Between dying and going blind and figuring out the basis of quantum mechanics its hard to make time to do everything. So I had to set aside some time which might otherwise have been spent on this blog to get some closure relative to the second edition of spirals in amber.
It would be wrong to say that I'm making no progress, because a lot is being done, but that first edition is a mess. There are gems of truth in the book, but the second edition will be light years ahead of the first.
The universe decided that I was moving to fast and it threw some diversions in front of me, but I did spend today concentrating on the book and getting into the treatment of different time states which has become something entirely different given the stacked universe model.
The margins of the first edition are now filled with notes pointing out everything that should have been changed.
Let me make an excuse for myself. I'm in a hurry to publish because one day mainstream physics is going to admit I was right because some mainstream physicist is going to either rewrite my work as his or come up with the same thing, reach a more receptive audience, or perhaps just not piss off everyone he writes for or he'll submit something to a publication which will publish it because he'll get my math finished and everyone will say how smart he is and I want to be able to say, if anyone is listening, that I was really smart first.
So I publish a lot of stuff that can't be called anything but quantum mush instead of quantum math. However, there are only two letters between mush and math and you might say that is where I'm "at". I really should be doing stand up.
I was at my charity board meeting and had some speakers come and it turned into something really weird but me and my speakers left and went downstairs and laughed and laughed about it and it really made me feel good, because I'm really good at laughing and we had a rip-roaring time. In fact it was so much fun that I missed the rest of the board meeting and have no idea what really happened, but its a long story and one that I can't do justice here.
Today is the first day in a while that I didn't get any exercise but that's a long story too and I guess I moved around enough during the day, but I"m feeling a little guilty about it even though I did a little better yesterday.
Anyway, I'll get back to something of value in the next post, this one is just a place marker. Not dead yet.
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Monday, September 19, 2016
Building an algorithm, hairy black holes and aliens and philosophy of illusory self determination-aliens a halloween pre-story for you
The universe doesn't give a flip about us. We are so tiny in its scheme of things. If you look at the data embodied in our system (people) and the change inherent in that system and compare it to say just the sun, it fades into nothing by comparison and that has nothing to do with the overall universe.
And, of course, quantum entropy is non-existent. We create that apparent order because in our little part of the universe, there is an increase at this moment in time in entropy (spirals coming together) which is reflected in the much grander scale of fusion on the sun which comparatively renders our data storage of no consequence. The greatest of us is no more significant in this than a butterfly which is about to get smashed by your window. A side note, I was near the woods this weekend (alone) and decided to go into them for a hike despite the heat and near certainty of catching malaria. Afterwards, I took the opportunity to jump in the cold, clear water (freezing initially, but then comfortable) which I did for old times sake. But where was i?
The world isn't here for us, we're just here? True, but not there.
No, I"m here to talk about the aliens in the universe before I get to the bigger post on ghosts in AuT which I will, for Halloween, breath life into. But back to Aliens.
We listen to the background noise which we believe comes from the big bang. We listen to the stars for messages from aliens.
What we should be looking for is a message left by aliens from a pre-collapse universe that was left for us. It is likely that there was sufficient organization before the latest big bang that some society would have figured out something insightful that would give us a head start on the next collapse and that they, out of a sense of pathos left us a message in a way that will lead to my ghost story in a coming post.
Of course, if I can figure AuT out, it's almost certain that some aliens in our universe version have figured it out and perhaps they'd send some of that to us which would, for a solar system without me in it, save a lot of time and money looking for the wrong things, like bozons and quantum time and strings and such.
So how does insight into the workings of the universe fit into things?
It prevents goofball articles like this one:
http://bigthink.com/robby-
We are more like a story which some creative entity put on auto pilot, a self writing story. Once you set up the basic rules, you get war and peace; in our case mostly war.
And while we're debunking nonsense, let's talk about the "black holes" have no hair and the even more nonsensical idea of "falling into a black hole." What idiocy is that! Imagine falling into something which is more solid than anything else in the universe. Remember, even though in my early work (3 years ago (EHT)) I posited that black holes were singularities going to the same place (I addressed why that theory didn't make sense already, read the old posts) it quickly become obvious that they were just more information states in exponential compression changing together. You can't fall into that, all you can do is fall against it. A quantum black hole would be exponentially more solid than a neutron. Imagine how silly you'd feel arguing you just fell into a neutron.
That doesn't mean that matter doesn't fall towards black holes and having made contact with them that something doesn't happen.
All matter types have contact with one another in the sense that solutions are stacked. Actual contact requires dimension which is absent.
So when you look at a black hole that is greater than the minimum predicted and less than twice the minimum, what you are looking at is a "hairy black hole." I say that because it is the opposite of the idea that black holes have no surface features.
Black holes have the same surface that matter has, just with more coordinates changing together.
Like matter interacts and shares information properties with adjacent photonic, wave energy and space, so too would black holes share information and surface with those 4 states and change relative to them.
But that is enough for now, when I was alone in the woods, I was able to enjoy it because I was alone on purpose, it was not like being abandoned, and for a short time, that was good enough.
I wish the universe did give a damn about us, because if it did I could ask it a question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMlou7Q0GRE
And, of course, quantum entropy is non-existent. We create that apparent order because in our little part of the universe, there is an increase at this moment in time in entropy (spirals coming together) which is reflected in the much grander scale of fusion on the sun which comparatively renders our data storage of no consequence. The greatest of us is no more significant in this than a butterfly which is about to get smashed by your window. A side note, I was near the woods this weekend (alone) and decided to go into them for a hike despite the heat and near certainty of catching malaria. Afterwards, I took the opportunity to jump in the cold, clear water (freezing initially, but then comfortable) which I did for old times sake. But where was i?
