Post 1 on the presentation

I who should be the freest of men do not take advantage of the knowledge that has been given to me.  I am trying to change, to become who I was 45 years ago, more or less.  It is a strange thing to go back in time.
Today I swam 2500 yards and then went for a long walk in the heat with my faithful hound who collapsed at one point.

Parmenides

Zeno

Socrates

It is time for me to begin a non-technical book on AuT.  I generated an audio book, now wildly out of date and realized after its production that it is a hopelessly difficult read.  The next one I will do myself and I will try to include it here as I write it for your entertainment.

I thought about putting the muse in here, the fourth parent of AuT, I being the one that gave birth to the theory in its current form, does that make the muse the father?  It is hard to tell.

I do not know how to get freedom, other than what we all know inherently, freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ-QfMv7Fzw

AuT-cleaning things up and the Marley post

Yesterday I had a fairly good workout on the stair machine followed by 3 sets of weights at my normal load.  I could have done better.  I at a bison burger, a piece of meat about the size of small tape measure, but still a lot for me and then had, perhaps coincidentally, perhaps not, dreams all night.
One was me running during the purge of the French Revolution.  The others have faded in the light of day which I regret.  If you read Vol 1 of AuT it covers a lot of why history repeats itself and why someone like me who is probably more in touch with this process than anyone else (I have filed a patent related to this) would worry about his dreams, particularly those where history repeats itself or where they are nightmares and not dreams.

I cannot begin to get into all of thethings I have had to face recently, the threats, both real and esoteric to me and my work, the outreach, teh progress and the setbacks.

One thing that I will spend some time on is the evolution from 2f(n)^n^2 to (2f(n)-1)^2^n-1 which can yield the 256:27 (4^4):3^3 and where that goes from f(n)=2 to f(n)=16 in predicting the amount of free or hinge information.

I cleaned up both Kindle and Createspace to get rid of the old versions of the book.
Now what is available are the following:
1) Vol1 of AuT compendium 2nd ed
2) Vol2 of AuT Compendium 1rst and unedited ed
3) Summary of Vol 1
4) All of my other books
5) Maybe the 1rst ed of Vol 1which would be a terrible book to order but has a lot of deleted (and rightfully so) content in the Kindle version.

The two above being respectively the kindle and print versions and

This being what the summary looks like in print which is close to what the kindle version will look like when it gets through the administrative hurdles.

I have the print version of the summary available, but not the kindle version which is being held up by some administrative questions since it is a summary of my own book.
There are (surprising to me) 21 books in this series written over 5 years, beginning with the Einstein Hologram Universe which was conceptually accurate, the two spiral books some of whose content survived long past the 2016 publication date of the second of those books when the model was still looking for the transition between non-dimensional features and dimensional feature, still trying to find a place for time and pi as the model, perhaps well into 2018.
Now there are only 3 books available in print, plus one for kindle versions which includes the second and unedited Volume 2.

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from facebook

I spent a great deal of time worrying that I would stumble onto someone that came up with the same thing first.  It turned out to be an unnecessary concern, and still these articles (below on the god particle which is not ct1) predominate the news.  While I have submitted an article by invitation to rebut this (as of the 29th) there is no news yet as to its publication date, if any.

Scientists finally observed ‘God Particle’ behavior that supports our understanding of physics http://flip.it/vhqP3o

This is the section I am working on on the Marley post...

To Robert Boyle in the 17th century, shortly before Isaac Newton, the aether was a probable hypothesis and consisted of subtle particles, one sort of which explained the absence of vacuum and the mechanical interactions between bodies, and the other sort of which explained phenomena such as magnetism (and possibly gravity) that were inexplicable on the basis of the purely mechanical interactions of macroscopic bodies, "though in the ether of the ancients there was nothing taken notice of but a diffused and very subtle substance; yet we are at present content to allow that there is always in the air a swarm of steams moving in a determinate course between the north pole and the south".^[4]

