AuT Augury and an article review: Nonsense about black holes

I have at least after a fashion made it through the first 8 items on "The List" which is destined to be the core of the new material in Book 5, an advance on the interaction of different solutions, an initial look into the evoluton of the solutions which is probably continuing into ct5 and beyond and the basis for 17 or 18 blog posts where these solutions will be set out for those who do not buy my books but instead follow along in this rambling collection of broken verbal hills, ravines, switchback and dried intellectual creek beds.

The completion, not necessarily eventual, of this list, long coming given that it was previously scattered throughout several books and not necessarily a comlete as it is now as the evolution of the theory continues, is an augury of its disclosure and the coming of book 5 which is yet far from certain.

Why not do the first 8?    Why not indeed, the fickle track of this blog, reflected in the eclectic wanderings of the theoy itself follow no patter other than my "free will" at the time and AuT argues against the signficance of such an arcane pattern painted with fading colors which darken in spots as they coallesce over the tapestry of supersymmetry.

While I've stopped caughing to a greater or lesser extent, the sharpness of mind and the time to focus on this are not altogether assured.   But soon enough it will come.

In the meantime, between these advanced summaries, I have been going back, taking the half written, unpublished posts down below 200.  This one being the 197th.

http://www.businessinsider.com/mini-black-hole-effects-on-earth-2016-8

We are talking about black holes where we ought to be talking about space, but there are many truths and issues raised by this article that require some thought.

For a long time, AuT has speculated that the 80% missing gravitational mass comes from space.  That may well go all the way back to EHT, the first book in this 8 or 9 book series.  But the newer work on the vibrational nature of the compression decompression inflection points suggests that this effect of space changes over time in a way not previously examined in that early speculation.

Another issue raised is the effect of black holes on matter which AuT suggests is the gradual information arm changes that take electrons (and presumably anti-electrons) and concentrate them into the other, heavier or more concentrated forms of matter, notably protons and neutrons, the latter being a more or less complete stage of intermediary particle which suggests a changing solution geometry.  While it doesn't allow for the tiny black holes suggested by this article, the scale of force (strong and weak nuclear forces) suggests that the distant black holes (in time or in space, forward or back) give life to the heavier (heavier than electron) ct4-ct5 transitional states.

While I get frustrated with the rest of the physicists who do not see the truths inherent in their own mathematics, I see our work coming together where explanations are sought that may shed light on the discoveries made by both.

I the prior post an article was discussed that held similar insight, the mystery of black holes that had formed too early in the universe, an observation which so supports the AuT model that it is hard not to say, "we're finished here, at least if the observation is accurate."  And, of course, talking about the "age of the universe," in pre AuT physics has to be rewritted as the age afetr the last inflection point.

But were I to arrive at the end of my inquiries
I would find another problems to complain about
Tao says, the journey is the reward
But we make our journey what we want it to be in part
and the universe finishes it by making it what it needs to be

We are Heirs of our actions
these other are heirs of their actions
and we are prisoners of our inactions