The purpose of this series is to attempt to find the answers to the fundamentals by moving from the beginning outward just as the original took illusory but convincing existence and tried to move backwards. Some of you are (stupidly) suggesting the methodology is too simple to reflect a rich universe like ours, but an opposite truth is shown by a even a cursory examination. Even the cursory pre-AuT universe shows that energy and matter can be exchanged (e=mc^2) and while that equation has been shown to be nonsensical in many ways, what it means on a quantum level is that matter at whatever complexity is the same as the most simple form of energy, therefor there is nothing special about any type of matter. Getting back a couple more steps to an information state is trivial and is handled very handily by AuT. Only a scientific moron would fail to see this.
The equations then are self solving.
The "Carrier" (0,1,1,2,3,5) is merely the straight addition of the individual states:
01,01,01-01,01-01-01 etc. By adding each of the states together to get the next state you arrive automatically even according to earthly mathematics at the F-series function. Curvature is given by the equation giving rise to separation without which you'd have a singularity with everything in it.
THE SIMPLE EQUATION, THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION HELD IN G-SPACE IS MERELY A VARIANT OF THIS:
CT1(x)=1(sin'(pi')/2x and pi' is defined as the special equation sum(1-x)[4/(2x-1)+/-] and Ct-1(x)=-1(sin'(pi')/2x so that each of these is separated by an evolving value of x which changes the function sin' and the value of pi to provide mechanical separation of pi.
For any quantum sum of points ct1(x) ct-1(x) the two will eventually be carried towards each other as x gets very large and the sum of ct(x) points based on adding the prior two to get the current grows very large.
The addition of time states almost ensures that there is a fading, but still present, multiple solutions and therefore changing curvature of space. In fact, over time, there should be a measurable difference in space curvature for the universe that can be looked for.
In fact, the change in pi provides a basis for observed separation of points without any more complex algorithm since at every change in x there is a corresponding change in the amount that one curve exists relative to the next, but addition of states means that the change for an early less curved state becomes less and less effective in changing the current perception of the universe.
Compression states actually show a change in space curvature locally that has to be tied to this same phenomena at least indirectly, high compression means that you have a place where these changes are happening together so that there is an increase in the localized change of pi relative to uncompressed space so you'd necessarily see space compress without regard to some Einsteinian magic that pre AuT technology requires.
Compression occurs when alignment continues over a period of time beginning with when the states are aligned in the quantity necessary to achieve exponential compression and this requires that collections of spirals are solved for a common geometry over a long period which apparently results from intersection of positive and negative spirals with a continuing common solution. The idea that the big bang started with no compressed states in it is refuted by this which requires compression occur within the big bang and decompression (on average at least) occurs after it which is discussed in detail. The "single big bang fantasy" of pre AuT mathematics is clearly refuted, even though for the wrong reasons it was previously refuted with big bounce concepts.
it is possible, even likely, that until there is enough information to define pi, while there would be a type of separation of information states based on the changing value of pi possible, there would not be sufficient curvature of space to allow combinations or to allow for the type of solutions that we experience with a high solution of pi for the current relatively (relative to x=1 or 1 million anyway) infinitely high values of x that we experience (nothing that what I call relatively infinite is small compared to what x will grow to at ct7 states).
When x is very high then you have the combined states begin to spread out and achieve a magical separation where space is possibly defined and where they can combine and separate to compress and expand to give the pheonomena that AuT can define merely with compression and expansion which is defined in Spirals in Amber if you care to read it.
So what you have is the building algorithm and then it builds on itself.
The most satisfying method of arriving here is by using 4 (for pi) being derived as a factor of 2 (information theory) which may be a reflection of positive and negative information (even though normally this would be plus 2 and minus 2 the equation )+/- might allow for the addition of the two states for purposes of the algorithm for building pi. I'll get to that later.
If you want something spiritual out of all of this consider that a significant number of spirals exiting one state and then coming back to that state could result in unusual phenomena, for example electrical impulses forming memories change state significantly upon death and do so in proximity, who is to say its impossible for those states to reconvene somewhere else, even in another mind altogether to give memories of that prior life.
Want something more spiritual? This is the result of two minds coming together and then being torn apart..
Wednesday, August 10, 2016
Monday, August 8, 2016
The building of space and building an algorithm part 3
The purpose of this set of posts is to show one method that space can be built as an information based system according to an algorithm.
This method is considered the best so far, but is far from complete. Also, at 2.5 years into this project, there are places where choices have to be made, but not all of those choices have been made.