The world isn't here for us, we're just here? True, but not there.
No, I"m here to talk about the aliens in the universe before I get to the bigger post on ghosts in AuT which I will, for Halloween, breath life into. But back to Aliens.
We listen to the background noise which we believe comes from the big bang. We listen to the stars for messages from aliens.
What we should be looking for is a message left by aliens from a pre-collapse universe that was left for us. It is likely that there was sufficient organization before the latest big bang that some society would have figured out something insightful that would give us a head start on the next collapse and that they, out of a sense of pathos left us a message in a way that will lead to my ghost story in a coming post.
Of course, if I can figure AuT out, it's almost certain that some aliens in our universe version have figured it out and perhaps they'd send some of that to us which would, for a solar system without me in it, save a lot of time and money looking for the wrong things, like bozons and quantum time and strings and such.
So how does insight into the workings of the universe fit into things?
It prevents goofball articles like this one:
http://bigthink.com/robby-
We are more like a story which some creative entity put on auto pilot, a self writing story. Once you set up the basic rules, you get war and peace; in our case mostly war.
And while we're debunking nonsense, let's talk about the "black holes" have no hair and the even more nonsensical idea of "falling into a black hole." What idiocy is that! Imagine falling into something which is more solid than anything else in the universe. Remember, even though in my early work (3 years ago (EHT)) I posited that black holes were singularities going to the same place (I addressed why that theory didn't make sense already, read the old posts) it quickly become obvious that they were just more information states in exponential compression changing together. You can't fall into that, all you can do is fall against it. A quantum black hole would be exponentially more solid than a neutron. Imagine how silly you'd feel arguing you just fell into a neutron.
That doesn't mean that matter doesn't fall towards black holes and having made contact with them that something doesn't happen.
All matter types have contact with one another in the sense that solutions are stacked. Actual contact requires dimension which is absent.
So when you look at a black hole that is greater than the minimum predicted and less than twice the minimum, what you are looking at is a "hairy black hole." I say that because it is the opposite of the idea that black holes have no surface features.
Black holes have the same surface that matter has, just with more coordinates changing together.
Like matter interacts and shares information properties with adjacent photonic, wave energy and space, so too would black holes share information and surface with those 4 states and change relative to them.
But that is enough for now, when I was alone in the woods, I was able to enjoy it because I was alone on purpose, it was not like being abandoned, and for a short time, that was good enough.
I wish the universe did give a damn about us, because if it did I could ask it a question.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMlou7Q0GRE
Sunday, September 18, 2016
Building an algorithm-the exclusion prinicple and attraction
So how does this process occur. It is made up of draft concepts, so here's one of those draft concepts which, if it fits into the model, gets to stay.
The comparison of the new solution of AuT with the prior ideas that fell by the wayside (e.g. algorithms replacing a specific amount of unchanging information as suggested by einstein) shows how theories are built. Nothing too rediculous unless it doesn't work, like pre-AuT quantum mechanics.
So here's an undeveloped concept,
The 0-1-1 combination suggests both an overlap and a repulsion within the fixed system. At the 0 point, there is nothing to conflict with so that another state can join with it but as soon as the change in state occurs it is repulsed. There is an exception which occurs when one has space followed by the other, shared state, having space as its next state. 0-1-1-0 paired with 1-0-1-1.
This is one way to find an exception allowing for shared states.
The significance is that this provides a methodology for going from 1,1,0 to 11,11,22. The 11 comes from the two 1 states together, the 22 is where the 11 states come together. Subsequent compression can come from the attraction between positive and negative time states.
This type of combination would not be reversible without a separation of the joined states, but it would allow there would be no empty space so no 0 for the higher states because the 0 would be filled.
This is the type of matrix analysis that needs to be made in order to get a dimensional result from information which does not otherwise have dimensional elements and which would provide a mechanism for stacking time states.
The right mechanism will automatically provide for stacking and if it is accurate it would include a mechanism for exponential growth at the ct4 ct5 level and provide a methodology for ariving at concentration states where comrpessions would occur spontaneously.
When this is addressed later, well it will be addressed later, but I have a ghost oriented post I need to make for Halloween.
The comparison of the new solution of AuT with the prior ideas that fell by the wayside (e.g. algorithms replacing a specific amount of unchanging information as suggested by einstein) shows how theories are built. Nothing too rediculous unless it doesn't work, like pre-AuT quantum mechanics.
So here's an undeveloped concept,
The 0-1-1 combination suggests both an overlap and a repulsion within the fixed system. At the 0 point, there is nothing to conflict with so that another state can join with it but as soon as the change in state occurs it is repulsed. There is an exception which occurs when one has space followed by the other, shared state, having space as its next state. 0-1-1-0 paired with 1-0-1-1.
This is one way to find an exception allowing for shared states.
The significance is that this provides a methodology for going from 1,1,0 to 11,11,22. The 11 comes from the two 1 states together, the 22 is where the 11 states come together. Subsequent compression can come from the attraction between positive and negative time states.
This type of combination would not be reversible without a separation of the joined states, but it would allow there would be no empty space so no 0 for the higher states because the 0 would be filled.
