7 years ahead of everyone and 2 pounds overweight

In near perfect conditions, after exercising for many days with a single day break and eating healthy, I still find myself almost 2 pounds above my target weight.  Will it never end?
two days ago I did 2500, including 1400 im, a new record of sorts.  It was necessary to burn off the stress of a hard day.  Yesterday it was 3000 or 6000 yards on the rowing machine, I forget which, in 30 minutes plus 2.5 sets of weights, some areas just would not open up.

One of my lead men suffered an injury that put him out of the game, the injury of my fellow man is mine.  There was a changing and clarification of rules, every good thing came with a burden.  Events and my mind are racing forward at ever increasing speeds.

This is the state of physics, in agreement, but 5-7 years behind us: https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/dark-matter-theory.  Like the MIT article, he is theorizing what we have already modeled.  Well technically the MIT group are still scratching their heads.  We're filing patents and grants on what he is theorizing without a model.  In 2012 I published a book with the conceptual model he came out with, although it wasn't till 2018 that all the holes were filled in and a lot continues to happen.

Our stuff has been published, much of it for 7 years and yet scientific prejudice is so high that even when they see it, they ignore us.  Our time is coming....

Meditations in times of anxiety

You have been there for a long time, 40 years.
I can remember the first time my eyes settled on you.
The earth, and therefore the universe, stopped for a moment
There is no way to tell how long, but there is no time without movement

Fifteen years ago, everything ended in flood
And you were there again, a phantom from the past
The whole world had turned to chaos around us
All dark, all destroyed, all beautiful because you were there

I almost died from anxiety 7 years ago
You were there when the old world died
But a new world, one with you it was born
And I looked on the destruction and on you and it was good

You left me over and over again
There were times when there was nothing
Not even the hope that you were somewhere
There was no place to turn so I did this

In times of great loss there are two paths
One leads nowhere, the other is enlightenment
A chance to cast away everything and see in what's left
if there isn't something more important to find

And so I took the only path open to me,
because i was afraid to find nowhere
And in the end everything came together again
as it always seems to do, despite the terror

I looked around again and you were gone
And then you came back after I found the light
The anxiety was still there, the fear just under the surface
But there was a light all around me because you were there

The time between the event and the now is where anxiety lives
And we all live between the event and the now
except when we are in the past
but we cannot long stay in the past, the now is jealous

How long can I wait for the event
As it gets closer the anxiety about it grows
How long can I live without you
Every moment seems to stretch on forever

spooky action at a distance

I find myself mentally entangled with you.
I was up at 4am, sleepless; dozing till 5am when I undertook the first set of chores for the day.
I rowed for 30 minutes, falling just 60 yards short of the target in that time, but still short.  Then just two sets of weights.  It has been many days in a row without a break in exercise and I plan to swim today, outside in the near bitter cold to loosen weight tightened muscles.
How I wish your hands could sooth the hardened old muscle instead.
I have a big project which will take several hours and require much attention this morning, for now it is too early, too dark to begin, but that will change very soon, even though it is still early.

I moved a little closer to my concept piece.

Physics especially at the quantum level is famous for getting the right answer for the wrong reasons.

Observe: Albert Einstein famously said that quantum mechanics should allow two objects to affect each other’s behaviour instantly across vast distances, something he dubbed “spooky action at a distance”1. 

Physics is not about denying reality. It is about finding a suitable mathematical representation of that reality, one that not only describes reality accurately but can also be used to make sensible, verifiable predictions. Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist

The truth of entanglement is the lower dimensional sharing of lower ct information.  The entanglement of solutions which are closer to the information order sharing of ct3 which are shared, quite literally without a time component and hence at speeds which are only relevant once time is introduced.  They are, however, time limited in the sense that only so many pre-time changes occur when time is compared.  The number of these pre-time changes is huge.

There is another hidden truism, "vast distances" which must be differentiated from infinite distances.  In fact, the same limit issue with the number of changes during any period of time limits both the distance of near instant change; the entangled region of space affected by folding, greater for greater compression, etc; and the number of folds involved.

The article goes on to say "incalculable" complexity.  Again this is right for the wrong reasons.  The calculations themselves are simple, but they are so many that they are too complex to do except in the case of relatively simple solution.

Schrodinger, among others, has shown that they can be estimated and these estimates are used in science regularly.  The ability to get better estimates is built into the better math.

www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00120-6

Time as a commodity

I weighed within 1 pound of my target weight this morning and might have been able to time it to hit my target weight.
Yesterday I swam 2200  yards, the day before that another 2200 yards, the day before that yoga, the day before that 35 minutes on the stair machine and then three sets of weights.

