There is a lot of teeth gnashing over what the universe looks like in other theories of creation right before the big bang. One of the fun things about the e-hologram universe, is that you can take existing concepts and pretty much figure these things out as well as other "mysteries" of the universe, like 22/7 and other infinite series.
This mystery big ball of "something" (immediately before the big bang) becomes something very obvious and intuitive. This is one of the fun things about taking E-H-Theory and re-writing it and you'll get many such tid-bits from the book. These are the types of things you'll find in the examination of E-Hologram theory, and I'll give you this one since it is both clever and intuitive in the theory (whether right or wrong).
If you want to look at the infinite cone of time for any given tendency, you don't get to go down to zero, although the integration says you would (zero to infinity, zero to right now, etc). You only go down to Planck Length where time originates. Since we know in E-H-T that the Planck length is actually a measure of time (where time appears to uncoil in our universe), and since we know that there is a constant defining the volume of a sphere (4/3 pi(r^3) containing this time and that time comes from a singularity and hence would appear statistically within a space defined by the uncoiling of this distance from space we have all of the parts of the predecessor of the big bang. All time compressed into a Planck length sphere (that's not going to last very long, you don't want to stick your finger in there). Note that since r is 1/2 of the diameter from one side of this sphere to another, it actually defines a non-existent distance since the minimum size for time is the Planck length. Since P-L is a number, it can be divided in two and this brings us surprisingly close to the infinite series we discussed earlier of trying to cross a road by going 1/2 of the distance each time!
Something strange happens for pi at this length and it should become self evident what that is since below that length you cannot define a circle in o-space (at least in theory).
The volume of the sphere or the area of either the sphere (pi*d^2) cone at any section (pi*r^2) moving outward starting at time zero (Planck length times pi) expanded to infiniti (infinitiy times pi) defines a probability area for any tendency. Since time seems to be an expanding bubble, and since we want to avoid cutting the Planck length in half, the area of the expanding sphere provides some interesting possibilities for each quantum of time.
The intersection of an infinite number of these cones defining the probability of time coordinates for any tendency defines both a "space" and a place where different things can form depending on the intersection of the tendencies.
In e-hologram theory there is no big mystery to what the universe looked
like immediately before the big bang.
Existing physics and current theory (E-H-theory) tells us with some
certainty (a Planck sphere of time).
It also describes one potential for pi, reflecting, as it were, all of the
uncoiling times that make up our universe.
If pi seems to go on for infinity, it would reflect an infinite number
of times.
This also gives a basis for matter (energy at these concentrations, of
course) since time is uncoiling in cones or spheres in this model (starting with all
times uncoiling around a Planck length sphere) as these times move out from the singularity (not actual movement, mind you but changing time coordinates) they
form cones.
If you were to show these cones from zero to infinity it would be
integrating pi(r^2) for the radius from zero to where you stopped (infinity if you don’t stop,
the 14 or so billion years of our universe if you only go to today, etc). But
you don’t have one cone, you have all of the cones of time and many of these
will intersect from a probability standpoint. Now I know many of you are looking at this saying that we should be integrating spheres and not cones, but it all amounts to the same thing in the end, one is just a better reflection of what we're looking at (an infinite number of cones offset slightly is a sphere and I am not sure if we're stuck with spheres or cones, but it's one or the other or we wouldn't have pi and these are time functions and not geometric function in E-H-T
What is important is that pi may be a reflection of the amount of times that are generated (even if it is infinite (a pi that is never solved with real numbers)) at the point where time began to uncoil in Planck lengths to define our universe.
Since the “probability of intersection is small, at least once you get away
from planck length time you end up with more “space” than concentrations of
(intersections of) time coordinates.
Hence, you can end up with more space than energy initially and finally more space than matter which becomes defined by the intersection of probabilities of "time cones" with same or different coordinates.
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
the wavering lover
why do you think
you can think for me
and decide what I am doing
are you so much wiser than me
that you can predict
the future that I can't
have I ever been different
than the consistent man
unwavering in my loyalties
unwavering in my goals
can you say you are the same
your hopes are not consistent
you want to forget about me
what type of goal is that
you are supposed to love
but you want to hurt me
when sharing your plans
and I want to join you in mine
what is evil and to be despised
me a victim of my circumstances
or you a victim of your passions
and who is being unfair in this
you with all of your plans
or me with some of my poems
you can think for me
and decide what I am doing
are you so much wiser than me
that you can predict
the future that I can't
have I ever been different
than the consistent man
unwavering in my loyalties
unwavering in my goals
can you say you are the same
your hopes are not consistent
you want to forget about me
what type of goal is that
you are supposed to love
but you want to hurt me
when sharing your plans
and I want to join you in mine
what is evil and to be despised
me a victim of my circumstances
or you a victim of your passions
and who is being unfair in this
you with all of your plans
or me with some of my poems
Monday, September 2, 2013
A sample chapter past page 100-for you-The E-Hologram Theory, closer to the end
It is a relief to be into the last 1/3 of the e-hologram universe. It is getting more difficult as the origin gets closer to join everything together, but here is a sample of an early chapter re-written to take advantage of the concepts. And yes, the stuff about getting it right was there the first time and it's still here for you.
