This is a post that has been sitting around for a while unfinished. I am not for certain why, although my guess is that I didn't want to to edit it.
I was supposed to find out what I left off of a grant application, but its been a week or two and nothing. I understand this. Some egghead is hired by the government and reads my theory quickly, doesn't understand what he's looking at, looks for more credentials and doesn't find them so he rubber stamps things. When my heirs are accepting my nobel prize postumously he'll probably make some sort of speah where he says he knew it all along.
Doesn't matter. Real earth shattering genious is always slow to catch on. Darwinism, Solar centrism, Algorithm Universe theory, it's a rite of passage. If I'm not crucified, it will be a shame.
In the post that should be going in here, I talk about the underlying carriers that control how long a state on an information arm lasts relative to that information arm, the creating factor of relativity and the feature of the carriers that cause it to move in one direction of compression or the other. Those are, after all, the most important elements of AuT in practice.
The reason they can do this is because they have all of the historical elements included so that you can cover each of these elements in turn, and once folded you can have the positive and negative elements providing the two sides, expansion and contraction, but its so important as an underlying concept, the base on which relativity is based.
The great thing about this theory is it explains the smallest elements of the universe and the largest.
It lays the groundwork for something that grant goons like the guy I'm waiting to hear from don't get. That is what energy really is.
The Sun if full of ct1 state conversion towards compression. It makes it what it is. But we are too. We look at our dead rocky selves, mars and the surface of the earth and we say, dead as a doornail Mr pre-aut physicist. But that's a load of horse manure in AuT because all states change together. Instead what we're looking at is very long compression arms where with every change in x, you just have a shift of large compression states to other large compression states along information arms which are held stable for very long periods of time vrs the very short periods of time along a star. The amount of change is the same and the movement indicates that the surface ct1 transitions are carried through the entire matrix, otherwise the rocks of the world would fly apart, but that's another post.
And this is true of the super hot black holes where the transitions between very high ct states are of the type shown in the figure below of which a simplified version as well as this one is covered in another post and which will continue to be discussed in the post I refer to.
I was supposed to find out what I left off of a grant application, but its been a week or two and nothing. I understand this. Some egghead is hired by the government and reads my theory quickly, doesn't understand what he's looking at, looks for more credentials and doesn't find them so he rubber stamps things. When my heirs are accepting my nobel prize postumously he'll probably make some sort of speah where he says he knew it all along.
Doesn't matter. Real earth shattering genious is always slow to catch on. Darwinism, Solar centrism, Algorithm Universe theory, it's a rite of passage. If I'm not crucified, it will be a shame.
In the post that should be going in here, I talk about the underlying carriers that control how long a state on an information arm lasts relative to that information arm, the creating factor of relativity and the feature of the carriers that cause it to move in one direction of compression or the other. Those are, after all, the most important elements of AuT in practice.
The great thing about this theory is it explains the smallest elements of the universe and the largest.
It lays the groundwork for something that grant goons like the guy I'm waiting to hear from don't get. That is what energy really is.
The Sun if full of ct1 state conversion towards compression. It makes it what it is. But we are too. We look at our dead rocky selves, mars and the surface of the earth and we say, dead as a doornail Mr pre-aut physicist. But that's a load of horse manure in AuT because all states change together. Instead what we're looking at is very long compression arms where with every change in x, you just have a shift of large compression states to other large compression states along information arms which are held stable for very long periods of time vrs the very short periods of time along a star. The amount of change is the same and the movement indicates that the surface ct1 transitions are carried through the entire matrix, otherwise the rocks of the world would fly apart, but that's another post.
And this is true of the super hot black holes where the transitions between very high ct states are of the type shown in the figure below of which a simplified version as well as this one is covered in another post and which will continue to be discussed in the post I refer to.
But that's all off of the point which is that pre-AuT physicists are judging me, deciding whether to invite me as a guest lecturer or not, missing the opportunity to hear the true nature of the universe from the one who devined it and it's not like I'll be around forever.
I'm sure it happens to all the geniuses. Poor Einstein was recognized, but run clear out of his country, Parminides wasn't killed but his grand follower (as opposed to grandchild) socrates was put to death and I'm unwilling to believe it had nothing to do with the physics of Parminides, the real father of AuT, even though it was left to me to show how it was related to different states and to offset expanding and compressing infinite series and all those other gems you can find in Book 3.
Well, enough of all that, it is irritating.
Here's the beginning of the post that I haven't edited yet but is topically covered in the subject line. Fibonacci series should be tied to pi to allow the fundamental algorithm to include compression scaled according to the formula F(n)^(2^n) where F(n) is the three part Fibonnaci number for n. The transition between the two is discussed in this post, but the key to finding a real answer should lie in some relationship that leads to long term compression.
It the ct2 state, for example, photons stay as photons for very long periods of time without degrading to space in large numbers.
Likewise, the same can be said for ct3,4 and 5 states. There is degradation, and it should be relatively common, but if you are holding a non-radioactive rock, you expect it to remain a rock over a long period of time.
The idea that there is no degradation remains possible, but even pre-aut physics assumes that there is a half life to protons. While the AuT view of these states is different, there are still limits to how long compressive states will last if there is decompression of higher ct states.
Is there decompression of higher ct states? While the answer appears to be yes, the idea that only ct1 states expand and that higher ct states replace F-series expansion with dimesion, movement and history means that those states may have different operating parameters. Those operating parameters include a changing definition of pi.
***Had to be there, the evidence insisted, but there it was, crammed down my throat as well as yours.
Mathematically, this is the equivalent of when an eclipse showed the bending of light. However, this is much, much more significant. Because the effect of gravity on light was a theory without a firm super symmetry underpinning. That is, the math was an approximation and required an act of nature to confirm it.
On the other hand, this mathematics can be solved for anyone with a piece of paper, although it works better with a computer. I have the spreadsheet, of course.
Anyway, I have to spend a little more time on this, apparently.
dy/dT=cosT where you're using quantum points together, but in F-series
expansions you don't have exact equivalence the increase is between 38.1% and
38.2% in a converging series.
As you are aware pi is an evolving equation set forth with specificity
as:
Pi= N+(from 2 to max x)N/F(pix)]
What this equation allows is that you can change N to any number and
get a pi result.
The value of pi increases, but the % change between values of pi approaches 1.
| radius/fibonacci | ||
| F-series | % F-SERIES increase | |
| 1 | 1-b | |
| 1 | 0.5 | |
| 2 | 0.333333333 | |
| 3 | 0.4 | |
| 5 | 0.375 | |
| 8 | 0.384615385 | |
| 13 | 0.380952381 | |
| 21 | 0.382352941 | |
| 34 | 0.381818182 | |
| 55 | 0.382022472 | |
| 89 | 0.381944444 | |
| 144 | 0.381974249 | |
| 233 | 0.381962865 | |
| 377 | 0.381967213 | |
| 610 | 0.381965552 | |
| 987 | 0.381966187 | |
| 1597 | 0.381965944 | |
| 2584 | 0.381966037 | |
| 4181 | 0.381966001 | |
| 6765 | 0.381966015 | |
| 10946 | 0.38196601 | |
| 17711 | 0.381966012 | |
| 28657 | 0.381966011 | |
| 46368 | 0.381966011 | |
| 75025 | 0.381966011 | |
| 121393 | 0.381966011 | |
| 196418 | 0.381966011 | |
| 317811 | 0.381966011 | |
| pi for u(2) | -1 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | PI FOR | |||||||
| -1^x | x-1 | 2x(-1)^x-1 | f(pix) | n/f(pix) | n+n/fx | n/(n+n/fx) | 4 | ||
| 1.00 | 1.00 | -4 | -3.00 | -1.333333333 | 2.666666667 | 1.5 | 2.666666667 | ||
| -1.00 | 2.00 | 6 | 5.00 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 0.833333333 | 3.466666667 | ||
| 1.00 | 3.00 | -8 | -7.00 | -0.571428571 | 3.428571429 | 1.166666667 | 2.895238095 | ||
| -1.00 | 4.00 | 10 | 9.00 | 0.444444444 | 4.444444444 | 0.9 | 3.33968254 | ||
| 1.00 | 5.00 | -12 | -11.00 | -0.363636364 | 3.636363636 | 1.1 | 2.976046176 | ||
| -1.00 | 6.00 | 14 | 13.00 | 0.307692308 | 4.307692308 | 0.928571429 | 3.283738484 | ||
| 1.00 | 7.00 | -16 | -15.00 | -0.266666667 | 3.733333333 | 1.071428571 | 3.017071817 | ||
| -1.00 | 8.00 | 18 | 17.00 | 0.235294118 | 4.235294118 | 0.944444444 | 3.252365935 | ||
| 1.00 | 9.00 | -20 | -19.00 | -0.210526316 | 3.789473684 | 1.055555556 | 3.041839619 | ||
| -1.00 | 10.00 | 22 | 21.00 | 0.19047619 | 4.19047619 | 0.954545455 | 3.232315809 | ||
| 1.00 | 11.00 | -24 | -23.00 | -0.173913043 | 3.826086957 | 1.045454545 | 3.058402766 | ||
| -1.00 | 12.00 | 26 | 25.00 | 0.16 | 4.16 | 0.961538462 | 3.218402766 | ||
| 1.00 | 13.00 | -28 | -27.00 | -0.148148148 | 3.851851852 | 1.038461538 | 3.070254618 | ||
| -1.00 | 14.00 | 30 | 29.00 | 0.137931034 | 4.137931034 | 0.966666667 | 3.208185652 | ||
