I have been working towards dealing with the hinge/trapped state problem in AuT which is neither difficult nor unusual but requires a great deal more study than the more obvious and easilty identified features of AuT. This is the first of two posts connected withthat.
It is a part of rewrite of the second volume of the compendium, currently cut down from 750 pages (approx) to 454 with a target of 300 pages or less. While intended to supplement Vol 1 which is a complete presentation of the theory, it will contain novel portions such as those related to hinge states which are critical to a full understanding of the change between ct states.
It has been suggested that Neutrinos are possibly transitional space-photons or even pure photons given the nature of things, although their near invisibility most strongly suggests the previously disclosed (see the book below-AuT Compendium Vol 1, 2nd edition) transitional state, most likely a 1:3 transitional state although a 2:3 state is possible. This is suggested by the model.
THis article shows the futility of seeing these transitions which occur in the 10^-38/second range.
It is a part of rewrite of the second volume of the compendium, currently cut down from 750 pages (approx) to 454 with a target of 300 pages or less. While intended to supplement Vol 1 which is a complete presentation of the theory, it will contain novel portions such as those related to hinge states which are critical to a full understanding of the change between ct states.
It has been suggested that Neutrinos are possibly transitional space-photons or even pure photons given the nature of things, although their near invisibility most strongly suggests the previously disclosed (see the book below-AuT Compendium Vol 1, 2nd edition) transitional state, most likely a 1:3 transitional state although a 2:3 state is possible. This is suggested by the model.
 |
| https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn |
 |
| https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn |
THis article shows the futility of seeing these transitions which occur in the 10^-38/second range.
CNN: The ultimate mystery of the universe (Opinion). https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/20/opinions/protodune-neutrino-antimatter-opinion-lincoln/index.html
http://mashable.com/2017/05/
There is another important feature of AuT which is hinge states which is covered in detail for the first time in the second edition (currently unpublished) of AuTC Vol 2. The first part of this discussion appears below although reference at least to the summary is important to fully comprehend its importance.
The more traditional way and credible way of approaching this is to just increase the number of hinge states just by the number of ct2 states.
There is another important feature of AuT which is hinge states which is covered in detail for the first time in the second edition (currently unpublished) of AuTC Vol 2. The first part of this discussion appears below although reference at least to the summary is important to fully comprehend its importance.
 |
| https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn |
1.
The (256)32/27 Hinge state problem
Figure 6 The
interaction of dimensional states
The derivations of fpix require recalculation for each
point and the memory of all prior solutions along with their modification.
Pi changes for each increase in information
and so does sin.
There
is no denominator for pi before ct1, so in the ct0 environment there is only
positive and negative potential which increases in quantity.
Ct1
has no dimensional quality, but allows for separation of ct0 information in the
form of order and a changing lifespan.
At
ct2, a single dimension does not allow for folding, but adds the potential for
things to go either towards or away from compression.
At ct3
the second dimension allows for folding.
While
a single neutron represents a ct4 state, we experience reality as transitional
states via the alignment of these 3-dimensional ct4 states as compressed
towards the initial ct5 state.
The
net tendency towards compression at the ct1 level leads to the impression of
gravity which is partially offset by the gross decompression that is reflected
as velocity.
These
lower dimensional changes occur with concentrations far below those where mass
would be affected, but they dilute the dimension and control sub-molecular features
of the ct3-4-5 transition states.
Resulting
curvature from the ratio of different compression states is presumed to hold
clues to compression just as the denominator of pi reflects the charge and
features of the charge of ct1 states as a function of what is, for lack of a
better term, called ct0 which is a primordial stuff from which the universe is
built. While it is fine to call this
“information” that is a cop out since it really is a ‘thing’ which can hold
charge and memory which makes it very complicated.
To try
to come to grips with how dimension ratios interact and form AuT looks for
clues.
Since
ct0 has positive and negative results, the starting point is to look at the
math that yields curvature equations for -1 and 1.
Sin(pi=1)
to sin(pi=-1) yields a ratio of 32/27/8. This is the .148148 ratio
solution highlighted or y=256/27 in the equation 2*y/(pi0^(2n+1) which yields
mirror image results for pi=1 and -1.
Put
another way, dimensional curvature of the universe originates from the
application of fpix from which is derived the simple compression function 2f(n)^2^n
which comes from the simple equation: 256/27/(-1)=negative of 256/27/1.
The 8
is separated for the inquiry since “whole numbers” come as -8 and 8 if 32/27 is
used.
27 in
base 2 is 11011 and 33 is 100001.
8 is
1000 and 256 is 1 followed by 8 zeroes.
If we
are looking to place and we are trying to find patterns we can say there are
two places on either side of 0 as opposed to the -1-0-1 results for -1^x. There is no reason to expect this pattern
(after all 5 is base 2 is 101) or to restrict ourselves to base 2, but it is
worth considering other ways of looking at numbers when attempting to figure
out transition points.
