To understand my frustration you have to look at things from my perspective, something the wise man would avoid like the plague..
Let me start by apologizing for the dearth of postings on Non-Linear time when we were so close to the end of the paper. Alas, reconciling the chapters for publication takes precedent. I am hoping that in doing so I don't lose anything too important. The possibility exists that the only grain of true insight in the project will be edited out in favor of taking the wrong path and eliminating it in order to have a more elegant model. But for better or worse the time has come to publish and books must follow a clearer path than blog posts. That both my eyesight and imagination have dimmed will do nothing to improve the content. The occasional burst of energy is nothing more than a purer paraffin, without the oxygen the flame stays dim.
For Europe's vast unemployed, hopes remain dim
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_ECB_STRUGGLING_EUROPEANS?CTIME=2014-09-06-09-18-45&SECTION=HOME&SITE=AP&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
These articles continue to come up and you might ask me what the economic war with china and the inevitable (historically) failing of the US currency as the reserve currency with the planet have to do with one another. The idea the reserve currency countries borrow against their economies to the point of collapse is another brick in the wall of sand I am building to lay siege to the forces that refuse to give me the support I need to finish my thesis; but I'm not sure that this is the case. I fear as I slowly (terribly slowly) pursue this line of inquiry some more subtle fact leading to the more obvious collapse will be at work. A decay in the "fiber" of the inhabitants of the "lucky" country; a class separation; a propensity for war; perhaps some combination, but some common threat. But before we talk about common threads, let's get back to the article above, the article in question.
The reason this bothers me is that this reflects two sad truths. One is that many of these European countries, those doing the worst, at one point in time held the world's reserve currency.
NLT assumes a non-real universe is more likely than a real one. History repeating itself is one of the indicators of this. To understand this better, let's look at more "fundamental repetition." When you look at basic chemical and physics interactions, you get a high degree of "observed consistency." I say "observed consistency" because many are assuming there is some background anarchy led by the idea of "random chance", the idea that when you roll the dice you get a 7 ever 4 rolls; but that you can roll a very long time without rolling a 7 because of randomizing forces (or loaded dice). But NLT recognizes something which is subtle, but obvious. It is much easier to "build a universe" without true space-time if you have rules which cannot be broken. NLT assumes there are sufficient rules to make the universe easily constructed (easily from the point of some god like force) and then the universe plays out based on the rules which do not exist because they have to exist; but instead they exist because they were helpful in designing a universe with sufficient simplicity for the god like force.
In such a scenario, randomness and even self determination and invention (including the invention of a theory to explain the universe) do not really exist. I am inventing this because it was written. The hand does not "having written move on" to write something else, because the script was in place and the actors are not so much "punished" for deviating; but they are prevented from deviation. There are no true outliers. While you might say that this is incredibly stupid conceptually, it can be shown to be the most likely outcome by physics, the world of science is currently trying to prove it (at least on the level of the hologram because my credentials are not good enough for the pompous cabals that allegedly run these shows, perhaps correctly so).
I will mention, as an aside, that even if everything we do is pre-determined, the perceived ability to have self determination is as critical as any "true" self determination because there is much less to fear if you know that your acts are predetermined, that you can act as aggressively or intellectually as powerfully as you wish because you literally have the power of god behind you (well a god like force anyway) in any undertaking as long as your actions don't deviate from the script and the script allows for amazing undertakings, great happiness and the foolishness to squander it.
So, back to repetition of history. The idea of having everything governed by rules not because the universe requires rules but because that makes it easier to repeat is the best way to build this, it takes less effort. You see this with genetics, the patters are repeated to get the same thing. While many of you are jumping up and saying, "yes, but random change allows for mutation (and evolution)" but you are missing the point. The idea of randomness is a fiction, the Heisenberg uncertain principle is a fiction. Non-Linear time theory eliminates randomness in all its forms.
For those of you who are incredulous, you can get in line with those who would will not help me stop history from repeating itself in the fall and decline of the US empire; it is, sadly, a long line.
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Saturday, September 6, 2014
China, Bric, Russia and country national bankruptcy
Sometimes I feel so alone
even though I've been
around so many people today
Saturday mornings I give back
My habitat for theater work
Sometime building
today, ironically, tearing down
it was my first workshop
for such a very long time
and it was nice to see everyone
and to be able to be the doughnut guy
but it brought back so many memories
that i cannot live with
but that is another story
and that is another sadness
and today i mourn for my country
which doesn't think I am smart enough
or perhaps not educated enough
to solve all of its problems
or even see what they are
and it will probably see me the same
when it comes to undressing space time
and i laugh and i cry
for i have already done both
and perhaps done neither
but that is not the source
or the reason for my disquiet
it is the donuts and memories
sugar coated and sweet
killing me slowly
even as i try to hold on to them
to precious to forget
to painful to digest
So, the issues related to China's weaponized economy have been put on the back burner. However, I continue to have the importance of this thrown at me in ways that are often quite surprising.
One issue has to do with the despoliation of our environment, the oceans in particular. This issue I've ignored till now and I am somewhat embarrassed about it missing something so important. Closely related is the problem of foreign species being introduced into the US eco-system by increases in human traffic.
Hence, while some time in this entry will be spent discussing the debt problems associated with the export of manufacturing, particularly as they are manifested in Detroit, I want to spend a little time on the objects that are significant not only to the US but also to China, what has previously been called the "Silent Spring" phenomena associated with the shipment of massive quantities of product from China to the USA.
