NLT theory predicts the universe is the product of a single quantum time point existing outside of dimensional time and space. Everything in the universe happens at once within the singularity.
While many are incredulous, most of those who feel this way believe in the possibility of the big bang which is the universe coming from a singularity. Others believe that black holes collapse into a singularity with all their massive whatever. NLT, of course, has figured out what black holes really are, but if you don't want to find that in a blog entry prior to this one, wait a few weeks and you'll be able to buy NLT on Amazon.
The idea behind NLT Quantum theory is that a single point gives rise to the universe and therefore everything is necessarily quantum from this single point successively going linear. This point has no definition in our reality because it exists without linearity and without dimension.
It is further a proposition of NLT that every moment (and therefore every molecule, sub-particle, past, present or future person) can exist simultaneously with a full past and future. So this NLT point not only has all of the elements of the universe, but all times, past, present and future at one time, unseparated by space or time. It seems like a very heavy and well stuffed singularity, except it has no weight or dimension.
To understand how difficult it is to understand such a universe it is a good idea to conceive how impossible it is to conceive of our universe and how unlikely a thing the universe you live in.
A good place to start is with the size of the universe and the link above is the source for this information understanding the "observable universe is limited by the speed of light"
The “observable” universe is thought to consist of roughly:
-*10 million superclusters (note-we just found our supercluster)
- *25 billion galaxy groups
- *350 billion large galaxies
- *7 trillion dwarf galaxies
- *30 billion trillion (3X10^22) stars
(of which, almost 30 stars go supernova per second)
....The total universe is 10 billion times larger than the size of the observable.
Now some of you are saying, if it's really that big, it would be impossible to fit this into a singularity where everything happens at once. However, just the opposite is suggested because this ridiculously complex universe has a past and future and therefore the entire universe has the features of the singularity.that those people are arguing it is hard to comprehend.
That is the universe is impossible to comprehend, so why should anything else be less comprehensible? The answer is that it makes a lot more sense to assume that the universe is a projection of linearity from a point where everything happens at once. For those of you, assuming there is one of you, who are still reading this, let's look at this logically.
When I wrote that list above, if you read it you were able to conceptualize in your mind everything that was listed at least in a broad sense. For example, you could "think" a trillion has 12 zeros and a billion has 9 so there are 30x10^21 stars. And you may have thought, in the time it took me to read this maybe 600 stars (6,000 if you're a slow reader) stars have gone supernova meaning that a couple of civilizations much like ours may have been snuffed out while you are reading this and maybe it brings a tear to your eye to think that we're wasting time killing each other rather than addressing these issues or maybe you're sad that rather than cherish what we have, we're just polluting ourselves to death, walking away from opportunities or, heck, maybe you're pretty happy about where everything is going. Either way, an awful lot is going through your mind, even if you're pretty stupid like me.
The point is, even you with your tiny, tiny computer brain (compared to all the brains (past present and future) in the universe) were able to comprehend a general outline of what the universe is while you were reading this. If you're catching on, and I doubt anyone is still reading this, but if you are catching on, you can see that "conceiving of the universe" is a lot easier than actually building it out, particularly if you are conceiving it based on a pre-set group of rules (physics).
The singularity in NLT is a lot like the idea of conception in the prior two paragraphs. It's like a database that can call on the facts it needs to for the construction of everything, more particularly of "anything", at any moment in time. Its a lot easier than actually building out the universe every instant. For those of you (if any) still reading this, asking if there are religious overtones to this, the answers that I arrived at are set out in the Einstein Hologram Universe, and while they are largely for my amusement, they may be worth a casual glance. If you want me to place a bet on what god looks like from NLT, that's actually pretty simple, NLT deals with a singularity so the "god" of the singularity would be a point of infinite density in terms of intelligence, time and space. Now if you ask me what "environment" this point-god would exist in, I'd tell you that its an environment without dimension or linear time, its a place where everything happens at once, its a place very alien to our way of thinking and while some have theorized that the "maker" of our universe is an under-achieving third grader in this alien environment, I'd venture to think that our attempts to apply anthropomorphism to that environment are more likely to yield results if we keep our humor in check and instead apply our observations to this problem and, quite frankly, I'm probably going to bore you with that if you stick around long enough, but not today.
Regardless of your thoughts or lack of thoughts on this issue, the point is (I could have reduced this entire chapter to one line) that a conceived universe that exists without true linearity is equally likely and equally easy to construct as a linear universe and NLT shows that a lot of the math makes more sense if you get rid of this space time matrix that you are so "stuck on". And if you are upset that I would make such a grand pronouncement, I would remind you that it comes from what Einstein said and if you aren't particularly fond of Einstein, it is inherent in the creation story of the Bible, so I guess that means it is what Moses said; not base on what he said, certainly, but inherently the same thing. To paraphrase: in the beginning there was nothing and then everything was laid out by a (cognizant) singularity who had the ability to control the past, present and future. Perhaps in the editing Moses left out the part where he wanted to say "and it continues to exist for this cognizant singularity without time and dimension" because he thought it would be too hard to explain to everyone.
When I wrote that list above, if you read it you were able to conceptualize in your mind everything that was listed at least in a broad sense. For example, you could "think" a trillion has 12 zeros and a billion has 9 so there are 30x10^21 stars. And you may have thought, in the time it took me to read this maybe 600 stars (6,000 if you're a slow reader) stars have gone supernova meaning that a couple of civilizations much like ours may have been snuffed out while you are reading this and maybe it brings a tear to your eye to think that we're wasting time killing each other rather than addressing these issues or maybe you're sad that rather than cherish what we have, we're just polluting ourselves to death, walking away from opportunities or, heck, maybe you're pretty happy about where everything is going. Either way, an awful lot is going through your mind, even if you're pretty stupid like me.
The point is, even you with your tiny, tiny computer brain (compared to all the brains (past present and future) in the universe) were able to comprehend a general outline of what the universe is while you were reading this. If you're catching on, and I doubt anyone is still reading this, but if you are catching on, you can see that "conceiving of the universe" is a lot easier than actually building it out, particularly if you are conceiving it based on a pre-set group of rules (physics).
The singularity in NLT is a lot like the idea of conception in the prior two paragraphs. It's like a database that can call on the facts it needs to for the construction of everything, more particularly of "anything", at any moment in time. Its a lot easier than actually building out the universe every instant. For those of you (if any) still reading this, asking if there are religious overtones to this, the answers that I arrived at are set out in the Einstein Hologram Universe, and while they are largely for my amusement, they may be worth a casual glance. If you want me to place a bet on what god looks like from NLT, that's actually pretty simple, NLT deals with a singularity so the "god" of the singularity would be a point of infinite density in terms of intelligence, time and space. Now if you ask me what "environment" this point-god would exist in, I'd tell you that its an environment without dimension or linear time, its a place where everything happens at once, its a place very alien to our way of thinking and while some have theorized that the "maker" of our universe is an under-achieving third grader in this alien environment, I'd venture to think that our attempts to apply anthropomorphism to that environment are more likely to yield results if we keep our humor in check and instead apply our observations to this problem and, quite frankly, I'm probably going to bore you with that if you stick around long enough, but not today.
Regardless of your thoughts or lack of thoughts on this issue, the point is (I could have reduced this entire chapter to one line) that a conceived universe that exists without true linearity is equally likely and equally easy to construct as a linear universe and NLT shows that a lot of the math makes more sense if you get rid of this space time matrix that you are so "stuck on". And if you are upset that I would make such a grand pronouncement, I would remind you that it comes from what Einstein said and if you aren't particularly fond of Einstein, it is inherent in the creation story of the Bible, so I guess that means it is what Moses said; not base on what he said, certainly, but inherently the same thing. To paraphrase: in the beginning there was nothing and then everything was laid out by a (cognizant) singularity who had the ability to control the past, present and future. Perhaps in the editing Moses left out the part where he wanted to say "and it continues to exist for this cognizant singularity without time and dimension" because he thought it would be too hard to explain to everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment