If I was in charge of the nobel prize for literature, it is very likely LS would be in the running for great works of literature containing 5 words or less. I think I should have named this one "jerking your time" or something. Anyway, some people have the turn of the phrase some do not.
My readers are whining about the unobservability of time if it attaches to tendencies to give matter dimension and to propel it (apparent, not actual-see the discussion of black holes) from the singularity.
First, as pointed out before, we do see a reflection of it in our study of gravitons. But while our search for this missing (and very irrelevant in hologram theory) particle takes us ever smaller; if instead we are looking for the hologram equivalent (time) we will never see it based on distance because time gives the appearance of dimension to tendencies and by itself has not connection with space. To some extent, it is space, but not in the absence of tendencies.
The most obvious place to find time (at least by its absence) is in black holes where it is stripped off and perhaps where it migrates or is rejuvenated in the radiations from those objects.
Temporary black holes (if they really exist and are not something else) might also yield clues to the nature of time. The good news is that time is all around us. It's not like the elusive dark matter (which is probably also all around us-see the discussion previously about time going in alternative dimensions or being attached differently to different tendencies). If you are reading this, the distance between the print and your eye is a function of the time difference between the time attached to the computer screen and the time in your retina that is picking it up. Likewise, if we are in the singularity as appears likely (that is all time and therefore all dimension is merely an illusion in the singularity) then there is not real distance or dimension there, but instead some feature of time causes the appearance of separation and this appearance can be easily manipuated (this is the discussion awaiting 20 physicists-see the great contest blogs) and we know it's easy even without me explaining it since all black holes lead back to the same singularity. that means faster than light travel (apparent) occurs at every black hole all the time which renders faster than light travel pretty ho-hum in our universe. If you have (as you do) black holes separated by a million light years, then travel a million times faster than light happens constantly within the known universe. What could be more boring than that! Here we are complaining about how long it takes to get to the moon or mars when black holes make a much longer trip instantly!
That's a clue but the way, so I'll move on and leave you to ponder it out yourselves if you insist on doing it and when you're bouncing across the universe faster (apparent) than light, you can say you figured it out on your own, ha!
Now as I've mentioned the foundation for this hologram theory in in the 1930's and 40's. Hence while it might be called new Hologram theory (compared to old hologram theory developed in the 1990's which is still stuck on strings and space-time and looking smaller and smaller and expecting to find something there and perplexed that Planck is mathematically right and observationally wrong). This inconsistency is only appropriate given ancient-new hologram theory's foundation (Einstein started it so let's just call it E-H theory. since it being both younger and older than new hologram theory makes just conceptualizing it sort of nauseating) and the fact that it is based on throwing everything out with the dishwater except for time and a singularity. E-Hologram theory is much more religious and spiritual in nature since time travel, seeing into the future, faster than light travel, and past lives is almost axiomatic (and common) and it readily lends itself to some concept of diety since as we move deeper into the singularity we discover that it is something which has no dimension as we experience it but has the ability (at least once you add a drop or two of time) of being as big as all creation.
I have some other stuff to write, but these are all good questions and one day enough people will ask the right one and I'll give some practical answers.
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
What is the size range to search for quantum time? Wrong!
differences between tendencies and matter
One recurring question is whether it makes a difference between talking about tendencies and matter. After all, matter when taken to a small enough particle size turn into something else (strings, holographic projections from two dimensions, etc). It can be properly argued that this is merely a symantic difference and I agree with that position. Note this same argument applies to energy since energy and matter are interchangeable at least at this level.
The fundamental concept difference, however, allows us to identify dark matter and dark energy which is the majority of the universe and even come up with interesting theories explaining those within the context of a common framework. This fundamental concept can be worded several ways, but the easiest is to state there is no space in the sense that we expeience it. Matter requires space to exist so we hold dearly onto our concepts of space while similtaneously stretching it beyond our experience (multiple universes, multiple realities, etc). What this means is that while we reject the idea that space is an illusion (despite objective evidence-discussed previously-showing it is) we readily accept the bizarre multi-dimension/multi universe models with hardly a qualm.
