Dark matter and Everyone is looking in the wrong direction and the wrong way but me

After the hard work out yesterday, I was forced inside for swimming and surpised myself by finishing 2500 yards.  It is always hard transitioning from a pure timed workout to one involving actual counting.   I don't mind telling you that the 10 i-ms were a challenge.
Afterwards I had to roll down the windows to get enough air to stay alive.

I'm working on a vc speech, not sure I like it.
Eventually I'll put it here, when I don't hate it as much as I hate it now.

For now, let's talk a bit about dark matter and AuT

Forbes: This Is The Real Reason We Haven't Directly Detected Dark Matter. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/10/05/this-is-the-real-reason-we-havent-directly-detected-dark-matter/

Let's pick apart a few things in this article:

1) This article says that we haven't detected dark matter.  AuT takes a different approach.  it sees dark matter, that is missing gravity, as being integral in the gravity we see and knowing that such gravity varies regionally and over time, we mistakingly look at a narrow time range and think that tells us what gravity should look like for the universe-Awnnnk! Wrong.

2) (Exptrapolating the laws of physics) we find that there was not only a time so early when the Universe was hot enough that neutral atoms couldn’t form, but there was a time where even nuclei couldn’t form-Awnnnk!  Pre-AuT physics doesn't understand a partially compressed universe which has plent of 'stuff' at the most compressed state, indeed there is more ct5 and ct5-6 transition states at the big bang than there are today.

3) Ratios (matter-radiation-darkmatter) from cosmic background radiation.  The problem here is that these ratios change over time according to a formula not recognized by the standard model.

4)  Dark matter doesn't interact with matter.  Awnnk!  This is the stupidist part of pre-AuT physics and I don't  intend to honor it with a discussion; but I would directly you to the first book of AuT if you do not already understand why it is redonkulous, too absurd to just be rediculous.

5) Colliding galaxies provides empirecal proof of dark matter.  Dark matter is seen to pass through matter.  Semi Awnnk? Here is the rub of all of this.  First the interaction of matter and anti matter should not affect gravity since the feature that gives rise to gravity is independent of the organization of the higher states.  However, when a compressing and decompressing ct1-ct2 matrix interact what you get is a net gravity.  We happen to live in a net positive interaction planet, but if our planet were to suddenly be net negative our planet would begin to break up and float into space.  What's more is coliding galaxies represent something more than gravity and net positive gravitational results.  It represents a unwinding of the universe pulling galactic bodies together as the knotted up ct1 states they represent come unwound.  Who can even discuss what is going on there without a careful application of AuT?  

6) Look for particles to explain it?  AWNNK (ALL CAPS)!  What AuT proves mathematically is that looking at particle physics is the physics equivalent of trying to communicate with aliens using african drums.  No, its worst than that, becuase that seems sort of cool and plausible.

Anyway, the answers are all here, in these books.  Fortunately, book 2 is going better than expected.  While book one was a mess even in the first 100 pages, book 2 seems to have more typos than outright mistakes.  The summary, of course, is intuitively brilliant if you buy into this whole Greg has figured out the universe thing.