This is the type of matrix analysis that needs to be made in order to get a dimensional result from information which does not otherwise have dimensional elements and which would provide a mechanism for stacking time states.
The right mechanism will automatically provide for stacking and if it is accurate it would include a mechanism for exponential growth at the ct4 ct5 level and provide a methodology for ariving at concentration states where comrpessions would occur spontaneously.
When this is addressed later, well it will be addressed later, but I have a ghost oriented post I need to make for Halloween.
Saturday, September 17, 2016
Building an algorithm-the failure of entropy
Entropy doesn't exist. Kinder-physics won't like this, but the universe is geared towards a steadily more organized system despite isolated instances of disorder and despite the fact that for a period of time it is "net" moving in an entropic direction. On the quantum level everything is moving according to a very rigid plan and at a rigid rate of change towards a rigid converging, if infinite, series.
The Kinder pre-AuT physics is not so stupid because on a middle level, we live in an entropy driven system, but our EDS is illusory just as self determination is. When you get caught up in the illusion you lose the symmetry of the system. Symmetry requires that our "perceived self determination" is only a tool to accomplish an end by an underlying system.
It is not "I think therefore I am" instead it is "The desired result of the algorithm requires these thoughts to accomplish this result which makes me think I am."
A careful study of AuT allows that by careful analysis it "backed in" to spiral theory and following that line of thought eventually stumbled upon the Algorithm Model. AuT then started with where we are and made a steady line backwards until an existing model (Freeman actually saw a stacking system of sorts in his calculations but they were tied too close to traditional physics, but otherwise he might have stumbled back into the AuT model) or at least an existing framework was discovered which could be adapted to the "backed in model." Once that was available, it was possible to go back to g-space again and begin taking that model outward which worked equally well. That's the sign of a good theory, one that works in both directions.
It provides predictability in terms of compression using numeric systems that we accept.
The complicated part isn't having the pieces because those are all required by the system. The complicated part is putting them together.
Fortunately, there are models that give F-series results using matrix type models of the type needed in order to create the illusion. A matrix yield an F-series can be viewed as looking backwards from a model that takes an F-series and "stacks" it in order to get the illusion of multiple dimensions from a single algorithm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number#Matrix_form look down till you get to the section entitled
The Kinder pre-AuT physics is not so stupid because on a middle level, we live in an entropy driven system, but our EDS is illusory just as self determination is. When you get caught up in the illusion you lose the symmetry of the system. Symmetry requires that our "perceived self determination" is only a tool to accomplish an end by an underlying system.
It is not "I think therefore I am" instead it is "The desired result of the algorithm requires these thoughts to accomplish this result which makes me think I am."
A careful study of AuT allows that by careful analysis it "backed in" to spiral theory and following that line of thought eventually stumbled upon the Algorithm Model. AuT then started with where we are and made a steady line backwards until an existing model (Freeman actually saw a stacking system of sorts in his calculations but they were tied too close to traditional physics, but otherwise he might have stumbled back into the AuT model) or at least an existing framework was discovered which could be adapted to the "backed in model." Once that was available, it was possible to go back to g-space again and begin taking that model outward which worked equally well. That's the sign of a good theory, one that works in both directions.
It provides predictability in terms of compression using numeric systems that we accept.
The complicated part isn't having the pieces because those are all required by the system. The complicated part is putting them together.
Fortunately, there are models that give F-series results using matrix type models of the type needed in order to create the illusion. A matrix yield an F-series can be viewed as looking backwards from a model that takes an F-series and "stacks" it in order to get the illusion of multiple dimensions from a single algorithm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number#Matrix_form look down till you get to the section entitled
Matrix form[edit]
A 2-dimensional system of linear difference equations that describes the Fibonacci sequence is
- This derivation is of little significance as a derivation, but as a mechanism for determining how individual solution can combine to give multi-dimensional qualities to define space and separation it holds some promise for this model.
- Leonardo Bonacci Sequences (Fibonacci Sequences) make sense primarily because when used with an offset and anti-spiral model you get pretty good results. Backing out from a boring set of curves to something stacked is where the modeling gets interesting. This matrix type of concept that might lead with more study to the stacking mechanism.
- In this section:
Divisibility properties[edit]
Every 3rd number of the sequence is even and more generally, every kth number of the sequence is a multiple ofFk. Thus the Fibonacci sequence is an example of a divisibility sequence. In fact, the Fibonacci sequence satisfies the stronger divisibility property[36][37]Any three consecutive Fibonacci numbers are pairwise coprime, which means that, for every n,- gcd(Fn, Fn+1) = gcd(Fn, Fn+2) = gcd(Fn+1, Fn+2) = 1.
Every prime number p divides a Fibonacci number that can be determined by the value of p modulo 5. If p is congruent to 1 or 4 (mod 5), then p divides Fp − 1, and if p is congruent to 2 or 3 (mod 5), then, p divides Fp + 1. The remaining case is that p = 5, and in this case p divides Fp. These cases can be combined into a single formula, using the Legendre symbol:[38]Primality testing[edit]
The above formula can be used as a primality test in the sense that if- , where the Legendre symbol has been replaced by the Jacobi symbol, then this is evidence that n is a prime, and if it fails to hold, then n is definitely not a prime. If n is composite and satisfies the formula, then n is a Fibonacci pseudoprime.
When m is large—say a 500-bit number—then we can calculate Fm (mod n) efficiently using the matrix form. Thus- ≡ (mod n).
