The pantheon vs the one true equation First Editions

The sun is not up yet.  It is cool.  Soon the tops of the tallest trees will be touched with light and the day will begin.  Not yet, not another day without you yet.
I have entered the exploitation phase of invention with the filing of the first patent. I wonder if were even possible before nowand what it means.  But it is something different.  I am now the professor McMurphy tinkering with flying cars and time machines in my mental garage.  How big a leap is it before I do something more dramatic and build wings of feathers and wax?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V0lw3qylVfY

Phys.Org: Team makes first particle accelerator beam measurement in six dimensions. https://phys.org/news/2018-08-team-particle-dimensions.html
No they did not, they do not know what dimensions are and their particles are not.

No pre-aut physics is about primordial goo and a pantheon of particles, their version of the Greek religion.  Does that make -1^n the one true god?   I think not.  There is the line of thought that  the universe is an information processor, the closely related idea that the universe is math.  These, AuT suggests, are both close to accurate; but not exactly.

AuT destroyed faith, but not god.  Indeed the information processor or the arbiter of math is a godlike thing.  AuT goes a bit further, and not as far, by defining what this god of quantum phenomena does; but it recognizes that there are two parts to the universe.  One is dimensional with time which we recognize and live in, where I correct the wrongs of my predecessors and create my on mistakes.  The other is the non-dimensional world where time and dimension do not exist, but where the ability to remember solutions and to count and to process the logic of remembered solutions does exist.
This is not pure math, much as it may seem to be and is an information processor, but not the type that we experience.  By separating dimension and time and by showing both to be effects, we move very far towards a universe where we are nothing but math, but that begs the questions of why the count, how the memory, why the logic.
It took 5 years, but AuT finally stripped dimension and time from the underlying universe, but once they were removed, something was left.

AuT has been differentiated and summarized in the first edition of the Compendium, Volume 1 and somewhere in an only slightly unedited version here.

I found my first "edit."  Not a correction, but Figure 52 on page 303 (which is a duplicate of 10 on page 59 and the unnumbered chart on page 607) is just a black box.  Obviously, nothing is missing since it appears in two other places, but even so, if you were wondering as you read the compendium what Figure 52 is supposed to look like, it speaks to this

 but it looks slightly different, it appears in multiple volumes, but surprisingly not exactly in that form where i could find it this morning in this blog.
Another reason to get the book, i suppose.

Notwithstanding, I wish you people who are downloading large numbers of posts at once would just buy a book!!!
I'll even sign it for you, imagine having a book signed by Einstein, Parmenides or Gottfried Leibniz.  Wouldn't that look good on your shelf.

You ought to get this one, but if not, get book 3 or 4 in the set; both good in their own way and a lot more complete than the blog; or do you just like hearing me complain?

The e book is cheaper but maybe I can, that is a thought.

The light has touched the top of the trees, another day without you has started, it is something i cannot avoid anymore.