It is, after all difficult to reject reality as being an illusion, but it is not a true illusion, it is merely that there is only time and not space time and that time gives us the appearance of dimension. Again, this difference is largely symantic, but it is critical in allowing for faster than light travel (an every day occurence as black holes fall to a common singularity) and the discussion of how to achieve that outside of black holes which I am still not going to describe pending the challenge being fulfilled (see prior entries).
The main point of reference that this takes us to is allow us to work from the framework that we are in g-space which gives us the ability to examine it more closely. As long as we are trying to travel to the edge of the universe, what we're really doing is going out to the most distant phase shift of time and beyond that would be the singularity not some vast void or other universes; and yes that same singularity within each black hole and the same one we're in right now!
Now not all of the problems are solved. For example, dark matter while nothing more than tendency might be tendency with defective time (only one of the four prongs) or it may have different prongs (same time, but different dimensions) which would explain its elusive nature.
Eventually we must come to grips with whether time comes with multiple dimensions included or whether there are multiple times attached to each particle. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately) there is evidence for either and both have intuitive support.
The fundamental concept difference, however, allows us to identify dark matter and dark energy which is the majority of the universe and even come up with interesting theories explaining those within the context of a common framework. This fundamental concept can be worded several ways, but the easiest is to state there is no space in the sense that we expeience it. Matter requires space to exist so we hold dearly onto our concepts of space while similtaneously stretching it beyond our experience (multiple universes, multiple realities, etc). What this means is that while we reject the idea that space is an illusion (despite objective evidence-discussed previously-showing it is) we readily accept the bizarre multi-dimension/multi universe models with hardly a qualm.
It is, after all difficult to reject reality as being an illusion, but it is not a true illusion, it is merely that there is only time and not space time and that time gives us the appearance of dimension. Again, this difference is largely symantic, but it is critical in allowing for faster than light travel (an every day occurence as black holes fall to a common singularity) and the discussion of how to achieve that outside of black holes which I am still not going to describe pending the challenge being fulfilled (see prior entries).
The main point of reference that this takes us to is allow us to work from the framework that we are in g-space which gives us the ability to examine it more closely. As long as we are trying to travel to the edge of the universe, what we're really doing is going out to the most distant phase shift of time and beyond that would be the singularity not some vast void or other universes; and yes that same singularity within each black hole and the same one we're in right now!
Now not all of the problems are solved. For example, dark matter while nothing more than tendency might be tendency with defective time (only one of the four prongs) or it may have different prongs (same time, but different dimensions) which would explain its elusive nature.
Eventually we must come to grips with whether time comes with multiple dimensions included or whether there are multiple times attached to each particle. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately) there is evidence for either and both have intuitive support.
Arghhh! The WSJ's 4 "end game" scenarios for North Korea
If you have not read my posts relative this this, you may want to go back. Today, there is the WSJ perspective. If I seem like I'm screaming in agony at the stupidity that rules this country (even at the Wall Street Journal level) please read "China's weaponized Economy" or "World War C" and you'll understand my frustration. Scott Harold (Rand Corp)-His reasons for the current unrest in North Korea:
1) Controversy to extract economic concessions (oil/food)
2) Test the new prime minister of sk
3) increase domestic legit of new ruler
4) prelude to war-unlikely
Ok, I'll admit everyone at the Rand Corporation is smarter than I am and knows more facts.
North Korea is more than a rouge nation. It's a handfull of guys who get everything they want and basically hold their populations as slave labor. This is not altogether non-existent elsewhere and it's also the model in China and was, to a large extent, the model of communist Russia and continues, particularly in locallized areas, within the US (Want to see an example in your community, go to the government where too many employees are being paid too much-check this link if you want to see the statistics on US enslavement by just the regional governments: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-11/-822-000-worker-shows-california-leads-u-s-pay-giveaway.html). Politicians pay their croonies (school boards, municiple employees, etc) to keep them in power at the expense of everyone else, occasionally getting in a stink for throwing lavish parties or going on expensive trips at their population's expense.