I have not been to this blog in a while, too busy with hard science.  I have accomplished a lot more than a few blog posts in the last 7 months in the way of building science, practical applications and a team than I did in the 7 years preceding it; but then I am 7 years ahead of MIT; but still in many ways at the doorstep of science.

I should be posting more than every two weeks and I will think on this, but it is not something easy.  I am considering switching to a podcast format.

Time is something I only have in limited quantities despite my superior understanding.  The ways in which I have taken the science in prior posts and more clearly tied up the loose ends of energy, matter and time into very specific features seems mundane until I look at the state of current science, quite literally looking 7 years or more into the past; the equivalent of the pre-fire caveman being observed by the ceramic casting ancestors.

Its not that I'm smarter, which I am certainly not, it is just that I understand now the triad of connectivity between time, energy and matter and how all 3 are just another way of talking about dimension.  Haggni envisioned the conceptual framework, but not in the way that I have at last defined it.  Even Peter was hopelessly mired in time; the scientific vehicle mired to its axle in pre-aut nonsense like time.

And yet I have to deal with people talking about "your idea" crap; as if AuT was an idea and not a proven model.  It is like a civilized man being cooked for dinner by cannibals while trying to teach them proper nutrition.

I am, notwithstanding all of that, on the cusp in several respects of taking the next step.  It depends on much and it will determine if I am using what time I have wisely, or if the cannibals are ignoring the lecture.

There is some recognition of differences in time, but not quite the elimination in time of AuT in articles being published and this language is worth talking about.  It is not, perhaps, the most important part of this article, but it does go a little ways towards what AuT actually said way back at the beginning of last year:

"Controlling and probing electronic motion in atoms and molecules on their natural time scale of attoseconds is one of the frontiers in atomic physics and attosecond physics. Thanks to advances in laser technology, a number of attosecond experiments have been performed with ultrashort laser pulses. "
1x10^18 attoseconds make up a second, so its a measure of time which has a lot to do with "electron" time, but not so much to do with AuT T-12 time.
There is something to be said of the compression chart which appears in earlier posts, especially absolute compression; but what "time" primarily concerns it with is the 5x10^44 changes per second between ct3 and ct4.
compare this to the 3x10^8 km/sec that the milky way moves and you can get some concept of the relative ratio between the time clock of the true electron cloud and the 16^32 (10^38) relative compression of the black hole equivalent.
The attosecond is more of measure of the time frame of the nucleus, the proton, than the electron cloud, much of which is operating at essentially pre-time speeds.

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-attosecond-atomic-electron-cloud.html

There are ways to do the dimensional thing that has to be done, but it is hard to do; the idea of spinning up to it is not unlikely to yield results but take this example;  https://newatlas.com/physics/fastest-spinning-object-300-billion-rpm/ where atoms are being spun at per minute speeds which are almost not relevant to the time frames in question.

where is everything headed?

I have now reinstated swimming officially.  After a test swim, two swims with my "short pool equipment," were successful, both over 2000 yards.
I now have on my workout regiment: swimming, rowing, stair and yoga, the middle two with weights, the latter a rest day.  Then there is walking.
I have no idea where my weight is, although if recent past event are any indication it is at least slightly over the target weight.  The new year has come, happy new decade, all rights reserved.
Great transitions are afoot.  How easily they will be recognized remains to be seen.
If the team reassembly I am working on goes smoothly as early as the end of next week I will be in a position to file the grant application.
Well on the way to table top fusion in a way that is, if it works, a little too easy.

I fear that I have not published nearly as much as I should here, but there is so much material in the posts before this, that unless you have read them all, you would not know what you are missing.  There are summaries, referenced below.

It is possible without a reassembly of the team to move forward, possibly with the loss of two members; but it will be better with the expanded team where either there will be a net zero change or a net 1 change.  Either way things are getting excited.

Another nonsense step in the huge pool of wrong techniques, this one barely worth considering.
https://phys.org/news/2019-12-powder-gas-safer-effective-star.html
Let's stabilize plasma...why?
The answer is that invalid science says so.  In the meantime, the techniques tied to following the new model are being improved.
The next deadline is the 30th of this month.
Its a pretty serious deadline with a lot of work to do to get ready, but in the middle it suggests strongly that the grant needs to be finished and filed first, a target of less than 14 days now if there are no team problems.
Want to hear more?