war with china-china's medal and economic model

Not surprisingly, China maximizes their medal count by first going after the least contested events.  This is not the case for all events, many are hotly contested and many reflect historic Chinese strength.
This is the identical startegy they used in targeting the US economy.  One has to wonder how predictable this model is.
You will see, if the model holds truth, a gradual move into other areas until they dominate, leaving only irrelevant events to the others, although who knows how many years this would take.  This, of course, is more of a fantasy.  The extension model may not apply to the olympics but by weakening the other competitors, the ability of others to bring stronger event teams forward may be reduced, will be reduced.
Are they confident that no one will see the parallel or are they so certain in the success of the economic model that they consider success already recognized or perhaps they understand the the political bodies in the US are too weak to react.

Russia the middle east and the war with china

The book concentrates on the systematic process embodied in the War With China (http://www.amazon.com/Trust-Lost-China-Term-Limits/dp/1466424338/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1344190407&sr=8-2&keywords=gregory+friedlander).  Russia which has traditionally been a cold war enemy and a hot war friend is affected more directly by US war with China.
While this has not been a part of the subject matter of the writings, it is an interesting and important dynamic in world politics.  Russia is, after all, the largest country in the world.  If world dominion was accepted as a possible option of war and the fictional book-second edition (www.worldwarc.net) coming out this year:  then Russia might seem proximately more concerned.  Also the USA v. Russia cold war model led to the current problems with China by providing a model to the Chinese.
The difference is that the US cold war victory was truly unintentional; reflecting the use of non-military economic "techniques".  One difference is that the US consistently used wasteful active military techniques because of a lack of sophistication.  The current political problems were only developing at that time, many of which started or were "perfected" (sarcasm) with the election of Lydon Johnson.  Perfected is emphasised because we perfected a defective method of handling the electorate
There will be more on this later, but this is to my friends who are connected to Russia who will undoubtedly be a part of whatever comes forward later.
And the middle east? That is the source of Russian and USA common military vs economic errors and will come up more later.

Olympics and the War with China

It is Sunday, so let's do something just for fun: Guess the Olympic Charts. read to the bottom for some additional charts.

As you know my "themes" are the need for term limits (honest government), USA immediate or short term intelligence as govenrment vs china's longer term intelligence, and that we are at war with china (USA v. China) but only the Chinese know about it because our government is blinded by avarice and the need to get re-elected.
The olympic results provide what I consider to be a fun look at the rise and fall of power as reflected by the olympics over the years, so a country like England may disappear even though they earned many medals because I only used data from the top teams each year so it's quicker.  This information just takes the top handfull of teams, leaves out many countries who were temporary visitors to this group but did not make it to the top 3 just to make the summary easier for me to put together.

The chart above shows graphically the rise in "Olympic" power of china relative to the US/Russia superpowers, past or present.  If one can extrapolate this chart to the USA transfer of its wealth, technology and manufacturing to china you can see where the USA failure to recognize a shift in priorities (from Russia to China) has eluded completely our leadership and the danger embodied in that failure.  But really, how can you tie olympic medals to our countries loss in war?    By the way, you can see below where Germany takes huge hits after they lose each of the major world wars as does Japan.
This is not scientific, of course.  It's just for fun on a quiet Sunday morning.
Here is the raw data, please excuse any mistakes and my appologies to the omitted olympic titles which I will try to supplement in the future:

year
1896
1900
1904
1906
1908
1912
1916
1920
1924
1928
1932 la
1936 ge
1948
1952
1956
1960
1964
1968
1972
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
2000
2004
2008
greece
46
2
34
war
us
20
48
239
24
47
64
95
99
56
110
57
84
76
74
71
90
107
94
94
94
108
101
92
103
110
gb
31
2
24
145
41
44
36
22
17
26
24
20
91
21
24
24
20
47
china
28
28
54
50
59
63
100
germany
13
8
13
15
14
25
39
24
101
24
26
42
50
51
106
126
142
142
82
65
56
49
41
france
11
108
40
19
16
42
41
25
20
19
32
18
29
37
38
33
40
sweden
65
63
29
25
24
21
46
35
belgium
42
13
italy
25
16
20
27
31
21
25
36
27
35
34
32
japan
18
20
19
29
25
29
37
soviet union
71
103
96
99
195
132
132
112
63
88
92
72
australia
35
22
18
17
59
49
46

War With China

War with China has gone some way; the theme being that they captured our manufacturing.  There is a great deal of blame laid at our system.   The increase in protests on the economy are better directed than this book, but perhaps they are missing the depth of focus that would allow something to be accomplished in the protests.