Here the matrix power Am is calculated using Modular exponentiation, which can be adapted to matrices--modular exponentiation for matrices[39]- you get to some interesting models because (1) it works for larger number of the type you'd find where there was compression and (2) you get the type of exponential stacking that supports the observed results.
- If there is a problem with these models it is that I need an upgrade in my matrix mathematics which I'm not sure if I have time to finish. Perhaps that will be something for someone else.
, where the Legendre symbol has been replaced by the 
≡ 
(mod n).Monday, September 12, 2016
Building an algorithm 17
An object at rest tends to remain at rest, an object in motion tends to remain in motion. Newton's theories related to velocity are accepted by the kinder-physic community. An entire science is built around his observations of "natural forces" and the equations that "defined" them.
But he did not define them. All he did was calculate them.
Later scientists came up with rules that predicted what would happen in the context of an amazingly predictable relativity. But what was it predicting? Gravity? The interaction of time and space? But it was obsessed with distances and forces as things in and of themselves. It looked for harmony, but only with the matrix we lived in. There was plenty of thought about what is behind the matrix, but that was too theoretical, even for the theoretical physicists and those who were close enough were distracted by life, especially war, but that is part of life.
Do you ever sit around wondering how people can be so stupid? I know you do. You sit and watch the news and you say, people can't be that stupid! They're killing themselves, killing each other, they believe in the most bizarre fantasies in the world, they pay huge multiples for stocks that don't make any money...profit from it! They are destroying the only planet they have and don't really seem to get why that's a bad idea and spend most of their resources preparing to kill each other when they aren't actually doing it. Andy you think, even if we're just monkeys we have have to be smarter than this.
But if you look at human stupidity through the lens of AuT you see the ebb and flow of intellect as a reflection of the solution of the twin algorithm towards or away from intersection, you see irony not as a thing in and of itself, but a recognition that things of necessity flow together and apart.
The stacked algorithms form an onion (layers) of complexity, but it's equally important to see that the form things falling apart and coming together, constantly with only a net coming together or falling apart in any localized outcome. At each layer, the underlying mathematical result is hidden further by the layers on top of it. Newton looked at the results, but he didn't have the tools to look under the result to see what caused them because the layering process was so good at disguising what would otherwise have been an obvious sequentially more complicated solutions that underline not just Newton's forces, but everything.
But we're dumber than the monkeys. Where's the explanation for that? What else can it be other than that imperfection is a requirement of the system.
The Makeup of any group of spiral states tends to remain the same, whether it defines a quantum acceleration or a quantum stillness over any small group of combined states of necessity because of the way that spirals are made of the prior states. A prior state that is moving is going to require a great deal of change to become still and the other way. Newton's law then supports this whole idea. What he accepted blindly as inertia, we now can see is a reflection of the natural tendency of combined items to reflect the status of what is combined to get to the current quantum state. The fact that perturbations occur and often times on a large scale is because the combined solutions hold pockets of rapid change on a scale of x which is difficult to imagine at least by you, I think I have a handle on it.
The approach of the F-series to the gold ratio is seen with the function lim(n approaches infinity)F(n+inf)/Fn
GR(phi)=(1+sqr(5))/2 which is approx 1.618. Interestingly it is also equal to [-1-sqr(5)/-2] of necessity because the first equation is equal the the second equation time -1/-1.
The golden ratio is a relativity function. In two lines (a and b) the golden ration for any two lines is determined where a+b is to a and a is to b. Mathematically: (a+b)/a=a/b
As an infinite series it can be expressed as:
13/8 + Sum(0 to inf)[(-1)^(n+1) * (2n+1)!/(n+2)!n!4^(2n+3)]
It can also be expressed as (sqr(1+sqr(1+sqr1+...)
What AuT teaches us is that infinite series have solutions for any quantum state in the universe.
For the golden ratio this would be GR=1+2sin(pi/10) or 1/2csc(pi/10) as pi is solved for a perfect circle, but we know that pi evolves which is what allows curvature in a quantum universe.
When you use the concepts to collapsing space, you see that it cannot collapse perfectly in the way required by relativity which is a little too clean to be right.
Gravity exists, and it bends light, but the reason why it exists and what it reflects and what information states those photons represent is where the answer lies. For the interactions of space-time with black holes is much like the interaction of photons, wave energy and space against ct4, the stuff we are made of. It looks like forces, but it is only change of information as states attempt to move from one moribund state to the next.
So what happens with a black hole that prevents photons from escaping? What happens to the different ct4 states that fall within the gravity well if they cannot join a singularity, for we know that they can only achieve a stable state in adequate concentrations and if they do not fall within the black hole and cannot become ct5, what happens. The answer lies in the interface of ct4 and ct3. When a copper wire is exposed to wave energy, it carries it. The waves do not cease do exist, but neither do they have the same level of freedom before. The understanding of these interaction, the study of them understanding what they are, will lead to a better understanding of what we are seeing in space and what we see when we look closer on us.
And what if we get too smart. What if we build a disallowed tower of babel? Why, the universe can deal with us without even thinking, a meteor, a supervolcano, supernova, something we have never heard of or perhaps the easiest thing, it will kill our knowledge with our own stupidity, the use of its primary weapon. Irony.
As I continue, we will look at some other question.
What is the effect of spatial calculations and the exclusion principle if there is no real dimension, is there any exclusion principle? The solutions of relativity to black holes are too pure, they have time collapse because classical physics looks for perfection in a universe which can only exist by virtue of the tiny offset imperfections in an evolving pi equation.