Now none of these groups is declaring war (although I think Oregon would like to declare war on California to keep them from moving north) on their southern neighbors. You do see (and will continue to see a growing rash) of municiple bankruptcies to force financial concessions-1) reduce pensions, further enslaving their populations by enslaving their own ex-employees and 2) bond concessions (The Troika could learn a thing or two from Stockton and Birmingham) but you would see more of the North Korean model if that was the end game.
Come on, guys (at Rand). China using Korea as a puppet state to distract, drain and test the west may be a little extreme to you; but NKG would not last 60 days if the Chinese let their people know they could be free of tyrany. Get with program.
While the level of slavery practiced in California is not as open or as intrusive as the slavery in North Korea, you don't endanger your slave state just to make a point. If the NKG were to suddenly get some conscience and decide to free their people it would be one thing, but they have no interest in that. They wouldn't endanger their relationship with China and the South Koreans are not yet smart enough to realize that they could overthrow NKG's government (redundant?) merely by providing free internet service to North Korea (I'm sure some south korean's slapping his head righ now saying "duhhh!"
The end game has to be tied to maintaining power and that has to be tied to maintaining their unique relationship with the superpower to the North...of North Korea.
1) Controversy to extract economic concessions (oil/food)
2) Test the new prime minister of sk
3) increase domestic legit of new ruler
4) prelude to war-unlikely
Ok, I'll admit everyone at the Rand Corporation is smarter than I am and knows more facts.
North Korea is more than a rouge nation. It's a handfull of guys who get everything they want and basically hold their populations as slave labor. This is not altogether non-existent elsewhere and it's also the model in China and was, to a large extent, the model of communist Russia and continues, particularly in locallized areas, within the US (Want to see an example in your community, go to the government where too many employees are being paid too much-check this link if you want to see the statistics on US enslavement by just the regional governments: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-11/-822-000-worker-shows-california-leads-u-s-pay-giveaway.html). Politicians pay their croonies (school boards, municiple employees, etc) to keep them in power at the expense of everyone else, occasionally getting in a stink for throwing lavish parties or going on expensive trips at their population's expense.
Now none of these groups is declaring war (although I think Oregon would like to declare war on California to keep them from moving north) on their southern neighbors. You do see (and will continue to see a growing rash) of municiple bankruptcies to force financial concessions-1) reduce pensions, further enslaving their populations by enslaving their own ex-employees and 2) bond concessions (The Troika could learn a thing or two from Stockton and Birmingham) but you would see more of the North Korean model if that was the end game.
Come on, guys (at Rand). China using Korea as a puppet state to distract, drain and test the west may be a little extreme to you; but NKG would not last 60 days if the Chinese let their people know they could be free of tyrany. Get with program.
While the level of slavery practiced in California is not as open or as intrusive as the slavery in North Korea, you don't endanger your slave state just to make a point. If the NKG were to suddenly get some conscience and decide to free their people it would be one thing, but they have no interest in that. They wouldn't endanger their relationship with China and the South Koreans are not yet smart enough to realize that they could overthrow NKG's government (redundant?) merely by providing free internet service to North Korea (I'm sure some south korean's slapping his head righ now saying "duhhh!"
The end game has to be tied to maintaining power and that has to be tied to maintaining their unique relationship with the superpower to the North...of North Korea.
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
jerking off the numbers-hologram 4 point time
I don't know who Steffen Larsen is, but his comment on measuring distances below the planck length was worth preserving for future generations. So I dedicate this entry-"jerking off the numbers" to the that eloquent quote by SL.
Four point time is what we experience in o-space. That doesn't mean there are not dark people (dark matter people) who don't experience a different four point time in our same uinverse. In fact there could be multiple forms of dark people who cannot see us (except for our gravity) or each other (except each other's gravity) because they have different 3 dimension points and the same time point time.
