you were in my dreams last night
ensuring that I greeted the dawn
with sleepless eyes and restless
outside I felt the hurricane breeze
warm and tropical and steady
portending the great cataclysm
for we chose the storm coast
and we have learned the signs
the blood warm swimming
the evenings of spider lightning
dark rolling clouds and low skies
vast anvil mountains moving distant
and you visiting my slumber
downtown full of the well heeled
the meeting I wasn't dressed for
trapped outside looking in
the strange messages called
over unsuspected loudspeakers
knowing you are close
but unable to find you
and all of the time knowing
storm coast waters are coming
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Sunday, July 21, 2013
Chobama-the connection between China and Obama's new direction
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324144304578620332573923090.html
Obama wants to build the middle class and create jobs. That task is a difficult one, but it is impossible until he recognizes not only that we are exporting 50,000 manufacturing jobs a month overseas, but that this is the result of an intentional exercise to undermine the manufacturing dominance of the USA and export it to China.
Once that is recognized, there are several paths (defined in "China's Weaponized Economy") to potentially deal with this. These paths serve multiple functions since they concentrate on the application of immediate, short term and long term intelligence to the problems at hand. They not only allow us to face the Chobama problem, but they also create jobs by creating a mechanism to see the problems that need to be addressed in the future today.
We have a government with very limited vision and the president is not immune from the problems of short term tunnel vision. With some effort, the message of the CWE will get out and steps can be taken to force some form of evolutionary intelligence on congress through the mechanisms taught therein before the harder lessons set out in World War C are forced on the rest of the world by a China, dominating the USA with export USA manufacturing and the associated technology and wealth.
Obama wants to build the middle class and create jobs. That task is a difficult one, but it is impossible until he recognizes not only that we are exporting 50,000 manufacturing jobs a month overseas, but that this is the result of an intentional exercise to undermine the manufacturing dominance of the USA and export it to China.
Once that is recognized, there are several paths (defined in "China's Weaponized Economy") to potentially deal with this. These paths serve multiple functions since they concentrate on the application of immediate, short term and long term intelligence to the problems at hand. They not only allow us to face the Chobama problem, but they also create jobs by creating a mechanism to see the problems that need to be addressed in the future today.
We have a government with very limited vision and the president is not immune from the problems of short term tunnel vision. With some effort, the message of the CWE will get out and steps can be taken to force some form of evolutionary intelligence on congress through the mechanisms taught therein before the harder lessons set out in World War C are forced on the rest of the world by a China, dominating the USA with export USA manufacturing and the associated technology and wealth.
Saturday, July 20, 2013
The evolution of E-hologram Theory: a fun reminiscence; exploration remembered
This is a fun chapter in the book, so I thought I would share it for any long time readers of this blog.
The evolution of E-hologram Theory:
I have always had a problem with time. It is accepted, but it is strange in that you can look down dimensions and see time in the past, but you can only exist in an infinitely thin layer of time. Had my understanding of the relationship been better, this ability to look down dimensions to see past times would have suggested that time and dimension were the same thing; but no one else saw this relationship and neither did I.
I was reading Steven Hawkin’s book on Hologram theory that said the universe was a projection and that started the next phase of the investigation. The idea that we are a projection was originally a tenant of e-hologram theory. It was fairly unsatisfying and is firmly rejected except as a possibility of an unlikely road bypassed in the haste to find the real fundamentals. E-hologram theory accepts space and time, projections require space and any theory that “accepts” time instead of explaining it would be considered “vapid” under e-hologram theory. Of course what is vapid under the theory is fundamental in everyday life, so this “strangeness” in e-hologram theory forces us to accept the Newtonian universe or reject it. This “rejection” is not without precedent and relativity is the first break.
The first break between hologram theory and e-hologram theory came with the application of another Einsteinian proposition. “The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once.” This proposition led to the concept that there is a singularity, a place without time, or a place where time has not “uncoiled” where everything does happen at once.
This singularity is in fact observed in the universe as black holes. Since there is only one singularity under the Einsteinian Hologram model, all of these black holes must go to the same place, irregardless of how far apart they are. I thought of matter and energy differently, but they were instead the product of “potential” or “tendencies” for things to happen in the singularity. There was one major step I had to make.