And you will gradually see the genius in these posts and you will one day say, I could have hired him fairly cheaply to give a lecture, but I never did. I wonder why not. And the universe will answer you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qcVtEy6G1Q
But he did not define them. All he did was calculate them.
Later scientists came up with rules that predicted what would happen in the context of an amazingly predictable relativity. But what was it predicting? Gravity? The interaction of time and space? But it was obsessed with distances and forces as things in and of themselves. It looked for harmony, but only with the matrix we lived in. There was plenty of thought about what is behind the matrix, but that was too theoretical, even for the theoretical physicists and those who were close enough were distracted by life, especially war, but that is part of life.
Do you ever sit around wondering how people can be so stupid? I know you do. You sit and watch the news and you say, people can't be that stupid! They're killing themselves, killing each other, they believe in the most bizarre fantasies in the world, they pay huge multiples for stocks that don't make any money...profit from it! They are destroying the only planet they have and don't really seem to get why that's a bad idea and spend most of their resources preparing to kill each other when they aren't actually doing it. Andy you think, even if we're just monkeys we have have to be smarter than this.
But if you look at human stupidity through the lens of AuT you see the ebb and flow of intellect as a reflection of the solution of the twin algorithm towards or away from intersection, you see irony not as a thing in and of itself, but a recognition that things of necessity flow together and apart.
The stacked algorithms form an onion (layers) of complexity, but it's equally important to see that the form things falling apart and coming together, constantly with only a net coming together or falling apart in any localized outcome. At each layer, the underlying mathematical result is hidden further by the layers on top of it. Newton looked at the results, but he didn't have the tools to look under the result to see what caused them because the layering process was so good at disguising what would otherwise have been an obvious sequentially more complicated solutions that underline not just Newton's forces, but everything.
But we're dumber than the monkeys. Where's the explanation for that? What else can it be other than that imperfection is a requirement of the system.
The Makeup of any group of spiral states tends to remain the same, whether it defines a quantum acceleration or a quantum stillness over any small group of combined states of necessity because of the way that spirals are made of the prior states. A prior state that is moving is going to require a great deal of change to become still and the other way. Newton's law then supports this whole idea. What he accepted blindly as inertia, we now can see is a reflection of the natural tendency of combined items to reflect the status of what is combined to get to the current quantum state. The fact that perturbations occur and often times on a large scale is because the combined solutions hold pockets of rapid change on a scale of x which is difficult to imagine at least by you, I think I have a handle on it.
The approach of the F-series to the gold ratio is seen with the function lim(n approaches infinity)F(n+inf)/Fn
GR(phi)=(1+sqr(5))/2 which is approx 1.618. Interestingly it is also equal to [-1-sqr(5)/-2] of necessity because the first equation is equal the the second equation time -1/-1.
The golden ratio is a relativity function. In two lines (a and b) the golden ration for any two lines is determined where a+b is to a and a is to b. Mathematically: (a+b)/a=a/b
As an infinite series it can be expressed as:
13/8 + Sum(0 to inf)[(-1)^(n+1) * (2n+1)!/(n+2)!n!4^(2n+3)]
It can also be expressed as (sqr(1+sqr(1+sqr1+...)
What AuT teaches us is that infinite series have solutions for any quantum state in the universe.
For the golden ratio this would be GR=1+2sin(pi/10) or 1/2csc(pi/10) as pi is solved for a perfect circle, but we know that pi evolves which is what allows curvature in a quantum universe.
When you use the concepts to collapsing space, you see that it cannot collapse perfectly in the way required by relativity which is a little too clean to be right.
Gravity exists, and it bends light, but the reason why it exists and what it reflects and what information states those photons represent is where the answer lies. For the interactions of space-time with black holes is much like the interaction of photons, wave energy and space against ct4, the stuff we are made of. It looks like forces, but it is only change of information as states attempt to move from one moribund state to the next.
So what happens with a black hole that prevents photons from escaping? What happens to the different ct4 states that fall within the gravity well if they cannot join a singularity, for we know that they can only achieve a stable state in adequate concentrations and if they do not fall within the black hole and cannot become ct5, what happens. The answer lies in the interface of ct4 and ct3. When a copper wire is exposed to wave energy, it carries it. The waves do not cease do exist, but neither do they have the same level of freedom before. The understanding of these interaction, the study of them understanding what they are, will lead to a better understanding of what we are seeing in space and what we see when we look closer on us.
And what if we get too smart. What if we build a disallowed tower of babel? Why, the universe can deal with us without even thinking, a meteor, a supervolcano, supernova, something we have never heard of or perhaps the easiest thing, it will kill our knowledge with our own stupidity, the use of its primary weapon. Irony.
As I continue, we will look at some other question.
What is the effect of spatial calculations and the exclusion principle if there is no real dimension, is there any exclusion principle? The solutions of relativity to black holes are too pure, they have time collapse because classical physics looks for perfection in a universe which can only exist by virtue of the tiny offset imperfections in an evolving pi equation.