What we know is that quantum time states have to be built from multiple prior time states to protect historical perspective and dimension with change based on a single variable at quantum steps.
The assumption is that the universe has to build from an algorithm because there is nothing else for it to build from. It also assumes that observed phenomena reflect the algorithm and it relies heavily on on observed phenomena to derive the equations.
The substrate on which this is built is the really important element but the process of developing AuT is the process by which we will determine the features of the substrate.
The summation of ct states with carriers looks something like this to generate the F series.
What can be seen from this is that one builds from the other according to the f-series
x=x-1+x-2. A negative version 0,-1,-1,- is being built simultaneously
0,1,1,0 x=1 pi=4
0,1,1,0 x=1 pi=4-4/3+4/5
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0 x=x-1+x-2=2 pi=4/-4/3+4/5-4/7+4/9 (note that even though two spirals exist, they
0,1,1,0 are not offset from one another and pi may ory not have changed
0,1,1,0 twice it's assumed only that only a single even occurred.
0,1,1,0 x=x-1+x-2=3 pi=prior pi -4/11+4/13-again only a single change occurred so
0,1,1,0 pi may only have changed by one event
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
This continues but there is no reason to believe that each lower state ceases to exist and there is no reason to believe that it doesn't. there may be different versions of pi or the highest solution of pi may apply to all time states.
sin(pi/2) would be for each
sin(4/2), sin((60-20+12)/2)=sin(52)
This is much more complicated that it looks because there is no dimension as we perceive it in these initial formulations because there is not enough curvature.
Put another way, if we assume that the number in the parenthetical is radians, you cannot get to a dimensional answer because you have to multiply by 180 and divide by pi and pi isn't something that makes any sense here to get to degrees. Dimension is being built so the methods of defining space have to evolve with it.
There does not appear to be sufficient separation and sufficient complexity or staggering of states unless the earlier states remain in place and are offset although the offsets may be much more complicated for example where the f-series is 5 it appears that two are offset from the other 3 as they are added together.
The solution defines everything we experience so even though there is a very good reason to explore the large number of alternatives.
Presumably it will be some time before there is enough information and enough curvature to have compression states and the point at which our universe exists is far down the line.
This method is considered the best so far, but is far from complete. Also, at 2.5 years into this project, there are places where choices have to be made, but not all of those choices have been made.
What we know is that quantum time states have to be built from multiple prior time states to protect historical perspective and dimension with change based on a single variable at quantum steps.
The assumption is that the universe has to build from an algorithm because there is nothing else for it to build from. It also assumes that observed phenomena reflect the algorithm and it relies heavily on on observed phenomena to derive the equations.
The substrate on which this is built is the really important element but the process of developing AuT is the process by which we will determine the features of the substrate.
Preliminary
First Steps away from combination theory
Spiral methodology
The summation of ct states with carriers looks something like this to generate the F series.
What can be seen from this is that one builds from the other according to the f-series
x=x-1+x-2. A negative version 0,-1,-1,- is being built simultaneously
0,1,1,0 x=1 pi=4
0,1,1,0 x=1 pi=4-4/3+4/5
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0 x=x-1+x-2=2 pi=4/-4/3+4/5-4/7+4/9 (note that even though two spirals exist, they
0,1,1,0 are not offset from one another and pi may ory not have changed
0,1,1,0 twice it's assumed only that only a single even occurred.
0,1,1,0 x=x-1+x-2=3 pi=prior pi -4/11+4/13-again only a single change occurred so
0,1,1,0 pi may only have changed by one event
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
0,1,1,0
This continues but there is no reason to believe that each lower state ceases to exist and there is no reason to believe that it doesn't. there may be different versions of pi or the highest solution of pi may apply to all time states.
sin(pi/2) would be for each
sin(4/2), sin((60-20+12)/2)=sin(52)
This is much more complicated that it looks because there is no dimension as we perceive it in these initial formulations because there is not enough curvature.
Put another way, if we assume that the number in the parenthetical is radians, you cannot get to a dimensional answer because you have to multiply by 180 and divide by pi and pi isn't something that makes any sense here to get to degrees. Dimension is being built so the methods of defining space have to evolve with it.
There does not appear to be sufficient separation and sufficient complexity or staggering of states unless the earlier states remain in place and are offset although the offsets may be much more complicated for example where the f-series is 5 it appears that two are offset from the other 3 as they are added together.
The solution defines everything we experience so even though there is a very good reason to explore the large number of alternatives.
Presumably it will be some time before there is enough information and enough curvature to have compression states and the point at which our universe exists is far down the line.
Departing from preconceived notions of singularity
Sunday, August 7, 2016
Religious Fundamentalism
I should stick to physics or just about anything else.
However, I have had enough. I'm going to write a book or short story or something on this but I'm going to tell you first.
Any religion that believes in any man made activity being of consequence to god ignores physics, whether of mine or anyone else, but mine is more inflexible because it proves that an algorithm denies any ability of man to change events. Likewise the insertion of god into the events of man is pre-ordained. The only way to change anything is to change the base algorithm that defines the universe.
Therefore anyone who seeks to put their religion forward as a mechanism for political control is a anathema to me.
Who the f- are these idiots (yes, you can insert Rubio in place of idiot) who think reproductive control is a religious imperative? It isn't even a prerogative. To suggest that religion requires that Zika babies be born instead of aborted are as stupid as the Fundamentalist who believe that their religion allows them to control the day to day activities of their followers or condemn those who don't follow them. Let these boobs say that non-believers will end up with some punishment in the afterlife, but how can they be this stupid as a practical matter. Why would they saddle us with their fundamentalism, brainwashing, pain and expense for the sake of something that is un-provable and illogical?
The right wing religious boobs and the radical islamic fundamentalists are in the same crooked boat rowing against one another, not able to see their hypocrisy as they threaten one another with religious war. Even the pope, who perhaps can be excused for being a boob since he is the head boob of a religion, understands overpopulation. But he allows dogma to control his belief based on nothing other than the hallucinations or those who sought control of others, especially the more recent religious boops.
Religion is not wrong. The belief that man can understand it may not even be wrong. But to think that god dictates what we should or should not do is naive. God "requires" what we do. If we're boobs it's because the algorithm that defines the universe determines we are boobs.
Now, while you are right that I dislike the boobs for being boobs I don't put myself above you. In fact, I am as big a boob as any of you. I understand the ability to control my life in a way that no one else does and I have chosen, thus far, not to take advantage of the knowledge and I cannot blame that on anything other than my own superstitions; my 'internal' religious compass that keeps me from doing what I know to be the right thing for me and to some extent the right thing for society as a whole.
So let me reject the boobs, including myself, let me fight the idiots, including myself.
How I despise this fundamentalist nonsense and therefore myself for being a slave to my own stupid preconceptions.
However, I have had enough. I'm going to write a book or short story or something on this but I'm going to tell you first.
Any religion that believes in any man made activity being of consequence to god ignores physics, whether of mine or anyone else, but mine is more inflexible because it proves that an algorithm denies any ability of man to change events. Likewise the insertion of god into the events of man is pre-ordained. The only way to change anything is to change the base algorithm that defines the universe.
Therefore anyone who seeks to put their religion forward as a mechanism for political control is a anathema to me.
Who the f- are these idiots (yes, you can insert Rubio in place of idiot) who think reproductive control is a religious imperative? It isn't even a prerogative. To suggest that religion requires that Zika babies be born instead of aborted are as stupid as the Fundamentalist who believe that their religion allows them to control the day to day activities of their followers or condemn those who don't follow them. Let these boobs say that non-believers will end up with some punishment in the afterlife, but how can they be this stupid as a practical matter. Why would they saddle us with their fundamentalism, brainwashing, pain and expense for the sake of something that is un-provable and illogical?
The right wing religious boobs and the radical islamic fundamentalists are in the same crooked boat rowing against one another, not able to see their hypocrisy as they threaten one another with religious war. Even the pope, who perhaps can be excused for being a boob since he is the head boob of a religion, understands overpopulation. But he allows dogma to control his belief based on nothing other than the hallucinations or those who sought control of others, especially the more recent religious boops.
Religion is not wrong. The belief that man can understand it may not even be wrong. But to think that god dictates what we should or should not do is naive. God "requires" what we do. If we're boobs it's because the algorithm that defines the universe determines we are boobs.
Now, while you are right that I dislike the boobs for being boobs I don't put myself above you. In fact, I am as big a boob as any of you. I understand the ability to control my life in a way that no one else does and I have chosen, thus far, not to take advantage of the knowledge and I cannot blame that on anything other than my own superstitions; my 'internal' religious compass that keeps me from doing what I know to be the right thing for me and to some extent the right thing for society as a whole.
So let me reject the boobs, including myself, let me fight the idiots, including myself.
