This strange result is not nearly as strange as the results you get for photonic energy at 1,1,2 which would be yes,yes,yes/yes; yes, yes/yes indicates why we must avoid using arabic number since the universe works with "sticks" and not mathematical ease of expression. The yes/yes portion is why speed differences appear even though all changes occur at the same rate and is one of the "great" indicators that repeating spirals are a thing for stable states, although other solutions are discussed even in the first edition of spirals in amber.
This makes the assumption that the opposite states (no,no,maybe and no,no,no/no) do not interact directly with the positive solutions which opns the different question of how opposite spiral mathematics solves for itself. True separation doesn't exist, yet the yes,yes, maybe solution (non-linearity as one state of the F-series) indicates that a solution periodically exists for combinations.
The other result eliminates the need for a "carrier" state, but either solution or a combination of the two gives the satisfying result and is not the source of this post.
One of the big non-mysteries of the theory has to do with life and spontaneous demolition. For purposes of examining this we need to look at our solar system.
The sun represents a highly compressive oriented state. Fusion is occurring so we know that we are looking at a solution of net intersecting spirals. Any difference on a quantum level is invisible to us.
What we can "see" with our limited instruments is the net result.
Sterile planets reflect long term stable states and unstable planets, particularly with life like earth reflect net changes in both directions. It's not a coincidence, it is mathematically an imperative.
We see this on a macro level and on a micro level.
For example, spontaneous combustion of a person can be seen as a conversion of solid state to energy or merely as a separation of a combined energy/matter composite into its component parts. Both are observed daily (people being blown up) but this was not the case 10,000 years ago when any conversion was seen only on a microscopic level with the breakdown of organics by bacteria.
long term stability suggests that the solid elements of our world and the more tedious "rocks" especially those with no magma are "dead" but that isn't consistent with the theory and cannot be accurate.
Instead, the result of the applied mathematical formula is that concentrations (relatively rare in the grand scheme of things) of extremely stable states exist during different phases (net expansion and net compression) in the midst of the constant changes that we see both in comcentrated compression in the sun and in the compression/expansion interaction that reflects itself as life and the constatnt fission of compressed states.
One has to assume that in ct5 states (black holes) there is also a compression of the type observed in the sun where a steady compression occurrs over time to yield some result but on a scale that is very large, leading to ct6 compression as x (the single variable) gets large enough.
This conceptually appears hard to grasp at first. That is the general with his drone blowing up the terrorist doesn't see himself as the tool of some mathematical algorithm solving for x. He does, ironically, see himself as the tool of a number of different diverse forces including those electrical ones controlling his brain and those around him to the same effect. The idiocy in the world is largely caused by the refusal of perfectly intellegent apes to realize that there is one underlying algorithm on which all the others are built which simplifies rather than complicates the analysis.
To understand how such a simple algorithm can give rise to such diverse results, see the prior post.
No comments:
Post a Comment