But I also am watching the reserve currency move from the United States overseas, my ability to affect it; at least to understand it has been crippled. Still the signs are all there, the coming economic apocalypse and all that it entails, yet I am gladdened because all, or perhaps almost all of those countries that once were the source of reserve currency continue to be a part of the world, and some of them are even relevant; so perhaps I'll stick with my work, despite the lack of recognition and maybe I'll look smarter next year.
11 Countries Near Bankruptcy: 24/7 Wall St. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/02/countries-near-bankruptcy_n_5644368.html?ir=Business&utm_hp_ref=business
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-02/u-s-companies-say-china-subjectively-enforcing-laws.html
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/us/article/Detroit-s-historic-bankruptcy-trial-to-begin-5727430.php
even though I've been
around so many people today
Saturday mornings I give back
My habitat for theater work
Sometime building
today, ironically, tearing down
it was my first workshop
for such a very long time
and it was nice to see everyone
and to be able to be the doughnut guy
but it brought back so many memories
that i cannot live with
but that is another story
and that is another sadness
and today i mourn for my country
which doesn't think I am smart enough
or perhaps not educated enough
to solve all of its problems
or even see what they are
and it will probably see me the same
when it comes to undressing space time
and i laugh and i cry
for i have already done both
and perhaps done neither
but that is not the source
or the reason for my disquiet
it is the donuts and memories
sugar coated and sweet
killing me slowly
even as i try to hold on to them
to precious to forget
to painful to digest
So, the issues related to China's weaponized economy have been put on the back burner. However, I continue to have the importance of this thrown at me in ways that are often quite surprising.
One issue has to do with the despoliation of our environment, the oceans in particular. This issue I've ignored till now and I am somewhat embarrassed about it missing something so important. Closely related is the problem of foreign species being introduced into the US eco-system by increases in human traffic.
Hence, while some time in this entry will be spent discussing the debt problems associated with the export of manufacturing, particularly as they are manifested in Detroit, I want to spend a little time on the objects that are significant not only to the US but also to China, what has previously been called the "Silent Spring" phenomena associated with the shipment of massive quantities of product from China to the USA.
But I also am watching the reserve currency move from the United States overseas, my ability to affect it; at least to understand it has been crippled. Still the signs are all there, the coming economic apocalypse and all that it entails, yet I am gladdened because all, or perhaps almost all of those countries that once were the source of reserve currency continue to be a part of the world, and some of them are even relevant; so perhaps I'll stick with my work, despite the lack of recognition and maybe I'll look smarter next year.
11 Countries Near Bankruptcy: 24/7 Wall St. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/02/countries-near-bankruptcy_n_5644368.html?ir=Business&utm_hp_ref=business
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-02/u-s-companies-say-china-subjectively-enforcing-laws.html
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/us/article/Detroit-s-historic-bankruptcy-trial-to-begin-5727430.php
Friday, September 5, 2014
The BP litigation-what's the big secret?
One of the things those of us who actually read everything filed in court see is that an unbelievable amount of information is redacted.
Why?
What is the reason for redacting? It isn't to save embarrassment...or is it? One has to recognize the power of an independent branch of the United States government where the members are appointed for life. Give me that job. The judge can do whatever is fair, so what is the concept here? A bigger question is when will the final ruling on all this redacted information be entered?
If I had the time, I would write a history of this litigation, but other things call out to me.
This week saw two big events; one a settlement for a billion dollars by Haliburton, the other a 153 page judgment finding BP liable for punitive damages (the summary of this opinion which includes pictures is only a single page). Several parties were also found not liable.
I had the opportunity to listen to the non-psc (plaintiff steering committee) side of the Haliburton deal. It would be disingenuous of me to comment, but what I heard was interesting and points out something that I think is important.
First, we've waited four years for some sort of remedy here, but for some reason the PSC can't get an agreement where the people can find out what they will get before they sign off on it? I think the comments provide one answer, perhaps there is another one.
So here is what I think I heard: This Haliburton agreement is more of the same from the prior settlement with bp because it doesn't say anything specific, there is no ability for anyone to know what, if anything it will yield, the costs of administering it, including the huge fees which are primarily, if not exclusively, to the psc, come out of the amount set aside and unlike the BP settlement, it has a cap, albeit a high one.
Any settlement that doesn't define what the parties to it have to pay and receive in return is motivated by something other than justice in my opinion. What here? First, the huge amount paid to the attorneys for the plaintiffs who accepted this settlement. Second, it eliminates most of the future liability of the defendant. It takes the majority of the work out of a court system that could not handle all of the work this case would otherwise generate. What is left out, what parties are excluded? Those who are injured, of course.
The first bp settlement for all its flaws, was a compromise. It was a slap in the face of thousands, if not millions who were injured by the spill; but before it was turned into a circus by BP and the courts, it was designed to be a compromise verdict, punishing many for trying as hard as they could, rewarding others randomly, but dealing with a situation that was too much to deal with any other way within the short time frame at the time. Of course, it collapsed into an enabling act nightmare that may yet throw the entire thing into some crazy nether-legal world; but we'll probably know about that this year.
The supreme court is the "big tent", but there are hearings this month in district court, BP taking settlements that they signed off on with individuals, very specific ones where BP wants nothing less than to take the money back from individuals who agreed to specific amounts in exchange for specific releases. There's no fraud in these, just one more aspect of bp's scorched earth strategy. Well, bp, don't admit you did anything wrong but you're facing 19 billion in punitive damages and the line of cases will be shorter, but still waiting when the court finally releases them for trial.
