Its a cool grey 61 degrees, warm by many standards.
I am outside, cold with a blanket over my legs like an old man. The idea of a contemplation chair I have stolen from a friend who noted the lack on condensation trails from airplanes from his yard. I do contemplate and regularly sit out here in all weather to do it, often with fingers too stiff from the cold to type.
I am outside, cold with a blanket over my legs like an old man. The idea of a contemplation chair I have stolen from a friend who noted the lack on condensation trails from airplanes from his yard. I do contemplate and regularly sit out here in all weather to do it, often with fingers too stiff from the cold to type.
I had an Illiad dream last night, hard to believe since i was up every 30 minutes to an hour.
By 6am, I was ready to give up; but a charlie horse, barely caught in time (by flexing my foot) propelled me out even quicker than I was ready.
I am oustide with a sweatshirt, hood and blanket, knowing this seasonable weather may set back swimming a day or two. In other parts of the country it is snowing, so this is not bad.
The ski lifts are closed and look abandoned and, like everything else, slightly apocalyptic and distopian.
The daily bike rides, though not challenging, are keeping at least the lower part of my body in something resembling shape. The upper part, meh. I have not done a set of weights in over a week and while I have done 3 pullups here and there and sets of 25 pushups here and there, I have not gotten into an upper body routine. I guess I am hoping not so much for the pool to get warmer but for myself to brave that cold water. My outside timer has also died and needs to be replaced, but it made it through a cold winter when the inside pool was closed for maintenance and I swam in the often over heated, often underheated outdoor pool, often in a cool rain.
Here is a link to a photo from the closed library, so many little things.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10221919731286428&set=a.10216480598271502&type=3&eid=ARA0sPcORMbOiUbuYfRhM2GiRLXuY6PP-Yh4sw7n7MfoJ6WJA2FPeWPUklh-6qGWYPMd5rA2XGV8V1ajThe daily bike rides, though not challenging, are keeping at least the lower part of my body in something resembling shape. The upper part, meh. I have not done a set of weights in over a week and while I have done 3 pullups here and there and sets of 25 pushups here and there, I have not gotten into an upper body routine. I guess I am hoping not so much for the pool to get warmer but for myself to brave that cold water. My outside timer has also died and needs to be replaced, but it made it through a cold winter when the inside pool was closed for maintenance and I swam in the often over heated, often underheated outdoor pool, often in a cool rain.
Here is a link to a photo from the closed library, so many little things.
I keep planning to follow up with the board for the homeless charity I am on. We canceled our meeting last Tuesday and no one has taken the important step of dealing with this continuing problem which must be taking on ominous ramifications. After this blog post or during it, perhaps.
I am in a weird place . While hardly fair, nothing in the universe is fair, I consider myself to be the leading quantum physicist in the world, not because I deserve it, but because I figured out how the universe opwerates below the level of thermodynamics. And...
I have figured out what fields are and what they are not which brings me to the physics part of this post.
And so we reach the O-old and N-new physics.
O- in quantum field theory, all fields are present everywhere. N information is folded and what we call "everywhere" is where this information is folded enough to give the impression of what we consider space, ct1-ct3. Fields are merely the ct3-4 transition states, especially the early ones, witin the less dense space.
O-The distinguishing characteristic of the Higgs field after electroweak symmetry breaking is that its “vacuum expectation value” (v.e.v.) is nonzero, hence particles that interact with the Higgs field effectively interact with the vacuum, even when the Higgs field is free of “excitations” (no actual Higgs particles are present.) N-say what? This is all just nonsense. VEV is the pre AuT estimation of the direction of compression of a matrix, but there is an aspect of true science here, because everytihng interacts and, in fact, the 'particle' refefrred to is actually made up of the lower information states and necessarily interacts with them, although the neutron function of the strong force which is only defined by AuT and at that in the unpubliished patents is different.
O-only about 1% of the masses of these protons and neutrons is due to their constituent quarks. The remaining 99% is due to the strong force binding energy; N-Mass is worth thinking about, but only in terms of what it represents and this is compression state.
O- gravity is not about rest mass. It is about all forms of energy, including rest mass. N-this is largely accurate as far as it goes, but it is important to note that what AUT has shown is the relationship, fairly complex in that it has multiple parts (compression and direction of compression) of the pre-time and post time features of compression which is largely a function of the amount of ct1-ct3 free within a matrix and the rate at which that ct1-ct3 is changing within the matrix as compared to other things, but correctly this old science recognizes the interconnection between all forms of information.
O- rest mass is not conserved, energy is. So even if a physical process were to cause the Higgs v.e.v. to vanish, it would just mean that the energy in the form of rest mass is converted into some other form of energy; however, insofar as gravitation is concerned, the same amount of energy remains. N-Energy is not conserved, since energy is a ratio of pre-time to post time states, ct1-3 and early ct4 transition states to higher compression ct4 transition states along with the change rate within the particular matrix. It is quite different math, but it doesn't prevent the hint of accuracy to remain.
O- gravity is not about rest mass. It is about all forms of energy, including rest mass. N-this is largely accurate as far as it goes, but it is important to note that what AUT has shown is the relationship, fairly complex in that it has multiple parts (compression and direction of compression) of the pre-time and post time features of compression which is largely a function of the amount of ct1-ct3 free within a matrix and the rate at which that ct1-ct3 is changing within the matrix as compared to other things, but correctly this old science recognizes the interconnection between all forms of information.
O- rest mass is not conserved, energy is. So even if a physical process were to cause the Higgs v.e.v. to vanish, it would just mean that the energy in the form of rest mass is converted into some other form of energy; however, insofar as gravitation is concerned, the same amount of energy remains. N-Energy is not conserved, since energy is a ratio of pre-time to post time states, ct1-3 and early ct4 transition states to higher compression ct4 transition states along with the change rate within the particular matrix. It is quite different math, but it doesn't prevent the hint of accuracy to remain.
There is no “fabric of spacetime”. It is a colorful expression used by science writers (and sometimes, sadly, bona fide scientists) but it is deeply misleading. No equation (within mainstream physics) describes any such “fabric”.
There is matter and there is the gravitational field. On account of being universal (affecting all objects the same way) the gravitational field determines the geometric relationship between objects (which is what leads to the misguided metaphor.)
When objects move… relative to what? Now that we established that there is no “fabric”, let’s remember the basic tenet of relativity theory: (inertial) motion is always relative. So an object that moves relative to you may be at rest relative to me. Its gravitational field may be changing over time as seen by you, but it is a static field as far as I am concerned. So there is no “moving dent”. Just a static field. And the fact that you are moving relative to me and the object makes no difference.
As to why we cannot move at, or faster than, the speed of light, it is a consequence of the fact that the speed of light in relativity theory is an invariant. That is to say, something moving at the (vacuum) speed of light moves at that speed for all observers. So imagine that you are an observer who is actually moving at the speed of light. Your speed, then, is the speed of light for all observers, including yourself. Yet relative to yourself, you are always at rest. Being both at rest and moving at the speed of light at the same time is an obvious contradiction. Similarly, if something moves faster than light, its motion is faster than light for all observers. So if you were moving faster than light, then relative to yourself, you’d be simultaneously at rest and moving faster than light. Again, an impossibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment