NLT The next thing-56 PLANCK LENGTH AND SOLAR SCALES

Focus on your own problems.  That is a recipe for nothing.  

PLANCK LENGTH AND SOLAR SCALES: The first issue I'd like to address is the Planck length issue of getting from 10^38 to the correct, theoretical scale of 10^30.  First, Planck lengths are a theoretical construct with quantum support.  The 30 factor should be right and since Planck is minimum distance in space based primarily on light’s role as a speed limit in terms of coordinate change (under NLT).  How can both be right?

This is fairly easy.  The reason both can be right is that Planck length is tied to a specific measurement (meters).  That is, Planck length accepts dimension, it is not a pure scale measurement.  Planck Length (in NLT), says “once time goes non-linear, dimensional changes reflect this linearity (coordinate change) in ‘meters’ on a scale of 10^38.”  Therefore, the factor of 6 is a difference in the chosen “measurement”, meters.  This doesn’t mean that meters, millimeters (factor of 3 different) or kilometers (factor of 9) is more or less correct than any other unit.

The “true scale” has nothing to do with dimension between the first discrete matters nor with the size of solar mass to get to a collapse in concentration without other factors. 

This might include a possible mistake in the solution of the maximum size of star necessary to get to concentration levels predicted by NLT.

I'm willing to make a modest wager as to the accuracy of the concentration predictions in NLT both in terms of spatial concentration (10^2,10^4, 10^8) and mass concentration (10^32) which is why I keep these scales within this paper.