This latest Haliburton settlement is predicted to have little of the positive that the prior settlement had and much of the negative, designed mainly for to help line the pockets of those who made the settlement either by adding money to them or limiting how much comes out, but lets see how the parties defend what they have proposed.
Next year the case will take huge strides towards resolution, however long in the future the final resolution will be.
Why?
What is the reason for redacting? It isn't to save embarrassment...or is it? One has to recognize the power of an independent branch of the United States government where the members are appointed for life. Give me that job. The judge can do whatever is fair, so what is the concept here? A bigger question is when will the final ruling on all this redacted information be entered?
If I had the time, I would write a history of this litigation, but other things call out to me.
This week saw two big events; one a settlement for a billion dollars by Haliburton, the other a 153 page judgment finding BP liable for punitive damages (the summary of this opinion which includes pictures is only a single page). Several parties were also found not liable.
I had the opportunity to listen to the non-psc (plaintiff steering committee) side of the Haliburton deal. It would be disingenuous of me to comment, but what I heard was interesting and points out something that I think is important.
First, we've waited four years for some sort of remedy here, but for some reason the PSC can't get an agreement where the people can find out what they will get before they sign off on it? I think the comments provide one answer, perhaps there is another one.
So here is what I think I heard: This Haliburton agreement is more of the same from the prior settlement with bp because it doesn't say anything specific, there is no ability for anyone to know what, if anything it will yield, the costs of administering it, including the huge fees which are primarily, if not exclusively, to the psc, come out of the amount set aside and unlike the BP settlement, it has a cap, albeit a high one.
Any settlement that doesn't define what the parties to it have to pay and receive in return is motivated by something other than justice in my opinion. What here? First, the huge amount paid to the attorneys for the plaintiffs who accepted this settlement. Second, it eliminates most of the future liability of the defendant. It takes the majority of the work out of a court system that could not handle all of the work this case would otherwise generate. What is left out, what parties are excluded? Those who are injured, of course.
The first bp settlement for all its flaws, was a compromise. It was a slap in the face of thousands, if not millions who were injured by the spill; but before it was turned into a circus by BP and the courts, it was designed to be a compromise verdict, punishing many for trying as hard as they could, rewarding others randomly, but dealing with a situation that was too much to deal with any other way within the short time frame at the time. Of course, it collapsed into an enabling act nightmare that may yet throw the entire thing into some crazy nether-legal world; but we'll probably know about that this year.
The supreme court is the "big tent", but there are hearings this month in district court, BP taking settlements that they signed off on with individuals, very specific ones where BP wants nothing less than to take the money back from individuals who agreed to specific amounts in exchange for specific releases. There's no fraud in these, just one more aspect of bp's scorched earth strategy. Well, bp, don't admit you did anything wrong but you're facing 19 billion in punitive damages and the line of cases will be shorter, but still waiting when the court finally releases them for trial.
This latest Haliburton settlement is predicted to have little of the positive that the prior settlement had and much of the negative, designed mainly for to help line the pockets of those who made the settlement either by adding money to them or limiting how much comes out, but lets see how the parties defend what they have proposed.
Next year the case will take huge strides towards resolution, however long in the future the final resolution will be.
Thursday, September 4, 2014
NLT equations
I want you to know I gave love a few chances over my life; more than once. Maybe not recently; but definitely a few times. Most times it failed me, and the other times I failed love. If I gave in to responsibility, it isn't anything different from anyone else who sacrificed love for duty. Doesn't make me right, doesn't even make me responsible, just proves I'm human.
In editing NLT, and the last edit is 1/3 finished, I have been forced to look at the issues with the equations. In the videos of Gavin Wince, and even in the lectures at Stanford they use shortcuts to show the conceptual framework without all the details, so I'm going with that.
Democritus, in Greece, of course, in 460 BC came up with the idea of the atom. I do not miss the proximity of time between Democritus and Parminides and the other Greeks for that matter. Valence bond theory wasn't developed until 1927; almost 2500 years later and it is still under development today. http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n2/people_n2/science_n2/atomic_theory.html
Likewise, it took Einstein 10 years to derive the basic field equation. Therefore, I can be excused perhaps if I have not fully developed all the math, but perhaps not and I do not seek to be excused for this, only to explain myself. Out of laziness, despair and the difficulty in reading the small print (maybe in that order, maybe not) I am not even reconciling the formulas. Don't like it? Neither do I, but if it's my problem, then I own only that. No love, no editor, no life. It is my opus magnums if that is the right term, but if it isn't the last thing I write, then perhaps I have another surprise in me, another card up my sleeve.
It had some meaning when it was originally conceived, even when it was first written; a work possible only because of the passion behind it, the suffering, the recognition of what was really important in life, the redemption that came with it, and for a moment I held it all in my hands, everything that mattered, running through my fingers like sand. Now I'm left with what I came into this show with,..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMihKmoYfe8
In editing NLT, and the last edit is 1/3 finished, I have been forced to look at the issues with the equations. In the videos of Gavin Wince, and even in the lectures at Stanford they use shortcuts to show the conceptual framework without all the details, so I'm going with that.