I didn’t make the obvious jump immediately, but I was hesitate to give up the old fashioned views of time and space. I should have seen that space cannot exist, that we remain in the singularity, that time only gives the illusion of dimension. Unfortunately, I was focused on gravity being surrendered and the theorized tendencies existing in the singularity. Only when the math was applied and only when I began to solve equations with time did I realize that it wasn’t gravity being stripped. It was time.
The next big break came with the examination of time within the singularity. It is well understood that what we call “vacuum” is as full as what we call energy and matter. Only now is it completely clear that time coils and uncoils from the singularity to give no only dimension, but all existence within a singularity where none of these exist except as an illusion. It is now clear, however, that matter, dimension, energy and everything else we observe is not the application of time to tendency, but the uncoiling of time in an environment that has no dimensions as we experience them.
Much of the nomenclature in this book continues to cling to “tendencies”, “g-space” (the space of the singularity) and “o-space” (the space that we experience); but these are only tools for examining something more elegant and more circular and therefore more troubling.
The "E" in e-hologram theory comes from Einstein who laid the groundwork for the theory by stating "The only reason for time is so that everything does not happen at once" thereby implying that in the absence of time, things do happen at once, at least potentially. To attempt to define this “potential” the term “tendencies” is used. These tendencies are the “tendency” for something to happen once time is applied and is stuff of the singularity.
The second foundational column of E-H theory comes from String theory of the Hologram Universe which looks at matter as a projection in “Space-Time”.
I was originally introduced to the hologram theory by Steven Hawkin’s book on the topic which allows that we are merely a projection on an ever-expanding bubble, perhaps a two dimensional projection although the number of dimensions is optional. There are problems with the projection theory which are hologram theorist’s problems. These problems are eliminated by E-hologram theory which eliminates all dimensions except as a function of time.
Equally important, mathematical “proofs” will show that the only possible method of reconciling the interaction of time and space is to eliminate space in favor of time. Those proofs come later in this text.
Hence, we are not a true “projection” because time only gives the impression of projection. The same broad principle that allows for us to look at ourselves as a 3 dimensional projection of a two dimensional “post-singularity” allows us to take the next step back. Instead of insisting on a post singularity two dimensional projection we are still in the singularity, time only gives the appearance of dimension.
There is no space-time. There is only time, space is an illusion.
Unlike hologram theory, e-hologram theory deals with most of the “unknowns” in our universe and joins magic, the occult and physics in one neat bundle. It allows for a unified field theory which is actually observed in the universe. It is not alone, being as close as you can get to hologram theory without being the same thing.
While some of you are scoffing already, you will see as you read on that this bizarre conceptual framework is actually supported by math and by the observed universe. Read on, if you dare, you will scoff further.
The evolution of E-hologram Theory:
I have always had a problem with time. It is accepted, but it is strange in that you can look down dimensions and see time in the past, but you can only exist in an infinitely thin layer of time. Had my understanding of the relationship been better, this ability to look down dimensions to see past times would have suggested that time and dimension were the same thing; but no one else saw this relationship and neither did I.
I was reading Steven Hawkin’s book on Hologram theory that said the universe was a projection and that started the next phase of the investigation. The idea that we are a projection was originally a tenant of e-hologram theory. It was fairly unsatisfying and is firmly rejected except as a possibility of an unlikely road bypassed in the haste to find the real fundamentals. E-hologram theory accepts space and time, projections require space and any theory that “accepts” time instead of explaining it would be considered “vapid” under e-hologram theory. Of course what is vapid under the theory is fundamental in everyday life, so this “strangeness” in e-hologram theory forces us to accept the Newtonian universe or reject it. This “rejection” is not without precedent and relativity is the first break.
The first break between hologram theory and e-hologram theory came with the application of another Einsteinian proposition. “The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once.” This proposition led to the concept that there is a singularity, a place without time, or a place where time has not “uncoiled” where everything does happen at once.