How I despise this fundamentalist nonsense and therefore myself for being a slave to my own stupid preconceptions.
Building an algorithm part 2
The original technique used to define the universe was based on observations. This took us back quite a ways. Recognizing force and space for what they are, a reflection of some background, allowed us to solve all mysteries by applying the new insights to existing phenomena.
Once defined, it become possible to take the background that was determined and attempt to figure out how it arises.
Once defined, it become possible to take the background that was determined and attempt to figure out how it arises.
This is creation. It isn't
the false creation of "the big bang" which is proven by AuT to be
nothing more that one in an extremely large series of of inflection point averages.
But it still is not creation in the senes of the absolute beginning. It is a step towards that, but absolute creation requires the ability to understand the environment of non linear time which, by definition has neither a beginning nor an ending but which, instead the Einstein Hologram Universe (EHU) environment where everything happens at once. and is the reason why I don't take the Einstein Hologram Universe completely out of print despite it being incorrectly based on Hologram Theory and Einstein Theory which is impressive, but ultimately tied to working with the reflection invironment rather than the actual environment of AuT..
But it still is not creation in the senes of the absolute beginning. It is a step towards that, but absolute creation requires the ability to understand the environment of non linear time which, by definition has neither a beginning nor an ending but which, instead the Einstein Hologram Universe (EHU) environment where everything happens at once. and is the reason why I don't take the Einstein Hologram Universe completely out of print despite it being incorrectly based on Hologram Theory and Einstein Theory which is impressive, but ultimately tied to working with the reflection invironment rather than the actual environment of AuT..
There is a series of points that from the second part of the Algorithm Building Exercise
BUILDING THROUGH ADDITION
There is a fundamental formula that describes how you get something from nothing.
BUILDING THROUGH ADDITION
There is a fundamental formula that describes how you get something from nothing.
F-Series: 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 so for any location along this series we can associate a number 0(1),(1)2,1,(3),2(4) or 1(1),1(2),2(3),3(4), etc and we can define an equation FsF where for any x FsF is that number plus the prior two numbers which helps us to understand the level of compression between stable clock time states.
PI BUILDING
We observe pi building which AuT tells us is a reflection of how the algorithm is built.
pos 4/1 4/5 4/9
pos 4/1 4/5 4/9
neg 4/3
4/7 4/11
There is a fixed numerator which has to have a source and it is offset by 2 which suggests that both 4 and odd numbers have to have a specific origin or must be built out of an algorithm based solution like the base number (FSF(x)) in compression. Today, we are going to explore the former concept.
CURVATURE-The Origin of 4
The suggested explanation
for the algorithm of curvature is that the four comes from the cycle.0,1,1,0
which is a four part cycle. This compares unfavorably to the idea that the outermost spiral reflects space and requires, instead, that there is a carrier that controls the length of the spiral. This suggests the length of spirals is based on how long they exist within the environment of linearity which grows for each. X increases and you have the non-linear solution giving each successive quantum element being shorter while the earlier the time state the longer its carrier spiral.
DERIVATION OF THE PI EQUATION
DERIVATION OF THE PI EQUATION
The PI equation is a
non-dimensional vibration equation which is discussed before, but we are here going to introduce a non-linear function based on the 0,1,1,0 feature:
Sum(From x=1 to
n)(4/(2x-1)+/- where +/- reflection that every other answer in the sum changes from positive to
negative.
Creation of space looks something like this:
0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0
CURVATURE-The origin of curve
In the very limited portion given above, pi would "begin" to look like this:
4/1,-4/3,4/5,-4/7 based on the formula [4 changes per unit]/(2x-1) where x starts as 1, then 2, then 3, then 4.
4 comes from the number of changes in any event
x comes from the number of events
2x-1 becomes the part where a solution needs to be determined based on the relationship. There are several suggestions. One is that there are two positive events followed by one negative event (1,1 followed by 0). This flies in the face after a fashion of the 4 units per event, but it has to be understood that this is not just a selection of elements, this is the definition of information collected to form space and giving it curvature.
Another suggestion is that there is a positive mirror curvature that is being created. This would mean there is something (y/2x)+/-. If y is 4, for example, then the solution would be -4/2,4/4,-4/6,4/8. While silly at first, this suggests the source of an uncurved solution which in turn brings our attention back to that uncurved solution, the F-series spiral from which the curved spiral arises (0,1,1,2,3,5,8) and which gives rises to compression (big bang predecessor) averages and expansion (where we live) averages.