Democritus, in Greece, of course, in 460 BC came up with the idea of the atom. I do not miss the proximity of time between Democritus and Parminides and the other Greeks for that matter. Valence bond theory wasn't developed until 1927; almost 2500 years later and it is still under development today. http://www.hyperhistory.com/online_n2/people_n2/science_n2/atomic_theory.html
Likewise, it took Einstein 10 years to derive the basic field equation. Therefore, I can be excused perhaps if I have not fully developed all the math, but perhaps not and I do not seek to be excused for this, only to explain myself. Out of laziness, despair and the difficulty in reading the small print (maybe in that order, maybe not) I am not even reconciling the formulas. Don't like it? Neither do I, but if it's my problem, then I own only that. No love, no editor, no life. It is my opus magnums if that is the right term, but if it isn't the last thing I write, then perhaps I have another surprise in me, another card up my sleeve.
It had some meaning when it was originally conceived, even when it was first written; a work possible only because of the passion behind it, the suffering, the recognition of what was really important in life, the redemption that came with it, and for a moment I held it all in my hands, everything that mattered, running through my fingers like sand. Now I'm left with what I came into this show with,..https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMihKmoYfe8
NLT-the next thing 68 the size of the universe
http://www.fromquarkstoquasars.com/from-quark-to-quasar-the-observable-universe-2/
NLT theory predicts the universe is the product of a single quantum time point existing outside of dimensional time and space. Everything in the universe happens at once within the singularity.
While many are incredulous, most of those who feel this way believe in the possibility of the big bang which is the universe coming from a singularity. Others believe that black holes collapse into a singularity with all their massive whatever. NLT, of course, has figured out what black holes really are, but if you don't want to find that in a blog entry prior to this one, wait a few weeks and you'll be able to buy NLT on Amazon.
The idea behind NLT Quantum theory is that a single point gives rise to the universe and therefore everything is necessarily quantum from this single point successively going linear. This point has no definition in our reality because it exists without linearity and without dimension.
It is further a proposition of NLT that every moment (and therefore every molecule, sub-particle, past, present or future person) can exist simultaneously with a full past and future. So this NLT point not only has all of the elements of the universe, but all times, past, present and future at one time, unseparated by space or time. It seems like a very heavy and well stuffed singularity, except it has no weight or dimension.
To understand how difficult it is to understand such a universe it is a good idea to conceive how impossible it is to conceive of our universe and how unlikely a thing the universe you live in.
A good place to start is with the size of the universe and the link above is the source for this information understanding the "observable universe is limited by the speed of light"
NLT theory predicts the universe is the product of a single quantum time point existing outside of dimensional time and space. Everything in the universe happens at once within the singularity.
While many are incredulous, most of those who feel this way believe in the possibility of the big bang which is the universe coming from a singularity. Others believe that black holes collapse into a singularity with all their massive whatever. NLT, of course, has figured out what black holes really are, but if you don't want to find that in a blog entry prior to this one, wait a few weeks and you'll be able to buy NLT on Amazon.
The idea behind NLT Quantum theory is that a single point gives rise to the universe and therefore everything is necessarily quantum from this single point successively going linear. This point has no definition in our reality because it exists without linearity and without dimension.
It is further a proposition of NLT that every moment (and therefore every molecule, sub-particle, past, present or future person) can exist simultaneously with a full past and future. So this NLT point not only has all of the elements of the universe, but all times, past, present and future at one time, unseparated by space or time. It seems like a very heavy and well stuffed singularity, except it has no weight or dimension.
To understand how difficult it is to understand such a universe it is a good idea to conceive how impossible it is to conceive of our universe and how unlikely a thing the universe you live in.
A good place to start is with the size of the universe and the link above is the source for this information understanding the "observable universe is limited by the speed of light"
The “observable” universe is thought to consist of roughly:
-*10 million superclusters (note-we just found our supercluster)
- *25 billion galaxy groups
- *350 billion large galaxies
- *7 trillion dwarf galaxies
- *30 billion trillion (3X10^22) stars
(of which, almost 30 stars go supernova per second)
....The total universe is 10 billion times larger than the size of the observable.
Now some of you are saying, if it's really that big, it would be impossible to fit this into a singularity where everything happens at once. However, just the opposite is suggested because this ridiculously complex universe has a past and future and therefore the entire universe has the features of the singularity.that those people are arguing it is hard to comprehend.
That is the universe is impossible to comprehend, so why should anything else be less comprehensible? The answer is that it makes a lot more sense to assume that the universe is a projection of linearity from a point where everything happens at once. For those of you, assuming there is one of you, who are still reading this, let's look at this logically.
When I wrote that list above, if you read it you were able to conceptualize in your mind everything that was listed at least in a broad sense. For example, you could "think" a trillion has 12 zeros and a billion has 9 so there are 30x10^21 stars. And you may have thought, in the time it took me to read this maybe 600 stars (6,000 if you're a slow reader) stars have gone supernova meaning that a couple of civilizations much like ours may have been snuffed out while you are reading this and maybe it brings a tear to your eye to think that we're wasting time killing each other rather than addressing these issues or maybe you're sad that rather than cherish what we have, we're just polluting ourselves to death, walking away from opportunities or, heck, maybe you're pretty happy about where everything is going. Either way, an awful lot is going through your mind, even if you're pretty stupid like me.
The point is, even you with your tiny, tiny computer brain (compared to all the brains (past present and future) in the universe) were able to comprehend a general outline of what the universe is while you were reading this. If you're catching on, and I doubt anyone is still reading this, but if you are catching on, you can see that "conceiving of the universe" is a lot easier than actually building it out, particularly if you are conceiving it based on a pre-set group of rules (physics).