This singularity is in fact observed in the universe as black holes. Since there is only one singularity under the Einsteinian Hologram model, all of these black holes must go to the same place, irregardless of how far apart they are. I thought of matter and energy differently, but they were instead the product of “potential” or “tendencies” for things to happen in the singularity. There was one major step I had to make.
I didn’t make the obvious jump immediately, but I was hesitate to give up the old fashioned views of time and space. I should have seen that space cannot exist, that we remain in the singularity, that time only gives the illusion of dimension. Unfortunately, I was focused on gravity being surrendered and the theorized tendencies existing in the singularity. Only when the math was applied and only when I began to solve equations with time did I realize that it wasn’t gravity being stripped. It was time.
The next big break came with the examination of time within the singularity. It is well understood that what we call “vacuum” is as full as what we call energy and matter. Only now is it completely clear that time coils and uncoils from the singularity to give no only dimension, but all existence within a singularity where none of these exist except as an illusion. It is now clear, however, that matter, dimension, energy and everything else we observe is not the application of time to tendency, but the uncoiling of time in an environment that has no dimensions as we experience them.
Much of the nomenclature in this book continues to cling to “tendencies”, “g-space” (the space of the singularity) and “o-space” (the space that we experience); but these are only tools for examining something more elegant and more circular and therefore more troubling.
The "E" in e-hologram theory comes from Einstein who laid the groundwork for the theory by stating "The only reason for time is so that everything does not happen at once" thereby implying that in the absence of time, things do happen at once, at least potentially. To attempt to define this “potential” the term “tendencies” is used. These tendencies are the “tendency” for something to happen once time is applied and is stuff of the singularity.
The second foundational column of E-H theory comes from String theory of the Hologram Universe which looks at matter as a projection in “Space-Time”.
I was originally introduced to the hologram theory by Steven Hawkin’s book on the topic which allows that we are merely a projection on an ever-expanding bubble, perhaps a two dimensional projection although the number of dimensions is optional. There are problems with the projection theory which are hologram theorist’s problems. These problems are eliminated by E-hologram theory which eliminates all dimensions except as a function of time.
Equally important, mathematical “proofs” will show that the only possible method of reconciling the interaction of time and space is to eliminate space in favor of time. Those proofs come later in this text.
Hence, we are not a true “projection” because time only gives the impression of projection. The same broad principle that allows for us to look at ourselves as a 3 dimensional projection of a two dimensional “post-singularity” allows us to take the next step back. Instead of insisting on a post singularity two dimensional projection we are still in the singularity, time only gives the appearance of dimension.
There is no space-time. There is only time, space is an illusion.
Unlike hologram theory, e-hologram theory deals with most of the “unknowns” in our universe and joins magic, the occult and physics in one neat bundle. It allows for a unified field theory which is actually observed in the universe. It is not alone, being as close as you can get to hologram theory without being the same thing.
While some of you are scoffing already, you will see as you read on that this bizarre conceptual framework is actually supported by math and by the observed universe. Read on, if you dare, you will scoff further.
Friday, July 19, 2013
e-hologram theory and the dearth of blog posts
Now some of you know other reasons for the shortage of blog posts lately, but the major factor is that the first edition of E-Hologram Theory is well underway. Many new and fascinating disclosures await the physicists and laymen alike (other than those you'll find in this blog, but the secrets to faster than light (apparent) travel in the e-hologram theory will remain shrouded in the contest set out in earlier blogs.
An example of the text of newly disclosed theoretical constructs is the following quote which comes from (tentative) Chapter 16
Gravity can be seen as many things. The tendency for time to be given up from possibility or the tendency of the time to recoil absorbing it’s dimensions. If time is consciousness then what is seen is gravity.
It’s relationship to the singularity merely a coincidence tied to its tendency to give up time and return to the singularity or it could be a visualization, in either direction. That is, if god exists, he sees gravity.
Gravity is the tendency to give up time and the tendency to return to singularity, but this only means that when time winds back up, giving up its dimensional qualities, gravity is what is experienced in those dimensional qualities as time ravels and unravels.
An example of the text of newly disclosed theoretical constructs is the following quote which comes from (tentative) Chapter 16
Gravity can be seen as many things. The tendency for time to be given up from possibility or the tendency of the time to recoil absorbing it’s dimensions. If time is consciousness then what is seen is gravity.