In this case, the -4/2,4/4 is replaced with 0,1,0,-1,1,-1,2,-2,3,-3 although the actual expression of this result is different because these F-series spirals are solved separately, but added together to get a net result for any quantum moment.
Another suggestion is that there is a positive mirror curvature that is being created. This would mean there is something (y/2x)+/-. If y is 4, for example, then the solution would be -4/2,4/4,-4/6,4/8. While silly at first, this suggests the source of an uncurved solution which in turn brings our attention back to that uncurved solution, the F-series spiral from which the curved spiral arises (0,1,1,2,3,5,8) and which gives rises to compression (big bang predecessor) averages and expansion (where we live) averages.
In this case, the -4/2,4/4 is replaced with 0,1,0,-1,1,-1,2,-2,3,-3 although the actual expression of this result is different because these F-series spirals are solved separately, but added together to get a net result for any quantum moment.
While the spiral algorithm remains, it can be seen that the spiral algorithm is at most an extension of this more basic algorithm.
VIBRATION
VIBRATION
Pi and Spiral type compression and expansion suggest that fundamentally space (and therefore the foundation of all other types of information) is comprised of positive and negative elements that are offset according to non-linearity (0,1,0,-1) giving rise to vibrationally offset elements given the designation herein of positive and negative although those designations are more of a reflection of first and second where features of first and features of second are expressed by us using a mathematical positive or negative, yes or no type of expression, but they are more rich than these designations just as zero doesn't fully express the inherent "maybe," "non-linearity," and related characteristics of what comes before linearity or algorithm.
So we call them positive and negative at our peril, just as we use base 10 numbers at our peril and confusion in looking at this process.
Why they are offset is probably a function of the fact that certain algorithms (which may exist alongside of the one that defines our universe) are too homogeneous or which otherwise cancel themselves out Examples of a cancelling algorithm is x-x. It is never truly non-linear. Examples of a too homogeneous algorithm would be x/x. There is no offset and while it grows, it changes in a flat line that is always 1, which would be a very one dimensional universe. By introducing the F-series function (adding prior states to get the current state) you get multiple dimensions and preserved history. Anything less than the F series would yield 0,1,1,1 (or 0,0,0,0) where only the first number is added instead of 0,1,1,2,3. But it also suggests something like this: 0,1,1,2,4,7,13 which is adding the prior 3 instead of the prior 2 and would generate a universe which is poorly understandable but might for an interesting exercise for someone with more time.
Hence, our universe has vibration elements because if it didn't it wouldn't be offset and it is offset because if it didn't it would be too homogeneous to have the value and flavor that it has to give rise to the perception of self awareness.
This suggests an infinity of algorithms all of which can exist together in the non-linear environment of g-space because there is no reason for them not to exist together.
Offset, in this case, is a single complete event followed by a negative single complete event and they remain offset pairs because they happen sequentially and not at the same time, at least that is the suggestion of pi which is observed in the curvature of space.
So we call them positive and negative at our peril, just as we use base 10 numbers at our peril and confusion in looking at this process.
Why they are offset is probably a function of the fact that certain algorithms (which may exist alongside of the one that defines our universe) are too homogeneous or which otherwise cancel themselves out Examples of a cancelling algorithm is x-x. It is never truly non-linear. Examples of a too homogeneous algorithm would be x/x. There is no offset and while it grows, it changes in a flat line that is always 1, which would be a very one dimensional universe. By introducing the F-series function (adding prior states to get the current state) you get multiple dimensions and preserved history. Anything less than the F series would yield 0,1,1,1 (or 0,0,0,0) where only the first number is added instead of 0,1,1,2,3. But it also suggests something like this: 0,1,1,2,4,7,13 which is adding the prior 3 instead of the prior 2 and would generate a universe which is poorly understandable but might for an interesting exercise for someone with more time.
Hence, our universe has vibration elements because if it didn't it wouldn't be offset and it is offset because if it didn't it would be too homogeneous to have the value and flavor that it has to give rise to the perception of self awareness.
This suggests an infinity of algorithms all of which can exist together in the non-linear environment of g-space because there is no reason for them not to exist together.
Offset, in this case, is a single complete event followed by a negative single complete event and they remain offset pairs because they happen sequentially and not at the same time, at least that is the suggestion of pi which is observed in the curvature of space.
Instead of a positive and negative being created together so they would cancel each other out, one positive solution happens and then offset but summed to define any given point (otherwise the 2x-1 number would never increase).