Chapter 115: E-hologram universe-we are in g space of course
You knew it was coming by now. We are in the singularity, we are in g-space (which isn't space at all).
How is this possible and how is it obvious.
1) If we can see the future and the past (not proven, but there is plenty of intrinsic data);
2) If black holes on opposite sides of the universe go back to the same singularity and
3) if there is no space (only time with multiple displays of dimension.
If these hold true, we exist in non-dimensional space, the display is not out of the singularity but within it. Time gives us the ability to "experience" o-space; but it is an illusion. We are in Einstein's singularity where everything happens at once. A type of "ground-hog" day but where Bill Murray makes all of the mistakes the exact same way over and over again (and me too!). Oh no! I'm going to make the same mistakes over and over again?!?
This is where the courage to act becomes so important. If we are in this perpetual ground-hog day, if we are basically in some type of script, read over and over again by time (or maybe just once all the way through) which is almost certainly the case if hologram physics holds up we should make the most of our time and not worry so much about what someone will think about us, but if the play is to be worthwhile one, we must do good things and improve our lot.
One way of doing this will be to get outside of the singularity (which will require more than apparent faster than light travel).
Also, just because we are a "display" on time within a singularity of something where everything has happened at once (and is happening at once without time) that does not mean the play cannot be re-written or even that we cannot do it ourselves. While we can predict the rules of g-space, it remains to be seen whether we can change them or whether we only think we can.
For now we must focus on time and the singularity. Once we quit trying to force our physics to accept space and concentrate on the substance of our observational matrix (time) we should in short order be able to get back to the singularity (assuming we really want to go there). For g-space does exist, it is something concrete and amazing. It may have its own type of space which we can hardly imagine (without any time or maybe with all sorts of times, times in ways we cannot fully comprehend like "backwards time", "sideways times", "un-moving time", "non-dimensional time"...well we may actually experience dark matter and non linear-one way time, "two way time" with or with traffic lights and crossing guards, "malleable time" the chance to do everything right (to say yes when you should say no).
It's really a wonderful opportunity, but I’m sure you have other things to do this morning.
Chapter 115: E-hologram universe-we are in g space of course
You knew it was coming by now. We are in the singularity, we are in g-space (which isn't space at all).
How is this possible and how is it obvious.
1) If we can see the future and the past (not proven, but there is plenty of intrinsic data);
2) If black holes on opposite sides of the universe go back to the same singularity and
3) if there is no space (only time with multiple displays of dimension.
If these hold true, we exist in non-dimensional space, the display is not out of the singularity but within it. Time gives us the ability to "experience" o-space; but it is an illusion. We are in Einstein's singularity where everything happens at once. A type of "ground-hog" day but where Bill Murray makes all of the mistakes the exact same way over and over again (and me too!). Oh no! I'm going to make the same mistakes over and over again?!?
This is where the courage to act becomes so important. If we are in this perpetual ground-hog day, if we are basically in some type of script, read over and over again by time (or maybe just once all the way through) which is almost certainly the case if hologram physics holds up we should make the most of our time and not worry so much about what someone will think about us, but if the play is to be worthwhile one, we must do good things and improve our lot.
One way of doing this will be to get outside of the singularity (which will require more than apparent faster than light travel).
Also, just because we are a "display" on time within a singularity of something where everything has happened at once (and is happening at once without time) that does not mean the play cannot be re-written or even that we cannot do it ourselves. While we can predict the rules of g-space, it remains to be seen whether we can change them or whether we only think we can.
For now we must focus on time and the singularity. Once we quit trying to force our physics to accept space and concentrate on the substance of our observational matrix (time) we should in short order be able to get back to the singularity (assuming we really want to go there). For g-space does exist, it is something concrete and amazing. It may have its own type of space which we can hardly imagine (without any time or maybe with all sorts of times, times in ways we cannot fully comprehend like "backwards time", "sideways times", "un-moving time", "non-dimensional time"...well we may actually experience dark matter and non linear-one way time, "two way time" with or with traffic lights and crossing guards, "malleable time" the chance to do everything right (to say yes when you should say no).
