I am not so sure about that.
It is something which is not necessarily for public consumption, it is not private either.
It is for reasons set out below.
You could say that it is because I am an emotional trainwreck, not just because my emotions are outside of my control, but because I understand everything so clearly, too clearly. If anyone achieves my understanding of the universe, they necessarily would experience a sense of purposelessness which can only be offset by an understanding that a goal is inherent in that purposelessness and it is not to do the bidding of the universe, even though that is a requirement of sorts. But I will get to that.
In a universe governed by irony and predestination, secrets serve little purpose.
Keeping my work secret would be asinine. I have said it before, I am not tesla playing with electricity and pretending towards some great understanding, essentially a side show magician.
I work as hard as anyone, I think, towards success when success appears to hold its own proof of irrelevance. But I will get to that.
There are a couple of reasons to expect controlled fusion and several to doubt it.
Lets talk about these.
First the pro-fusion arguments:
1) They occur with great frequency in nature
2) The necessary forces, being effects, are not per-se required to achieve a reaction but merely result from the reaction
3) The model for fusion and the reactants have been achieved for fission triggered fusion based on achieving a plasma of two isotopes of hydrogen;
4) Better modeling means less energy required to achieve the same results.
I could go on. Lets go to the con-fusion side:
1) So called cold fusion is not seen, although AuT suggests it goes on in the earth's mantle;
2) The reactions, more specifically the dimensional changes, are acrosss several different dimensional strata, the most important being the most difficult to control and being time independent;
3) Putting a vacuum on the process only increases the ct1 within the system, likely along with ct2 and 3 when what we need to do is target the specific amounts of different types of information between several different dimensional states; some of which are time independent.
Pre-aut models talk about converting matter into energy. AuT redefines energy, actually it is the only model to define energy, per se, as something other than what its effect is on other things, as dimensional features with greater pre-time elements, effectively this means converting information of sufficient compression to generate the effect of time to being those which change is a more time free environment to being completely time independent (ct1 and 2 essentially).
The real question can be distilled from the list as this: Can knowing what you are doing be enough to allow you to do it?
There is a drawing in the books of something which is critical to the understanding of AuT and it is, to some extent what Schrodinger could have been studying if he had only understood what he was was looking at and it is what someone else will look at in the future. It is a system being built from the pre-time elements looking like it is being built from post time elements.
This picture is much more than it appears to be, although I can't say it appears in any but one of the books. If I had time, I could continue to break this picture down, again and again until it formed the basis of an entire branch of physics. It gets to the root of the problem with an accurate model of the universe.
In a sentence: The higher ct states result from the need to do what the lower ct states yield of necessity.
This is the nighmare of AuT. It changes "I think, therefore I am" to "Because I am, I think."
Depending on how the inflection is added to that it could have two different meansings, but the one thta applies is the only one that logically follows from the meaning of the words and sentence structure and I do not "think" AuT is right, I merely point out that mathematically it is maintained based on the logic of math at least back to ct1.
God does not play dice with the universe, because the math of the universe is not broken at any point.
Emotional trainwrecks...
The only way to understand the universe as well as I do and yet maintain a semblance of sanity is to look for a way to break symmetry or surrender to it.
All the other sciences have "endless probabilities." Even in those where they say we are a fixed system (hologram theory or simulation theory, both of which have features of AuT) the system being unfixed holds possibilities. AuT is not like that. It is a horrifically specific model. It allows for no potential variation outside the fundamental math.
And yet, even trainwrecks can be put back on the tracks and under AuT the tracks are never really separated from the wheels.
Early versions of the model were called "Non-Linear Time" and indeed that title has something to be said for it if you accept time as important in quantum mechanics because time is pocket driven and not line driven; but time is not a thing. And perhaps to make it linear, to make it a thing which can be used to change what is free of time.
http://www.popularmechanics.
there are a lot of reasons why this project will not work out, but science is not one of them.
math does not lie, at least not too much.
I do think however, there is something to be said for the relative view of dimension in this video if you ignore the time part of it which is largely inaccurate, even though the math works.
Chapter 4
“Dr. Chang, did I hear you isolated
your patient?” Chang was a first year
intern at Memphis General in Tennessee within site of the bridge over the
Mississippi River and 30 minutes from the Mississippi state line. The question asking Doctor Penny was the head
of Medicine for the hospital, specially brought in to make sure it did not lose
money.
In a thickly oriental voice, he
replied, “Yes sir. Patient in Memphis General isolation ward.”
“For god’s sake why? Do you know how much isolation costs a day?”
“The patient had rabies.”
“Off that ship? Did you check to see if he was exposed to an
animal?”
“His shipmates denied it, but he
had multiple mosquito bites, there was no other source of exposure.”
“Mosquitos do not carry
rabies,” Thank god, Penny thought.
“I have been examining the
slides. I was a microbiologist before
going to medical school. I believe it may be a new strain. There were signs of a modified cell wall. I think this may be mosquito borne.”
“Please, that has never happened. There is no reason for it now. Please keep this to yourself. I do not want to hear that a panic was begun
at this hospital.”
“We’ve never had flooding like
this, more flooding, more mosquitos.
Animals are driven out of their habitat.
It is a recipe for genetic experimentation.”
“And now you are going to blame
global warming?”
Chang looked at Dr. Penny. He was appointed by god fearing republicans
in the state legislature. He was
unlikely to want to here Chang’s answer.
“Whatever you say.”
“I say take this man out of
isolation immediately and don’t even think of questioning my order.”
Later, Chang stopped at the
administrative office to take a week’s vacation.
“This is sudden, but if you have an
emergency, we can spare you. Where are
you going?”
“I’m driving down to New Orleans.”
“Does this have to do with your
patient? The one you got in trouble for
putting in isolation?”
“The tugboat he was taken off of,
it was pushing LNG barges to New Orleans.”
No comments:
Post a Comment