I was at 173.4 again. Did not eat much, the heat. Did a 1500 yard swim, a little short. The heat is unbearable.
So here is the next part which will include an answer to Tony's question as the introduction.
When I started this 7 years ago, I talked about time states. I was just mulling over things, one of the obvious ones being that there was no obvious reason for the numerator of pi to be 4. I thought, well there may be different states of time, so "clock times." As work progressed, I realized that I had no idea what I was talking about, but I still had these different conceputal frameworks, so I shortened "clock time" to "ct" so that it would not reference anything in particular. As it turns out, ct states are dimensional building blocks and they do carry features of different times, so I was wrong and right.
Xeno and Parmenides figured out that you could not have infinitely split dimension which necessarily means that the universe either has an unseen logic, or must be information based. While I use a positive/negative information system for the model, it would easily be a three or four part information system, but the positive and negative system works well. The most fundamental units are hidden even from my model. That hidden part is what people might call god, more accuartely it might be called the great information processor. This thing exists in an environment without time or dimension as we know it. We know what it does, it generates solutions to an iterated equation and remembers them. The result, in this case, is Tony, among other things.
Another mistake I made, which was only recently corrected was designating ct1 as space. In all the papers, I still use space nd ct1 together continuing the inaccuracy of the model, but at least I point it out now. Ct1 is partially pi, but with a numerator of 1 instead of 4. It is also a "pre-folding" state so that it exists only as a string of solutions to that iterated equation.
ct2 is pi with a numerator of 2 but it is folded and the nature of those folds is set out but unnecessary to an understanding of time and dimension. Since you might ask, it is basically a folding of 256:27 derived from the ratio sinpi(-1):sinpi(1). Pi-1 being pi with a numerator of -1 and pi1 being ct1.
Getting back to the point, space is not "just" ct1. Instead it is ct1-ct3 and possibly early folding of ct4. Space is a lot of stuff and for that reason when it is examined it appears to be many things, summarized in a group of effects: movement, gravity, and time for example. Anti-gravity, also called dark energy, is unfolding of ct2 to ct1 as opposed to gravity which is folding of ct1 to ct2. Hence, the universe "expands" because the net effect is an unfolding of space. What is called "the big bang" is merely when the universe went from a net folding to a net unfolding state which is something that necessarily happens because the universe is based on iterated equations with alternating postive and negative results; and this is just what iterated equations do.
The great "proof" of the model is that gravity fits perfectly with the other forces in terms of "scale" and things like black holes fit perfectly in terms of scale as ct5.
One of the "cool" things about the model is not just that it defines what a black hole is, but it also defines how much information is in a black hole and relates that to the amount of information around the black hole(s) in the form of a galaxy. When you look smaller, you can find the periodic table of the elements in the first two folds between the neutron and the black hole (ct5T1 and ct5t2 (the first two folds or transitions of the neutron towards the black hole). You can also see why a neutron is only stable within an atom and that electrons, far from being non-divisible fundamental particles, must be made up of a group of other particles. Galaxies wtihin galaxies,but each smaller galaxy having exponentially less information. You can see this in the picture that accompanies this post.
This brings me to the short definition of time which would be the totality of this post if Tony had not asked a question.
A short definition of Time
Speed and therefore energy are merely the amount of pre-time change which may be called change outside of a higher compression state.
Long before it was clear what was time or energy it became clear that all changes had to occur at the same rate. While offset fuse lengths provided some explanations it was not till the definition of time became clear that the rest of the change phenomena became clear.
What is time?
Time is a ‘frame’ of information which consists of pre-time changes. It can be further defined as ct1,2 and 3 net changes creating a dimensional framework which is a quantum bit of time before the next change in these states. That however is overly simplistic.
The reason for the over-simplification finding is that there is a type of time at ct3 comprised of ct1 and ct2 changes creating a net dimensional ct3 state. There are gradients of time with transitional states, so there is a time which is ct1,2, 3 and (for example) ct4t1-5 which creates a quantum bit for ct6 (theorized to be the photon) and another which may be the most important.
The most important is likely ct1,2,3 and ct4t1-6, photonic time; which forms the basis for our view of thermodynamics being a quantum time which could never be fully parsed, because full parsing would involve breaking it down to the ct4t1-5 variety.