The basic theory we'll use is that there is a singularity (so called because it has no dimension in the sense that we experience it) where everything in our universe happens at once. For the sake of simplicity I'll say that consciousness is either an illusion or that we have a bit of whoever set up the singularity that allows us to be self conscious. This latter idea is actually important in a number of applications including the (perhaps never to be disclosed) faster than light (apparent) travel.
So what is "four point time"
Time gives dimension as discussed earlier. Space is an illusion as everything is still in the hologram which is proven by all black holes dropping into the same singularity. In effect they strip off time from tendencies which accumulate sufficiently for this purpose.
Time is added to dark matter/energy to accelerate that type of matter away from the singularity conceptually, not not in reality. The "faster" things appear to move from the "center" of the universe just means that there is a greater phase shift of the time attached to the matter in question. This follows quantum mechanical rules, but only to the same extent that the universe follows Newtonian physics (that is, it applies until it breaks down under close scrutiny, but its still useful).
Time has three effects on the tendencies to which it is attached that we recognize as four dimensions (three that can be traversed in either direction but only by using up the fourth (what we call time). The tendencies all exist at the same time in the singularityand without dimension until time is applied. Time was applied fairly quickly and evenly to all the tendencies that we call o-space (or the universe) and occasionally the time is stripped off and the events go back to happening all at once.
Dark Matter/Energy having gravity must by extension have at least some form of time although it may be time withoutthe same 4 prongs. It may be that DM/DE is only missing one prong (different DM/DE tendencies could be missing different tendencies and would still be hard to recognize (in fact if they were missing two they would appear as a point if they were dimension; but if they were missing the fourth prong (the one way time) they would not appear to have any dimension at all because you need the linear time to move along to observe the other three dimensions. DM/DE may have "broken time".
If time can be broken, it can be examined more easily because it has component parts. Multiple universes are more unlikely in this senariou (alas) but not impossible (hurrah) because dark matter may have times that branch out and likewise it is even posible that tendencies may have different results (which would provide that we would have self determination possibly) with differently pronged time; although this would mean that the same tendencies would have different times attached to them at once which is an uncomfortable and non-intuitive result and most of the g-space hologram theory is intuitive (see the simple application of math in earlier discussions).
The measurement of matter smaller than the hypothysized planck constant is seen by SL as "jerking off the numbers" although it is practical given the enormous distances that give rise to a magnified view of something small far out in the universe would yeild a mathematical distance so measured. But this magnification is artificial since the two events are adjacent other than the effects of time on the tendencies involved (making one set of tendencies appear far away and the other close until the tendencies approach each other (one being radiation from far away). Times can therefore go out of phase and come back in phase relative to each other along the dimensional prongs of time.
The argument can be made that this is "jerking off" because even if there is only time, the dimensions are merely aspects of moving along time and the change of phase of one time relative to another but the distance still exists. However black holes show that the distances can be stripped and tendencies come together no matter how far apart given a sufficient concentration of tendencies and this may be true with so called temporary black holes where some aspects of time are temporarly stripped off.
More on all this later and a tip of the hat to SL.
Four point time is what we experience in o-space. That doesn't mean there are not dark people (dark matter people) who don't experience a different four point time in our same uinverse. In fact there could be multiple forms of dark people who cannot see us (except for our gravity) or each other (except each other's gravity) because they have different 3 dimension points and the same time point time.
The basic theory we'll use is that there is a singularity (so called because it has no dimension in the sense that we experience it) where everything in our universe happens at once. For the sake of simplicity I'll say that consciousness is either an illusion or that we have a bit of whoever set up the singularity that allows us to be self conscious. This latter idea is actually important in a number of applications including the (perhaps never to be disclosed) faster than light (apparent) travel.
So what is "four point time"
Time gives dimension as discussed earlier. Space is an illusion as everything is still in the hologram which is proven by all black holes dropping into the same singularity. In effect they strip off time from tendencies which accumulate sufficiently for this purpose.