And you will gradually see the genius in these posts and you will one day say, I could have hired him fairly cheaply to give a lecture, but I never did. I wonder why not. And the universe will answer you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qcVtEy6G1Q
Sunday, September 11, 2016
Building an algorithm 16 gravity and anti-gravity
It's not really fair to say that an F-series (fibonacci series) yields the current universe. That does appear to be part of a single variable algorithm, but the persuasive look of randomness should bother everyone. How coudl a relatively simple algorithm give rise to something as complicated as today. How can I explain it? Well, the easiest way to explain it is to say that if you took a photograph of the entire universe, that would be a lot easier to imagine. If you still can't get your hands around it, think about the alternative. A zillion monkeys randomly typing it out on a zillion typewriters (that's randomness). Still no good? How about a spontaneously generated all knowing god who follows specific rules that he doesn't even need to follow? The idea is that you're being stupid. A foundational algorithm that builds on a very few specific rules is so much more likely that the only real problem is the background in which the algorithm exists. But if you're looking for spirituality, that's whereyou can find it, in g-space.
It's time to talk about what happens when we stop blowing expansion into the Freeman Balloon Universe. This is another way of ignoring dimension, which models fairly well on the actual universe which has none.
There are so many things based on misconception. For example, the reasons that photons leave stars but not black holes. The idea that black holes fall into a singularity is a odd little trap (double entendre) and one which I fell into originally. Only when I noticed they were moving with the rest of the universe did I realize the mistake. So why no photons? It's pretty simple, they are not trapped, they are compressed out or into the higher compression state. This doesn't stop black holes from attracting light, however or space. In fact, time dilation requires that space be compressed in the proximity to any object with sufficient mass, even ct4 scale materials which are exponentially less dense than black holes. A side note-the idea of miniature black holes making up dark matter is so absurd that it is absurd. All ct5 states are exponentially more dense that ct4 states, it just works out that way. Anything else would be unstable. It might be created in a laboratory but as soon as the compression forces were removed it would break up and it would only be dense ct4, not ct5.
Now some of you are going to cling to black holes of the type in The Einstein Hologram Universe and that is my wrong turn also. Since it remains possible (if outrageous) that book remains in print and you're welcome to read its misleading pages and who know it may be right. Because the AuT universe doesn't give a crap. It makes me point out the way that things really work for its own purposes and it can snuff me out (or you out) whenever it takes a mind to and if its going to happen in the next 10 minutes, that was also the case 50 billion years ago.
That 13.7 billion year ago start to the universe is utter nonsense since x wasn't large enough for even ct4 to exist in it's present form at 13.7 billion years from the true start. Note you have all the information to do that but, you are correct, it wasn't in the book. That was my mistake. It is, however, in this blog (the spreadsheet allowing you to determine how much information is in the universe from the 16 billion expansion universe that we're in (note it may be 50x13.7 billion years too,but I'm going with the shorter time till I have a minute to unravel the post). Whatever the age, it's based on AuT theory, not the nonsense that is spouted by the kinderphysic community.
At full compression, the "big bang" suggests and explosion, but there is no explosion, although some force changes the compression of the universe. What is it?
This is an anti-gravity defined by the fact that an inflection point has been reached where a net inward movement is suddenly replaced with a net out ward force.
This transition will continue according to our estimates for either 16 billion years or 50x14 billion years when the next inflection point is reached.
What is the anti-gravity? It appears that there is a net feature. It currently nets where antigravity is greater than gravity for the entire universe, although for locations where gravity predominates, higher ct states, there appears to be something quite different. As a matter of fact, the fact that we see so much gravity indicates that we are approaching an inflection point sooner rather than later. When that happens we'll see a contracting universe.
There has been a very slight observed increase in gravity of the earth tied to meteor impacts and the like, but do we know that to be the case? It's a slow process, the conversion from expansion to contraction and occurs at such a small level it might be hard to see and may be impacted by the relative stability of the states, that is ct4 states and ct5 states may change slower than ct1-3 states, that is the net anti-g and g for space, photonic and wave energy may change more quickly and even more often. It is worth looking at more, but I have a bike ride to tdo this morning.
ct1 forms a matrix, possibly around the non-linear state (o,1,1-the zero).
The expansive force is around us, perhaps because it is "outweighed" by gravity it appears invisible or perhaps doesn't appear at all, but as the universe shifts and the air goes out of the Freeman balloon model, perhaps it will become predominate in some way and we will see it pushing against and apparently ever increasing gravity with just a different spin.
Space may change itself. instead of an average of 0,1 it might be 1,1.
However, it is more likely the case that gravity itself changes over time. It will take 16 billion (the short time frame) years for gravity to change from "net anti-gravity" to "net gravity" in this model. Now it could be that the transition will take 50 times as long for this change.
However under either it is possible under that spiral theory that gravity has changed so little during the 10,000 years of sort of recorded history that having seen 10,000/16 billionth of a change has not been noticed or it could be that the features of space might change to increase the apparent gravity there while it remains locally unchanged in compression states.
The possibilities are exciting and not quite endless.
I'm just saying, it's a powerful concept, a powerful memory, a bike waits for me, a little motivational music...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToP82VUjrNU&list=RDToP82VUjrNU#t=0
It's time to talk about what happens when we stop blowing expansion into the Freeman Balloon Universe. This is another way of ignoring dimension, which models fairly well on the actual universe which has none.