It's really a wonderful opportunity, but I’m sure you have other things to do this morning.
Yosemite burns
For all we think we are, we cannot protect the helpless for ourselves
Check out this video. http://once.unicornmedia.com/now/od/auto/f21d8e33-8e2f-460c-965d-e4939d60d203/487e1da2-3daa-425b-b91a-06df14c69d93/4dcfc782-3198-4240-a9b8-b4e1cbb16ef4/content.once
Check out this video. http://once.unicornmedia.com/now/od/auto/f21d8e33-8e2f-460c-965d-e4939d60d203/487e1da2-3daa-425b-b91a-06df14c69d93/4dcfc782-3198-4240-a9b8-b4e1cbb16ef4/content.once
The very best thing
What would you do with the best thing
would you lock it away
would you put it on display
would you save it for a rainy day
who would you hire to protect it
is it possible to make it yours
because the very best thing
would not be owned, it would own you
How do you know the best thing
do you have to compare it to everything
Not just to one thing, to everything
Or is it something you know
without asking, without thinking
And if you had the best thing
the best thing that there was
would it be worth everything else
to be owned, enslaved by it
and if it wasn't would it be the best
How do you set it free
how do you set yourself free
and still hold onto it
and if you cannot hold it
be happy knowing that you can't
some questions are better off
never having been asked
you should never want answered
for there is no true freedom
in being a slave to what is lost
would you lock it away
would you put it on display
would you save it for a rainy day
who would you hire to protect it
is it possible to make it yours
because the very best thing
would not be owned, it would own you
How do you know the best thing
do you have to compare it to everything
Not just to one thing, to everything
Or is it something you know
without asking, without thinking
And if you had the best thing
the best thing that there was
would it be worth everything else
to be owned, enslaved by it
and if it wasn't would it be the best
How do you set it free
how do you set yourself free
and still hold onto it
and if you cannot hold it
be happy knowing that you can't
some questions are better off
never having been asked
you should never want answered
for there is no true freedom
in being a slave to what is lost
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Black holes infinite series ehologram
http://m.nbcnews.com/science/milky-ways-giant-black-hole-spits-out-its-food-8C11034082
Chapter 108:
Perhaps, by now, you are whining about the difficulty in observing time. It incorporates tendencies to give matter dimension and to propel it from the singularity.
We do see a reflection of quantum time in our study of (search for) gravitons. The search for this missing (and irrelevant in hologram theory) particle takes us ever smaller. Instead we can look for the hologram equivalent (time) which will never see it based on distance because time gives the appearance of dimension to tendencies and by itself has not connection with space. Time is space and holds tendencies or carries them out.
The most obvious place to find time (at least by its absence) is in black holes where it is stripped off or recoiled. Since the reduction of time into the singularity is considered in the nature an infinite series, it is hard to get it to happen, so much of the matter which tends towards giving up time migrates or is rejuvenated in the radiations from those objects. This theoretical observation (check the timing on the published blogs and the wall street journal article on the observation) was recently observed.
Temporary black holes (if they really exist and are not something else) might also yield clues to the nature of time. The good news is that time is all around us. It's not like the elusive dark matter or Higgs Bosons. If you are reading this, the distance between the print and your eye is a function of the time difference between the time attached to the computer screen and the time in your retina that is picking it up. Likewise, if we are in the singularity as appears likely (that is all time and therefore all dimension is merely an illusion in the singularity) then there is not real distance or dimension there, but instead some feature of time causes the appearance of separation and this appearance can be manipulated and there is evidence that it is manipulated in the universe.
While there are some arguments for this on earth, all black holes lead back to the same singularity. This means faster than light travel (apparent) occurs at every black hole all the time which renders faster than light travel pretty ho-hum in our universe.
If you have (as you do) black holes separated by a million light years, then travel a million times faster than light happens constantly within the known universe. What could be more boring than that! Here we are complaining about how long it takes to get to the moon or mars when black holes make a much longer trip instantly!
The foundation for this hologram theory of time was laid down in the 1930's and 40's. Hence while it might be called new Hologram theory (compared to old hologram theory developed in the 1990's which is still stuck on strings and space-time and looking smaller and smaller and expecting to find something there and perplexed that Planck is mathematically right and observationally wrong). This inconsistency is only appropriate given ancient-new hologram theory's foundation (Einstein started it so it is called E-H theory. since it being both younger and older than new hologram theory makes just conceptualizing it sort of nauseating).
While the theory is based on throwing everything out with the dishwater except for time and a singularity, in fact all of the math in other theories applies to E-H Theory or E-H Theory is not valid.