This summation is the same summation that gave rise to 0,1,1,2,3,5. It looks like this:
0,1,1,0 4/1 4 yielding 1
0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0 4/2 4 yielding 2
0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0 4/3 4 yielding 3
0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0,1,1,0,-1,-1,0 4/4 4 yielding 4
Time and dimension are unrelated to these events but these events define curvature and the spirals themselves arise from the application of these equations and the changing value of x, the changing number of positive and negative elements related to the changing value of x, gives rise to the impression of dimension and space.
TRANSITIONS
While it is important to understand the transition from this to the compressed states as is discussed below, this relationship gives rise to an understand of why pi occurs.
It is a type of
formula that we don't see or if we see it we don't recognize it because it has
a variable vibrating between a positive and a negative result. If we don't know exactly which phenomena of non-linear algorithm gives rise to 2 we know 2 is how many are added to get to next f-series state and how many are added to the denominator and it is likely the relationship for the two added to get to the next F-series (adding the two prior numbers to get to the current number) since that is the foundational building block of the suggested equation. This defines a fixed relationship between pi and the changing
f series and changes them for the same reason.
The numerator, d may have to do with the number of coordinates changing at once in space, it may have to with a constant base for
our space only, but it is tied to some event, it exists for a reason in the Algorithm.
x controls the exponential 2^x and they
appear slower, but maybe not because of coordinates changing at once, instead it may be the process of how many changes occur in the spiral equation:
space 0,1,1,0
Photons 0,1,1,2,0
Wave 0,1,1,2,3,0
Matter 0,1,1,2,3,5,0
etc. and the 11, 111,1111 suggests it is just the number of coordinates changing together
space 0,1,1,0
Photons 0,1,1,2,0
Wave 0,1,1,2,3,0
Matter 0,1,1,2,3,5,0
etc. and the 11, 111,1111 suggests it is just the number of coordinates changing together
COMPRESSION States
The suggestion of
the F-series is 0,1,1,2,3,5.8 for our black holes, the first 3 representing
space, the second three photons, the third three wave energy, the fourth matter
and the last group of black holes with a return to zero at the end and.
So, the transition
works in this fashion: 0,1,1,0 it remains space. 0,1,1,2,0 it remains photons
with compression on the scale of 3^2^2.
0,1,1,2,3,0 is
wave energy with a scale of 6^2^3
0,1,1,2,3,5,0 is
matter with a scale of 10^2^4
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,0 is
black hole material with a scale of 13^2^5
The actual
appearance is:
0,1,1,0
00,11,11,22,00
000,111,111,222,333,000
0000,1111,1111,2222,3333,5555,0000
00000,11111,11111,22222,33333,55555,88888
The next set would
use 1prime(13 units but not 13-111111111111)
Friday, August 5, 2016
AuT Building an algorithm 1
In order to define the algorithm it is a good thought to see how the algorithm originates.
While logic will figure into this discussion, it is important to remember a couple of key elements
1) Time and distance are irrelevant
2) Our logic is irrelevant
3) The background environment is as amorphous as the mind of god but is critical because it allows for a durable algorithm and for a transition of the governing variable.
Steps
1) information creation:yes/no/non-linear; +/-/0
2) FsF-for each value in step 1 0,1,1; 0yes,0no,0nl;1yes,1no,1nl;1yes;1no;1nl;0yes,0no,0nl
3) pi creation-offset expansion:01,11,10 for example for each information state to create a compounding of information around offset information states
4) Solution of net information states from the positive, negative and non-linear aspects relative positions to create compression and expansion phases based on net solutions
5) compression through a f-series base raised to the incremental increase in n as the amount of information becomes sufficient during net compression phases
So endith part 1
While logic will figure into this discussion, it is important to remember a couple of key elements
1) Time and distance are irrelevant
2) Our logic is irrelevant
3) The background environment is as amorphous as the mind of god but is critical because it allows for a durable algorithm and for a transition of the governing variable.
Steps
1) information creation:yes/no/non-linear; +/-/0
2) FsF-for each value in step 1 0,1,1; 0yes,0no,0nl;1yes,1no,1nl;1yes;1no;1nl;0yes,0no,0nl
3) pi creation-offset expansion:01,11,10 for example for each information state to create a compounding of information around offset information states
4) Solution of net information states from the positive, negative and non-linear aspects relative positions to create compression and expansion phases based on net solutions
5) compression through a f-series base raised to the incremental increase in n as the amount of information becomes sufficient during net compression phases
So endith part 1
Thursday, August 4, 2016
AuT Assumptions and the Real world
Space is either the outer state of any spiral or it is a repeating 0,1,1,0. To understand what this means, it means it is maybe, yes, yes, maybe.