The singularity in NLT is a lot like the idea of conception in the prior two paragraphs. It's like a database that can call on the facts it needs to for the construction of everything, more particularly of "anything", at any moment in time. Its a lot easier than actually building out the universe every instant. For those of you (if any) still reading this, asking if there are religious overtones to this, the answers that I arrived at are set out in the Einstein Hologram Universe, and while they are largely for my amusement, they may be worth a casual glance. If you want me to place a bet on what god looks like from NLT, that's actually pretty simple, NLT deals with a singularity so the "god" of the singularity would be a point of infinite density in terms of intelligence, time and space. Now if you ask me what "environment" this point-god would exist in, I'd tell you that its an environment without dimension or linear time, its a place where everything happens at once, its a place very alien to our way of thinking and while some have theorized that the "maker" of our universe is an under-achieving third grader in this alien environment, I'd venture to think that our attempts to apply anthropomorphism to that environment are more likely to yield results if we keep our humor in check and instead apply our observations to this problem and, quite frankly, I'm probably going to bore you with that if you stick around long enough, but not today.
Regardless of your thoughts or lack of thoughts on this issue, the point is (I could have reduced this entire chapter to one line) that a conceived universe that exists without true linearity is equally likely and equally easy to construct as a linear universe and NLT shows that a lot of the math makes more sense if you get rid of this space time matrix that you are so "stuck on". And if you are upset that I would make such a grand pronouncement, I would remind you that it comes from what Einstein said and if you aren't particularly fond of Einstein, it is inherent in the creation story of the Bible, so I guess that means it is what Moses said; not base on what he said, certainly, but inherently the same thing. To paraphrase: in the beginning there was nothing and then everything was laid out by a (cognizant) singularity who had the ability to control the past, present and future. Perhaps in the editing Moses left out the part where he wanted to say "and it continues to exist for this cognizant singularity without time and dimension" because he thought it would be too hard to explain to everyone.
When I wrote that list above, if you read it you were able to conceptualize in your mind everything that was listed at least in a broad sense. For example, you could "think" a trillion has 12 zeros and a billion has 9 so there are 30x10^21 stars. And you may have thought, in the time it took me to read this maybe 600 stars (6,000 if you're a slow reader) stars have gone supernova meaning that a couple of civilizations much like ours may have been snuffed out while you are reading this and maybe it brings a tear to your eye to think that we're wasting time killing each other rather than addressing these issues or maybe you're sad that rather than cherish what we have, we're just polluting ourselves to death, walking away from opportunities or, heck, maybe you're pretty happy about where everything is going. Either way, an awful lot is going through your mind, even if you're pretty stupid like me.
The point is, even you with your tiny, tiny computer brain (compared to all the brains (past present and future) in the universe) were able to comprehend a general outline of what the universe is while you were reading this. If you're catching on, and I doubt anyone is still reading this, but if you are catching on, you can see that "conceiving of the universe" is a lot easier than actually building it out, particularly if you are conceiving it based on a pre-set group of rules (physics).
The singularity in NLT is a lot like the idea of conception in the prior two paragraphs. It's like a database that can call on the facts it needs to for the construction of everything, more particularly of "anything", at any moment in time. Its a lot easier than actually building out the universe every instant. For those of you (if any) still reading this, asking if there are religious overtones to this, the answers that I arrived at are set out in the Einstein Hologram Universe, and while they are largely for my amusement, they may be worth a casual glance. If you want me to place a bet on what god looks like from NLT, that's actually pretty simple, NLT deals with a singularity so the "god" of the singularity would be a point of infinite density in terms of intelligence, time and space. Now if you ask me what "environment" this point-god would exist in, I'd tell you that its an environment without dimension or linear time, its a place where everything happens at once, its a place very alien to our way of thinking and while some have theorized that the "maker" of our universe is an under-achieving third grader in this alien environment, I'd venture to think that our attempts to apply anthropomorphism to that environment are more likely to yield results if we keep our humor in check and instead apply our observations to this problem and, quite frankly, I'm probably going to bore you with that if you stick around long enough, but not today.
Regardless of your thoughts or lack of thoughts on this issue, the point is (I could have reduced this entire chapter to one line) that a conceived universe that exists without true linearity is equally likely and equally easy to construct as a linear universe and NLT shows that a lot of the math makes more sense if you get rid of this space time matrix that you are so "stuck on". And if you are upset that I would make such a grand pronouncement, I would remind you that it comes from what Einstein said and if you aren't particularly fond of Einstein, it is inherent in the creation story of the Bible, so I guess that means it is what Moses said; not base on what he said, certainly, but inherently the same thing. To paraphrase: in the beginning there was nothing and then everything was laid out by a (cognizant) singularity who had the ability to control the past, present and future. Perhaps in the editing Moses left out the part where he wanted to say "and it continues to exist for this cognizant singularity without time and dimension" because he thought it would be too hard to explain to everyone.
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
happy birthday NLT-the flash of genius captured for posterity
I'm pretty tired. In addition to my regular work I've been getting NLT theory ready to publish. This should be fairly easy, but its an undertaking given the work. In getting this ready, I had an occasion to look to see when I started this inquiry; something possible because it came as a part of this blog!
NLT has come a long way since it started. And guess what? It's almost exactly two years old! So in light of this, I will have a birthday celebration sans cake. Welcome to the party.
