Day 239: Specter-introduction

Day 239, 94 days to the next election, the apocalypse continues.

This post begins the next paper from:

www.specterscientific.com

I have consistently weighed in around 173 pounds, essentially 15 pounds under my pre-covid weight, although most of that was lost before covid. I continue to less scrupulously follow the regimen of exercise, portion control and diet which I expect will get me down to my second target weight of 170 pounds and which has rendered my comfortable clothes too large and the once abandoned clothes comfortable. There isn't much need to dress up these days, but at least I am there.

My situation continues to be complicated. I have built my initial science team, done some incredibly significant work in the Covid arena and rewritten the NSF grant and resubmitted it along with letters of commendation; but I have a long way to go to monetize any of these; although the science is well secured for at least the next 90 days and probably until January if April of 2021 when some level of funding should be forthcoming. I realize I am more of an unrecognized Edison than a Ford and I need a Ford to recognize the potential of the project to myself; but there are areas where I ahead of the curve and areas where I am behind and this post includes the beginnings of the next assault on the recognition end of things; there are other undertakings on the monetizing end of things.

The introduction

AuT continues to accurately predict results based on the fractal model that was originally submitted and refused, without reason, to the APS.

The purpose of this article is twofold. One is to expose the institutional prejudice at the APS, the other is to update the articles previously submitted.

In the defense of the APS, the original submissions were of a very theoretical construct. The math was not clearly laid out and it was more of a concept piece, largely in the vein of the better known work of Max Nathan. The defense stops there.

The later article set out the math at the core of the pre-thermodynamic universe. While many of the critical features were not defined until later, and while it was a rough theory without all of the subsequent verification, AuT did reconcile and correlate gravity with the other forces, define the big bang and black holes and any one of these or the other solutions provided including the rough definition of space, time and quantum change alone would have made it worthy of publication and extensive recognition.

Why didn't the editorial board approve the article or even respond to requests that the promised critique of the article be made? The answer is obvious, institutional prejudice. The article was not submitted by an "insider" one of the "race" of PhD level physicists who were members of the APS. For this reason the first in a series of the most important physics papers ever written was published in the "Journal of Physical Mathematics." September 4, 2018 DOI 10.4172/2090-0902.10.00290 as Algorithm Model Defining Dimensional Features.

A more accurate version, but still reflecting the underlying math appeared in:

"Advances in Theoretical & Coputational Physics ISSN 2639-0108 May 3, 2019 based on an article submitted 2/2/19 and accepted on the 21rst. Space is the Same thing as Energy-The Underlying Structure of the Observed Universe Review Article Friedlander GM Clean Water, Inc, Attn: Gregory Friedlander, 11 S Florida St, Mobile, AL 36606, USA Corresponding author Friedlander GM, Clean Water, Inc, Attn: Gregory Friedlander, 11 S Florida St, Mobile, AL 36606, USA; E-Mail: gmfpc1@gmail.com Submitted: 02 Feb 2019; Accepted: 21 Feb 2019; Published: 03 May 2019

AuT is radical and while easily confirmed, it is so obvious that it shows the inability of the aristocracy of physics to consider anything which does not follow their preconceived and to a large extent brainwashed models. AuT eviscerates 100 years of Nobel prize theories including the work of Einstein on whose work it is based. This is important. It isnt' that AuT does not go far beyond the work of these other physicsts, it does. It is that AuT depends on the work of the last 100 years for its proof and providing an adequate basis for what it teaches. That does not mean that the other work survives AuT.

150 years of chemistry and 100 years of physics are doomed to be replaced by AuT and the paper which is the subject of this introduction is the proof of this assertion. It is impossible to "prove" the assertions against APS, those are implied. The only defense of the APS to what is otherwise clear prejudice; is that in the AuT universe, no one is guilty of their crimes in the traditional sense.

Science continues to pursue dead ends, despite coming close by accident; only AuT points us in the right direction for the next revolution. The other attempts are the equivalent of chickens pecking at the ground; so it is only right they are worried about chirping.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a33396352/nuclear-fusion-tokamaks-chirping-problem/