This strange result is not nearly as strange as the results you get for photonic energy at 1,1,2 which would be yes,yes,yes/yes; yes, yes/yes indicates why we must avoid using arabic number since the universe works with "sticks" and not mathematical ease of expression. The yes/yes portion is why speed differences appear even though all changes occur at the same rate and is one of the "great" indicators that repeating spirals are a thing for stable states, although other solutions are discussed even in the first edition of spirals in amber.
This makes the assumption that the opposite states (no,no,maybe and no,no,no/no) do not interact directly with the positive solutions which opns the different question of how opposite spiral mathematics solves for itself. True separation doesn't exist, yet the yes,yes, maybe solution (non-linearity as one state of the F-series) indicates that a solution periodically exists for combinations.
The other result eliminates the need for a "carrier" state, but either solution or a combination of the two gives the satisfying result and is not the source of this post.
One of the big non-mysteries of the theory has to do with life and spontaneous demolition. For purposes of examining this we need to look at our solar system.
The sun represents a highly compressive oriented state. Fusion is occurring so we know that we are looking at a solution of net intersecting spirals. Any difference on a quantum level is invisible to us.
What we can "see" with our limited instruments is the net result.
Sterile planets reflect long term stable states and unstable planets, particularly with life like earth reflect net changes in both directions. It's not a coincidence, it is mathematically an imperative.
We see this on a macro level and on a micro level.
For example, spontaneous combustion of a person can be seen as a conversion of solid state to energy or merely as a separation of a combined energy/matter composite into its component parts. Both are observed daily (people being blown up) but this was not the case 10,000 years ago when any conversion was seen only on a microscopic level with the breakdown of organics by bacteria.
long term stability suggests that the solid elements of our world and the more tedious "rocks" especially those with no magma are "dead" but that isn't consistent with the theory and cannot be accurate.
Instead, the result of the applied mathematical formula is that concentrations (relatively rare in the grand scheme of things) of extremely stable states exist during different phases (net expansion and net compression) in the midst of the constant changes that we see both in comcentrated compression in the sun and in the compression/expansion interaction that reflects itself as life and the constatnt fission of compressed states.
One has to assume that in ct5 states (black holes) there is also a compression of the type observed in the sun where a steady compression occurrs over time to yield some result but on a scale that is very large, leading to ct6 compression as x (the single variable) gets large enough.
This conceptually appears hard to grasp at first. That is the general with his drone blowing up the terrorist doesn't see himself as the tool of some mathematical algorithm solving for x. He does, ironically, see himself as the tool of a number of different diverse forces including those electrical ones controlling his brain and those around him to the same effect. The idiocy in the world is largely caused by the refusal of perfectly intellegent apes to realize that there is one underlying algorithm on which all the others are built which simplifies rather than complicates the analysis.
To understand how such a simple algorithm can give rise to such diverse results, see the prior post.
This strange result is not nearly as strange as the results you get for photonic energy at 1,1,2 which would be yes,yes,yes/yes; yes, yes/yes indicates why we must avoid using arabic number since the universe works with "sticks" and not mathematical ease of expression. The yes/yes portion is why speed differences appear even though all changes occur at the same rate and is one of the "great" indicators that repeating spirals are a thing for stable states, although other solutions are discussed even in the first edition of spirals in amber.
This makes the assumption that the opposite states (no,no,maybe and no,no,no/no) do not interact directly with the positive solutions which opns the different question of how opposite spiral mathematics solves for itself. True separation doesn't exist, yet the yes,yes, maybe solution (non-linearity as one state of the F-series) indicates that a solution periodically exists for combinations.
The other result eliminates the need for a "carrier" state, but either solution or a combination of the two gives the satisfying result and is not the source of this post.
One of the big non-mysteries of the theory has to do with life and spontaneous demolition. For purposes of examining this we need to look at our solar system.
The sun represents a highly compressive oriented state. Fusion is occurring so we know that we are looking at a solution of net intersecting spirals. Any difference on a quantum level is invisible to us.
What we can "see" with our limited instruments is the net result.
Sterile planets reflect long term stable states and unstable planets, particularly with life like earth reflect net changes in both directions. It's not a coincidence, it is mathematically an imperative.
We see this on a macro level and on a micro level.
