NLT the next thing 53: Rate of Change

The next chapters will define the relationship of rate of change and time orbits.  They will get to the end game for all this discussion in a way that is somewhat spectacular.  That you have to suffer with so much ground work is only because I put together Einstein's analysis of the universe with that of several others so that the end game became apparent to me first.  Others will have taken what I've written and gotten there long before I post it, but if you prefer to wait instead of looking for it yourself, sit back, pour yourself a scotch or a glass of wine, curse me under your breath or out loud if you really think that I'm some kind of a monster, and read on or just go to a different blog, perhaps one with cats in it.

PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS Rate of Change: Instance is the prediction of NLT.  Non-linearity means that everything happens at once, but quantum linearity means that “instance” exists.  The reason your perceive that you are in a linear environment, that is that space-time exists, is because your perception is based on the linear projection of a single instant, a quantum rate change.  While you think that the instant you are in is part of a sequence, that is not a requirement.  
The “infinite universes” that traditional physics, dare I say primitive physics (I think not), tried to sell you is nothing more that the simultaneous existence of all of the instances at once.  Our "instant" could easily be shuffled and dealt out in any order and we would still have all the memories and dreams for the future that we have now even though the order they play out would be purely random.  This idea of shuffling will become very important later on.

Presumably the universe has a set rate of change, this is the minimum quantum of time that creates instance.  This is reflected in the conservation of time.  As the volume of the universe changes, the amount of change of the space coordinates and the rate of creation of quantum space (if such in fact occurs) can be estimated.  If expansion doesn’t occur this would not change the rate of change, but would change the way it would be calculated.  This "rate" appears different from different perspectives of concentration of clock time, but we know from prior entries that for our purposes it is 10^16*10^8*10^4*10^2 in terms of scale (or 10^30 for CT4).  That is we can multiply our perception of the universe by 10^-30 (1 with 30 zeros between the decimal and the starting point) and we have the minimum distance with which time changes to be perceivable in all its myriad forms (from quantum gravity to black holes).

          The rate of change is the same whether points are compressed matter or dispersed as space.  The difference lies in the speed of one set of coordinate change verses another.  This is why we must accelerate to change from matter to energy, we are eliminating Standard clock time in favor of faster dimensional coordinate changes and, presumably even faster two dimensional changes.  An interesting exercise will be to look at the different rates of compression while maintaining coordinate change.  It is, of course, predicted that coordinate change rates decrease exponentially along with compression rates and this will be discussed shortly to bring the idea of "dimensionless time orbits", "coordinate change" and "minimum quantum change" (rate of change) together in subsequent chapters.

          The exact "perceived" change rate (as opposed to quantum rate change) is complicated because every point on earth is changing relative to the spin of the earth, the spin of the solar system, the spin of the galaxy and the spin of the universe itself so it is not a clear or linear expansion equation.  The speed with which something spins to create standard clock time would affect the overall rate of change since all times are conserved.  

And so we arrive back at formulating the basic theoretical equation of NLT, subject to certain revision; but the starting point for the next stage of inquiry, the basic equations of NLT.

NLT the next thing 52: THE END OF ALL THINGS

Perhaps it is only appropriate, perhaps only possible that NLT would be the idea of someone who has lost so much, who has to blame himself for his losses, who perceives the futility of all gain and all loss.  Who understands the importance of the moment but who has nevertheless sacrificed it for nothing more than pre-programmed values and a lack of courage.  It is only fair that someone so worthless has rendered so much of lasting value, valueless.
But the invention is complete, the utilization of the concept while well underway, in the end points to a certain futility.  We will see what we can do to make the future something greater, but first we will discuss...