Time is added to dark matter/energy to accelerate that type of matter away from the singularity conceptually, not not in reality. The "faster" things appear to move from the "center" of the universe just means that there is a greater phase shift of the time attached to the matter in question. This follows quantum mechanical rules, but only to the same extent that the universe follows Newtonian physics (that is, it applies until it breaks down under close scrutiny, but its still useful).
Time has three effects on the tendencies to which it is attached that we recognize as four dimensions (three that can be traversed in either direction but only by using up the fourth (what we call time). The tendencies all exist at the same time in the singularityand without dimension until time is applied. Time was applied fairly quickly and evenly to all the tendencies that we call o-space (or the universe) and occasionally the time is stripped off and the events go back to happening all at once.
Dark Matter/Energy having gravity must by extension have at least some form of time although it may be time withoutthe same 4 prongs. It may be that DM/DE is only missing one prong (different DM/DE tendencies could be missing different tendencies and would still be hard to recognize (in fact if they were missing two they would appear as a point if they were dimension; but if they were missing the fourth prong (the one way time) they would not appear to have any dimension at all because you need the linear time to move along to observe the other three dimensions. DM/DE may have "broken time".
If time can be broken, it can be examined more easily because it has component parts. Multiple universes are more unlikely in this senariou (alas) but not impossible (hurrah) because dark matter may have times that branch out and likewise it is even posible that tendencies may have different results (which would provide that we would have self determination possibly) with differently pronged time; although this would mean that the same tendencies would have different times attached to them at once which is an uncomfortable and non-intuitive result and most of the g-space hologram theory is intuitive (see the simple application of math in earlier discussions).
The measurement of matter smaller than the hypothysized planck constant is seen by SL as "jerking off the numbers" although it is practical given the enormous distances that give rise to a magnified view of something small far out in the universe would yeild a mathematical distance so measured. But this magnification is artificial since the two events are adjacent other than the effects of time on the tendencies involved (making one set of tendencies appear far away and the other close until the tendencies approach each other (one being radiation from far away). Times can therefore go out of phase and come back in phase relative to each other along the dimensional prongs of time.
The argument can be made that this is "jerking off" because even if there is only time, the dimensions are merely aspects of moving along time and the change of phase of one time relative to another but the distance still exists. However black holes show that the distances can be stripped and tendencies come together no matter how far apart given a sufficient concentration of tendencies and this may be true with so called temporary black holes where some aspects of time are temporarly stripped off.
More on all this later and a tip of the hat to SL.
Origins and failings (alleged) of the hologram universe theory
The discussion you have been (not) following deals with an offshoot of the hologram theory of the universe. A discussion of the early hologram theory (on which this part of the blog is based) is set out in some detail below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
Originator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_%27t_Hooft
This is conceived of as a "new model" sort of a 90's string theory. This blog deals with some of its earlier origins, going back only as far as Einstein in any detail who first proposed the instant theory of the hologram uinverse (one where time-space existed which we know to be an exageration of time) was a combination of space and time which existed for limited purposes.
Modern hologram (from the nobel prize winner's perspective) largely harkens back to string theory because of the practical physicist's unwillingness to give up matter for matter's sake and space for space's sake. This is entirely appropriate since we all keep track of time and occupy space.
The failings of the traditional hologram uinverse is that it forces dimension on g-space. It separates black holes by large distances, in particular the "interior" of black holes.
The name "hologram" is misleading and is not used in a fashion that is consistent with anything but "projection" in classic hologram theory.
In this discussion, the projection theory is further emaciated. Space and matter (and therefore energy) are rejected outright as parts of the perception of the universe, not to be confused with the actual universe which can only be observed at very small levels or very large levels.
Examples of large level observations are black holes, the big bang, the area immediately outside of the universe, etc.
