Pages

Monday, August 22, 2016

Building an algorithm 9

To fully prepare this work, eventually someone needs to prepare a chart showing all the abandoned twists and turns of the theory, a tree of the universe.   Perhaps preparing it backwards would be easier, but there have been so many choices that had to be made to get to a place where a concise and consistent theory arose.
As I edit the latest version for the new steps in it I am making huge slashes in the information provided as I abandon what I consider to be one dead end after another.
Today I did almost nothing on the book and that is after a weekend where death faced me at one turn or another.
The theory took a quantum shift when I left behind the last vestiges of Einstein and Hawking, respectively a singularity where everything happens at once (now replaced with an algorithm that can solve for any x) and any specific tie to what has heretofore been called space/time theory.
I have replace predestination with a super-predestination.  They both amount to the same thing, physics governing our actions, but sp holds that the solution to the alorithm drag events to a conclusion giving rise to forces rather than having any independent background forces.
These are small things but taken with the results that are previously identified, the improperly based being eliminated, gives a much more lucid explanation of why the converging infinite series and diverging infinite series give rise to what you call reality and I call the shadow existence of mankind.
Nor despite having both ends laid out, ignition of the space time quantum universe and compression towards its final conclusion, do I believe even the next edit will be a magnum opus.  Yes it will be nobel prize worthy, although it does render such a prize rather mundane, like one big bang against the millions suggested by the theory as inflection points, as inevitable as yesterday since tomorrow is anyone's guess.  But despite having the fundamentals of both ends it will still fall short of the final mathematica.
The building of one solution on top of another suggests a commonality of solution, perhaps even an overlap of solution which I think might be contrary to a theory where things do  not overlaps so much as they converge even as they diverge, a discrepancy which is nevertheless inherent in the solution which says the larger x the closer to the fully compressed state though neither pi nor full compression are expected of the theory.
In fact the pefectly alligned F-series spirals have had to give way to F-series spirals defined by an evolving pi curved universe and just as pi by definition could only be solved by a finite universe in the theory of NLC which preceded AuT so must an infinite solution be the result of converging series universe.
I had hoped for a finite series universe where spirals would meet, but I now see they will always be offset, the universe will never finally collapse in on itself with two equal but opposite types of informtion cancelling each other out.
And yet, there may be an end, because since time and space don't exists in the singularity, it is possible in that environment even if not in ours that infinity may  be a finite number.  That is also, rejected by AuT which replaces infinity with nothing other than an algorithm which for any imaginable x can be solved, although from our perspective, the algorithm appears to build with an ever increasing value of x.
However, despite the shortcomings, I have a more clear picture of the universe than anyone else, you don't have to like it or agree, at least not yet..  Eventually you will, perhaps when someone with less modesty comes up with details which remain hidden even from me this afternoon.


old-satisfying but inaccurate



Newer, less satisfying but closer to observed phenomena

second edition coming sooner or later


No comments:

Post a Comment