So where does NLT get it start? Apparently in a couple of posts:
SOLUTIONS IN NLT/EHT: It has been postulated that NLT can explain a universe without real dimension. The list of “pre-NLT mysteries” of the universe solved by NLT are listed in previous entries. So when did this revolutionary approach to Quantum Mechanics get its start:
The development of NLT has occurred relatively quickly after the first entry on September 1, 2012. That reference was only a discussion of hologram theory. It was not conception, it was only a discussion of an interesting concept.
On September 2, 2012 under "plumbing the depths" this post appeared:
This is a holiday break from the war with china and the term limits arguments that will come up later. See the earlier posts if you want to follow that part of the blog
This examines some of the questions raised by current theories of the universe. This one, supported by some of the writings of Einstein, Hawkins (The Universe in a nutshell) and others, is not a finished model, so I take the liberty of assigning certain features to it which may or may not be consistent with the model.
One of those "assigned features" is that everything has already happened. Time is just a method of allowing someone to "walk around" the universe and see what is happening at any point in time, just as in a laser-hologram you can walk around in one direction and see a banana peeled and then go in the opposite direction and watch it closed back. Hence, one question of the hologram universe is whether it is possible to go around it and see in them the past and go in another direction and see the future.
We have seen that the past is visible and easily visited, at least on a macro scale. You do this every time you look into the night sky; starring eons into the past of galaxies and stars. Even when you see sunlight you are looking a short time in the past.
Light is the speed limit of the universe, at least in the dimensions that we live in, and it is also a way to walk around the hologram for distant objects. The fact that it does not, at least the way we have observed light so far, allow us to look at near objects in the distant past or any objects in the future raises the question of whether there is another way to look at light so this would be possible or to find the source of light or of the projection of the universe so that we could go walking around it. This would give us the perspective of the hypothetical "god" which presumably created the universe and who could, by walking around it, on a micro level, see the beginning and the end.
This is not science fiction if the hologram universe allows for this type of view and if it is merely a projection of something that already exists and but for the artifice of time has already happened. In fact, there is little reason to believe in the bubble theory that there are not an infinite number of universes, each with an infinite number of ways of things happening being viewed by whoever created them with interest or without interest just as some of us look into the sky with great interest and some out of boredom; why some see the full moon and are filled with romantic thoughts and others are merely aggravated that it is not dark enough to sleep.
In a future blog, perhaps we will discuss who is viewing these holograms. Are they exhibits in some god museum or are we merely the bubbles formed while some great being beyond the scope of our comprehension bubbles water for tea?
Then, on 11/8/12 this was written under the title: the "biblical relevance of hologram theory":
"In the beginning there a was a great void, which was hot and dense being filled with everything that would ever happen.
Then there was light which was the beginning of time. In a logical progression everything that was already there is a three dimensional framework moving outward from a central location was provided a surface on which to be displayed which was time.
This is the explanation of why time fits so poorly with the other dimensions. It is because the other dimensions are painted, or etched onto time.
Time expands in only one direction which explains why the universe where everything had already happened had to begin expanding.
Obviously on some level things may go in either direction and time is a fairly constant surface on which to paint events which have already happened so that at any given moment in time, everything is painted at once...or etched. Everything is actually etched. You etch in time, you don't paint in time.
Time need only move at one speed, probably the speed of light, as the universe gets bigger. Sometimes we feel like time is expanding faster or slower, but it is only a layer of material, an intangible material which we cannot feel and we cannot see but which may be the only material of relevance to someone watching the process of taking everything that has happened being etched onto the fabric of space and time...but it isn't etched on space, space is just something that is defined by things and things are etched only on time, there is no other surface.
The only question is how many times there are, how many universal fabrics. Each would receive everything that has already happened and everything that will happen.
If Einstein were here would he still say that time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once or would he instead say that everything has already happened and that time is a surface on which it is displayed in a linear fashion?"
The highlighted part above is the first peek, the first gasp, the beginning of NLT. So what we see here is the "germ of an idea" turning into a question over 2 months and 7 days. Then it turns into a full fledged theory over the following 2 years. The blog includes coffee and non-coffee, affection and betrayal, poems and prognostication, love and loss, emotional and physical blindness, all over 24 months. And there on October 8, 2012 captured like a photograph is the moment of genius. It is the apple falling onto Newton, Einstein picturing himself falling (like the apple) and, of course, it is Archimedes shouting Eureka as his bathwater spills over the floor of a Greek bath house, of course it is.
Now some of you may be questioning the brilliance of Non-linear time theory and who knows, perhaps you are correct. However, that is a mere technicality. It either is brilliant or it is not. But either way, the flash is there, it is either a flash of genius or irrelevance.
I wish you what I cannot have, a good night -
NLT has come a long way since it started. And guess what? It's almost exactly two years old! So in light of this, I will have a birthday celebration sans cake. Welcome to the party.
So where does NLT get it start? Apparently in a couple of posts:
SOLUTIONS IN NLT/EHT: It has been postulated that NLT can explain a universe without real dimension. The list of “pre-NLT mysteries” of the universe solved by NLT are listed in previous entries. So when did this revolutionary approach to Quantum Mechanics get its start:
The development of NLT has occurred relatively quickly after the first entry on September 1, 2012. That reference was only a discussion of hologram theory. It was not conception, it was only a discussion of an interesting concept.