It’s relationship to the singularity merely a coincidence tied to its tendency to give up time and return to the singularity or it could be a visualization, in either direction. That is, if god exists, he sees gravity.
Gravity is the tendency to give up time and the tendency to return to singularity, but this only means that when time winds back up, giving up its dimensional qualities, gravity is what is experienced in those dimensional qualities as time ravels and unravels.
Sunday, July 14, 2013
snowden, zimmerman, martin, screaming fire in a movie theater and the people's justice one of three
Can Snowden get the people's justice or would his crime go before a state tribunal, "the king's justice"? The article below, the genesis of the "fire in the movie theater" line of reasoning-
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/students_in_action/schenck.html
is worth considering. In the Schenck v. United States (249 U.S. 47, 1919) case the supreme court tackled the first amendment issues that govern the government's right to protect itself and held that the circumstances of the moment governed those rights. The use of secret courts http://www.acslaw.org/files/Prosecuting-Suspected-Terrorists.pdf (call them military tribunals) and sealed records is one way of handling these.
Let me make a quick aside to Abbie Hoffman who responded to the court's reasoning many years later by stating that he was (in a much different war and much different America) "Yelling theater in a crowed fire". What makes this relevant (other than the fact that it is witty) is that we need to recognize that the wars today, the world today and the America today is different and it will be different again tomorrow. Next we may find ourselves whispering theater because we are engulfed in Hoffman's fire and cannot breath louder. For those of you who feel this is unlikely, look at Snowden's recent concession to (at least temporarily) stop disclosing information.
Martin received the justice of the streets, and his sentence was for a crime created by the circumstances and one for which only one person gave the death sentence.
Zimmerman received the people's justice (see: http://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/en_usa-int-desc-guide.html) for an article applicable to this; a court duly empaneled where a judgment call is reached based on disputed facts and one which, given an infinite series of potential outcomes, would probably break around 50/50 depending on attorneys and jury composition as much as the testimony. I can't say I watched anything but the summaries, and while many could argue it was a bungled prosecution as much as anything that led to the verdict in this case, that is the way that the people's justice works.
Long before 9/11 the government had the technology to monitor every phone call that was made. Voice recognition and high speed computers render this a relatively modest task. Further, large storage arrays mean that not only can the data be monitored, but it can be stored...forever.
George Orwell's ideas of government monitoring are relatively modest in a world where everyone carries a tracking device voluntarily. Most of us hesitate to leave our cell phones in the other room; much less farther away. If you wonder why all the large governments seem to be willing to have Snowden "shut up" it may be that all the governments in question are doing the same sort of monitoring of their own people.
The difference today is that Snowden has let everyone know that the government is doing what any of us would have suspected they were doing even without his disclosures. While we can assume that the below-average terrorist was too stupid to realize this; it's likely that the above average terrorist could explain this situation. There are other issues related to this that I am hesitant to discuss openly, but I've seen where this leads personally and no one would like it. If you think the monitoring of everything you say and do is right around the corner, suffice it to say that it is behind a corner that is behind and not in front of you.
The supreme court has allowed that "circumstances" allow it to curb first amendment rights (first in this case means most important). I.E. the government, in order to protect itself, can prosecute you for espionage and the relative need to protect itself is a sliding scale which will necessarily change with circumstances. We have imprisoned using war tribunals "suspected terrorists" without trial or constitutional protections for long periods of time in Guantanamo even though justice continues to trickle down in that direction using these "war powers" as applied to terrorism.
The movie theater argument in Schenck was applied to subversive materials designed, not to disclose sensitive information, but to discourage participation in the war. This means that active participation in direct harm is not a pre-requisite to the government arresting people.
In World War C, I discuss the use of technology to direct weapons and anyone who things that a determined government could not use your cell phone to fire a weapon directly at you, has not watched much war coverage. While lighting a target with a laser beam makes a lot of sense in a battlefield, the ability to target using signals from the enemy dates back to World War II and World War I in other cases. The fact that we all carry a bulls eye in our pockets today is just the latest twist in a headlong rush towards "1984" (the book not the year) and we have long since passed Orwell's envisioning in the future in many respects and can expect to pass it in all other respects as time goes on. In China's Weaponized Economy I give a method of dealing with the government on these issues; but that treatment is at best temporary and inadequate and those of you expecting a short answer will have to wait for me to come up with one which is unlikely to happen.