THE END OF ALL THINGS
NLT has debunked more than any other theory the pre-NLT concept of an infinite number of dimensions.  This "infinite dimension" concept is nothing more than a mathematically complex, and logically "primitive" attempt to explain randomness.  It denies Einstein and says instead that the universe is composed of an infinite number of dice rolls, each item being.  It is absurd, of course, but it protects the idea of self control, or more to the point of self.
Conceptually, one then says, well if NLT is the case, clearly the frontrunner in terms of logic, then NLT is an invention of absolutely nothing.  While it "allegedly" is made by putting together the statements of others, in truth it is less than the combination of Einstein and Hologram theory, because it is the creation of a projection, everything a priori by the reproducible nature of math being pre-ordained.  In this you are right and you are wrong.  You, Einstein and I are merely "actors."  While I have already done this and you have already condemned me for it, from our perspective we both "chose" to do so.
The NLT defense to crimes (both of law and passion) is totally defensible, but so are the acts of punishment, ostrasism, extinction.
Equally true, history has no true meaning.  While we can say, "I know what happened a million years ago, a thousand years ago, yesterday and today," in truth one "moment" is all that exists.  History is within a can of NLT, we can project any moment; this one , the one a million years ago and the one a million years in the future.  It is so painfully logical and necessary, even in light of what we've already proven that we cannot but strike our heads and say "do-oh!"
Which brings us back to the most dangerous part of NLT.  Once we accept it to be the case, how do we survive psychologically.  How does the projection go forward with the act of creation, with the act of building once we realize it has already been done.  The most obvious answer is that we lie to ourselves.  We know we will die, that life will come to an end; yet we go on living.  We know that heartache is possible, but we continue to hope and to love.  We are part of a program and the program demands that we act in accordance with certain rules.
The idea that the universe must be something more than NLT made linear is foolhardy.  The arguments in favor of this primitive idea such as "natural selection made us" disappear once we realize that natural selection itself is a function of the rules laid out by basic math, physics, chemistry and the like all culminating in the idea that "god doesn't play dice".  If we are going to allow that god does play dice, fine, you can have your self determination.  There is no difference between your universe and mine at this point in time, merely you are delusional and wrong and I am right...or the other way around.  We both continue to think we have self determination, we still control our acts from our limited perspectives, but only one outcome is logical and for those of you who condemn me, remember that I am only presenting what was taught before I had opened my first physics text, before I was born...although it really wasn't before anything, but time is non-linear and this moment, the last moment and the next all exist together of necessity.

NLT-the next step 51: Einstein Revisited

The mountain air has been good for me in a very temporary way.  I feel both more enlightened and freed by the distance and temporal separation from my real problems.  It is too short a time to be a vacation, and too filled with necessary events to be relaxing; but there is the different perspective that even poor travel gives.
The melancholy with which my life is filled is seen from a distance here and it allows me to see those things that are important and those that are not.
Next week is almost here and the last of my "pre-life" requirements; not that there will not be post life requirements to fill in the gaps that would otherwise be filled with freedom, if not happiness.

EINSTEIN REVISITED
NLT is a math exercise which seems to follow philosophical concepts of mysticism.  In it there are many different routes, as many as there are pre-existing, inadequate fundamental physics concepts.  While original in a sense, the basic concepts date back 2500 years and were obvious even with fundamental mathematics and the logic of early philosopher mathematicians, Parminides and Zeno being the two most common references.
If you accept all paths at once (they ar mutually exclusive in many cases) NLT includes a type of god where the concentration of all thought without dimension or time to separte them gives them a "god-like" power, perhaps enough to give linearity to the universe; the same features of time giving rise to prognosticaton and and, the subject of this chapter, predestination.
This is already supported by one concept of Einstein's philosophical rambling, "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once".  But there is another, more compelling.  "God doesn't play dice with the universe."  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle has already been debunked in NLT although you may not have that chapter, it is inherent in what is already written.  While using traditional physics you are limited, severely, by using one aspect of time to view another, if you are looking fundamentally at time, there is no interference of the same form.
There is a subtle difference between prognotication and predestination.  The most basic logical formulation if a=b then b=a mandates a closer relationship if one accepts that god doesn't play dice.  This reference to god is misplaced and is unrelated to the god that Einstein was referring to or the one that is the concentrtation of thought.  God in this case refers to the fact that everything happens at once without linear time in a singularity unseparated by time and space at least in a linear format.  It refers to the force that causes this to be expressed linearally.
And if the processes of linearity are not randomized, if there is no cosmic set of dice, then one can predict, with adequate mathemtics outcomes.  And if one can predict what will happen with certainty (whether the computational equipment is available or not to actually do it) then everything is predestined from the start unless one has the ability to insert a random event which would both insert dice into the non-dice universe and make time something somewhat greater than the separation of events and therefore dimensions.