On September 2, 2012 under "plumbing the depths" this post appeared:
This is a holiday break from the war with china and the term limits arguments that will come up later. See the earlier posts if you want to follow that part of the blog
This examines some of the questions raised by current theories of the universe. This one, supported by some of the writings of Einstein, Hawkins (The Universe in a nutshell) and others, is not a finished model, so I take the liberty of assigning certain features to it which may or may not be consistent with the model.
One of those "assigned features" is that everything has already happened. Time is just a method of allowing someone to "walk around" the universe and see what is happening at any point in time, just as in a laser-hologram you can walk around in one direction and see a banana peeled and then go in the opposite direction and watch it closed back. Hence, one question of the hologram universe is whether it is possible to go around it and see in them the past and go in another direction and see the future.
We have seen that the past is visible and easily visited, at least on a macro scale. You do this every time you look into the night sky; starring eons into the past of galaxies and stars. Even when you see sunlight you are looking a short time in the past.
Light is the speed limit of the universe, at least in the dimensions that we live in, and it is also a way to walk around the hologram for distant objects. The fact that it does not, at least the way we have observed light so far, allow us to look at near objects in the distant past or any objects in the future raises the question of whether there is another way to look at light so this would be possible or to find the source of light or of the projection of the universe so that we could go walking around it. This would give us the perspective of the hypothetical "god" which presumably created the universe and who could, by walking around it, on a micro level, see the beginning and the end.
This is not science fiction if the hologram universe allows for this type of view and if it is merely a projection of something that already exists and but for the artifice of time has already happened. In fact, there is little reason to believe in the bubble theory that there are not an infinite number of universes, each with an infinite number of ways of things happening being viewed by whoever created them with interest or without interest just as some of us look into the sky with great interest and some out of boredom; why some see the full moon and are filled with romantic thoughts and others are merely aggravated that it is not dark enough to sleep.
In a future blog, perhaps we will discuss who is viewing these holograms. Are they exhibits in some god museum or are we merely the bubbles formed while some great being beyond the scope of our comprehension bubbles water for tea?
Then, on 11/8/12 this was written under the title: the "biblical relevance of hologram theory":
"In the beginning there a was a great void, which was hot and dense being filled with everything that would ever happen.
Then there was light which was the beginning of time. In a logical progression everything that was already there is a three dimensional framework moving outward from a central location was provided a surface on which to be displayed which was time.
This is the explanation of why time fits so poorly with the other dimensions. It is because the other dimensions are painted, or etched onto time.
Time expands in only one direction which explains why the universe where everything had already happened had to begin expanding.
Obviously on some level things may go in either direction and time is a fairly constant surface on which to paint events which have already happened so that at any given moment in time, everything is painted at once...or etched. Everything is actually etched. You etch in time, you don't paint in time.
Time need only move at one speed, probably the speed of light, as the universe gets bigger. Sometimes we feel like time is expanding faster or slower, but it is only a layer of material, an intangible material which we cannot feel and we cannot see but which may be the only material of relevance to someone watching the process of taking everything that has happened being etched onto the fabric of space and time...but it isn't etched on space, space is just something that is defined by things and things are etched only on time, there is no other surface.
The only question is how many times there are, how many universal fabrics. Each would receive everything that has already happened and everything that will happen.
If Einstein were here would he still say that time exists so that everything doesn't happen at once or would he instead say that everything has already happened and that time is a surface on which it is displayed in a linear fashion?"
The highlighted part above is the first peek, the first gasp, the beginning of NLT. So what we see here is the "germ of an idea" turning into a question over 2 months and 7 days. Then it turns into a full fledged theory over the following 2 years. The blog includes coffee and non-coffee, affection and betrayal, poems and prognostication, love and loss, emotional and physical blindness, all over 24 months. And there on October 8, 2012 captured like a photograph is the moment of genius. It is the apple falling onto Newton, Einstein picturing himself falling (like the apple) and, of course, it is Archimedes shouting Eureka as his bathwater spills over the floor of a Greek bath house, of course it is.
Now some of you may be questioning the brilliance of Non-linear time theory and who knows, perhaps you are correct. However, that is a mere technicality. It either is brilliant or it is not. But either way, the flash is there, it is either a flash of genius or irrelevance.
I wish you what I cannot have, a good night -
Monday, September 1, 2014
NLT-the next step 67 why do time quanta interact
I'm working on going back to Mexico. There's a particular reason, but perhaps the particular reason is no particular reason. Maybe it is just that south of the border cites, central Mexico, is a place where you can get pretty far away from yourself, unless you're Mexican, of course.
This, losing yourself, requires not going to tourist Mexico and not going to directly across the border mexico. This requires going to the part of mexico where people live without being anything different than what they are, people. It's a dangerous place in some ways, but its just a place where people live. But maybe I'm going because it is a dangerous place, because life needs some danger. Of course, my life has all kinds of danger now, I wonder how the life would be without it.
And Mexico is hot, perhaps too hot. Its a long term proposition anyway. A better person would just go to Mexico, maybe they would leave their computer and just go, maybe I would just go, if I was a better person.
I haven't been giving time to my writing, yes I've posted a great deal about NLT, but that is just explaining a weary mathematics, weary because it has already been written.
I have a dozen projects that I have ignored for so long and so badly I want to work on them.
It you know in your heart you say yes because you want to, then perhaps that is why you say no to life, because for whatever reason you want to..
With the recent concentration of interest on hologram theory, however far behind everyone is from NLT, I feel the need to go ahead and publish NLT, the book. Perhaps, then, I will publish and the perhaps I will disappear for a while.