| 1.00 | 15.00 | -32 | -31.00 | -0.129032258 | 3.870967742 | 1.033333333 | 3.079153394 | ||
| -1.00 | 16.00 | 34 | 33.00 | 0.121212121 | 4.121212121 | 0.970588235 | 3.200365515 | ||
| 1.00 | 17.00 | -36 | -35.00 | -0.114285714 | 3.885714286 | 1.029411765 | 3.086079801 | ||
| -1.00 | 18.00 | 38 | 37.00 | 0.108108108 | 4.108108108 | 0.973684211 | 3.194187909 | ||
| 1.00 | 19.00 | -40 | -39.00 | -0.102564103 | 3.897435897 | 1.026315789 | 3.091623807 | ||
| -1.00 | 20.00 | 42 | 41.00 | 0.097560976 | 4.097560976 | 0.976190476 | 3.189184782 | ||
| 1.00 | 21.00 | -44 | -43.00 | -0.093023256 | 3.906976744 | 1.023809524 | 3.096161526 | ||
| -1.00 | 22.00 | 46 | 45.00 | 0.088888889 | 4.088888889 | 0.97826087 | 3.185050415 | ||
| 1.00 | 23.00 | -48 | -47.00 | -0.085106383 | 3.914893617 | 1.02173913 | 3.099944032 | ||
| -1.00 | 24.00 | 50 | 49.00 | 0.081632653 | 4.081632653 | 0.98 | 3.181576685 | ||
| -23 | 1.00 | 25.00 | -52 | -51.00 | -0.078431373 | 3.921568627 | 1.02 | 3.103145313 | |
| -1.00 | 26.00 | 54 | 53.00 | 0.075471698 | 4.075471698 | 0.981481481 | 3.178617011 | ||
| 1.00 | 27.00 | -56 | -55.00 | -0.072727273 | 3.927272727 | 1.018518519 | 3.105889738 | ||
| -1.00 | 28.00 | 58 | 57.00 | 0.070175439 | 4.070175439 | 0.982758621 | 3.176065177 | ||
| 1.00 |
The
converging series for Pi as derived in this work when this series is used for N
converges on 1, quantum change, x, what have you.
The background for curvature, were it not based on F-series, would
be nothing more than pre-AuT calculus.
What the infinite converging series from the infinite diverging series
of the F-series does is provide a mechanism for defining curvature from a
quantum change universe based on the total amount of information at any quantum
instant.
The suggestion is the convergence is based on the following comparison:
F(n'-1)/(F(n') converges to n/(fpix)) for x=2 or 3
F(n'-1) converges to n (at a second quantum limit)
F(n) converges to (n+(n/fpix)) or n(1+1/fpix).
If there is a direct relationship, we know that:
n(1+1/fpix)=F(N'-1)-approx 38.2% at F(n'-1)=n
so at this point n= 1/fpix converges on 1/38.2% of n
N is a fixed number; and f(pix)==[(-1)^x]+[2x(-1)^x-1]
the suggestion is that 1/f(pix)=.382 which suggests that f(pix) converges on 2.618
-1^x+(2x(-1)^x-1 has a value at the transition of around 2.618
There is then a second effect on information a 1/(1+1/fpix) and as f(pix) goes to zero (the limit) this convergence goes to zero: (1/(1+1/0)) = 1/(infinity plus 1). Since there is no zero state at the first quantum, this would be 1/2 with the next being 1/3 etc.
To understand this, remember that just as pi for the solution to
the infinite series for % change of the F-series goes to one, so too does this
answer get closer to one the more information there is, that is the higher the
value of x. If x equaled infinity, the %
change would equal 1 when applied to the pi equation and the pi equation would be
balanced. While this result is
impossible, the fact that this relationship exists means that curvature can be
based on an equation derived from the F-series and that the increase in x on
F-series spiral math can simultaneously define the amount of information and
the compression of information based on the curvature built into the
equation. The pi solution necessarily
defines expanding and compressive results providing for net amounts of
compression and decompression in the universe, what we can dark energy and
gravity and which are the effect of this interplay which has now been defined
by specific relationships as pure algorithms.
A universe with supersymmetry, with apparent entropy, but no real
entropy. An AuT universe.
AuT answers virtually all the questions left unanswered by science
except those that predate space time but even in failing in this regard, it
gives a framework from which to discuss that pre-linear time. It defines the
holy grail of physics, super symmetry and by extension things like 'what is
dark matter' and 'what is the big bang' but it leaves those glasses broken and
less important than the appeared at first. Almost all modern physics is headed
toward AuT and as such it may be the most timely of inquiries in that field and
in a sense in any field.
No comments:
Post a Comment