It should be noted that some of the most important issues and solutions come from other people’s observations.  Some have even risen to the level of becoming the substance of separate books which may or may not be available at the time you read this.  It is also significant that while solutions are suggested in this book, blank pages using the solutions provided as exemplary or setting out how to implement them would make this more relevant.

Now the equipment of world dominance is gone, loaded on boats which set sail long before congress or business or the general public woke up.  The courts and congress have lost jurisdiction long before any relevant action could be taken. That the same thing had happened around the country surprises no one today but everyone is surprised that our government and industry allowed this to happen without a discussion of the results..  

One original theme was that this was a war and that it was a studied and systematic undertaking, at least at some point.  The final thing taken, is not gone yet but will go with the money and the technology.  It is the schools where the scholarly, soothing catchphrases which calmed a nervous population originated.  Instead of screaming warnings, there were platitudes because the intelligence did not go out far enough.  There was no lack of wisdom, no lack of learning, just too much focus on one area of study, too short term an analysis within that area of study.  Perhaps the moral is that every writing of macro economics should have a section dedicated to the effect on war and extremely long term intelligence or even medium or short term intelligence.  This is a section of this essay, what is the difference between long term and short intelligence and immediate intelligence.

War with China-olympic uniforms

Hawker Beechcraft Chairman Rebuffs Security Concerns Over Sale To Chinese: EXCLUSIVE

The world is not Flat

There are some preaching that the world is flat and that China can do all the manufacturing for us, that the world is too inter-related for war.  That is so foolish that it is questionable why this foolishness was ever written, much less accepted.  The reason is probably that the right answer is too frightening, there is comfort in coming up with a meaning that ignores danger that substitutes empty hope for common sense that means that no one has to sacrifice, that the status quo can stay there forever.  It is better to say the world is flat, than to admit that we were at war and had to make uncomfortable decisions.  Now, as a result, we have to make desperate decisions.

Need more? 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2012/07/23/why-are-the-us-olympic-uniforms-being-made-in-china/

And the congressional reaction continues to miss the fact we are at war with china: www.worldwarc.net; www.moftheg.com

http://life.nationalpost.com/2012/07/18/olympic-fashion-controversy-is-only-thing-made-in-usa/

Fixing a hacked computer-by popular demand

download and run the folllowing 3 free programs:
> 1) malwarebytes (may be listed as
> anti-malwarebytes)
> 2) avg (unless you have other antivirus program
> 3) ccleaner (will speed up computer)
> 4) change all your e-mail passwords
>
> 5) (optional) subscribe to my blogs:
> http://gmfbooks.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/term-limits-and-the-war-with-china/
> http://gmfbooks.blogspot.com/

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Power-grid-failures-a-wake-up-call-for-aspiring-India/Article1-906410.aspx

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/world/asia/indias-power-grid-lacks-excess-capacity.html?_r=1

The power failure in india and the rolling blackouts (government imposed) in Pakistan show that even in the countries that supply us with manufactured goods, power is not to be taken for granted and with power goes modern living.

World War C is finished and should be available on all the markets within 3 months.
While you are waiting, here is an excerpt from the companion philosophy book.

TERM LIMITS, Long Term Intelligence AND HOW WE LOST THE WAR WITH CHINA

PHILOSOPY

The essay at the core of WORLD WAR C

INTRODUCTION

The man who removes a mountain begins by carrying away small stones.  Chinese proverb

Great love sometimes mutes the voice and must be told in poetry so the soul may speak. Also great horror often blinds the mind and must be hidden in prose.  So begins the Novel World War C. 

The first edition used a fictional mechanism to present the themes raised in this essay.  Once the novel written, it was easy to pull out the pieces and to examine them one at a time.  It might have been easier and clearing to write the essay first.  There may have more clarity, but that was a work of fiction in two separate versions and this is an essay.

The first edition-Trust-How we lost the war with China-is available on Amazon.  The second edition is coming out later this year.  Stay tuned here or go to www.worldwarc.net for updates.  Like us on facebook.http://www.facebook.com/moftheg