Isaac Newton contended that light was made up of numerous small particles. This could explain such features as light's ability to travel in straight lines and reflect off surfaces. This theory was known to have its problems: although it explained reflection well, its explanation of refraction and diffraction was less satisfactory.^{[citation needed]} To explain refraction, Newton's Opticks (1704) postulated an "Aethereal Medium" transmitting vibrations faster than light, by which light, when overtaken, is put into "Fits of easy Reflexion and easy Transmission", which caused refraction and diffraction. Newton believed that these vibrations were related to heat radiation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether

What was posted earlier was this (with some inserts in smaller text)
The ether experiment of Michelson and Marley was flawed.  It did not show this substitution rate because it only looked at ct3 (wave length variation) which occurs after the ct1-ct2 one dimensional exchange between space and photons.
"It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions, in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles. This result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out a stationary aether.^{[A 1]} The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution".^{[A 2]}

"Michelson–Morley type experiments have been repeated many times with steadily increasing sensitivity. These include experiments from 1902 to 1905, and a series of experiments in the 1920s. More recent optical resonator experiments confirmed the absence of any aether wind at the 10⁻¹⁷ level.^[2][3] Together with the Ives–Stilwelland Kennedy–Thorndike experiments, Michelson–Morley type experiments form one of the fundamental tests of special relativity theory.^{[A 3]"}

^{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment}

The Flaw (from AuT Compendium Vol 2)

The space-ether test of Michelson and Marley was flawed, every physicist but me is wrong and I've basically discovered everything or I'm wrong.  No seriously, the test is flawed.

The fixed velocity idea is incorrect because velocity includes both time and dimension.  Time is an illusion that only begins at ct3 and only at ct4 in earnest.

Light exchanges with space as a pre-time, pre-dimensional state.  Light itself has only two elements (dimensions) of time in its wave form and a time free one element (dimension) as photons.

.

Ether (the name they used for space before AuT) doesn't fill space, it is space itself and the earth doesn't move through it because it space is dimensionless.  Dimensionless things necessarily do not flow.  Solution order can exist without movement. At that level all things change at once so looking for consequent phase shifts in wavelengths is absurd.  

Lets talk about this and I'll start with a metaphor.  If I hold up a bag of sand and ask how much candy is in it and you guess 1 piece and we run it through a sieve and there is no candy you don't say that candy doesn't exist.  If you're really interested in the bag, you say we should be looking for sand and not candy in the bag.  

That is the problem with the test for the movement of light (or anything else through space).  Neither space nor light has time.  The shift due to movement through the "new" ether, doesn't occur because it is a ct2 outer shell-ct1 exchange whether in terms of waves or in terms of photons.

 We've known this since the 1920's.  Lorentz and Einstein solved for this.  Indeed, Einstein's comment that we all take our own time is the equivalent (given the proofs of AuT)of saying we take our own dimension with us.

Space has neither time nor dimension, but it still exists.  Passing through it requires that it be processed along with the higher compression states of information or everything would be stuck in place.  We have to distinguish between quantum change and time which are vastly different, the second requiring two different parts of dimension.

Light does not have time, but it does have one dimension.  However the velocity in one dimension, having no second rate of substitution has no relativity and that means that it has no time.  Looking for a time based change between space and light is like looking for candy in a bag that only has sand in it.  We know this, by the way, because acceleration to the speed of light eliminates time.  We also know that history requires sufficient information be carried from one compression state to the next to allow in a quantum state where nothing is moving the experiences of the prior states to be viewed (as history) although they cannot be "felt," at least not the way we are used to feeling things, since momentum is largely history being felt, by way of example.

The illusion of dimension in space is only because we carry our 3 dimensions with us.   It is like looking down on a sheet of drawings with two dimensions on them.  We see them in 3 dimensions even though they only have two.

Dimension arises from ratios of different dimensions and they allow us to look down on 2, 1 and 0 dimensional space with perspective which is apparent to us only because we are not total flatlanders.   Of course, compared to black hole states we are, but that is another chapter.

AuT-Looks at Big time

So I have to start taking a little of this seriously.  On the scale from insane to not totally, the needle is wavering at least a little big off of insane

There it is, the meter

The new book is now available:  https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GWLNBKC

In the near future there will a 26 page summary.

Of course the big news is this:

Gregory Friedlander is presenting his theory of quantum mechanics December 3, 2018 in Chicago at the Astrophysics and Particle Physics Conference.  He recent published his 2 volume Compendium on the origin of space time,  the origin of quantum mechanics.

Among other things, the model explains concepts as diverse as the origin and makeup of the big bang, the structure of black holes and their relationship to other forms of matter, and the riddles of dark matter, dark energy, universal expansion and contraction to name a few.

Algorithm Universe Theory Compendium begins with and proves mathematically these haunting concepts:

Time is not the same as change.

Just as Energy and Matter are the same thing, Space and Energy are the same thing. These conclusions require a different view of Atomic Structure and a very specific mathematical model.
Everything we thought we knew about force and dimension are wrong at the quantum level.

Please see the author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn and the author's Facebook page for more links and articles at https://www.facebook.com/frzmn1 or @frzmn1 from facebook

I am hoping for a positive response on publication where an invitation was extended.

The future looks...metered.

Iranian Hackers Target Universities in Global Cyberattack Campaign https://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/iranian-hackers-target-universities-in-global-cyberattack-campaign/d/d-id/1332676

The end of physics as we know it

Quanta Magazine: The End of Theoretical Physics As We Know It. https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-end-of-theoretical-physics-as-we-know-it-20180827/

This post is not about this article, it is, however, about the end of physics as we know it.

Just as Energy and Matter are the same thing, Space and Energy are the same thing.  This conclusion requires a different view of Atomic Structure and a very specific mathematical model.
 Time and Change are different.
          a) This has ramifications far down the line.  Time is just an effect in the ct3-4-5 interface (electron, proton and black hole matrix).  This is why force is so misleading; force is the stacking and unstacking of compression states over time and since ct1,2 and portions of 3 stacking occur without time, forces like gravity appear to be instantaneous relative to time when they are not relative to quantum change.
Algorithm Universe theory is a model, not a theory.  it relies on math to interpret what we observe and to make accurate predictions. 
A single variable algorithm composed of infinite expanding series offset by compressive series define the universe from a non-dimensional, time free environment.
Aut is a true theory of quantum mechanics because it defines a universe defined by quantum changes in a single variable giving rise to quantum moments for each quantum state for the entire universe.

At 364 pages it is 1/2 (less than half) of the first edition, more concise, accurate and less repetitive.  It is not perfect, but it is the end of physics as we know it.

The theory will be presented at the Astrophysics & Particle Physics 2018 symposium in Chicago on December 2-5th.  I hope at least some of my loyal readers will be there.

I will have more on this at the days follow including the abstract, assuming I have not already published it.

If you cannot make the meeting, for the price of a sandwich you can buy the e-version, probably later this week and for the price of taking me out to dinner, a hard copy (at half the price of the less concise and accurate vol 1 thanks to a decrease in the length).

I am exhausted and plan to actually take tonight off. 

#QUANTUMMECHANICS, #SPACE, #TIME, #BLACKHOLES, #DIMENSION, #GRAVITY, #PARMENIDES, #EINSTEIN, #RELATIVITY, #TIMEDILATION, #QUANTUMTHEORY, #PHYSICS

The time pulse in Aut and the speech

 I'm apparently going to be presenting my physics paper at the astrophysics and particle physics coference in December in Chicago.

Ah sweet peer review.

I am on page 160 and I have eliminated 250 of the 550 words that are my current target.  That would leave a book of 250 words which is about right I now think for the next draft.  It is getting easier and more complicated.
I just rode till I wasn't sure that that the heat would not win and in the middle lifted weights but perhaps you are happy to know I made it.  Or maybe not.  Fell into the pool to cool off and now am trying to rehydrate.  But where was I?

My speech:

I have decided my speech might be delta not equal t.
Perhaps I could spice it up with a ct1=func(x)m.
You see you have to have one thing and I can have one thing.
A year ago, it would have been the bottom today it is the top.  Who knows what tomorrow will bring.
We only have today, and I am still so tired I am not even sure of that.

It could also be f(-1^x)=([-1^x plus 2x(-1)^x-1])
That would perhaps be the one with the most peculiar answer (use 0) and you get 1=1.

