Saving Shrodinger's cat-the double slit experiment under AuT

It is Sunday morning so I have a special treat for you.
I am trying to decide whether to risk exercise or not, but it is a beautiful day and not worthwhile wasting it on these concerns.
So instead, what I am going to do is to explain the observational mystery of the double split experiment thereby saving Shrodinger's cat for a life of misery inside of a quantum box.
To fully understand this you have to understand two things.  One is the very weird (from a pre-AuT standpoint) mystery of the double slit experiment and the other is AuT.  I will brief explain the former, if you want to understand AuT you can order one of the books, eh?

Any one of them will do since it only the basics of AuT that are required.
The double slit experiment is where when any number of possible scenarious for looking at photons going through a slit are observed,they are particulate in form and in any scenario where they are not observed going through the slit a wave pattern (interference pattern exists). 
The big mistake is how conceited you are.  Under pre-AuT it is framed "Our knowledge changes the way the photon acts." I may be conceited too, but if you understand AuT you understand that conceit is a driven reaction, the reason I don't do what I know is better for me even though I know it.  Am I insane or is some underlying stream of control making be act like an idiot?  I am not making on choice on that score, I am just saying it is as mysterious to me as this double slit test is to pre-AuT physicsts.
Here is the AuT explanation:

Wave particle duality and the double slit test revisited: As t-12 ct3-4 transition states, electrons can be viewed as collections of photon waves and immature matter, just as molecules can be see as ct4-5 transition states as collections of neutrons and as immature black holes.  Hence for the double slit test, electrons create wave type interference patterns because they are waves without complex probability analysis.  The act of observing or just collecting the data is thought of as collapsing the wave functions in some unknown way.

It literally is a question of whether we know the path information or do not know it!  Under pre-AuT mathematics this means our consciousness “controls” what is observed.  This, of course is baloney; but it is observed.

Under AuT the suggested answer is that something “forces the T-12 to retain its particle form by freezing the fuse changes of the T-12 so it maintains its particle phase by locking in those changes over the time required (very short) to get to the detector.

This is Schrodinger’s probability vs measured particle quantum analysis effecting something existing as both a wave and a particle is baffling, but any true AuT quantum solution must be certain based on changes in x. 

From the pre-AuT perspective, when we observe it we fix the particle based on our perception of time over those values of x as a particle.  

Here is the secret of the perspective Change: AuT says that changes in X cause the changes in dimension, force and time that we experience.

“Knowledge causes the collapse,” might be replaced with this, “when a photon has a known path, we can observe it as having a known path.” The known path is presumably because the fuse doesn’t allow change to a wave form during the period under observation.  The counter is that if a photon does not have a known path (i.e. if it is transitioning in form between wave and photon because of fuse changes) we cannot observe it.  This is a forced solution, but AuT suggests that AuT is defined by forced solutions.  Changes in dimension over values of x drives force and time instead of force or time being driving elements. 

While not satisfying there is a built in test for this.  If two potential observers look at the data and one is allowed to sees it and the other doesn’t, the results of the dispersal pattern should be different for the two.  The dispersal pattern is the same, however, for the two observers.  This is the same result for his cat.  If one observer sees the cat in the box as alive, it is fixed as alive for the other observer.

This is why the “baseline” for time is the same for different places across the universe.  The same x is affecting both.  Time is changing based on net compression and decompression at the ct3-4-5 interface for both.  Therefore even though they are unrelated in terms of proximity, if they both “observe” time, they would observe it the same way subject to their relative dilation issues at the same time.

This is the same feature at work in AuT with one caveat.  The caveat is that every time photons can be observed in their particulate form, we can observe them in that way and every time they cannot we cannot whether we do or not.  The underlying changes is fuse state determine what we can see.

Two choices occur.  One is that Schrodinger is right but the act of any observer affects all other observers which is not a bad choice.  AuT, on the other hand says, “the fact that it can be observed means that over the time (value range of x) observed the particle form was maintained.”

A precise solution to why this fixed value of fuses leads to our ability to observe it from a time based perspective can be determined from how AuT works.  Essentially, fixed solutions over time (very large values of x) occur in an environment where we can observe all the operative features.  Where the solutions are changing in a time independent state, they happen in a way that we only see the net effect.  

There is certainly some additional logic that needs to be applied to this solution, but in reality it is only an extension of the solution (also given in those books) to Zeno's paradox.  And, yes, someone else is responsible for much of this work for pointing that out this work parallels the work of Parmenides and Zeno and I dedicate the saving of the cat to them and not my own heroism.

Now you should order a book (or better still, all 3).