Would Snowden accept the people's justice is a good question. He has only been offered the King's justice and many would suspect a government inspired "justice of the streets" with the killer being a government agency in place of an individual like Zimmerman is not a stretch.
Snowden is a smart guy and when he decided to stand up and scream "theater" (thereby ironically creating theater) in this crowded fire, he must have had some idea of what he was doing. What type of justice he is offered will play a role in his future if he makes it there. We are listening, but he has screamed "George Orwell's 1984 has come to America" and not everyone is listening, although everyone has heard it.
More on this later.
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/students_in_action/schenck.html
is worth considering. In the Schenck v. United States (249 U.S. 47, 1919) case the supreme court tackled the first amendment issues that govern the government's right to protect itself and held that the circumstances of the moment governed those rights. The use of secret courts http://www.acslaw.org/files/Prosecuting-Suspected-Terrorists.pdf (call them military tribunals) and sealed records is one way of handling these.
Let me make a quick aside to Abbie Hoffman who responded to the court's reasoning many years later by stating that he was (in a much different war and much different America) "Yelling theater in a crowed fire". What makes this relevant (other than the fact that it is witty) is that we need to recognize that the wars today, the world today and the America today is different and it will be different again tomorrow. Next we may find ourselves whispering theater because we are engulfed in Hoffman's fire and cannot breath louder. For those of you who feel this is unlikely, look at Snowden's recent concession to (at least temporarily) stop disclosing information.
Martin received the justice of the streets, and his sentence was for a crime created by the circumstances and one for which only one person gave the death sentence.
Zimmerman received the people's justice (see: http://www.oas.org/juridico/mla/en/usa/en_usa-int-desc-guide.html) for an article applicable to this; a court duly empaneled where a judgment call is reached based on disputed facts and one which, given an infinite series of potential outcomes, would probably break around 50/50 depending on attorneys and jury composition as much as the testimony. I can't say I watched anything but the summaries, and while many could argue it was a bungled prosecution as much as anything that led to the verdict in this case, that is the way that the people's justice works.
Long before 9/11 the government had the technology to monitor every phone call that was made. Voice recognition and high speed computers render this a relatively modest task. Further, large storage arrays mean that not only can the data be monitored, but it can be stored...forever.
George Orwell's ideas of government monitoring are relatively modest in a world where everyone carries a tracking device voluntarily. Most of us hesitate to leave our cell phones in the other room; much less farther away. If you wonder why all the large governments seem to be willing to have Snowden "shut up" it may be that all the governments in question are doing the same sort of monitoring of their own people.
The difference today is that Snowden has let everyone know that the government is doing what any of us would have suspected they were doing even without his disclosures. While we can assume that the below-average terrorist was too stupid to realize this; it's likely that the above average terrorist could explain this situation. There are other issues related to this that I am hesitant to discuss openly, but I've seen where this leads personally and no one would like it. If you think the monitoring of everything you say and do is right around the corner, suffice it to say that it is behind a corner that is behind and not in front of you.
The supreme court has allowed that "circumstances" allow it to curb first amendment rights (first in this case means most important). I.E. the government, in order to protect itself, can prosecute you for espionage and the relative need to protect itself is a sliding scale which will necessarily change with circumstances. We have imprisoned using war tribunals "suspected terrorists" without trial or constitutional protections for long periods of time in Guantanamo even though justice continues to trickle down in that direction using these "war powers" as applied to terrorism.
The movie theater argument in Schenck was applied to subversive materials designed, not to disclose sensitive information, but to discourage participation in the war. This means that active participation in direct harm is not a pre-requisite to the government arresting people.
