NLT the next thing 71: NLT and science fiction

Its hard to work well when you don't get more than 3 hours sleep at a time.  Fortunately, this is all written.  It's a little more than cutting and pasting (if I was using scissors I'd probably cut myself or glue myself to a wall) but not so much that I cannot do it.
Today is a day off.  I did my community service which was working alone in an attic space most of the time.  The heat, dust and close quarters made it feel like the inside of a coffin, but a spacious coffin and though the morning an uncomfortable one, the job I had was as technical a one as I get on a normal day, and it was finished.
Silence is harder than speaking.  Speaking may seem pointless.  But there is more than points to be made.  There is the decision, to say nothing or to speak.  Perhaps the more noble thing involves silence, certainly the more mysterious, perhaps even the less painful.
It is better to let the mind wander to things, Greek ruins, fallen civilizations, the beginning of things and their ends.  And to speak of it.  It is the easier thing, perhaps not the most sincere, or the nicest.
or the most kind or the most appropriate, but it is easier than staying quiet.
I see the end of the world, I don't blab about it, but I know its there and don't mind mentioning it every once in a while, it is not what bothers me the most, death being inevitable is not the most important thing.
But what if you know what's important and ignore it?  This morning at 4:00 am I thought about who I lived my life for.  I might advise everyone to live their lives for themselves given physics, but that doesn't appear to be the key to contentment (maybe its the key to happiness).  In my worst time, it was the surrender of self that seems to have saved me.  That has happened twice.  But that doesn't mean giving up happiness, it means accepting it.  And what happens if you don't do that?

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT EXPLAINED BY NLT

The exponential equation for the factor for clock time is 2^n as n moves from 0 to some unknown endpoint (apparently in discrete, quantum whole numbers at least at the lower quantum time states). If you accept the logarithmic functions as an integral part as suggested by the multiple appearances of other non-rational numbers (pi, e in particular) then you get the impression that the universe is designed around attempting to get somewhere but never arriving. As used here, the universe is the bigger universe, not just our system of CT5 elements, but the CT5 universe and the CT6 universe where the scale of compression makes even black wholes and our universe appear tiny.

Why the exponential of 2? An intuitive answer should always be suggested by NLT or it is no better than the other physics theories which allow counter-intuitive thinking and blind acceptance of phenomena just because it is convenient or necessary to the theory. This doesn't mean that NLT does not have similar failings, the only way to aovid that would be to explain what E-hologram theory describes as G-space and I'm not ready for that yet.

One step towards an explanation is that it is that each additional simultaneous coordinate change is a two part change, another is that you have the changes in terms of twos, the original change and the new change, at least after the initial change.

Another step is that you start with no elements, non-linearity. You add one going in two directions, towards linearity and away from linearity. You add another in two directions, one linear the other non-linear; but the first changing coordinate does not disappear, it remains changeable so you have exponential concentration to get from one to the other using a factor of 2.

This discussion of the source of exponential growth of the concentration of coordinated time changes, called compression, sounds like a minor issue. But in NLT, you cannot accept anything like you can in traditional physics because NLT is not based on a universe with preset rules, it is based on a universe where everything has happened at once and everything must have an intuitive basis.

Compression has some unexpected consequences that non-NLT physicists have struggled with but which become clear with NLT. We know that compression in NLT is the state of matching coordinate set changes so that they change at the same rate and in the same direction. We also know that there are coordinate sets other than the locational coordinates x, y and z. Two of these are the CT4 coordinate set known as spin and the CT5 coordinate  which is not even as clear as spin but results, in concentrations at the scale of 10^32.

Quantum entanglement can be envisioned as the matching in terms of compression of coordinate sets other than the locational coordinate sets so they change together. Hence, knowing what these coordinates are, for the first time, we can better match them and better understand how a change in one which we can manipulate (pushing on one side of a wagon affects the other side as it were) the other.

Now we're going to talk about how to create a transporter, science fiction and non-linear time.  This is not meant to imply that anything like a transporter is possible, only that quantum entanglement would provide a mechanism for moving elements from one place in the linear universe to another.

At almost any point in the universe, and the more compressed the area the better, you can match the "change" in spatial coordinates (x,y and z), to other points that will be changing (moving in the same direction at the same rate).  Aligning two coordinates in two points along a line, the two dimensional movement, is also possible. The third coordinate change rate can be the same, but alignment of those along a line would be impossible. However, imagine if you could coordinate the fourth, fifth, and perhaps additional dimensional elements represented by CT4 and CT5.  This would require the clock times in excess of the initial 3 were linear, but we exist with the fourth (spin) dimension and we are able to create temporary black holes thereby allowing, at least termporarily, localized CT5 states.  

It is believed that if we accept quantum entanglement, then entangling involves some entangling of dimensional characteristics, at least CT1-CT4.  It may involve aligning quantum time points along a line losing linear alignment of only a single coordinate which could otherwise remain compressed to the extent that the change occur in some of the same particulars, even though proximity was lost, like two dancers whose movements continue to be synchronized as they move apart and stop touching. 
 The idea of quantum entanglement is that the other coordinates remain matched so that a change in one particle clock time would be related to another through these higher time states.

Now imagine that you get a better understanding of the this matching and the time coordinates that do not depend on quantum change within just the three dimensions, that you add the dimensions of CT4, CT5 and perhaps other Clock time states. If this were possible, you could potentially determine what is happening in that other location and potentially you could either mimic or exchange the particle states by allignment from a distance using the clock time relationship although presumably you'd have to do it for small quantities at a time. If you could change enough coordinates in this fashion, you could either duplicate what exists in one location with another or exchange what is in one location with another, a replicator or a transporter or perhaps just a single quantum point which changed in concert with another far away allowing for some determination of what the quantum particle far away is experiencing; like two dancers who have danced too far apart, but remain engaged.