When I started this 7 years ago, I talked about time states. I was just mulling over things, one of the obvious ones being that there was no obvious reason for the numerator of pi to be 4. I thought, well there may be different states of time, so "clock times." As work progressed, I realized that I had no idea what I was talking about, but I still had these different conceputal frameworks, so I shortened "clock time" to "ct" so that it would not reference anything in particular. As it turns out, ct states are dimensional building blocks and they do carry features of different times, so I was wrong and right.
Xeno and Parmenides figured out that you could not have infinitely split dimension which necessarily means that the universe either has an unseen logic, or must be information based. While I use a positive/negative information system for the model, it would easily be a three or four part information system, but the positive and negative system works well. The most fundamental units are hidden even from my model. That hidden part is what people might call god, more accuartely it might be called the great information processor. This thing exists in an environment without time or dimension as we know it. We know what it does, it generates solutions to an iterated equation and remembers them. The result, in this case, is Tony, among other things.
Another mistake I made, which was only recently corrected was designating ct1 as space. In all the papers, I still use space nd ct1 together continuing the inaccuracy of the model, but at least I point it out now. Ct1 is partially pi, but with a numerator of 1 instead of 4. It is also a "pre-folding" state so that it exists only as a string of solutions to that iterated equation.
ct2 is pi with a numerator of 2 but it is folded and the nature of those folds is set out but unnecessary to an understanding of time and dimension. Since you might ask, it is basically a folding of 256:27 derived from the ratio sinpi(-1):sinpi(1). Pi-1 being pi with a numerator of -1 and pi1 being ct1.
Getting back to the point, space is not "just" ct1. Instead it is ct1-ct3 and possibly early folding of ct4. Space is a lot of stuff and for that reason when it is examined it appears to be many things, summarized in a group of effects: movement, gravity, and time for example. Anti-gravity, also called dark energy, is unfolding of ct2 to ct1 as opposed to gravity which is folding of ct1 to ct2. Hence, the universe "expands" because the net effect is an unfolding of space. What is called "the big bang" is merely when the universe went from a net folding to a net unfolding state which is something that necessarily happens because the universe is based on iterated equations with alternating postive and negative results; and this is just what iterated equations do.
The great "proof" of the model is that gravity fits perfectly with the other forces in terms of "scale" and things like black holes fit perfectly in terms of scale as ct5.
One of the "cool" things about the model is not just that it defines what a black hole is, but it also defines how much information is in a black hole and relates that to the amount of information around the black hole(s) in the form of a galaxy. When you look smaller, you can find the periodic table of the elements in the first two folds between the neutron and the black hole (ct5T1 and ct5t2 (the first two folds or transitions of the neutron towards the black hole). You can also see why a neutron is only stable within an atom and that electrons, far from being non-divisible fundamental particles, must be made up of a group of other particles. Galaxies wtihin galaxies,but each smaller galaxy having exponentially less information. You can see this in the picture that accompanies this post.
This brings me to the short definition of time which would be the totality of this post if Tony had not asked a question.
A short definition of Time
Speed and therefore energy are merely the amount of pre-time change which may be called change outside of a higher compression state.
Long before it was clear what was time or energy it became clear that all changes had to occur at the same rate. While offset fuse lengths provided some explanations it was not till the definition of time became clear that the rest of the change phenomena became clear.
What is time?
Time is a ‘frame’ of information which consists of pre-time changes. It can be further defined as ct1,2 and 3 net changes creating a dimensional framework which is a quantum bit of time before the next change in these states. That however is overly simplistic.
The reason for the over-simplification finding is that there is a type of time at ct3 comprised of ct1 and ct2 changes creating a net dimensional ct3 state. There are gradients of time with transitional states, so there is a time which is ct1,2, 3 and (for example) ct4t1-5 which creates a quantum bit for ct6 (theorized to be the photon) and another which may be the most important.
The most important is likely ct1,2,3 and ct4t1-6, photonic time; which forms the basis for our view of thermodynamics being a quantum time which could never be fully parsed, because full parsing would involve breaking it down to the ct4t1-5 variety.
No comments:
Post a Comment