The next chapters will define the relationship of rate of change and time orbits. They will get to the end game for all this discussion in a way that is somewhat spectacular. That you have to suffer with so much ground work is only because I put together Einstein's analysis of the universe with that of several others so that the end game became apparent to me first. Others will have taken what I've written and gotten there long before I post it, but if you prefer to wait instead of looking for it yourself, sit back, pour yourself a scotch or a glass of wine, curse me under your breath or out loud if you really think that I'm some kind of a monster, and read on or just go to a different blog, perhaps one with cats in it.
PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS Rate of Change: Instance is the prediction of NLT. Non-linearity means that everything happens at once, but quantum linearity means that “instance” exists. The reason your perceive that you are in a linear environment, that is that space-time exists, is because your perception is based on the linear projection of a single instant, a quantum rate change. While you think that the instant you are in is part of a sequence, that is not a requirement.
The “infinite universes” that traditional physics, dare I say primitive physics (I think not), tried to sell you is nothing more that the simultaneous existence of all of the instances at once. Our "instant" could easily be shuffled and dealt out in any order and we would still have all the memories and dreams for the future that we have now even though the order they play out would be purely random. This idea of shuffling will become very important later on.
PRE-EQUATION ANALYSIS Rate of Change: Instance is the prediction of NLT. Non-linearity means that everything happens at once, but quantum linearity means that “instance” exists. The reason your perceive that you are in a linear environment, that is that space-time exists, is because your perception is based on the linear projection of a single instant, a quantum rate change. While you think that the instant you are in is part of a sequence, that is not a requirement.
The “infinite universes” that traditional physics, dare I say primitive physics (I think not), tried to sell you is nothing more that the simultaneous existence of all of the instances at once. Our "instant" could easily be shuffled and dealt out in any order and we would still have all the memories and dreams for the future that we have now even though the order they play out would be purely random. This idea of shuffling will become very important later on.
Presumably the universe
has a set rate of change, this is the minimum quantum of time that creates
instance. This is reflected in the
conservation of time. As the volume of
the universe changes, the amount of change of the space coordinates and the
rate of creation of quantum space (if such in fact occurs) can be
estimated. If expansion doesn’t occur
this would not change the rate of change, but would change the way it would be
calculated. This "rate" appears different from different perspectives of concentration of clock time, but we know from prior entries that for our purposes it is 10^16*10^8*10^4*10^2 in terms of scale (or 10^30 for CT4). That is we can multiply our perception of the universe by 10^-30 (1 with 30 zeros between the decimal and the starting point) and we have the minimum distance with which time changes to be perceivable in all its myriad forms (from quantum gravity to black holes).
The rate of change is the same whether points are
compressed matter or dispersed as space.
The difference lies in the speed of one set of coordinate change verses
another. This is why we must accelerate
to change from matter to energy, we are eliminating Standard clock time in
favor of faster dimensional coordinate changes and, presumably even faster two
dimensional changes. An interesting exercise
will be to look at the different rates of compression while maintaining
coordinate change. It is, of course, predicted that
coordinate change rates decrease exponentially along with compression rates and this will be discussed shortly to bring the idea of "dimensionless time orbits", "coordinate change" and "minimum quantum change" (rate of change) together in subsequent chapters.
The exact "perceived" change rate (as opposed to quantum rate change) is complicated because every point on
earth is changing relative to the spin of the earth, the spin of the solar
system, the spin of the galaxy and the spin of the universe itself so it is not
a clear or linear expansion equation.
The speed with which something spins to create standard clock time would
affect the overall rate of change since all times are conserved.
And so we arrive back at formulating the
basic theoretical equation of NLT, subject to certain revision; but the
starting point for the next stage of inquiry, the basic equations of NLT.
No comments:
Post a Comment