27 is
3^3 which suggests a relationship of -1^n and fpix which would be 3,9,27
matching the 4:16:64:256 by providing a “hinge” where the colons appear between
the solutions.
electron/proton
|
ELEC
|
||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
10
|
100
|
1000
|
10000
|
100000
|
1000000
|
10000000
|
1E+08
|
15
|
14
|
13
|
12
|
11
|
10
|
9
|
8
|
6.25E+14
|
1.25E+15
|
1.875E+15
|
2.5E+15
|
3.125E+15
|
3.75E+15
|
4.375E+15
|
5E+15
|
9.375E+15
|
8.75E+15
|
8.125E+15
|
7.5E+15
|
6.875E+15
|
6.25E+15
|
5.625E+15
|
5E+15
|
15
|
7
|
4.333333333
|
3
|
2.2
|
1.666666667
|
1.285714286
|
1
|
wave with ct2 cloud
|
|||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
6
|
36
|
216
|
1296
|
7776
|
46656
|
279936
|
1679616
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
209952
|
419904
|
629856
|
839808
|
1049760
|
1259712
|
1469664
|
1679616
|
1469664
|
1259712
|
1049760
|
839808
|
629856
|
419904
|
209952
|
0
|
7
|
3
|
1.666666667
|
1
|
0.6
|
0.333333333
|
0.142857143
|
0
|
ct1 with space cloud
|
|||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
||||
4
|
16
|
64
|
256
|
||||
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
||||
64
|
128
|
192
|
256
|
||||
192
|
128
|
64
|
0
|
||||
3
|
1
|
0.333333333
|
0
|
||||
black hole
|
ELEC
|
||||||
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
16
|
128
|
1024
|
8192
|
65536
|
524288
|
4194304
|
33554432
|
31
|
30
|
29
|
28
|
27
|
26
|
25
|
24
|
1.06338E+37
|
2.12676E+37
|
3.19015E+37
|
4.25353E+37
|
5.31691E+37
|
6.38029E+37
|
7.44368E+37
|
8.51E+37
|
3.29649E+38
|
3.19015E+38
|
3.08381E+38
|
2.97747E+38
|
2.87113E+38
|
2.76479E+38
|
2.65846E+38
|
2.55E+38
|
31
|
15
|
9.666666667
|
7
|
5.4
|
4.333333333
|
3.571428571
|
3
|
This table shows the first part of the electron/proton
compression scale as well as the first part of the black hole.
Just as
you have 3^3 in the first case, you would have 4:6:10 states for the base of
the 2^n states so too you have some relationship here 3:x:y. This could well be 2f(x)-1 yielding 3:5:9.
The
exponential ^3 could easily be replaced with (2^2)-1. This would yield 3:7:15 and so on for the hinge
states (3^3;5^7;9^15).
The
other choice is just multiplying the 27 by the number of ct1 states, although
one other option is combining these two.
ct2
states
|
2f(n)^2n
|
ct1
units
|
|||
2*f(n)
|
2^n
|
changing
|
compression
|
CT1
units
|
|
N
|
ratio
|
per
quantum
|
|||
1
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
||
2
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
256
|
256
|
3
|
6
|
8
|
1679616
|
1.68E+06
|
4.30E+08
|
4
|
10
|
16
|
1.67962E+22
|
1E+16
|
4.29982E+24
|
5
|
16
|
32
|
5.71544E+60
|
3.40282E+38
|
1.46315E+63
|
The combination looks like this:
5
|
3 Hinge
|
combined
|
beginning
|
states
|
|
(end is
total)
|
||
unbalanced
|
||
4
|
27
|
|
6
|
78125
|
3.36E+13
|
10
|
2.05891E+14
|
8.85294E+38
|
16
|
4.3144E+37
|
6.3126E+100
|
The more traditional way and credible way of approaching this is to just increase the number of hinge states just by the number of ct2 states.
| 3 Hinge | combined | 27 times |
| states | no of ct2 | |
| 27 | ||
| 78125 | 3.36E+13 | 45349632 |
| 2.05891E+14 | 8.85294E+38 | 4.53E+23 |
| 4.3144E+37 | 6.3126E+100 | 1.54E+62 |
One issue that is raised by these numbers is that give the number of these higher states (e.g. the number of neutrons and black holes) indicate a lot of information making up the universe.
The first shows the increase based on the 2f(x)-1^(2^n-1). The second shows a much, much higher number
combining the ct1 units * 27. While this
number may seem very large in some respects, it remains possible that since the
increase is exponential on one level it is on the other.
This
enormous number of potential hinge states given the combined total may allow
for the continuous compression and net unfolding of information we see as
790,000mph galactic movement without requiring a breakdown. It might also reflect
the lifespan of higher states in that the difference between (for ct 3 between
78,125 and 3.36x10^13) might be the amount of variation in hinge states between
complete stability and complete breakdown of these states.
The
trapped information/hinge state analysis remains the most uncertain aspect of
AuT, but the suggested 3-state solution and the 27-factor observed in curvature
ratios remains suggestive.
In the 3-state
solution (below) by changing the arrangement you can get an explanation for
particle and anti-particles where the net reflects the number of particles vs
antiparticles that we experience today because of the alignment that predominates
in a net expansion cycle or due to just the base solution orders predominating
and thereby crowding out the alternative solutions as hinge states.
https://www.amazon.com/author/frzmn
No comments:
Post a Comment