There are so many things based on misconception. For example, the reasons that photons leave stars but not black holes. The idea that black holes fall into a singularity is a odd little trap (double entendre) and one which I fell into originally. Only when I noticed they were moving with the rest of the universe did I realize the mistake. So why no photons? It's pretty simple, they are not trapped, they are compressed out or into the higher compression state. This doesn't stop black holes from attracting light, however or space. In fact, time dilation requires that space be compressed in the proximity to any object with sufficient mass, even ct4 scale materials which are exponentially less dense than black holes. A side note-the idea of miniature black holes making up dark matter is so absurd that it is absurd. All ct5 states are exponentially more dense that ct4 states, it just works out that way. Anything else would be unstable. It might be created in a laboratory but as soon as the compression forces were removed it would break up and it would only be dense ct4, not ct5.
Now some of you are going to cling to black holes of the type in The Einstein Hologram Universe and that is my wrong turn also. Since it remains possible (if outrageous) that book remains in print and you're welcome to read its misleading pages and who know it may be right. Because the AuT universe doesn't give a crap. It makes me point out the way that things really work for its own purposes and it can snuff me out (or you out) whenever it takes a mind to and if its going to happen in the next 10 minutes, that was also the case 50 billion years ago.
That 13.7 billion year ago start to the universe is utter nonsense since x wasn't large enough for even ct4 to exist in it's present form at 13.7 billion years from the true start. Note you have all the information to do that but, you are correct, it wasn't in the book. That was my mistake. It is, however, in this blog (the spreadsheet allowing you to determine how much information is in the universe from the 16 billion expansion universe that we're in (note it may be 50x13.7 billion years too,but I'm going with the shorter time till I have a minute to unravel the post). Whatever the age, it's based on AuT theory, not the nonsense that is spouted by the kinderphysic community.
At full compression, the "big bang" suggests and explosion, but there is no explosion, although some force changes the compression of the universe. What is it?
This is an anti-gravity defined by the fact that an inflection point has been reached where a net inward movement is suddenly replaced with a net out ward force.
This transition will continue according to our estimates for either 16 billion years or 50x14 billion years when the next inflection point is reached.
What is the anti-gravity? It appears that there is a net feature. It currently nets where antigravity is greater than gravity for the entire universe, although for locations where gravity predominates, higher ct states, there appears to be something quite different. As a matter of fact, the fact that we see so much gravity indicates that we are approaching an inflection point sooner rather than later. When that happens we'll see a contracting universe.
There has been a very slight observed increase in gravity of the earth tied to meteor impacts and the like, but do we know that to be the case? It's a slow process, the conversion from expansion to contraction and occurs at such a small level it might be hard to see and may be impacted by the relative stability of the states, that is ct4 states and ct5 states may change slower than ct1-3 states, that is the net anti-g and g for space, photonic and wave energy may change more quickly and even more often. It is worth looking at more, but I have a bike ride to tdo this morning.
ct1 forms a matrix, possibly around the non-linear state (o,1,1-the zero).
The expansive force is around us, perhaps because it is "outweighed" by gravity it appears invisible or perhaps doesn't appear at all, but as the universe shifts and the air goes out of the Freeman balloon model, perhaps it will become predominate in some way and we will see it pushing against and apparently ever increasing gravity with just a different spin.
Space may change itself. instead of an average of 0,1 it might be 1,1.
However, it is more likely the case that gravity itself changes over time. It will take 16 billion (the short time frame) years for gravity to change from "net anti-gravity" to "net gravity" in this model. Now it could be that the transition will take 50 times as long for this change.
However under either it is possible under that spiral theory that gravity has changed so little during the 10,000 years of sort of recorded history that having seen 10,000/16 billionth of a change has not been noticed or it could be that the features of space might change to increase the apparent gravity there while it remains locally unchanged in compression states.
The possibilities are exciting and not quite endless.
I'm just saying, it's a powerful concept, a powerful memory, a bike waits for me, a little motivational music...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToP82VUjrNU&list=RDToP82VUjrNU#t=0
Saturday, September 10, 2016
Building an algorithm-you are here revisited part 2
The last series of not totally co-existent blog posts need to be drawn together.
All physics has in common theme that self determination is illusory. While there is are limits to what can be measured, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, this limitation is merely the over-complication of the process embodied in its features that require two points of inquiry in a single variable universe. The Heisenberg mistake is in focusing on size, which is illusory, instead of mathematical modeling which can be solved for any point with certainty unless the universe is truly random in which case you should close this blog and get about your business.
But all physics rejects randomness. The contribution to non-randomness, to the extent that it can be called a contribution, of AuT is that it explains the purpose of illusory self-determination.
All events or solutions to the algorithm have a common purpose. Amusingly it is nothing more glorious than to begin or end compression/expansion cycles. In the early universe, this would have been fairly obvious, but given the layers, with x of the scale over 10^100 for each quantum instant, and the offset addition of several universes each with different space characteristics and all misaligned, the simple purpose becomes more clouded, especially given the existence of temporarily stable states along with co-existent expanding and contracting 'unstable' spiral states. Having the possibility of any point being recalculated for each value of x further complicates the model, especially if it leads to high x values being present in low value pi solution models. For purpose of the current model, it is worth noting (ad nauseum) that expansion is where the solution of the two spiral sets for any point are moving apart and the contraction is where they are moving together. Another complicating feature has to do with the offset feature of the universe.
While we can be absolutely, 100% certain that two separate points are offset due to the changing solution for the space/pi equation; it is less certain whether for any one point there is an offset. While the model almost screams an offset, it remains possible, if not likely, that for individual points that they are perfectly aligned F-series intersecting spirals of the type discussed in the early model. This would mean, at the point of overlap that you'd have these particles have equal amounts of positive and negative solution and they would disappear to some extent. While this is a disturbing result in some ways, it would go a long way towards explaining why space looks like it does. In AuT, of course, the idea that space would look empty is asinine, pre AuT physicists even knew this. The only real difference is that space becomes fairly easy to understand in AuT and you can see what it looks like at least mathematically.