In World War C, I discuss the use of technology to direct weapons and anyone who things that a determined government could not use your cell phone to fire a weapon directly at you, has not watched much war coverage. While lighting a target with a laser beam makes a lot of sense in a battlefield, the ability to target using signals from the enemy dates back to World War II and World War I in other cases. The fact that we all carry a bulls eye in our pockets today is just the latest twist in a headlong rush towards "1984" (the book not the year) and we have long since passed Orwell's envisioning in the future in many respects and can expect to pass it in all other respects as time goes on. In China's Weaponized Economy I give a method of dealing with the government on these issues; but that treatment is at best temporary and inadequate and those of you expecting a short answer will have to wait for me to come up with one which is unlikely to happen.
Would Snowden accept the people's justice is a good question. He has only been offered the King's justice and many would suspect a government inspired "justice of the streets" with the killer being a government agency in place of an individual like Zimmerman is not a stretch.
Snowden is a smart guy and when he decided to stand up and scream "theater" (thereby ironically creating theater) in this crowded fire, he must have had some idea of what he was doing. What type of justice he is offered will play a role in his future if he makes it there. We are listening, but he has screamed "George Orwell's 1984 has come to America" and not everyone is listening, although everyone has heard it.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
finding peace outside
I had to think the other day
about my lover and what she wanted
and then I had to think what i wanted
which was, of course, was her
but she was trying to find peace
beyond and outside of the relationship
the thing that comes after it all
all the longing, the happiness, the promise
I had to ask if that was what i wanted too
I decided i do not want the peace
the peace that would come
from coming to grips with losing love
to find a place within myself
where I could breath again
free from the pain and sense of loss
where there could be rebirth
and room to love someone else
and there is always room for someone else
but the price is too high for me
if the memories cannot come with me
i would rather go on with the scars
unhealed with time, bleeding emotion
not because every love deserves pain
because every loss does not
perhaps none of them should cling to
slowing us down, algae trailing on our hulls
all the same, I'll take with me my love for you
I know what I want from the memories
it has something to do with comfort
it has more to do with being with you
if that has to be painful, i accept it
in the hope that one day i will find
that place of peace and comfort
where whatever was between you and me
will be there too, the love the happiness
even if the price is despair
since otherwise, i will not know where to look
to find what i think about every day
about my lover and what she wanted
and then I had to think what i wanted
which was, of course, was her
but she was trying to find peace
beyond and outside of the relationship
the thing that comes after it all
all the longing, the happiness, the promise
I had to ask if that was what i wanted too
I decided i do not want the peace
the peace that would come
from coming to grips with losing love
to find a place within myself
where I could breath again
free from the pain and sense of loss
where there could be rebirth
and room to love someone else
and there is always room for someone else
but the price is too high for me
if the memories cannot come with me
i would rather go on with the scars
unhealed with time, bleeding emotion
not because every love deserves pain
because every loss does not
perhaps none of them should cling to
slowing us down, algae trailing on our hulls
all the same, I'll take with me my love for you
I know what I want from the memories
it has something to do with comfort
it has more to do with being with you
if that has to be painful, i accept it
in the hope that one day i will find
that place of peace and comfort
where whatever was between you and me
will be there too, the love the happiness
even if the price is despair
since otherwise, i will not know where to look
to find what i think about every day
Friday, July 12, 2013
the sound of me not telling you
This is the sound of me not telling you I love you
It is quiet, absent contact, laughter, and love, of course
it doesn't suggest kissing or affection of any type
this is what you wanted, I hope it is as good as you thought
tell me you like this, while you look over my shoulder
it is ok for you to watch me, but not for me to love you
for it, despite it, regardless of the reason
explain that one to me, take the rest of your life
oh wait, that is me telling you something
and you might think it's that I love you
This is the sound of two people who are not in love
the sound of one person not in love
you can decide which one doesn't want to hear it
the sound of me telling or not, i love you
It is quiet, absent contact, laughter, and love, of course
it doesn't suggest kissing or affection of any type
this is what you wanted, I hope it is as good as you thought
tell me you like this, while you look over my shoulder
it is ok for you to watch me, but not for me to love you
for it, despite it, regardless of the reason
explain that one to me, take the rest of your life
oh wait, that is me telling you something
and you might think it's that I love you
This is the sound of two people who are not in love
the sound of one person not in love
you can decide which one doesn't want to hear it
the sound of me telling or not, i love you
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)