NLT the next step 50 PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Sequence:

Things are not working out as well for me as I hoped and my hopes were not too great.  I am writing a story about a partnership derailed by an imagined or perhaps abandoned love affair.  Perhaps I am living it and only think I am writing it.   You, will never see it here.  After all it is a work of fiction and this set of blogs are about facts.  Imagined, the love affair is fiction within fiction.
Since I seem to have been given some time that i did not want and sufficient agony to be creative I will wax elloquent, or what passes as eloquent for me.  I suggest skipping ahead to the physics.
First, let me discuss the relationship between agony and productivity.  As you are aware, no doubt, Sam C (Mark Twain) cemented his fame after his daughter died and did much of his work when he was near bankruptcy, if not technically, essentially in it.  I know what that's like, just like that.  Another example, one of my favorite writers, Hemmingway committed suicide despite being an accomplished writer and being relatively well off.  It is too true that one needs disaster, disquiet, disillusionment and perhaps even dishonor to create, to accomplish. Oddly, however, I believe one also needs love.  Without a deep love for someone or something, one dies, see Hemmingway.  Perhaps he did very well for a time, but in the end found himself without love.  Hence, I cannot agree to abandon love.  Oh, I tried it.  I tried to say, "yes" just 3 letters, a single word.  For one to whom words come so easy, from whom they spew like a pus-fountain, one word should have been easy.  And yes, I did sit there and perhaps I even typed it.  But if I did, and to be sure I cannot remember for whatever reason, I could not send it.  I could not lie, I could not kill myself, not yet.  When I am sure that love is no more than perhaps I will follow Hemingway, when I can understand him.  Or perhaps I will die of whatever "natural causes" are first.
Natural causes of death, what an ignorant, non-non-linear time concept. Natural in non-linearity has an entirely different meaning.  Everything is following a script.  So nothing is a "natural cause" or everything is.  In NLT, even death is not what you think it is.  Do the characters in a movie die when the movie is over, when it is sealed in its can and put on a shelf.  I think not.
We are designed, us characters to live some interesting life.  To be interesting we must take chances and we must suffer and we must be driven to insanity or creation.  My story is one of being so in love, that I cannot be happy.  I am tortured by my love.  Were I not surrounded with anxiety and all the "dis" forms outlined above; just my love would drive me to madness or accomplishment.
Where are you tonight, in what part of the world?  What are you thinking?  Do you share my feelings or do you hold them in contempt?

PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Sequence: Linearity, as we perceive it, is not required by NLT but is apparent in the rules of the perceived universe. Just as a film may be "cut up" and displayed in slide formats in any order; or as different places in digital media may be expressed in random order; so our universe can be displayed in a non-sequential fashion.

Something happens with time that allows the expression of linearity that we experience, but this "order" is not a "requirement" any more than the digitized sequential film is required to be expressed sequentially.

          While we "experience" space-time, the sequential expression of Non-linear Time; space time coordinates need not be sequential. This conjures ideas of time travel; it actually indicates just the opposite for entities trapped in NLT. The possibility of "viewing" different places in time and space without regard to separation exists. For example you can theoretically see the big bang as it happens from within the coordinates in NLT which would be a goal of NLT in terms of practical application. But you cannot change NLT any more than you could change a single frame of a film just by virtue of being able to view it as a slide.  Of course, this is theoretical construct, so we can theorize around whatever roadblocks we run into. 
When we discuss the creation of NLT as a block; the environment in which it is created, the creator(s) of it, we can discuss the ability of those who are part of the display of NLT as those who create it and we can discuss the ability to change it.  Would it not be something if we could go back and change just one decision, just one moment in time.