The problem with having aligned individual states is that it complicates a simple math model and it begs the question of why those individual points would not just collapse instead of stacking as the model requires for everything else. But I digress.
The point is that the universe has a very simple fundamental purpose and while it is elegant in its simplicity it is far from romantic. The 9/11 hijackers were not, fundamentally, making some grand statement about infidels, they were merely carrying their share of compression/decompression cycles and did nothing more horrible or glorious than the stamping machine that spit out the rivets that went into the several planes that were hijacked. To fear, glorify and hate them is the job of morons, not physicists. Physicists' jobs are to make better and better ways of achieving those cycles because the cycles demand it and, strangely, to explain why what we do is absurd.
There are some challenges here.
The first is to determine how two different state universes add up. Since they are offset, adding them together is complicated from the simple F-series model. you don't have 1,11,111, instead you have the pi' function constantly changing the angle of overlap between points so you have (geo(1),geo(1)geo(2), etc) so that the points added are offset by a geometry function which gives us the dimensional qualities of the universe we experience.
The second is to explain when compression occurs. As the geometry function gives the illusion of dimension, so too does the compression function give the illusion of solidity. While we can look at compression as the transition from 1,1,1 to 11,11,11 to 111,111,111 and so on, and while we can see the compression and decompression cycles as function of F-series algorithms, the way that they are aligned and the reason they align according to the equation (fseries(n))^2^n remains to be perfectly defined.
There are a finite number of ways for this to be solved, but the appearance of randomness in the solution is required at sufficiently high values of x only because of our observations. However, the appearance of randomness hides a relatively simple model of clear cause and effect.
All physics has in common theme that self determination is illusory. While there is are limits to what can be measured, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, this limitation is merely the over-complication of the process embodied in its features that require two points of inquiry in a single variable universe. The Heisenberg mistake is in focusing on size, which is illusory, instead of mathematical modeling which can be solved for any point with certainty unless the universe is truly random in which case you should close this blog and get about your business.
But all physics rejects randomness. The contribution to non-randomness, to the extent that it can be called a contribution, of AuT is that it explains the purpose of illusory self-determination.
All events or solutions to the algorithm have a common purpose. Amusingly it is nothing more glorious than to begin or end compression/expansion cycles. In the early universe, this would have been fairly obvious, but given the layers, with x of the scale over 10^100 for each quantum instant, and the offset addition of several universes each with different space characteristics and all misaligned, the simple purpose becomes more clouded, especially given the existence of temporarily stable states along with co-existent expanding and contracting 'unstable' spiral states. Having the possibility of any point being recalculated for each value of x further complicates the model, especially if it leads to high x values being present in low value pi solution models. For purpose of the current model, it is worth noting (ad nauseum) that expansion is where the solution of the two spiral sets for any point are moving apart and the contraction is where they are moving together. Another complicating feature has to do with the offset feature of the universe.
While we can be absolutely, 100% certain that two separate points are offset due to the changing solution for the space/pi equation; it is less certain whether for any one point there is an offset. While the model almost screams an offset, it remains possible, if not likely, that for individual points that they are perfectly aligned F-series intersecting spirals of the type discussed in the early model. This would mean, at the point of overlap that you'd have these particles have equal amounts of positive and negative solution and they would disappear to some extent. While this is a disturbing result in some ways, it would go a long way towards explaining why space looks like it does. In AuT, of course, the idea that space would look empty is asinine, pre AuT physicists even knew this. The only real difference is that space becomes fairly easy to understand in AuT and you can see what it looks like at least mathematically.
The problem with having aligned individual states is that it complicates a simple math model and it begs the question of why those individual points would not just collapse instead of stacking as the model requires for everything else. But I digress.
The point is that the universe has a very simple fundamental purpose and while it is elegant in its simplicity it is far from romantic. The 9/11 hijackers were not, fundamentally, making some grand statement about infidels, they were merely carrying their share of compression/decompression cycles and did nothing more horrible or glorious than the stamping machine that spit out the rivets that went into the several planes that were hijacked. To fear, glorify and hate them is the job of morons, not physicists. Physicists' jobs are to make better and better ways of achieving those cycles because the cycles demand it and, strangely, to explain why what we do is absurd.
There are some challenges here.
The first is to determine how two different state universes add up. Since they are offset, adding them together is complicated from the simple F-series model. you don't have 1,11,111, instead you have the pi' function constantly changing the angle of overlap between points so you have (geo(1),geo(1)geo(2), etc) so that the points added are offset by a geometry function which gives us the dimensional qualities of the universe we experience.
The second is to explain when compression occurs. As the geometry function gives the illusion of dimension, so too does the compression function give the illusion of solidity. While we can look at compression as the transition from 1,1,1 to 11,11,11 to 111,111,111 and so on, and while we can see the compression and decompression cycles as function of F-series algorithms, the way that they are aligned and the reason they align according to the equation (fseries(n))^2^n remains to be perfectly defined.
There are a finite number of ways for this to be solved, but the appearance of randomness in the solution is required at sufficiently high values of x only because of our observations. However, the appearance of randomness hides a relatively simple model of clear cause and effect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)