E-Hologram theory is more religious and spiritual in nature since time travel, seeing into the future, faster than light travel, manipulation of the singularity through thought and even past lives is almost axiomatic in E-H theory. Likewise, it readily lends itself to some concept of deity since as we move deeper into the singularity we discover that it is something which has no time or dimension as we experience it but has the ability (at least once you add a drop or two of time) of being as big as all creation and everything happens at once.
Chapter 108:
Perhaps, by now, you are whining about the difficulty in observing time. It incorporates tendencies to give matter dimension and to propel it from the singularity.
We do see a reflection of quantum time in our study of (search for) gravitons. The search for this missing (and irrelevant in hologram theory) particle takes us ever smaller. Instead we can look for the hologram equivalent (time) which will never see it based on distance because time gives the appearance of dimension to tendencies and by itself has not connection with space. Time is space and holds tendencies or carries them out.
The most obvious place to find time (at least by its absence) is in black holes where it is stripped off or recoiled. Since the reduction of time into the singularity is considered in the nature an infinite series, it is hard to get it to happen, so much of the matter which tends towards giving up time migrates or is rejuvenated in the radiations from those objects. This theoretical observation (check the timing on the published blogs and the wall street journal article on the observation) was recently observed.
Temporary black holes (if they really exist and are not something else) might also yield clues to the nature of time. The good news is that time is all around us. It's not like the elusive dark matter or Higgs Bosons. If you are reading this, the distance between the print and your eye is a function of the time difference between the time attached to the computer screen and the time in your retina that is picking it up. Likewise, if we are in the singularity as appears likely (that is all time and therefore all dimension is merely an illusion in the singularity) then there is not real distance or dimension there, but instead some feature of time causes the appearance of separation and this appearance can be manipulated and there is evidence that it is manipulated in the universe.
While there are some arguments for this on earth, all black holes lead back to the same singularity. This means faster than light travel (apparent) occurs at every black hole all the time which renders faster than light travel pretty ho-hum in our universe.
If you have (as you do) black holes separated by a million light years, then travel a million times faster than light happens constantly within the known universe. What could be more boring than that! Here we are complaining about how long it takes to get to the moon or mars when black holes make a much longer trip instantly!
The foundation for this hologram theory of time was laid down in the 1930's and 40's. Hence while it might be called new Hologram theory (compared to old hologram theory developed in the 1990's which is still stuck on strings and space-time and looking smaller and smaller and expecting to find something there and perplexed that Planck is mathematically right and observationally wrong). This inconsistency is only appropriate given ancient-new hologram theory's foundation (Einstein started it so it is called E-H theory. since it being both younger and older than new hologram theory makes just conceptualizing it sort of nauseating).
While the theory is based on throwing everything out with the dishwater except for time and a singularity, in fact all of the math in other theories applies to E-H Theory or E-H Theory is not valid.
E-Hologram theory is more religious and spiritual in nature since time travel, seeing into the future, faster than light travel, manipulation of the singularity through thought and even past lives is almost axiomatic in E-H theory. Likewise, it readily lends itself to some concept of deity since as we move deeper into the singularity we discover that it is something which has no time or dimension as we experience it but has the ability (at least once you add a drop or two of time) of being as big as all creation and everything happens at once.
e-hologram universe-the book
If, the book turns out at 150 pages (plus or minus 30) then it is over 2/3 of the way finished.
As mentioned, the book promises several surprises over the blog entries (see previous) on which it is based.
Loosely, the theory is written backwards (using the last posts first) so that much of the early disclosure has been updated with interesting, sometimes unpredictable results.
New information on the difficulty that black holes have in digesting matter (i.e. the difficulty of matter in surrendering the time component (i.e. having the time component recoiled) has led to some nice formulations of infinite series which figure heavily into the overall thesis.
Likewise, the consolidation of the later theories or presentation concepts along with the early mathematical observations has breathed a new life into the early chapters and done a substantial justice to the examination of the theories.
A September publication date is still in the works.
As mentioned, the book promises several surprises over the blog entries (see previous) on which it is based.
Loosely, the theory is written backwards (using the last posts first) so that much of the early disclosure has been updated with interesting, sometimes unpredictable results.
New information on the difficulty that black holes have in digesting matter (i.e. the difficulty of matter in surrendering the time component (i.e. having the time component recoiled) has led to some nice formulations of infinite series which figure heavily into the overall thesis.
Likewise, the consolidation of the later theories or presentation concepts along with the early mathematical observations has breathed a new life into the early chapters and done a substantial justice to the examination of the theories.
A September publication date is still in the works.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)