type at higher compression states.  An early example of this appears in the first book which shows a curved concept, but the averaging of offset universes result in curves, the amount of curve increasing with each increase in the number of dimensions changing at once (pi=1/1+1/3-1/5+ etc; 2/1, etc; 3/1 etc; and so on)

Applying this concept to the universe as a whole; you end up with different universes with an incredibly rich and connected stacked universe result.  

Stacking can be seen as doubling (1 to 2 to 4 to 8 to 16 which is the effect of the exponential change in how much data is changing (2^n as n moves from 0 to 4); but Fseries changes occur according to a different formulation (2 priors lead to current, but the survival of history means that the two priors are part of the current and that is why the fseries is (n+(n-1)+(n-2)) and the universe changes based on a combination of these facts just as compression combines these two factors [f(n)^(2^n)].

The drawing above reflects compression, but not the change of the universe which is an F-series progression: a single spiral universe off of it followed by a second spiral universe, followed by 2 followed by three spiral universes, followed by 5 and so on which each one built on the prior two and containing the features of the prior two in the form of a historical reference point. for time dilation.  

There is a "relative time" generated by "offset intersecting spirals" of different lengths and by changes along quantum lengths of spirals and the changes at turns.

The solution, rather than the equation is what we experience but the equation, rather than some force driven system, gives rise to our experience of the universe so a mathematically less significant portion (fading history) would retain its informational quantum but would become less relevant for any future solution, particularly as it changes over a change in x.