For example, spontaneous combustion of a person can be seen as a conversion of solid state to energy or merely as a separation of a combined energy/matter composite into its component parts. Both are observed daily (people being blown up) but this was not the case 10,000 years ago when any conversion was seen only on a microscopic level with the breakdown of organics by bacteria.
long term stability suggests that the solid elements of our world and the more tedious "rocks" especially those with no magma are "dead" but that isn't consistent with the theory and cannot be accurate.
Instead, the result of the applied mathematical formula is that concentrations (relatively rare in the grand scheme of things) of extremely stable states exist during different phases (net expansion and net compression) in the midst of the constant changes that we see both in comcentrated compression in the sun and in the compression/expansion interaction that reflects itself as life and the constatnt fission of compressed states.
One has to assume that in ct5 states (black holes) there is also a compression of the type observed in the sun where a steady compression occurrs over time to yield some result but on a scale that is very large, leading to ct6 compression as x (the single variable) gets large enough.
This conceptually appears hard to grasp at first. That is the general with his drone blowing up the terrorist doesn't see himself as the tool of some mathematical algorithm solving for x. He does, ironically, see himself as the tool of a number of different diverse forces including those electrical ones controlling his brain and those around him to the same effect. The idiocy in the world is largely caused by the refusal of perfectly intellegent apes to realize that there is one underlying algorithm on which all the others are built which simplifies rather than complicates the analysis.
To understand how such a simple algorithm can give rise to such diverse results, see the prior post.
Tuesday, August 2, 2016
The changing face of AuT quatre
SIA is about AuT which is a mathematical theory which
explains dark matter, universal expansion and contraction, the big bang, the
relationship of space, energy, matter and black holes and other ‘mysteries’ of
science; which turn out to not be all that mysterious. It is more of a new way of looking at
phenomena than a new theory, although it is a new theory.
Succinctly, AuT holds that the perceived universe, including
forces, states of existence and events, may be explained as the result of a
single algorithm changing in response to a single variable. While this is initially counter-intuitive in
a history based, space-time continuum, it turns out that given the algorithms
ability to build from a simple model to a more complex model based on
coordinates being out of sync and having each subsequent state being built from
one or more prior states, the former giving rise to the variety we experience
in the universe, the later giving rise to the perspective of history.
As the algorithm is disclosed in this paper, and in the
book, it is suggested that the universe should appear largely homogenous, which
is observed when looking at empty space.
On closer examination, however, it can be seen that very complex, very
unhomogenous states of universe are the natural result as the amount of
discordance of even simple states increases and the amount of information reflected
by the size of the single variable grows to the phenomenal size we experience
in quantum instances in our universe.
Put another way, the universe is designed in such a way that
there are successive compression and expansion “averages”. In this way, at any point in any solution to
x there will be expanding and contracting solutions. Indeed, the equation suggests that there is a
diverging or (more likely) a converging infinite series like pi driving the
universe to a state where all points would be contracting together, but the
universe never reaches this state and instead just grows in size in terms of
information based on a value of x that never decreases.
It is possible to suggest the most likely solution to this
equation and that is done, but for purposes of understanding the general rule
of construction, the universe is based on a converging series based on the Fibonacci
series (referred to as F-series for simplicity). Several permutations to this will be
discussed, although it is certainly the case that only one will exist. That is there will not be multiple or
changing equations. Instead there will
only be one equation which the universe at any quantum point based on the
solution to a single algorithm in response to a single changing variable. This in turn seems to require that at the
quantum level all points change at the same speed, the speed at which the
single variable changes, but that relative concentrations of quantum states changing
together gives the impression of speed differentials.
Clock time states are used to explain the differences in F
series with the number of clock times changing together controlling the state
of information from 1 for space to 5 for black hole material. One permutation for state changes is
reflected by the F-series solution derived from non-base 10 solutions to the
F-series. Here 1,11,111,1111,11111 for
space, photons, wave energy, matter and black hole material respectively. However, within this solution stacking allows
for this type of result 1,12,122,2335,55555 etc. This enormous potential diversity even within
a single quantum clock time state gives rise to enormous diversity even within
a fairly static F-series based universe and this reflects only one type of
stacking in a universe where the stacking principle of the F-series is repeated
over and over again.
F-series sprials One permutation is the change of spirals
relative to a specific clock time state.
For example 0,1,1,0,1,1,0 being the series for space, 1,1,2,1,1,2,1,1,2
being the exclusive range for space, 1,2,3,1,2,3,1 being the exclusive range
for photonic energy, etc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)