But that is another story.
I was going to talk about the article below, but I am too hot and tired, too busy and too beyond that perhaps.  I am already becoming insufferable.

Phys.org: Understanding of light momentum: Researchers shine a light on 150-year old mystery. https://phys.org/news/2018-08-momentum-year-mystery.html

Instead, I will put this section here for you to think about, although I cannot remember why.

A.  THE ORIGIN OF VECTORS

a.     The first dimension runs ct1 to ct2 to the second, the second ct2 to ct3. They are continuous, otherwise we wouldn’t observe them or be able to move between them.

b.     The underlying states with their vectors continue to exist in equal quantity to the higher sta=te giving consistency to dimension and not distorting our view.

2)     The ct4-ct5 vector provides a 4^th dimension.

CT1 exchange occurs only with ct1 in ct2, but time is not involved in these transitions, it is onlythe ct2 to ct3 transitions that are at the speed of light.  The transitions of ct3 to ct4 and beyond are at a slower rate, reduce the velocity from the speed of light.  The ratio of these ct2-ct3 and ct3-cte substitution rates ct is v/c.  Substitution rates are absolute, but the “net substitution rate” at ct4, require eliminating negative results which gets us to the v^2/c^2 used in the Lorentz equation.

Looking at ct2, there are 256 sets which can be viewed as 128 positive (B) and 128 negative (A) with or without trapped ct1 states of dissimilar charge and potentially with ct0 solutions trapped between them. 

The trapping of these states before time is a measure can be viewed as gravity.  Hence gravity appears “present” at any moment of time even though it is constantly changing between gravity and anti-gravity with every change in x.

Free states entrapped in folding can come from the later states, 8 or 13 or any other intermediary sate in the Figure above, for example, coming unfolded and thereby being trapped within matrix of folded states of which it was originally a part.

Common origin points that reappear in multiple later solutions effect the level of the matrix relative to points on a different branch.  A folded state ends up with common points entangled and with branches that are affected by common disassociation or reassociation solutions within a complex matrix.

The idea of folding and entanglement gets increasingly dimensional with compression.   This compression includes combining quantities as opposed to actual states, but gets a similar result.

F-series compression is an effect which combines prior states not to create a new state, but to create a compression state made up of the lower compression states.  Pulses of unfolding and refolding can be controlled by ct0, by way of example, allowing these combined states to come completely undone and the refold slightly amended with each change in x.

The smoking gun of AuT

I met my goal today of eliminating 100 pages.  That being said, I have only gone through a first draft of the first two sections, overview and equations.
I also swam 2500 yards and walked for 45 minutes but that is another story.
Tomorrow, if things go as planned which I am abandoning other undertakings to make that happen, I plan to do the section on Dimension and perhaps the following section on Force which should, together, eliminate another 2 or 300 pages getting me most of the way to my goal.
Then it is on to Time, large scale results (sort of a version of the list) and Prior art.  My goal is to have a publishable draft, perhaps under the title Algorithm Universe Model First Edition perhaps as early as Monday of next week if I abandon everything else.
I am accepting candidates for the cover, although I am leaning towards the picture of the helium atom.

I am working on this idea that the positive and negative being offset will match with lengths of positive and lengths of negative being offset and replacing beats of time with individual intervening states so that time beats are replaced in the next scale equations with beats of positive and negative.
+---+++++------- is what pi separations looks like.
next you say ---+++-----+++++-------+++++++ and you have shifts from counting x to counting matching of positives and negative pairs which get steadily longer, but which leads to compression when during periods of time when they match.
The idea is that times are offset by having fuses, you have pairs that are offset by a different kind of fuse derived by how long the pairs last as pairs which is much more complicated because so many points within the paired states can change ---+++ can change to +--,++-,-+-,--+, just in the first part of the pairing.  Morever the actual pairing appears to be in 4's.
7,9,11 works to get a hinge of 27 for the four ct2 arms and if -7,9,-11were tobe a hinge for matter, might not a 7,-9,11  hinge set between the four ct2 arms be anti-matter or anti-charge? The sin-1 to sin1 likely holds some clue in this regard.
These then need to be matched up with f(x) and with curvature equations where somehow sin-1 to sin1 yields the same ratio.
Is it possible for me to do this?  I am not sure, but I don't know that it is required that having found the basic pattern and the specific pattern on either side that something has to be left for everyone else.  Any volunteers?

What a process.

I mentioned a story which I will record for posterity of my view of arriving at the data generator in the form of Fpix.

I started with intersecting spirals as a model for generating vibration.
It turned out to be the denominator of pi which was so obvious I missed it even though I worked with it for a year or two while I was developing the spiral model, I explained to a client.
It was like walking into a murder scene, the wife with red lipstick holding a smoking gun, grinding a cigarette under a matching a red stiletto, just outside of the pool of fresh blood which partially covers the divorce papers.
As the investigator, I walked in, took in the scene and said, "I wonder who did it?"
Eventually, however, the process of elimination forced me to arrest the right equation.

This is all a part of a very long editing process.

AuT-How simple a Universe

I am not well into the editing.  It is an evolving process.
For example, using the figures I have broken the calculations into:
1) Charts showing mathematical derivations
2) Figures showing graphic representations of dimension/force/etc
3) Figures showing theoretical origin features
I have also begun to cut out repetition and the irrelevant information and the relevant, but unessential.  
The goal is to turn two 800 page books into a 200 page book ultimately, but for now to turn an 825 page book into a 200 page book.
I have only begun this process, opening the first two sections, but I have already cut out 100 pages leading me to wonder just how many pages are required.
The base equations and overview took less than 43 pages.  The theory is embodied in its entirety in less than 50 pages.
That is it, with sufficient detail to fully describe the features of the universe, a mere 40 pages would suffice.  What is left for the other 150 pages is nothing more than a summary of some fundamental mathematical equations applied to those theories, some figures showing those features and descriptions of specifics, the specific forces and time.  Then there are the results, what is explained.  This is no longer the list, but is instead embedded within the different features, equations, change, dimension, force, and time and in that order of importance.  Time is the most important to us, it is only fair it be the least important to this least romantic of theories.
Without repetition, I wonder if I will get to the 200 pages, whether this undertaking will be easier than I thought, just time, and I have taken this week off to complete this task.
I am not disappointed.  If the universe was unduly complicated it would be wrong.
I preserved this in the book:  The principles of Occam’s razor and Leibniz’s provide an explanation: “when you have two competing theories that make [the same predictions], the simpler one is probably better.”  
But I took this out, even though it represents the obstruction between a true understanding of the universe and where I sit and write today.
The Standard Model which is the pampered and protected construct of pre-aut physics is a conglomeration of smoke and mirrors based on absurd features of particulate structures.  The standard model makes sense only if you blindly accept what we observe which is the equivalent of saying the universe revolves around the earth.  

The strange thing is that I answer questions, like the one below, in the most simple way possible, and yet no one listens.  But perhaps it is too early to ask for that.  While the compendium is complete in its 1600 words, I feel pretty comfortable that sometime next week there will be a summary compendium of volume 1 that is a mere 200 pages, easier to read, less redundant, better in every respect, and hopefully ready for peer review.

Forbes: The Simplest Solution To The Expanding Universe's Biggest Controversy. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/08/21/the-simplest-solution-to-the-expanding-universes-biggest-controversy/

