What is the size range to search for quantum time? Wrong!

If I was in charge of the nobel prize for literature, it is very likely LS would be in the running for great works of literature containing 5 words or less.  I think I should have named this one "jerking your time" or something.  Anyway, some people have the turn of the phrase some do not.
My readers are whining about the unobservability of time if it attaches to tendencies to give matter dimension and to propel it (apparent, not actual-see the discussion of black holes) from the singularity.
First, as pointed out before, we do see a reflection of it in our study of gravitons.  But while our search for this missing (and very irrelevant in hologram theory) particle takes us ever smaller; if instead we are looking for the hologram equivalent (time) we will never see it based on distance because time gives the appearance of dimension to tendencies and by itself has not connection with space.  To some extent, it is space, but not in the absence of tendencies.
The most obvious place to find time (at least by its absence) is in black holes where it is stripped off and perhaps where it migrates or is rejuvenated in the radiations from those objects.
Temporary black holes (if they really exist and are not something else) might also yield clues to the nature of time.  The good news is that time is all around us.  It's not like the elusive dark matter (which is probably also all around us-see the discussion previously about time going in alternative dimensions or being attached differently to different tendencies).  If you are reading this, the distance between the print and your eye is a function of the time difference between the time attached to the computer screen and the time in your retina that is picking it up.  Likewise, if we are in the singularity as appears likely (that is all time and therefore all dimension is merely an illusion in the singularity) then there is not real distance or dimension there, but instead some feature of time causes the appearance of separation and this appearance can be easily manipuated (this is the discussion awaiting 20 physicists-see the great contest blogs) and we know it's easy even without me explaining it since all black holes lead back to the same singularity.  that means faster than light travel (apparent) occurs at every black hole all the time which renders faster than light travel pretty ho-hum in our universe.  If you have (as you do) black holes separated by a million light years, then travel a million times faster than light happens constantly within the known universe.  What could be more boring than that!  Here we are complaining about how long it takes to get to the moon or mars when black holes make a much longer trip instantly!
That's a clue but the way, so I'll move on and leave you to ponder it out yourselves if you insist on doing it and when you're bouncing across the universe faster (apparent) than light, you can say you figured it out on your own, ha!
Now as I've mentioned the foundation for this hologram theory in in the 1930's and 40's.  Hence while it might be called new Hologram theory (compared to old hologram theory developed in the 1990's which is still stuck on strings and space-time and looking smaller and smaller and expecting to find something there and perplexed that Planck is mathematically right and observationally wrong).  This inconsistency is only appropriate given ancient-new hologram theory's foundation (Einstein started it so let's just call it E-H theory. since it being both younger and older than new hologram theory makes just conceptualizing it sort of nauseating) and the fact that it is based on throwing everything out with the dishwater except for time and a singularity.  E-Hologram theory is much more religious and spiritual in nature since time travel, seeing into the future, faster than light travel, and past lives is almost axiomatic (and common) and it readily lends itself to some concept of diety since as we move deeper into the singularity we discover that it is something which has no dimension as we experience it but has the ability (at least once you add a drop or two of time) of being as big as all creation.
I have some other stuff to write, but these are all good questions and one day enough people will ask the right one and I'll give some practical answers.