Examples of small are just very small things which have no actual size given the theory that all dimension comes from time, but this is a difference between traditional string theory-which says you shrink things down small enough (the plank length for example) and yoyucan't get any smaller and the universe as its actually observed which says that measurement is a function of time and therefore size doesn't exist at all except for time.
The relevance of this is that there need not be any minimum size in a hologram universe since dimension is only a function of time. There is only the minimum amount of tendency to which time can attach itself. This tendency at this very small level has no size at all (in theory) since size is a function of time. Instead it is "action" oriented. It is merely an event happening which is given shape by the addition of time and it's tendency to give up that time is gravity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
Originator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_%27t_Hooft
This is conceived of as a "new model" sort of a 90's string theory. This blog deals with some of its earlier origins, going back only as far as Einstein in any detail who first proposed the instant theory of the hologram uinverse (one where time-space existed which we know to be an exageration of time) was a combination of space and time which existed for limited purposes.
Modern hologram (from the nobel prize winner's perspective) largely harkens back to string theory because of the practical physicist's unwillingness to give up matter for matter's sake and space for space's sake. This is entirely appropriate since we all keep track of time and occupy space.
The failings of the traditional hologram uinverse is that it forces dimension on g-space. It separates black holes by large distances, in particular the "interior" of black holes.
The name "hologram" is misleading and is not used in a fashion that is consistent with anything but "projection" in classic hologram theory.
In this discussion, the projection theory is further emaciated. Space and matter (and therefore energy) are rejected outright as parts of the perception of the universe, not to be confused with the actual universe which can only be observed at very small levels or very large levels.
Examples of large level observations are black holes, the big bang, the area immediately outside of the universe, etc.
Examples of small are just very small things which have no actual size given the theory that all dimension comes from time, but this is a difference between traditional string theory-which says you shrink things down small enough (the plank length for example) and yoyucan't get any smaller and the universe as its actually observed which says that measurement is a function of time and therefore size doesn't exist at all except for time.
The relevance of this is that there need not be any minimum size in a hologram universe since dimension is only a function of time. There is only the minimum amount of tendency to which time can attach itself. This tendency at this very small level has no size at all (in theory) since size is a function of time. Instead it is "action" oriented. It is merely an event happening which is given shape by the addition of time and it's tendency to give up that time is gravity.
hologram universe-we are in g space of course
You knew it was coming by now. We are in the singularity, we are in g-space (which isn't space at all).
How is the possible and how is it obvious (theoretically, of course).
1) If we can see the future and the past (not proven, but plenty of intrinsic data);
2) more importantly if black holes on opposite sides of the universe go back to the same singularity and
3) if there is no space (only time with multiple displays of dimension)
Then we must still be in non-dimensional space, the display is not out of the singularity but within it.
Time gives us the ability to "experience" o-space; but it is an illusion. We are in Einstein's singularity where everything happens at once. A type of "ground-hog" day but where Bill Murray makes all of the mistakes the exact same way over and over again (and me too!). Oh no! I'm going to make the same mistakes over and over again?!?
This is where the courage to act becomes so important. If we are in this perpetual ground-hog day, if we are basically in some type of script, read over and over again by time (or maybe just once all the way through) which is almost certainly the case if hologram physics holds up we should make the most of our time and not worry so much about what someone will think about us, but if the play is to be worthwhile one, we must do good things and improve our lot.
One way of doing this will be to get outside of the singularity (which will require more than apparent faster than light travel) but you'll have to wait till after FTLT for that little gem.
Also, just because we are a "display" on time within a singularity of something where everything has happened at once (and is happening at once without time) that does not mean the play cannot be re-written or even that we cannot do it ourselves. I have yet to discuss the rules of g-space. Instead the concentration has been on getting the focus back to where it needs to be...time and the singularity. Once we quit trying to force our physics to accept space and concentrate on the substance of our observational matrix (time) we should in short order be able to get back to the singularity (assuming we really want to go there. For g-space does exist, it is something concrete and amazing. It may have its own type of space which we can hardly imagine (without any time or maybe with all sorts of times, times in ways we cannot fully comprehend like "backwards time", "sideways times", "un-moving time", "non-dimensional time"...well we may actually experience that with dark matter and in the linear-one way time, "two way time" with or with traffic lights and crossing guards, "malleable time" the chance to do everything right (to say yes when you should say no).