a better (aut) understanding of force * anyway

I have now finished the first part of the major rewrite of the compendium, a "maybe" 5% accomplishment leaving 95% of the work to be done. Even adding information, there is a gradual decline in length, 40 pages gone so far even at the very beginning of this process.
Part one was sorting the information into broad categories electronically.  I have begun the very long process of deleting the information within these sorts, but what an undertaking!  At the end, the universe will be redefined in a single draft (noting that the second volume is not even under review yet.
Of course, this is not the end.  There are 278 draft posts (including this one) and it grows constantly.
For all the bs I have to put up with, the pompous reaction of the greater part of the physics community by way of example, there are certain ways that I am gratified, primarily as I write this without a shirt because I cannot afford air conditioning, it is knowing through logic rather than belief that AuT is right.
A better definition of time vs change is one major feature.
To understand how force, change and time interact one need only "understand" AuT.  We see gravity as a fixed thing from our time based perspective  because gravity occurs based on change (ct1 to ct2 level compression).  We "look" at the ratio of  mass to  velocity (which includes time) and say (well everyone before me anyway) ahhh look, gravity is a force over time.  What AuT shows is that gravity is the net effect of multiple changes that occur free of time, before the passage of a second, and then when you look at these over the life of a second instead of seeing the quantum changes you say (well before me anyway) look a force over time.  Insanity.
This applies to the electromagnetic force in much the same way.  The only difference is that ct3 is a part of the time ct3-4-5 interface so it  more directly affects time.
Something different happens the the strong and weak forces which are within the time orbit phenomena which makes us think of them in terms of manipulatable matter, something we can put our hands on and manipulate instead of the more intangible forces (well, except for me anyway) because we can bend, powder or compress them physically and it is all within a time framework.
This shows how the time vs non time perspective confuses physics (well, before AuT anyway)
One of the victims of Aut is relativity

Phys.org: How Einstein's equivalence principle extends to the quantum world. https://phys.org/news/2018-08-einstein-equivalence-principle-quantum-world.html

Einstein's equivalence principle contends that the total inertial and gravitational mass of any objects are equivalent, meaning all bodies fall in the same way when subject to gravity," Dr. Zych said.

What is wrong with Einstein (well at least after me anyway): Just about everything, unfortunately, even though Einstein and Hawkins (two dead men) are the godfather of AuT, I am the third godfather, or perhaps the unble; when I am dead it will be an orphan, the parents, Parmenides, Leonardo di bianacci and the unnamed mathematician whose work was preserved, probably from ancient egypt being long gone, the muse being the only Aunt.
inertia
mass
time
All of these are non-quantum phenomena, all of these are tied to time at least the gravitational mass that Einstein was obsessed with.
All dead, like the godfathers.

AuT Whittling, headings and fundamental features*

I am engaged in the battle of whittling 800 pages down to perhaps 200 after which I will have to incorporate the other 750 pages into this without extending it.
Repetition is the primary enemy, but with subtle variations that hide the critical.
That brings to mind the idea of organizing and this means looking at the critical elements of AuT which change from time to time.
These change slightly as the focus of AuT becomes more sharp.
What are they today?  That is probably too much to cover,but I can put my notes on the subject.
The Core Fundamental features of AuT
1) Time and Change are different.
          a) This has ramifications far down the line.  Time is just an effect in the ct3-4-5 interface (electron, proton and black hole matrix).  This is why force is so misleading; force is the stacking and unstacking of compression states over time and since ct1,2 and portions of 3 stacking occur without time, forces like gravity appear to be instantaneous relative to time when they are not relative to quantum change.
2) Space and other dimensional features are the same thing
            a) A sub-set is that the mathematical alignment of ct1 states leads to the type of exponential compression set out in the theory as increasing folding of space.
            b) It is easy to see wher this overlaps with Time and Change when we are looking at force.
3)  All the different dimensionals states co-exist.  This is a very subtle but important feature of the universe, that non-dimensional, one, two and four dimensional states co-exist with our three dimensional ct4 state.
4) And the most difficult one to accept, all changes in every point in the universe change together in response to changes in the single variable in a time and dimension free environment.
None of these are theories, they are requirements of a math model and totally consistent with observed phenomena.
But withthe overlap, I am not so sure they provide the type of categorical separation required by this herculean, well, parmenidian task.
Here is where I think I need to start instead: Headings
1) Equations-this is where everything starts
2) Dimension-This is before time and force
3) Time-because we need this to understand the interface between arm loading/unloading and what we call force.  This would include Time dilation, one of the things that tells us what time is.
4) Force-including dark energy and the like
5) Large scale results, things like the big bang etc.
6) Overview.  In setting these up there are dozens of summaries which I need to put into a single summary.  The core features include the prior items and include some overlap of those just as all of those prior headings overlap.
7) Prior art-While it is nonsensical to look at classical physics from the standpoint of AuT, it is a requirement of peer review.  What's more, there are literally hundreds of reviewed articles and even a course.  All of this has to be a part of the paper.  The discussion has to have all the subgroups of the other entries set out above.
It is important to note that the book published is complete if repetitive.  it covers everything more or less to date except some of the conclusions which are restricted to the patent.
I am continuing to struggle through the peer review process and have now added venture funding to the equation, at least conceptually.
So I am steadily going insane, what are you up to?