It is, after all, the first of September. But first, to answer a question since it's weary and waiting to be answered and then I need to take all of this, and publish it, without, I'm sorry, letting you see it first or boring you with the commentary.
But before I go to Mexico, before I publish Non Linear Time Theory, before I go blind, quit swimming or watch Houdini on the history network, I will publish at least one more chapter.
NOW AVAILABLE EDITED ON AMAZON
Why do Time Quanta Interact:
Dimension is an illusion. Time exists without dimension. It is unlikely that time "physically" uncoils, but if it does, it only uncoils to give the appearance of dimension and linear time within the singularity. This is intuitive since something as complicated as space-time is contra-indicated. That is to say, space time is too complicated to exist and therefore a non-linear universe existing without actual dimension or linear time is no less difficult to perceive than space time. An entire universe arising from a singular time point is equally as likely as a universe made up of a near infinite number of finite points.
Why does quantum time interact, whether in the singularity or in a linear universe, with other time quanta to combine to create universes?
This is inherent in the idea that if we are splitting a single time quanta to create everything, the very act of division creates such a "force" to return to non-linearity, that it differs from all other forces, at least until it is seen as just another orbital state of time, and which we know as gravity. However, our rules of force and counter force mean very little in terms of Non-Linear Time Theory.
We know the apparent forces, the most fundamental being gravity, the tendency to return to the singularity or, theorized and put another way, is a prior time state going negative. This means the fundamental type of negative coordinate states is the tendency of time states to combine and as the concentration increases necessarily the amount of compression and the forces contributing to compression will increase.
But there are other forces and we know that time quanta interact and combine.
The question of why is fundamental to our ability to manipulate time at the fundamental level.
There are two possibilities. One is that awareness requires the interaction which is the spiritual path suggested by e-hologram theory (see chapter 6 of the book for more info on this). The other possibility is that there is some "physics" internal to time in the singularity that gives rise to the uncoiling of time and the forces that cause time to interact and even to combine in sufficient quantities to recoil and which is expressed herein as negative time states. The intensity of each negative time state need not be exponentially greater than the prior state, but each arises from an exponential increase in concentration (theorized) and each continues to exist in the face of the next higher counter force to higher time state concentrations suggesting consecutively filled time orbits.
This, losing yourself, requires not going to tourist Mexico and not going to directly across the border mexico. This requires going to the part of mexico where people live without being anything different than what they are, people. It's a dangerous place in some ways, but its just a place where people live. But maybe I'm going because it is a dangerous place, because life needs some danger. Of course, my life has all kinds of danger now, I wonder how the life would be without it.
And Mexico is hot, perhaps too hot. Its a long term proposition anyway. A better person would just go to Mexico, maybe they would leave their computer and just go, maybe I would just go, if I was a better person.
I haven't been giving time to my writing, yes I've posted a great deal about NLT, but that is just explaining a weary mathematics, weary because it has already been written.
I have a dozen projects that I have ignored for so long and so badly I want to work on them.
It you know in your heart you say yes because you want to, then perhaps that is why you say no to life, because for whatever reason you want to..
With the recent concentration of interest on hologram theory, however far behind everyone is from NLT, I feel the need to go ahead and publish NLT, the book. Perhaps, then, I will publish and the perhaps I will disappear for a while.
It is, after all, the first of September. But first, to answer a question since it's weary and waiting to be answered and then I need to take all of this, and publish it, without, I'm sorry, letting you see it first or boring you with the commentary.
But before I go to Mexico, before I publish Non Linear Time Theory, before I go blind, quit swimming or watch Houdini on the history network, I will publish at least one more chapter.
NOW AVAILABLE EDITED ON AMAZON
Why do Time Quanta Interact:
Dimension is an illusion. Time exists without dimension. It is unlikely that time "physically" uncoils, but if it does, it only uncoils to give the appearance of dimension and linear time within the singularity. This is intuitive since something as complicated as space-time is contra-indicated. That is to say, space time is too complicated to exist and therefore a non-linear universe existing without actual dimension or linear time is no less difficult to perceive than space time. An entire universe arising from a singular time point is equally as likely as a universe made up of a near infinite number of finite points.
Why does quantum time interact, whether in the singularity or in a linear universe, with other time quanta to combine to create universes?
This is inherent in the idea that if we are splitting a single time quanta to create everything, the very act of division creates such a "force" to return to non-linearity, that it differs from all other forces, at least until it is seen as just another orbital state of time, and which we know as gravity. However, our rules of force and counter force mean very little in terms of Non-Linear Time Theory.
We know the apparent forces, the most fundamental being gravity, the tendency to return to the singularity or, theorized and put another way, is a prior time state going negative. This means the fundamental type of negative coordinate states is the tendency of time states to combine and as the concentration increases necessarily the amount of compression and the forces contributing to compression will increase.
But there are other forces and we know that time quanta interact and combine.
The question of why is fundamental to our ability to manipulate time at the fundamental level.
There are two possibilities. One is that awareness requires the interaction which is the spiritual path suggested by e-hologram theory (see chapter 6 of the book for more info on this). The other possibility is that there is some "physics" internal to time in the singularity that gives rise to the uncoiling of time and the forces that cause time to interact and even to combine in sufficient quantities to recoil and which is expressed herein as negative time states. The intensity of each negative time state need not be exponentially greater than the prior state, but each arises from an exponential increase in concentration (theorized) and each continues to exist in the face of the next higher counter force to higher time state concentrations suggesting consecutively filled time orbits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)