It's really a wonderful opportunity, but I have other things to do this morning.
How is the possible and how is it obvious (theoretically, of course).
1) If we can see the future and the past (not proven, but plenty of intrinsic data);
2) more importantly if black holes on opposite sides of the universe go back to the same singularity and
3) if there is no space (only time with multiple displays of dimension)
Then we must still be in non-dimensional space, the display is not out of the singularity but within it.
Time gives us the ability to "experience" o-space; but it is an illusion. We are in Einstein's singularity where everything happens at once. A type of "ground-hog" day but where Bill Murray makes all of the mistakes the exact same way over and over again (and me too!). Oh no! I'm going to make the same mistakes over and over again?!?
This is where the courage to act becomes so important. If we are in this perpetual ground-hog day, if we are basically in some type of script, read over and over again by time (or maybe just once all the way through) which is almost certainly the case if hologram physics holds up we should make the most of our time and not worry so much about what someone will think about us, but if the play is to be worthwhile one, we must do good things and improve our lot.
One way of doing this will be to get outside of the singularity (which will require more than apparent faster than light travel) but you'll have to wait till after FTLT for that little gem.
Also, just because we are a "display" on time within a singularity of something where everything has happened at once (and is happening at once without time) that does not mean the play cannot be re-written or even that we cannot do it ourselves. I have yet to discuss the rules of g-space. Instead the concentration has been on getting the focus back to where it needs to be...time and the singularity. Once we quit trying to force our physics to accept space and concentrate on the substance of our observational matrix (time) we should in short order be able to get back to the singularity (assuming we really want to go there. For g-space does exist, it is something concrete and amazing. It may have its own type of space which we can hardly imagine (without any time or maybe with all sorts of times, times in ways we cannot fully comprehend like "backwards time", "sideways times", "un-moving time", "non-dimensional time"...well we may actually experience that with dark matter and in the linear-one way time, "two way time" with or with traffic lights and crossing guards, "malleable time" the chance to do everything right (to say yes when you should say no).
It's really a wonderful opportunity, but I have other things to do this morning.
Monday, April 1, 2013
China's Weaponized economy
While we are waiting for the requisite number of physicists to comment (excuse the pun) no one being in a hurry to hear the simplified explanation of faster than light travel; I will do my best to otherwise entertain with a global political view and additional storyline pieces.
As we move closer to the conspiratorial war with korea (see prior entries) I am spending a little more time on rhetoric and journey back to an earlier entry.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZt-KBzZIz4
As we move closer to the conspiratorial war with korea (see prior entries) I am spending a little more time on rhetoric and journey back to an earlier entry.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZt-KBzZIz4
This is a link to an early edition of the first chapter of "China's Weaponized economy"
We need to be aware the unlike other wars, there exists the possibility of escalation if we do not commit enough resources, it being China's unstated goal to continue undermining western economies (make them more dependent on china) and undermine the value of western currencies (as if they needed much effort to do that with our corrupted government) and ultimately instituting a Chinese world order (see World War C or China's weaponized economy for a complete discussion of this). The reasons for having a controlled escalation (possible with the nkg puppet state but more difficult if China was to take an active role) are discussed in prior entries.
We need to be aware the unlike other wars, there exists the possibility of escalation if we do not commit enough resources, it being China's unstated goal to continue undermining western economies (make them more dependent on china) and undermine the value of western currencies (as if they needed much effort to do that with our corrupted government) and ultimately instituting a Chinese world order (see World War C or China's weaponized economy for a complete discussion of this). The reasons for having a controlled escalation (possible with the nkg puppet state but more difficult if China was to take an active role) are discussed in prior entries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)