Why not just math or an information processor and the breathing universe

So you are out there waiting to see where I am while you get to hide in whatever inequity you have created.  But I am just this, so here I am.

This obnoxious article, is not accurate because it fails to set out that the two theories are reconciled to the extent they are not completely replaced by AuT.
CNN: The scientific theories battling to explain the universe. https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/17/opinions/superstrings-dark-energy-opinion-lincoln/index.html
Let me explain.
First, string theory, like the standard model, is nonsense if you read it.  All these different strings, however, are just a confused way of describing the single folded strand of solutions of AuT.  One day, someone with a physics degree will say, hey, what if these strings are just one string folded into stable states that reflect the dimensions and that the transitional states fill in the blanks that all these nonsense SM particles represent and the industry will fawn over him and when they point out that he stole AuT, they will all come up with some lame excuse to protect themselves.
Dark Energy is a little different, because AuT explains exactly (i mean really exactly) what dark energy is and how it and gravity are related and (as set out before) science is already claims to have found this and now "if we can only explain it without giving aut credit" is all that is left for them to get to AuT.
This is pretty much undeniable.  So the dark energy concept is a part of AuT, the string universe is nonsensical, just like that the standard model.
But it is sunday.

I have another drawing to do based on the editing of the compendium.
It is the same as another drawing but basically shows the arm loading as 2x2, 3x3 and 5x5 on the 4, 8 and 16 arm (respectively) compression arms sa compression arms and arm loading respectively.
Looking below you can see 3 examples (all from this blog) of the unbalanced arms, then (also from the blog) the comparison of balanced vs unbalanced just for the ct2 state, so it is sort of just fixing one of the three drawings in the top.

The universe is not just an information processor and is not just math.
We know this because the information processor itself is missing and the math alone does not explain how the solutions are memorized or where the counter is located.
The universe breaths and we know that and how that occurs through AuT.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/universal-method-to-sort-complex-information-found-20180813/

AuT and the non-miracle of time*

As I ride my donkey against the windmill of entrenched physics, the clarity of my heroism is clear (to me).  One need only type "what is time" into any youtube or other web-browser to see this.  The philosophy, the pathos, the importance, the flexibility, the travel through, the changing of this thing that pre-AuT physics calls time is so nauseating to the men and women of AuT-mancha.

Sadly, being right is not necessarily more romantic, for as a purveyor of romance:

I would prefer a more romantic world.   (The first in the series, I highly recommend it)

One of the many rather disappointing and unromantic disclosures of AuT is the elimination of time except as an effect of quantum change interacting with compression states, and the consequent change and current net degradation of the ct3 states within the ct3-4-5 matrix where we spend all of our time (pun intended).
One may think of the ct1 solutions as a wire capable of getting easily tangled (of ct1 tangling to ctanything) passing very slowly through the print version of the book.  It will change the book.  Each quantum movement with the book has no effect, bunching against the book would have no effect, but if it passes through the book it will change the words and paper ever so slightly.
The book represents a quantum moment, the wire the unraveling line of ct1 which turns into many lines due to entanglement and the consequent near infinite points where it may pull apart, but it may also just increase the position of the book relative to any other point by increasing the number of ct1's vrs ctwhatevers or  if it exits or pushes the book without moving within the interior.
The example that I used was that of a comb pushing against the book, the smooth end going against the pages or the rough (therefor folded) end of the comp pushing.  In one case the book does not age, but its velocity is higher.  In the other it ruffles the pages slightly as it moves along them, in the last it saws into the information of the book.   That is what time is, nothing more or less except that the vibrational nature of compresion and decompression means that the density of the book can increase or decrease over changes of x depending on how where the strand is moving and how entangled it gets with the rest of the book as it passes through.
The book:

On Life and Dispair and abstracts

The Abstractor

I have a lot of trouble trying to reconcile where I am and where I am going.  My allies act like my enemies and my enemies act like my family.  I get the feeling that it isn't the fault of everyone else.