          This suggests that decision makers have no choice in what they do.  However, predestination is actually a higher level of freedom in terms of initiative than the alternative because your actions have already happened.  You can take any chance and do anything you want to do because you've already done it, the consequences have already been suffered, the rewards already recognized.  This was the subject of “The illusion and power of self-determination.”  That was, by the way, the most read entry in this blog.
I will edit this further or perhaps shortly and perhaps in the next entry.

NLT the next step 49 Goals of Space and Energy

This will be the last or second to last post till after the opera on NLT.  It is appropriate that all things that are crucial that happen should be done without a safety net.  How much of life really has a safety net.  We don't need to know where we'll end up to make decisions.  Too much perceived safety is misleading, because we all end up in the same place whether you accept the predestination mandated by mathematics (don't worry we'll get there) or not.
How you make decisions should be the subject of this preamble.  
This isn't about predestination, which also demands a lot of time, its own set of posts which are coming if you're patient.  Instead it is about how to make a tough long lasting decision with no certainty of the end result, how to balance what you need and what you need to do with what you want and what you want to do.  Many of our decisions are made for us, especially if we're busy.  The busier we are, the less freedom we have.
Being busy is something of a cop out.  A person bored out of their mind is the one who has the tough life, the one who has to decide every minute what they will do.  Perhaps they will write a blog entry taking an unsustainable position.
But perhaps this is getting too long and I have decided what to do for the next 11 days, so there is plenty of time to explain how to deal with what comes next.

PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Goals of Space and Energy: Attaching specific equations to these combinations is critical to establishing any legitimacy.  A set of equations should be defined for time and the creation (or destruction) of linearity of the coordinates giving rise to dimension and force time characteristics.

          If forces can separate from space, energy and matter to some extent, they must be separate sets of equations; but if not; energy coordinates and those related to the existence of space-dimension qualities lie within the same mathematical framework, they are part of the same thing.  If Space or each dimension is a dimensional quality then forces associated with the creation of linearity of each dimension may be tied to those spatial elements and the movement of the forces can be tied to the coordinate changes of those same spatial elements. If true a photon takes its one and two dimensional elements with it. Gravity is seen to follow changes in dimensional characteristics. Energy in every form should follow similar consistency. The “high speed” we associate with these features are seen and accepted by relativity.

          Looking at the “most simple” of these equations, the creation of one dimensional space you have T'(d1)(F1)dt'dt'' where T' is a dimensional-force element which is defined by (d1) dimensional elements and (F1) force elements and wherein the dimensional elements have a common time dt' associated with both a dimensional element and a force element (element=set of coordinates in this example).  dt'' is another change in time associated with a different set of dimensional and force elements which arises sequentially.  For example; (Space and its force(s), mass and molecular forces and clock time).  This provides an explanation of what force requires dimension and what dimensional elements create or are created simultaneously with what forces.
Keep in mind the possibility exists that negative dimensional elements are the forces.
The expression of linearity in terms of sequences tied to both spatial, force, and clock coordinates (at least outside of black holes and other non-linear places) gives rise to space time as we perceive it; but should not be confused with independent space time as a fundamental framework for purposes of a mathematical analysis which is seductive, but inconsistent with close analysis of NLT.

NLT the next step 48 PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Steady state and super steady state

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6r5bo_D9QY
I guess I have to say, my new thing is listening to long, slow, slightly melancholic, instrumental playlists.  Do I have the right to anger, to disappointment?
Doesn't matter, feelings are not necessarily a matter of right, but in this situation there is little anyone can do about them other than to have righteous indignation and I am indignant they would be denied to me.
Understand me, I scream, accept that difficulties are not just yours, but ours, something we all share.  All our pre-conceived notions, all our prejudices, all our demons, they are shared.
I heard Mark Twain's pessimistic quote about the bible being a condemnation of a cruel, vindictive god who punished populations for the sins of the rules, children for the sins of their parents.  This is something not inconsistent with Non-Linear time theory and is very much common with the ideas of Einstein Hologram Theory.
Why mention it?  Because our universe is much like the song, "and in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make."
Anyway, a short chapter, as promised.

   PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS: Steady State and Super Steady state: If we can show conservation of time, can we artificially limit time to get acceleration?  If gravity is the tendency of time to go non-linear can we create linear time from a non-linear environment?  Create a type of acceleration which is different and "not affected by gravity?"   While universal expansion is questionable (according to Wince), this is suggested by the expansion of the universe which seems to occur only in the absence of gravity.  Expansion is the creation of quantum space.

For example:  by taking clock time and making it zero through concentration you could create a high speed change in dimension.  Multi-dimensional time says that expansion may not exist. The same finding is suggested by NLT which has similar features.

          Another example that no one wants to hear about is "prediction".  You might say that if you knew what was going to happen you could stop it.  This would be counter-indicated in E-H-T. Traditional thought holds it to be statistically driven.  Statistics say a prediction of the future could have more to do with infinite choices which are NOT an NLT concept.

          Non-linear time theory recognizes that the fundamental building block of space/time is non-dimensional time. Multidimensional time theory predicts a steady state universe.  Non-linear Time theory sees a universe which exists without dimensional qualities and there is a “super-steady state” where everything happens at once without time or dimension to separate it.  Dimensions don't really exist and reality itself only exists because it has always existed and is only linear because of an expression of non-linear time. 

China's weaponized economy-another stupid prediction about World War III between China and the USA

The lack of intelligent examination by our government is a reflection of the sloth that comes to an economy which is living off of its credit, the mature reserve currency.  This in turn is reflected in the media which seeks to adopt the popular beliefs of the masses, whether justified or not.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/artyom-lukin/world-war-iii_b_5646641.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl1%7Csec3_lnk3%26pLid%3D511150
What is wrong with this article.  This article is about everything that makes our country stupid; something you would not expect from a major new reporter, but while they would thoroughly research and intellectuallize an affair by Kim Kardashian, they are absolutely blind to anything beyond the superficial understandings of congress on issues of foreign affairs and this ignorance trickles down to all the parts of government and apparently the superficial press.
The issues that we have here are several.  First, I swam 3500 yards and I'm pretty tired.  But you don't care about that.
The failure of economies which has occurred over time and which is covered in more detail in the next edition of China's weaponized economy is theorized to be based on the fact that governments get lazy, established, corrupt and borrow their economies into bankruptcy.  The economies themselves go steadily further into debt, the citizens failing to recognize that their elevated lifestyles are based on their own debt.   Who knows, perhaps they fail to maintain a sufficiently impoverished lower class to maintain manufacturing; that would be a kick in the pants, and yet it is largely the story of "1984".
The solution, at least the immediate solution to ignorance, is a state constitutional convention to force term limits on congress.  This is a constitutional remedy which has never, in 200 plus years, been used.  This would at least take care of the entrenched government.
But what, you ask, does this have to do with this incredibly stupid article about World War III and why do I insist it is stupid.  Well, first it is clear that the author did not read the first edition of China's Weaponized Economy.  I can assume this is because the author is waiting for the second edition.
But the most important problem is that we are already engaged in WWIII.  This is proven by the chain of failures of currencies over the last 200 years; but here it is about manufacturing.
If we went to war with china, the first thing we would discover is that we do not have the technology to produce computers, cell phones or electronic cigarettes.  Yes, some minor things we could still make, but the major production of all of our techonology and the next war will be about technology, is made in asia and overall China has taken our capacity while our ignorant leaders, including those who run our news organizations apparently, have stayed, well ignorant.
I have my own problems, and none of them have anything to do with China, at least not yet.  But there is nothing that I can do about those at this moment; or there is but I don't know how to do it.
Ah, life is complicated, Alas, alas Babylon.
Oh, and the reason the article is so wrong?  World War III has already begun, it is a war of manufacturing and technology and the USA is sleeping through China winning it.