What is so weird about all of this is that as dismal as things are in my life, and they are pretty dismal, When I get away from that, I am trying to present a more accurate view of the universe to a largely hostile audience.  

I had a couple of choices today.  One was another post which pointed out why the universe was not (just) an informaton processor or math Then there is this one, which is a 150 word abstract which has been submitted for a speaking engagement.

Is it me?  I am not so sure about that.  Is it my fault that everyone has been studying something that is wrong for the last 2000 years, maybe its really been bad only for the last 100?

What is it that I need to deal with, one is to take this 150 word summary and the 1600 page (god knows how many words) publication (compendium) and turn it into something that is maybe 10 or 20 pages and:

1) Something which shows scientific rigour; 5 years of research and writing and conclusions which scream towards its accuracy, but how do you do get a hostile audience to agree with that;

2) Extensive literature research; you have seen all of the sited articles and I have  even taken the course on the Standard Model which I used to pick it apart and

3) a careful assessment of the validity of any conclusions presented, which my theory had to support what it says and the spreadsheets use scientific observations to show just this; but not sure what this means.

The thing with AuT is that you don't have to be a genius to understand it, but I have been immersed in it so deeply that I might assume too much clarity that doesn't exist for those whose heads are so far up their own asses that they need a flashlight to look at the figures.  I guess it is just me.

When life tears everything apart, fix a cup of hot tea and take everything one step at a time.

Anyway, the abstract:

1.           Title: Dimensional Model

            Just as Energy and Matter are the same thing, Space and Energy are the same thing.

Algorithm Universe Theory (AuT) models atomic structure and the underlying spatial matrix and re-defines time as an effect like force, and dimension.

          A mathematical model for generating dimensional features in two equations is presented:

1)     non-dimensional changes occur as the generation of data points: ([-1^x plus 2x(-1)^x-1]) as x varies from 1 to infinity for points generated with a new starting value of x with one new point generated for each change in x aligned by solution order; each point has a fuse counted down by the same counter. 

2)     Dimensional Changes use the data to increase n as the limit of prior, lower intervening solutions approaches 1 for 2f(n)^2^n points having alternating positive and negative values. Transitional states, such as the proton and electron for n=4 involve limits greater than 1.

          The interaction of the two derivation equations gives rise to results for observed dimensional features.  Non-dimensional Space becomes the densest substance all other dimensional forms are derived from folding space mathematically.

Image of Helium

Below was a picture of me that did not upload:

The really great thing about the picture is that I look like a crazy person sitting in their basement.  Ha Ha

Recent Publications See author's Amazon page at: https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn

a.        ALGORITHM UNIVERSE THEORY Compendium 2018, Gregory Friedlander

1.   Book 1: An Overview of the origin of space time and quantum phenomena 3^rd Ed 2017 Gregory Friedlander

2.   Book 2: The Derivation of Force from Space 2^nd Ed. 2017 Gregory Friedlander

3.   Book 3: Mathematical Proofs of Supersymmetry Fifth Ed. 2018 Gregory Friedlander

4.   Book 4: Transition from non-dimensional phenomena to space time 4^th ED. 2018 Gregory Friedlander

5.   Book 5 State Dimension and Time 1 2018 Gregory Friedlander

6.   Book 6 Dimension Time and logic 2018 Gregory Friedlander

7.   Book 7 First Edition-Time as electron movement and the not Higgs Boson 2018 Gregory Friedlander

8.   Book 8 First Edition-The nature of time as electron movement 2018 Gregory Friedlander

b.        SPIRALS IN AMBER, SECOND EDITION-The predecessor to Algorithm Universe Theory Books 2016 Gregory Friedlander

c.        The Einstein Hologram Universe 2013 Gregory Friedlander

quantum and not so quantum gravity*

Scientific American: Is Gravity Quantum?. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-gravity-quantum/